Influence of prior myocardial infarction on outcome in patients with ischaemic HFrEF: insights from the EVIdence based TreAtment in Heart Failure (EVITA-HF) registry.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce information about the influence of prior myocardial infarction (pMI) on outcomes in patients (pts) with ischaemic HFrEF. We analysed data from the EVIdence based TreAtment in Heart Failure (EVITA-HF) registry. METHODS: EVITA-HF comprises web-based case report data on demography, diagnostic measures, adverse events and 1-year follow-up of patients hospitalized for chronic heart failure ≥ 3 months (CHF) and an ejection fraction ≤ 40%. In the present study, we focused on the outcomes of pts with and without pMI in ischaemic HFrEF. RESULTS: Between February 2009 and November 2015, a total of 2075 consecutive pts with ischaemic HFrEF were included from 16 centres in Germany. A total of 81.2% were male, and the mean age was 71 years. A total of 61.5% of the pts with ischaemic HFrEF had a history of pMI. These pts were treated less often with PCI (20.0 vs. 31.0%, p < 0.001) or CABG (3.8 vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001). They more often received an ICD (40.9 vs. 28.7%, p < 0.001), but less often a CRT-D (11.3 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, pts with pMI had a greater all-cause mortality after 1 year than those without pMI (hazard ratio 1.4; 95% CI, 1.10-1.79, p = 0.007). The combined endpoint of death, resuscitation or ICD shock after 1 year was greater in patients with pMI (20.8 vs. 16.4%, p = 0.03). Mobility was more often reduced in pts with pMI (46.8% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.03), and overall health status was more frequently worse in patients with pMI than in those 12 months ago (23.1 vs. 15.9%, p = 0.01). More than a quarter of the pts with ischaemic HFrEF were anxious or depressive. CONCLUSION: pMI in patients with CHF and ischaemic HFrEF was associated with increased mortality, increased event rates, and worsened health status. Hence, the subgroup of pts with ischaemic HFrEF and pMI is at higher risk and deserves special attention.

Current spectrum and outcomes of infarct-related cardiogenic shock: insights from the CULPRIT-SHOCK registry and randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: We analysed consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who were enrolled into the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized controlled trial (RCT) and those with exclusion criteria who were included into the accompanying registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 1075 patients with infarct-related CS were screened for CULPRIT-SHOCK in 83 specialized centres in Europe; 369 of them had exclusion criteria for the RCT and were enrolled into the registry. Patients were followed over 1 year. The mean age was 68 years and 260 (25%) were women. 13.5%, 30.9%, and 55.6% had one-vessel, two-vessel, and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively. Significant left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis was present in 8.0%. 54.2% of the patients had cardiac arrest before admission. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 patency of the infarct vessel after percutaneous coronary intervention was achieved in 83.6% of all patients. Mechanical circulatory support was applied in one-third of patients. Total mortality after 30 days and 1 year was 47.6% and 52.9%. Mortality after 1 year was highest in patients with LM coronary artery stenosis (63.5%), followed by three-vessel (56.6%), two-vessel (49.8%), and one-vessel CAD (38.6%), respectively. Mechanical complications were rare (21/1008; 2.1%) but associated with a high mortality of 66.7% after 1 year. CONCLUSION: In specialized centres in Europe, short- and long-term mortality of patients with infarct-related CS treated with an invasive strategy is still high and mainly depends on the extent of CAD. Therefore, there is still a need for improvement of care to improve the prognosis of infarct-related CS.

Prognostic impact of secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting-insights from the TiCAB trial.

OBJECTIVES: There are disparities in the adherence to guideline-recommended therapies after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We therefore sought to evaluate the effect of guideline-adherent medical secondary prevention on 1-year outcome after CABG. METHODS: Data were taken from the randomized 'Ticagrelor in CABG' trial. From April 2013 until April 2017, patients who underwent CABG were included. For the present analysis, we compared patients who were treated with optimal medical secondary prevention with those where 1 or more of the recommended medications were missing. RESULTS: Follow-up data at 12 months were available in 1807 patients. About half (54%) of them were treated with optimal secondary prevention. All-cause mortality [0.5% vs 3.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.14 (0.05-0.37), P < 0.01], cardiovascular mortality [0.1% vs 1.7%, HR 0.06 (0.01-0.46), P = 0.007] and major adverse events [6.5% vs 11.5%, HR 0.54 (0.39-0.74), P < 0.01] were significantly lower in the group with optimal secondary prevention. The multivariable model for the primary end point based on binary concordance to guideline recommended therapy identified 3 independent factors: adherence to guideline recommended therapy [HR 0.55 (0.39-0.78), P < 0.001]; normal renal function [HR 0.99 (0.98-0.99), P = 0.040]; and off-pump surgery [HR 2.06 (1.02-4.18), P = 0.045]. CONCLUSIONS: Only every second patient receives optimal secondary prevention after CABG. Guideline adherent secondary prevention therapy is associated with lower mid-term mortality and less adverse cardiovascular events after 12 months.

Sex Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Insights From the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested sex-related differences in diagnostic and invasive therapeutic coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from consecutive patients who were enrolled in the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology were analyzed. We aimed to compare sex-related differences in in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, ST elevation myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock. From 2007 until the end of 2009 data from 185 312 PCIs were prospectively registered: 27.9% of the PCIs were performed in women. Primary PCI success rate was identical between the sexes (94%). There were no sex-related differences in hospital mortality among patients undergoing PCI for stable coronary artery disease, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, or cardiogenic shock except among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients. Compared to men, women undergoing primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction have a higher risk of in-hospital death, age-adjusted odds ratio (1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33), and risk of ischemic cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack/stroke), (age-adjusted odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.29). Furthermore, access-related complications were twice as high in women, irrespective of the indication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite identical technical success rates of PCI between the 2 sexes, women with PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction have a 20% higher age-adjusted risk of death and of ischemic cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Further research is needed to determine the reasons for these differences.

Effect of Nitroglycerin on the Performance of MR Coronary Angiography.

PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the effect of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin=nitro=glyceryl trinitrate=GTN=C3 H5 N3 O9 [NTG]) on the diagnostic performance of MR coronary artery imaging (MRCA) to detect relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five healthy volunteers and 25 patients with suspected or proven CAD (all in sinus rhythm) underwent MRCA before and after NTG using a contrast-agent free, three-dimensional, navigator-based, steady state free precession acquisition (voxel size 1.0 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm3 ) at 1.5 Tesla. Target parameters were stenosis detection (>50%), visible vessel length (straightened planar reconstruction) and vessel diameter (curved planar reconstruction, measured proximal/medial/distal). In patients, invasive coronary angiography served as reference. RESULTS: NTG led to increase of the coronary diameter both in healthy volunteers (right coronary artery [RCA]: 3.2 to 3.7 mm, P < 0.001; left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD]: 2.9 to 3.4 mm, P = 0.009; left circumflex coronary artery [LCx]: 2.8 to 3.3 mm, P < 0.001) and patients (RCA 3.5 to 4.0 mm, P = 0.01; LAD 3.3 to 3.7 mm, P = 0.008; LCx: 2.9 to 3.3 mm, P = 0.03). Visible vessel length increased after NTG for the LAD (volunteers: 72 to 84 mm, P = 0.03; patients: 56 to 78 mm, P = 0.01) and for LCx (volunteers: 48 to 60 mm, P = 0.02). Sensitivity to detect > 50% stenosis improved after NTG from 88.0 to 96%, specificity from 46.5 to 69.8%, diagnostic accuracy from 61.8 to 79.4% and positive/negative predictive value from 48.9 to 64.9% and 87.0 to 96.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sublingual administration of NTG significantly enhanced the visibility of the coronary arteries and improved the detection of coronary artery stenosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1419-1428.

Gender differences in therapeutic recommendation after diagnostic coronary angiography: insights from the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND: There is information suggesting differences and underuse of invasive coronary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in women compared to men. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients (pts) which were enrolled in the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology were analyzed. We compared gender-related differences in diagnosis and therapeutic recommendation of pts undergoing coronary angiography (XA) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). RESULTS: From 2004 until the end of 2009, data of 1,060,542 invasive procedures in 1,014,996 pts were prospectively registered. One-third (34.6%) of them were female. Women less often had significant CAD, irrespective of the indication for XA. In pts with relevant CAD, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were recommended in 87.1% of women versus 89.1% of men with STEMI [age-adjusted OR (aOR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.04], in 67.1 vs. 66.8% in NSTE-ACS (aOR 1.10, 1.07-1.12), and in 50.3 vs 49.4% in stable CAD (aOR 1.07, 1.05-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In pts with significant CAD, there was no difference in recommendation for PCI between the genders in stable CAD, whereas in STEMI and NSTE-ACS women were treated even more often with PCI. There were only minor differences in referral for CABG between women and men. Hence, our data provide strong evidence against a gender bias in use of invasive therapeutic procedures once the diagnosis of significant CAD has been confirmed.

Diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography in combination with adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 1.5-T non-contrast enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA) alone and in combination with adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-Perf). MRCA has been proposed to allow for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, recent studies failed to show an incremental value of MRCA when added to CMR-Perf. METHODS: Non-Gadolinium 1.5-T contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-triggered, navigator-gated free-breathing MRCA was performed in 144 patients (pts) with suspected or known CAD. Accuracy of MRCA in detecting CAD was evaluated using X-ray coronary angiography as the reference. A novel algorithm was used to combine the results of MRCA and CMR-Perf. RESULTS: MRCA was diagnostic in 96/144 pts (67%) with regular breathing (mean age 62.5 ± 13); 77% of all coronary segments (939/1226) and 92% of segments suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention (792/866) were assessable. In 59 pts a novel algorithm to combine MRCA and CMR-Perf was performed with high diagnostic performance: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 91.5% (54/59; 95% CI, 84%-99%), 95.7% (22/23; 77-100), 88.9% (32/36; 74-96), 84.6% (22/26; 71-99), and 97.0% (32/33; 91-100). Compared to the combined use of CMR-Perf and late gadolinium enhancement, specificity with the novel algorithm significantly increased (P = .008). CONCLUSION: MRCA has a high assessability in segments suitable for percutaneous coronary intervention in pts with regular breathing. The combined use of MRCA and CMR-Perf improved specificity for the detection of significant CAD.

Influence of small caliber coronary arteries on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Positive predictive value (PPV) of adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for coronary artery disease (CAD) is unsatisfactory. We investigated the impact of coronary caliber variability on this limitation in CMR performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: 206 consecutive patients with myocardial ischemia during CMR and subsequent coronary angiography (CA) were studied. Patients were examined in a 1.5-T scanner. After adenosine infusion, myocardial first-pass sequence using gadolinium-based contrast agent was performed and compared with rest perfusion. CAD was invasively confirmed in 165 [true positive (TP); PPV, 80.1%] and ruled out in 41 patients [false positive (FP)]. TP and FP were comparable for pre-test risk and CMR findings. We found a significant association between FP CMR and the presence of a small caliber coronary vessel (proximal diameter < one standard deviation below the mean) supplying the area of ischemia (chi-square 42.6, p < 0.0001). A small caliber artery ipsilateral to the ischemic region was a predictive parameter for FP versus TP discrimination (ROC area, 0.84 ± 0.04 vs. 0.59 ± 0.05; p < 0.0001). Further increment in diagnostic accuracy was achieved by including proximal ipsilateral/contralateral coronary diameter ratios (ROC area, 0.90 ± 0.03; p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Small caliber coronary arteries found as normal variations in right-dominant or left-dominant circulation may account for hypoperfusion in the absence of coronary stenosis and thus may cause FP adenosine stress CMR results. Non-invasive assessment of proximal coronary diameters in the vessel supplying the area of ischemia could reduce FP rates, raise the diagnostic accuracy of CMR for CAD and minimize subsequent superfluous CA.

Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications.

The health and economic implications of new imaging technologies are increasingly relevant policy issues. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is currently not or not sufficiently reimbursed in a number of countries including Germany, presumably because of a limited evidence base. It is unknown, however, whether it can be effectively used to facilitate medical decision-making and reduce costs by serving as a gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography. We investigated whether the application of CMR in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) reduces costs by averting referrals to cardiac catheterization. We used propensity score methods to match 218 patients from a CMR registry to a previously studied cohort in which CMR was demonstrated to reliably identify patients who were low-risk for major cardiac events. Covariates over which patients were matched included comorbidity profiles, demographics, CAD-related symptoms, and CAD risk as measured by Morise scores. We determined the proportion of patients for whom cardiac catheterization was deferred based upon CMR findings. We then calculated the economic effects of practice pattern changes using data on cardiac catheterization and CMR costs. CMR reduced the utilization of cardiac catheterization by 62.4%. Based on estimated catheterization costs of € 619, the utilization of CMR as a gatekeeper reduced per-patient costs by a mean of € 90. Savings were realized until CMR costs exceeded € 386. Cost savings were greatest for patients at low-risk for CAD, as measured by baseline Morise scores, but were present for all Morise subgroups with the exception of patients at the highest risk of CAD. CMR significantly reduces the utilization of cardiac catheterization in patients suspected of having CAD. Per-patient savings range from € 323 in patients at lowest risk of CAD to € 58 in patients at high-risk but not in the highest risk stratum. Because a negative CMR evaluation has high negative predictive value, its application as a gatekeeper to cardiac catheterization should be further explored as a treatment option.

Negative predictive value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac MRI in the assessment of coronary artery disease and correlation with semiquantitative perfusion analysis.

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the negative predictive value of normal adenosine stress cardiac MR (CMR) in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), predominantly with intermediate to high pretest risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography were examined in a 1.5 Tesla whole-body scanner before catheterization. A total of 158 patients with normal CMR on qualitative assessment were included, and semiquantitative perfusion analysis was performed. Significant CAD was regarded as luminal narrowing of >or=70% in coronary angiography. RESULTS: In the 158 study patients, negative predictive value of normal adenosine-stress CMR for significant CAD was 96.2% (for stenosis >or=90%: 98.1%). True-negative and false-negative patients were comparable regarding clinical presentation, risk factors, and CMR findings. Semiquantitative perfusion analysis gave significantly prolonged arrival time index and peak time index in the false-negative group. Using cutoff values >1.8 for arrival time index or >1.2 for peak time index, the CMR negative predictive value increased to 98.7% (for stenosis >or=90%: to 100%). CONCLUSION: The very high negative predictive value for CAD supports CMR-based decision making for the indication to coronary angiography. Semiquantitative perfusion analysis seems promising to identify the small group of CAD patients not detectable by qualitative CMR assessment.

Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our analysis is to assess gender differences in baseline characteristics, acute therapies, and clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. METHODS: The Maximal Individual Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction PLUS registry (MITRA PLUS) is a German prospective, multicenter, observational data pool of current treatment of STEMI. RESULTS: STEMI was more often (P < 0.0001) complicated by cardiogenic shock in female patients (12.9%) when compared to male patients (9.3%). This was still true after adjusting for confounding variables (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30). Women with STEMI admitted in a cardiogenic shock were older (P < 0.0001) and had more often concomitant diseases (P < 0.0001). There was no differences in rates of reperfusion therapy (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.09). Hospital mortality was 67.7% in female patients, when compared to 57.2% in male patients (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding variables in the multivariate analysis hospital mortality did not differ between men and women (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.38). Early reperfusion therapy was associated with a significant reduction of hospital mortality in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90) with primary PCI being more effective than thrombolytic therapy (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.68). CONCLUSION: In women, STEMI was more often complicated by cardiogenic shock when compared to men. However, the use of early reperfusion therapy did not differ between the sexes. Primary PCI was associated with the best outcome in female patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and is therefore the therapy of choice.

Reperfusion therapy for acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: what can be achieved in daily clinical practice in unselected patients at an interventional center?

BACKGROUND: In the year 2000 a new definition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was introduced, now differentiating ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) from non-ST segment elevation AMI (NSTEMI). The characterization of AMI patients according to this definition is still incomplete. METHODS AND RESULTS: 888 consecutive AMI patients at a single interventional center were included: 493 (55.5%) STEMI and 395 (44.5%) NSTEMI patients. Median age of STEMI patients was four years lower compared to NSTEMI patients (62.8 versus 66.6 years, P<0.001). STEMI patients more often presented in cardiogenic shock (11.0% versus 2.0%, P<0.001) and after pre-hospital resuscitation (4.9% versus 0.8%, P<0.001). Catheterization was performed in 98.4% of STEMI and in 95.9% of NSTEMI patients (P<0.001). The circumflex artery was more often the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients compared to STEMI patients (58.3% versus 48%, P=0.003). They also showed significantly more often a 3 vessel disease (41.4% versus 29.9%, P=0.002). Out of STEMI patients 10.1% were treated with medical therapy only compared to 27.2% of NSTEMI patients (P<0.001). Whereas PCI was performed more often in STEMI patients (84.3% versus 57.8%, P<0.001), CABG was used more often in NSTEMI patients (21.6% versus 9.1%, P<0.001). In-hospital death was 8.7% in STEMI compared to 4.8% in NSTEMI patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice STEMI and NSTEMI seem to occur with similar frequency. Invasive strategies were applied in a high percentage in both groups, however with different therapeutic consequences. In-hospital mortality was twice as high in STEMI compared to NSTEMI patients.

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in combination with and without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in unselected patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS: We sought to determine the efficacy of enoxaparin in unselected patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective analysis of the prospective MITRA-plus registry we compared the outcomes of patients with primary PCI and either enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. A total of 2,655 patients with STEMI < 12 hours were included in this analysis, 374 (14%) were treated with enoxaparin and 2,281 (86%) with unfractionated heparin. In the univariate analysis enoxaparin reduced mortality (1.6% versus 6.0%, < 0.001), fewer non-fatal reinfarctions (1.9% versus 3.8%, p = 0.05) and no significant difference in major bleeding (5.6% versus 7.2%, p = 0.2) was observed. In the multivariable propensity score analysis enoxaparin was associated with a reduction in the combined endpoint of death and non-fatal reinfarction (odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.2-0.8). This advantage was observed both in subgroups without (odds ratio 0.33 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.2-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in unselected patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin reduces the combined endpoint of in-hospital death and reinfarction and does not increase severe bleeding complications.

Efficacy of a 24-h primary percutaneous coronary intervention service on outcome in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves outcome in comparison to fibrinolysis. However, it is unclear whether patients treated in interventional facilities with 24-h primary PCI service have lower rates of adverse events. METHODS: We analyzed data of consecutive patients with STEMI prospectively enrolled in the German Acute Coronary Syndromes registry between July 2000 and November 2002 who were admitted to hospitals with catheterisation laboratory. RESULTS: Overall 6,350 patients were divided into two groups: 2,779 (43.8%) were treated in hospitals with and 3,571 (56.2%) without 24-h on-call cardiac catheter laboratories. 83.0% of the patients at facilities with and only 69.9% of the patients at facilities without 24-h PCI service received early reperfusion therapy (P < 0.001). Hospital death (7.4% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.001), non-fatal myocardial reinfarction (2.5% vs. 6.4%, P < 0.0001) and stroke (0.3 vs. 1.0%, P < 0.01) occurred significantly less often in patients treated in hospitals with 24-h primary PCI service. After adjustment for the confounding factors in the propensity score analysis the 24-h on-call strategy remained superior for the combined endpoint of death, reinfarction and stroke (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice the rate of patients receiving reperfusion therapy was significantly higher in hospitals with 24-h primary PCI service which was associated with an improved in-hospital outcome. Though the data was collected at a time that does not completely represent current clinical practice, these results could have an impact on planning efficient infarct networks in the future.

Efficacy and safety of optimized antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in clinical practice.

In randomized clinical trials enoxaparin in non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) has been shown to be more effective than unfractionated heparin in preventing the combined endpoint of death and myocardial infarction. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin reduced the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction and stroke in NSTE-ACS patients compared to aspirin alone. Aim of the present study was to determine the clinical impact of optimized antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin, clopidogrel and aspirin compared to standard therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin in NSTE-ACS in clinical practice. We analyzed data of 2,956 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS and either antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin, clopidogrel and aspirin or with aspirin and UFH, which were prospectively enrolled in the acute coronary syndromes registry (ACOS) from July 2000 until the end of November 2002. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and PCI the combined endpoint of hospital death and non-fatal reinfarctions was lower in the group with optimized antithrombotic therapy including clopidogrel, enoxaparin and aspirin compared to the control-group with aspirin and UFH (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.53). There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the two treatment groups (1.5% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.35), while overall there were more bleeding complications in the group with optimized antithrombotic therapy (4.9% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.005). In clinical practice optimized antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin in NSTE-ACS is associated with a reduction in the combined endpoint of death and non-fatal reinfarctions compared to standard therapy with aspirin and UFH without increase in major bleeding complications.

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

In randomized clinical trials the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin has been shown to reduce ischemic complications in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolysis. Little is known about the use and efficacy of enoxaparin in unselected patients with STEMI in clinical practice. In a retrospective analysis of the prospective ACOS registry we compared the outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. A total of 6,299 patients with STEMI < 12 hours were included in this analysis, 609 (10%) were treated with enoxaparin and 5,690 (90%) with unfractionated heparin. In the multivariable propensity score analysis enoxaparin was associated with a reduction in the combined endpoint of death and non-fatal reinfarction in the entire group (odds ratio 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.80) and the subgroups of patients treated without early reperfusion (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.97), fibrinolysis (odds ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.33-1.26) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.72). There was no significant increase in severe bleeding complications with enoxaparin (6.5% versus 5.5%, p = 0.4). In clinical practice in unselected patients with STEMI treated with or without early reperfusion therapy early treatment with enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin is associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint of inhospital death and reinfarction without a significant increase in severe bleeding complications.

Clopidogrel in addition to aspirin reduces in-hospital major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in unselected patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial.

We sought to assess the effect of clopidogrel on in-hospital events in unselected patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry with acute STEMI we compared outcomes of either adjunctive therapy with aspirin alone or aspirin plus clopidogrel within 24 hours after admission.A total of 7,559 patients were included in this analysis, of whom 3,541 were treated with aspirin alone, and 4,018 with dual antiplatelet therapy. The multivariable analysis with adjustment for baseline characteristics and treatments showed that the rate of in-hospital MACCE (death, non-fatal reinfarction, non-fatal stroke) was significantly lower in the aspirin plus clopidogrel group,compared to the aspirin alone group in the entire cohort and all three reperfusion strategy groups (entire group odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.72 , no reperfusion OR 0.69,95% CI 0.51-0.94,fibrinolysis OR 0.62,95% CI 0.44-0.88, primary PCI OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.74). There was a significant increase in major bleeding complications with clopidogrel (7.1% vs. 3.4%, p<0.001). In clinical practice early adjunctive therapy with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with STEMI is associated with a significant reduction of in-hospital MACCE regardless of the initial reperfusion strategy. This advantage was associated with an increase in major bleeding complications.

Clopidogrel in addition to aspirin reduces one-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in unselected patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the effect of clopidogrel on one-year ischemic events in unselected patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: We analysed data of consecutive patients with acute NSTEMI treated with aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel, who were prospectively enrolled in the ACOS registry. RESULTS: A total of 4290 patients were included, 2171 were treated with aspirin and 2119 with aspirin plus clopidogrel. In the univariate analysis in-hospital (13.7% versus 6.3%, P<0.001) and one-year (28.1% versus 15.6 %, P<0.001) mortality and the combined endpoint of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke was significantly lower in the clopidogrel group. There was a significant increase in in-hospital bleeding complications with clopidogrel (5.4 % versus 3.3 %, P<0.05). In the multivariable propensity score analysis adjusted for baseline variables the odds ratio for the one-year combined endpoint was significantly reduced (odds ratio 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64-0.74) in the aspirin plus clopidogrel group. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, early therapy with clopidogrel, in addition, to aspirin in patients with NSTEMI is associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint of death, non-fatal reinfarction and non-fatal stroke after one year. This advantage was associated with an increase in major in-hospital bleeding complications.

Impact of the body mass index on occurrence and outcome of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Obesity is a traditional risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. However, recent studies have described a better outcome of obese patients in the clinical course of acute coronary syndromes.We investigated the impact of the body mass index (BMI) on occurrence and outcome of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Data of 10 534 consecutive patients with STEMI of the German MITRA PLUS registry were analyzed, comparing international classes of the BMI (obesity: BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2), overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m(2), normal weight: 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)).STEMI occurred at a younger age in obese patients. The obese patients with first STEMI were 3 years younger than the normal weight patients with first STEMI (62.5 vs 65.7 years, p <0.0001).After STEMI has occurred, the obese patients had the lowest hospital (6.0%) and long-term mortality (4.8%) of all compared BMI-groups. In a multivariate analysis, obesity compared to normal weight was associated with a trend of a reduced mortality without significance during the hospital course (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.08) and with significance during follow-up (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79).In conclusion, our data show that obesity is a risk factor of a manifestation of STEMI at a younger age compared to normal weight patients. After STEMI has occurred, obesity is associated with a trend of a lower mortality during the following clinical course. Therefore, the focus of prevention should be the reduction of obesity and metabolic syndrome in young people, to avoid the early occurrence of STEMI by primary prevention.