Successful Implementation of the AIUM Standardized 4-Year Residency Ultrasound Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Lessons Learned and Way Forward.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities in sonographic education exist in Obstetrics and Gynecology programs in the United States. To address the lack of standardization in ultrasound teaching, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) assembled a multi-society task force in 2018 that resulted in the publication of a Consensus Report outlining a standardized ultrasound curriculum and competency assessment. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to implement the AUIM standardized curriculum within an Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program at a tertiary medical center, and report on the early implementation experience. The secondary objective was to assess current national practices in ultrasound training in Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs. STUDY DESIGN: Study design was an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study of a structured ultrasound educational program based on the 2018 AIUM Consensus Report. The theoretical portion of the curriculum consisted of 26 hours of didactic lectures distributed over 4 years. For the practical component, residents received instruction from faculty and sonographers and independently acquired the required images as part of their regular clinical work. Simulator app access was also provided for additional opportunities to practice and acquire images. Deidentified images for the required competencies were uploaded to a WhatsApp group for review. Theoretical knowledge was assessed with a series of multiple-choice exams. Practical skills were assessed through grading of images submitted through WhatsApp as well as direct observations of resident scans. At the completion of 4 years, the assessment of both theoretical knowledge and practical skills was carried out using the ISUOG Basic Training Examination. National patterns in the area of ultrasound education were assessed with a four-question electronic survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology program directors in the United States. Analysis of both portions of the study was primarily descriptive. RESULTS: Four Obstetrics and Gynecology residents completed the curriculum spanning postgraduate years 1 through 4. The number of competencies completed ranged from 7 to 19 out of 41. All of the residents passed the theoretical and practical components of the ISUOG Basic Training Examination. For the residency program director survey portion of the study, response rate was 20% (59 of 290). Among the respondents, 55.9% reported having a structured curriculum and 34.4% reported implementing the AIUM curriculum. The two most commonly cited obstacles to implementation of structured ultrasound teaching were uncertainty with how to start the process (49.2%) and lack of faculty engagement (49.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the AIUM Curriculum within the framework of an Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program at a tertiary medical center is feasible. In our experimental group, completion of the curriculum resulted in passing of an internationally recognized validated assessment. Obstacles to implementation in our program included a wide range of engagement and participation among residents, and limited opportunities to obtain some of the required competencies. Identification of obstacles to implementation from the perspective of residency program directors is critical for developing targeted approaches to ensure widespread implementation. Successful standardized validated sonographic training of graduating Obstetrics and Gynecology residents is crucial for this operator-dependent modality that has tremendous implications on patient safety and clinical care.

Fertility Preservation Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Reported Behaviors of Resident Physicians.

Purpose: Fertility preservation (FP) and family building are important considerations for quality survivorship for young cancer patients. Resident physicians across all specialties encounter reproductive-aged cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to assess resident physicians' attitudes and awareness about FP with the goal to identify specific educational gaps to direct future training. Methods: The Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved anonymous online survey was sent to resident physicians across specialties at three separate academic-affiliated campuses in one state. The survey consisted of three sections: awareness about FP options and knowledge about referral placement, attitudes and comfort levels discussing FP, and practices regarding FP. Data were collected in Qualtrics and analyzed by resident specialty, age, level of training, and gender. Statistical analyses were conducted with Prism. Results: Obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows were significantly more aware of FP options in cancer patients than their counterparts in other specialties. Postgraduate year (PGY 3) residents and beyond were more aware of at least one male and one female FP option compared with PGY 1 and 2 residents. Of importance, we found that the majority of resident physicians are aware of FP options and the referral process, but they are uncomfortable discussing these techniques with their patients. Conclusion: To provide better education for patients, focus should be on outpatient educational activities for both the health care provider and the patient to facilitate conversation about FP.

Association of Knowledge and Presence of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Participation in Pelvic Floor Exercises: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Women's baseline knowledge of pelvic floor exercises (PFEs) and pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) is not well established, as is their knowledge regarding PFE and participation in such exercise. The aim of our study was to assess baseline PFD and PFE knowledge and to determine if knowledge in any way influenced participation in PFEs. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional survey administered to women 18 years or older. We included all women who completed the survey, of which 3733 met the criteria. A survey-based questionnaire was used to query lower urinary tract symptoms, PFD, knowledge, and frequency of participation in PFEs. RESULTS: Of those who responded, the mean incontinence knowledge score was 9.2 ± 2.6, whereas the mean score for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) knowledge was 6.8 ± 3.6. Of the respondents, 92.5% reported being familiar with Kegel exercises. The majority of respondents reported that they did not participate in PFEs (57.4%). Those with POP were more likely to do daily PFEs than those without POP, 34.8% versus 16.4% (P < 0.001). Stress urinary incontinence did not influence frequency of performing PFEs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that while baseline knowledge of POP and incontinence knowledge were high in this patient population, the majority of participants did not participate in PFE. Participants with POP were more likely to partake in daily PFE. A gap exists between knowledge and willingness to participate in PFE. Bridging this gap may be significantly impactful for women's health.

Opioid Prescriptions for Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Patients Before and After Implementation of Tennessee State Legislation.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist regarding the impact of state legislation on opioid-prescribing patterns, particularly in states with the highest opioid-prescribing rates in the nation. Our primary objective was to examine the change in the amount of opioid morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed at discharge to patients undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery after the implementation of state legislation created in response to the opioid crisis. METHODS: At our institution, state legislation went into effect on July 1, 2018, implementing limitations on OMEs prescribed to patients. This retrospective cohort study examines all adult women undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. The study compares prescribing practices 6 months before and 6 months after the state law was enacted. RESULTS: In total, 346 patients met inclusion criteria. The 2 groups had similar demographics. Surgical procedures were well distributed, with 52% of cases occurring in the first 6 months of the calendar year. At the time of discharge, 324 (96.7%) patients received an opioid prescription, with an overall average of 197 OMEs. After the implementation of state legislation on July 1, 2018, the amount of OMEs prescribed at discharge significantly decreased, from a median of 210 mg (interquartile range, 150-225) to 150 mg (interquartile range 135-225; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: State legislation was associated with a significant decrease in prescribed OMEs at the time of discharge in patients undergoing female pelvic reconstructive surgery. These results support ongoing legislative efforts to address the current opioid crisis.

Influence of the urethral pressure transducer in measuring Valsalva leak point pressure in women undergoing multichannel urodynamic testing.

AIMS: To determine if the air-charged urethral sensor balloon currently used in urodynamic testing (UDS) significantly impacts Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) measurements. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of women undergoing UDS at an academic institution. VLPPs were obtained at 150 mL and urodynamic capacity with and without the urethral pressure sensor in the urethra. VLPP measurements were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Median and interquartile range are presented. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the study, 53 were included in the primary analysis. The mean age of the subjects was 56.2 ± 12.1 years. Nine patients (16%) solely leaked when the balloon was not present in the urethra either with cough or during VLPP measurement. At both 150 mL and urodynamic capacity, when VLPP testing was performed, there was a significant difference (cmH2 O) between the control and intervention values, (76.2 [55.0, 97.0] vs 68.8 [46.3, 93.3], P = .0012; 79.3 [53, 96.5] vs 72.5 [50.8, 92.3], P = .04). There was also a statistically significant difference between the control and intervention values for the lowest leak value at 150 mL and capacity (70.5 [51, 94.5] vs 60.0 [40, 88] P = .002; 73.5 [49.5, 91.5] vs 61 [45, 88], P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: The higher VLPPs obtained with the urethral balloon in place indicate that the balloon may be the cause of falsely elevated VLPPs during urodynamic testing. Additionally, the balloon may mask a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence in some patients.

Venous Thromboembolism Prediction in Postoperative Urogynecology Patients: The Utility of Risk Assessment Tools.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of risk assessment tools (Rogers and Caprini Score models) in predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a urogynecology patient population. METHODS: All surgical patients underwent a procedure in the operating room with 1 of 7 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.Attendings from January 1 to December 31, 2015, were investigated. Rogers and Caprini Scores were calculated for each patient as well as the occurrence of any VTE in the 30 days after surgery. Patients were then grouped into risk categories based on the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were identified and included in this study. The average patient age was 58 years (range = 18-89 years). The average operative time was 109 minutes (range = 4-491 minutes). Most patients obtained a Rogers Score of 5 (32%) and a Caprini Score of 4 (34%). Based on Caprini scoring, the American College of Chest Physicians category distribution was as follows: 10% low risk, 61% moderate risk, and 29% high risk. Based on Rogers scoring, this distribution was as follows: 96.8% very low risk, 3.1% low risk, and 0.1% moderate risk. Two VTE events were identified in the cohort. Overall, the incidence of VTE was 0.26%. CONCLUSIONS: The standard VTE risk assessment tools grade urogynecology patients very differently. Although the Caprini Scale seems to appropriately differentiate individual patient VTE risk, the Rogers Scale does not adequately stratify this risk, thus potentially limiting its use within this population.

Factors Associated With Nonadherence to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Referral for the Treatment of Pelvic Pain in Women.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pelvic pain due to pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome are often referred for pelvic floor physical therapy, the primary treatment option. However, many patients do not adhere to the treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the adherence rate and outcomes of patients referred for physical therapy for pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome and identify risk factors associated with nonadherence. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: ICD-9 codes were used to identify a cohort of patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome during a 2-year time period within a single provider's clinical practice. Medical records were abstracted to obtain information on referral to physical therapy, associated comorbidities and demographics, and clinical outcomes. "Primary outcomes" was defined as attendance of at least 1 visit. Secondary outcomes included attendance of at least 6 physical therapist visits and overall improvement in pain. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and independent t tests. Nonparametric comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Multivariate analysis was completed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients, 140 (68%) attended at least 1 session with physical therapy. At least 6 visits were attended by 68 (33%) patients. Factors associated with poor adherence included parity and a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis. The odds of attending at least 1 visit were 0.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.90) and 0.44 (95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.90), respectively. Patients who attended ≥ 6 visits were more likely to have private insurance (78%) and travel shorter distances to a therapist (mean = 16 miles vs 22). Patients with an improvement in pain (compared with those who were unchanged) attended an average of 3 extra physical therapist visits (mean = 6.9 vs 3.1). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include reliance on medical records for data integrity; a patient population derived from a single clinic, reducing the generalizability of the results; the age of the data (2010-2012); and the likely interrelatedness of many of the variables. It is possible that maternal parity and psychiatric diagnoses are partial surrogates for social, logistic, or economic constraints and patient confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Initial adherence to pelvic floor physical therapy was less likely for multiparous women and women with a history of psychiatric diagnosis. Persistent adherence was more likely with private insurance or if the physical therapist location was closer. Pain improvement correlated with increased number of physical therapist sessions.

Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain.

BACKGROUND: Midurethral slings have become the preferred surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Midline transection of midurethral sling for dysfunctional voiding is an effective treatment and also has a low rate of recurrent stress incontinence. Recurrent stress incontinence after sling revision for pain and mesh exposure has not been well defined. It is therefore difficult to counsel patients on risk of recurrent stress incontinence when sling revision is performed for pain or mesh exposure. OBJECTIVE: We examined the rate of postoperative stress incontinence after midurethral sling revision for the indication of mesh exposure or pain, as well as postoperative pain and urinary urgency. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort of 245 patients undergoing a vaginal midurethral sling revision in a 10-year period for the indication of mesh exposure or pain. Preoperative indication for revision, baseline characteristics, and preoperative reports of stress incontinence, pain, and urgency were collected. The type of sling revision was then categorized into partial or complete removal. A partial removal of the sling was defined as removing only the portion of sling exposed or causing pain. A complete removal of the sling was defined as vaginal removal of sling laterally out to the pubic rami. Subjective reports of stress incontinence, pain, and urgency at short-term (16 weeks) and long-term (>16 weeks) follow-up visits were gathered. The primary outcome of the study was recurrent stress incontinence. RESULTS: In our cohort of 245 women who underwent midurethral sling revision, 94 patients had removal for mesh exposure (36 partial and 58 complete) and 151 had removal for pain (25 partial and 126 complete). All patients had a short-term follow-up with a mean time of 5.9 ± 2.8 weeks and 69% patients had long-term follow-up with a mean time of 29.1 ± 17.7 weeks. No differences were seen in preoperative reports of stress incontinence, urgency, or pain in either group. In the patients with revision for mesh exposure with no preoperative stress incontinence, there was greater postoperative stress incontinence with complete vs partial removal of sling at short-term (14% vs 42%, P = .03) and long-term (7% vs 59%, P = .003) follow-up. In the patients with revision for pain with no preoperative stress incontinence, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent stress incontinence with complete sling removal at long-term follow-up (22% vs 56%, P = .07). In the patients with midurethral sling revision for pain, 72% of partial and 76% of complete sling removal had resolution of pain postoperatively (P = .66). No difference was seen in postoperative reports of urgency or pain improvement in either group between partial or complete sling removal. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing midurethral sling revision for mesh exposure, complete sling removal resulted in higher recurrent stress incontinence compared to partial sling removal. For the indication of pain, both partial and complete sling removal improved pain in the majority of patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent stress incontinence.