Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 147: 123-132, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467251

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs), mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus, pose a significant economic burden in Europe, leading to increased hospitalization duration, mortality, and treatment costs, particularly with drug-resistant strains such as meticillin-resistant S. aureus. AIM: To conduct a case-control study on the economic impact of S. aureus SSI in adult surgical patients across high-volume centres in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, aiming to assess the overall and procedure-specific burden across Europe. METHODS: The SALT study is a multinational, retrospective cohort study with a nested case-control analysis focused on S. aureus SSI in Europe. The study included participants from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK who underwent invasive surgery in 2016 and employed a micro-costing approach to evaluate health economic factors, matching S. aureus SSI cases with controls. FINDINGS: In 2016, among 178,904 surgical patients in five European countries, 764 developed S. aureus SSI. Matching 744 cases to controls, the study revealed that S. aureus SSI cases incurred higher immediate hospitalization costs (€8,810), compared to controls (€6,032). Additionally, S. aureus SSI cases exhibited increased costs for readmissions within the first year post surgery (€7,961.6 versus €5,298.6), with significant differences observed. Factors associated with increased surgery-related costs included the cost of hospitalization immediately after surgery, first intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 12 months, and hospital readmission within 12 months, as identified through multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The higher rates of hospitalization, ICU admissions, and readmissions among S. aureus SSI cases highlight the severity of these infections and their impact on healthcare costs, emphasizing the potential benefits of evidence-based infection control measures and improved patient care to mitigate the economic burden.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente) , España/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Alemania/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(4): 560-566, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological diseases are at high risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). AIM: The study aim was to describe excess length of stay and costs associated with CDI during the hospital stay for induction chemotherapy in the United States (USA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from US databases of Truven Health Analytics®. Comprehensive hospitalization data of patients with induction chemotherapy due to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were analysed. Patients with CDI occurring during the hospital stay were compared to controls through a case-control comparison of the direct treatment costs and length of stay was performed with an exact matching algorithm. FINDINGS: A total of 2611 patients were included between January 2014 and December 2017. NHL (43.5%) and AML (38.4%) were the predominant underlying diseases and 15% of patients received a stem cell transplantation. During the matching, 105 CDI cases (CDI+) were compared with 801 controls (CDI-). On average, hospitalization costs were increased by US$36,113 in CDI+ compared to CDI- patients (P=0.009) and patients with CDI spent on average 8.9 additional days in hospital (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight a significant burden associated with CDI in haematological patients undergoing induction chemotherapy in the USA. There is an important need for prevention of CDI in this specific patient population.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Clostridioides difficile , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(2): 135-140, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The healthcare burden of Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile infection (CDI) is high but not fully characterized. AIM: To assess hospitalization costs, length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality attributable to CDI in the USA by analysing nationwide hospital discharge records over the 2012-2016 period. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study based on the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database was conducted, in which 46,097 inpatient stays with a diagnosis of CDI were analysed. Costs, LOS and in-hospital mortality were studied for patients with either a principal or secondary (comorbidity) diagnosis of CDI, and for patients re-admitted because of CDI. If CDI was a comorbidity, its attributable burden was estimated by coarsened exact matching, comparing 17,273 CDI stays with 84,164 stays in a control group without a CDI diagnosis. FINDINGS: Inpatients for whom CDI was the main reason for hospitalization incurred mean costs of US$10,528 and an average LOS of 5.9 days. For CDI as a comorbidity, the mean additional cost was US$11,938 and the additional LOS was 4.4 days. CDI also increased the in-hospital mortality rate by 4.1%, on average. CONCLUSION: This study is consistent with previous publications which demonstrated the high economic burden of CDI for healthcare settings and health insurance systems. When recorded as a comorbidity, CDI significantly increased hospital costs and LOS. These results highlight the need for innovative therapeutic approaches in the prevention and treatment of CDI.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 101(3): 339-346, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) is a rare invasive fungal infection with a high mortality rate. However, data concerning the clinical and economic burden of IM are scarce. AIM: To evaluate the direct treatment costs and additional expenditures of patients with IM. METHODS: A retrospective cost-of-illness analysis of cases with IM extracted from FungiScope - Global Registry for Emerging Fungal Infections, accessible through the epidemiological research platform www.ClinicalSurveys.net, was undertaken. Results of patients with IM were compared with those of matched patients with similar underlying conditions based on the German Diagnosis Related Group (G-DRG) coding. FINDINGS: Out of 46 patients with probable/proven IM, 31 (67%) patients were male and the median age was 53 years (range 11-88 years). Forty-two patients (92%) had haematological diseases as the most common risk factor. Analysis of cost factors identified antifungal treatment due to IM as the primary cost driver [€22,816, 95% confidence interval (CI) €15,036-32,346], with mean overall direct treatment costs of €53,261 (95% CI €39,660-68,825). Compared with matched patients, patients with IM were treated in hospital for 26.5 additional days (standard deviation 31.8 days; P < 0.001), resulting in mean additional costs of €32,991 (95% CI €21,558-46,613; P < 0.001). Probable IM, as well as absence of chemotherapy, surgical measures due to IM, and antifungal prophylaxis were associated with lower overall costs. Nineteen patients (41.3%) died during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the considerable healthcare burden of IM. The choice of antifungal agent for treatment of IM had no impact on overall cost.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/economía , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/epidemiología , Mucormicosis/economía , Mucormicosis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antifúngicos/economía , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucormicosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto Joven
5.
Med Mal Infect ; 48(1): 23-29, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336929

RESUMEN

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most important cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea in industrialized countries. We performed a literature review of the overall economic burden of initial and recurrent CDI as well as of the cost-effectiveness of the various treatment strategies applied in these settings. Even though analysis of health economic data is complicated by the limited comparability of results, our review identified several internationally consistent results. Authors from different countries have shown that recurrent CDI disproportionally contributes to the overall economic burden of CDI and therefore offers considerable saving potential. Subsequent cost-effectiveness analyses almost exclusively identified fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment option for initial CDI and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for recurrent CDI. Among the various FMT protocols, optimum results were obtained using early colonoscopy-based FMT.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Australia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Colonoscopía/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Costos de los Medicamentos , Europa (Continente) , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , América del Norte , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 23(10): 776.e1-776.e5, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A prospective international multicentre surveillance study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and amphotericin B susceptibility of Aspergillus terreus species complex infections. METHODS: A total of 370 cases from 21 countries were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of A. terreus species complex among the investigated patients with mould-positive cultures was 5.2% (370/7116). Amphotericin B MICs ranged from 0.125 to 32 mg/L, (median 8 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Aspergillus terreus species complex infections cause a wide spectrum of aspergillosis and the majority of cryptic species display high amphotericin B MICs.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis/epidemiología , Aspergilosis/microbiología , Aspergillus/clasificación , Aspergillus/aislamiento & purificación , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Aspergillus/efectos de los fármacos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Infection ; 43(6): 707-14, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123227

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is the most common cause of health-care-associated infectious diarrhoea. In the context of the German health-care system, direct and indirect costs of an initial episode of CDAD and of CDAD recurrence are currently unknown. METHODS: We defined CDAD as presence of diarrhoea (≥3 unformed stools/day) in association with detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in an unformed faecal sample. Patients treated with metronidazole (PO or IV) and/or vancomycin (PO) were included. Comprehensive data of patients were retrospectively documented into a database using the technology of the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut). Patients with CDAD were matched to control patients in a 1:1 ratio. Analysis was split in three groups: incidence group (CDAD patients without recurrence), recurrence group (CDAD patients with ≥1 recurrence) and control group (matched non-CDAD patients). RESULTS: Between 02/2010 and 12/2011, 150 patients with CDAD (114 patients in the incidence and 36 (24 %) in the recurrence group) and 150 controls were analysed. Mean length of stay was: 32 (95 %CI: 30-37), 94 (95 %CI: 76-112) and 24 days (95 %CI: 22-27; P = <0.001), resulting in mean overall direct treatment costs per patient of €18,460 (95 %CI: €14,660-€22,270), €73,900 (95 %CI: €50,340-€97,460) and €14,530 (95 %CI: €11,730-€17,330; P = <0.001). In the incidence and recurrence group, the mean cumulative number of antibiotic CDAD treatment days was 11 (95 %CI: 10-12) and 36 (95 %CI: 27-45; P = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Especially CDAD recurrence was associated with excessive costs, which were mostly attributable to a significantly longer overall length of stay. Innovative treatment strategies are warranted to reduce treatment costs and prevent recurrence of CDAD.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Diarrea/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto Joven
8.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(2): 331-8, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213718

RESUMEN

Direct treatment costs caused by candidemia in German intensive care unit (ICU) patients are currently unknown. We analyzed treatment costs and the impact of antifungal drug choice. Comprehensive data of patients who had at least one episode of candidemia while staying in the ICU between 01/2005 and 12/2010 were documented in a database using the technology of the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut). A detailed analysis of all disease-associated treatment costs was performed. Patients treated with echinocandins (i.e., anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin) or fluconazole were analyzed separately and compared. Forty-one and 64 patients received echinocandins and fluconazole, respectively. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score was 114 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 106-122) vs. 95 (95 % CI: 90-101, p = <0.001). Twenty-three (56 %) and 33 (52 %, p = 0.448) patients survived hospitalization, while 17 (41 %) and 22 (34 %, p = 0.574) survived one year after diagnosis. In the echinocandin and fluconazole groups, the mean costs per patient of ICU treatment were 20,338 (95 % CI: 12,893-27,883) vs. 11,932 (95 % CI: 8,016-15,849, p = 0.110), and the total direct treatment costs per patient were 37,995 (95 % CI: 26,614-49,376) vs. 22,305 (95 % CI: 16,817-27,793, p = 0.012), resulting in daily costs per patient of 1,158 (95 % CI: 1,036-1,280) vs. 927 (95 % CI: 828-1,026, p = 0.001). Our health economic analysis shows the high treatment costs of patients with candidemia in the ICU. Sicker patients had a prolonged hospitalization and were more likely to receive echinocandins, leading to higher treatment costs. Outcomes were comparable to those achieved in less sick patients with fluconazole.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anidulafungina , Candidemia/economía , Caspofungina , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Lipopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Micafungina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 16(6): 968-74, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25371351

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment indications of new antifungals in clinical practice often deviate from the strict criteria used in controlled clinical trials. Under routine clinical conditions, beneficial and adverse effects, not previously described in clinical trials may be observed. The aim of this study was to describe customary prescription and treatment strategies of micafungin (MCFG). METHODS: A registry was set up on www.ClinicalSurveys.net and physicians were invited to provide retrospective information on cases they had treated with MCFG. Documentation comprised demographic information, underlying disease, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of MCFG. RESULTS: A total of 125 episodes of patients hospitalized between September 2009 and February 2012 were documented, of which 7 had to be excluded because of incomplete documentation. The most common risk factors of patients were hematological malignancy (n = 116, 98.3%) and antibiotic treatment >3 days (n = 115, 97.5%). MCFG was administered as prophylaxis in 106 (89.9%) patients. Median duration of MCFG application as prophylaxis was 21 days (range: 3-78); 53 of the patients (50%) received a dose of 50 mg, while the other 53 (50%) received 100 mg/day. For the different doses, prophylactic outcome was rated as success in 42 (79.2%) vs. 52 (98.1%; P = 0.004) patients. Fifty-five patients (51.9%) were treated with posaconazole before initiation of MCFG. Four patients (7.5%) developed a proven invasive fungal disease (IFD) while being treated with 50 mg MCFG, compared to no patient treated with 100 mg (P = 0.118). At the end of MCFG prophylaxis, 24 (22.6%) patients were switched to fluconazole and 64 (60.3%) patients to posaconazole. CONCLUSION: Our study shows clinical effectiveness of MCFG prophylaxis with low rates of breakthrough fungal infections. In most cases, MCFG was part of a multi-modal antifungal prophylactic strategy. Investigators reported fewer proven IFDs in patients receiving therapeutic doses of MCFG as prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Equinocandinas/administración & dosificación , Equinocandinas/farmacología , Lipopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Lipopéptidos/farmacología , Micosis/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/efectos adversos , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Equinocandinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Internet , Lipopéptidos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Micafungina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micosis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...