[Early optimization of antibiotic therapy through rapid detection of pathogens and sensitivity : Health economic aspects]. / Frühe Optimierung der Antibiotikatherapie durch den schnellen Nachweis von Erregern und Empfindlichkeit : Gesundheitsökonomische Aspekte.

INTRODUCTION: Severe infections require early optimization of antibiotic therapy. Since 2016, antibiotic susceptibility results with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) direct from positive blood cultures are available in less than 8 h using a new diagnostic system. The aim of this study is to investigate the economic effects of a rapid availability of antibiotic susceptibility in Germany and to validate these theoretical results in a German hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the context of a literature search, the clinical and economic benefit of an adequate therapy as well as the rate of the initially inadequate antibiotic therapy (IIAT) were determined for sepsis and bloodstream infections. In addition to the weighted average of the pooled studies, the case numbers in Germany (data year 2015) of all DRGs for sepsis patients with coded pathogen and ICU stay were integrated into a theoretical economic model that was subsequently validated in a German hospital. RESULTS: The analysis of 14 studies with a total of 6408 patients showed an average weighted rate of 27.3% IIAT. From a total of 8 studies (n = 2988), an average weighted length of stay (LOS) saving of 4.7 days was determined with adequate initial therapy compared to an IIAT. In the theoretical model, an average of €â€¯1539 per case could be saved with a possible LOS reduction of 3.7 days. A conservative scenario with an IIAT of 20% and LOS reduction of 2.5 days still resulted in an average saving of € 201 per case. In the hospital-individual model, 68% of 146 cases had a positive blood culture. In 61% of the examined cases an adjustment of the therapy would have been necessary (35% IIAT, 26% de-escalation). After deducting the cost of the test for 60 patients, the total potential savings amounted to €â€¯122,112, which is over 2000 € per patient. CONCLUSION: A fast adequate antibiotic therapy was economically advantageous both in the economic model and in the real-life evaluation. The optimization of antibiotic therapy by early pathogen detection and MIC-based susceptibilities represents a possibility to achieve savings despite the high costs for diagnostics in the clinic. Particularly noteworthy is the optimization through de-escalation. The potential for each hospital should be identified through systematic case studies.

[Procalcitonin as a tool for the assessment of successful therapy of severe sepsis : An analysis using clinical routine data]. / Procalcitonin als Instrument zur Erfolgsmessung der Therapie einer schweren Sepsis : Eine Untersuchung mit klinischen Routinedaten.

INTRODUCTION: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a well-evaluated biomarker for the detection of severe bacterial infections and monitoring effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of PCT in a clinical routine setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 358,763 clinical cases from 7 German hospitals in 2012 and 2013, 3854 cases had an ICD-10 code representing sepsis. A total of 1778 cases had pathologic PCT and one episode of infection. Of those, 671 showed a series of measures that was suitable to assess treatment success using PCT reduction. Propensity score matching was used to create two comparable groups with 211 patients in each group. RESULTS: The group with PCT reduction within 12 days showed a highly significant better proportion of survival (146/211 vs. 17/211; p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for death according to PCT reduction vs. nonreduction is 25.64 (p < 0.0001; 95 % CI: 14.49-45.45). PCT was normalized after an average of 6.2 days. DISCUSSION: The difference in survival implicates that PCT reduction is a suitable surrogate parameter to indicate successful antimicrobial therapy. Successful antibiotic therapy is a proven predictor for survival in sepsis. This study also showed concordant results in the group of patients with sepsis after abdominal surgery. Results from subgroup analyses confirm the initial findings. PCT reduction was used as surrogate for therapy success, as the antimicrobial therapy was not electronically available. CONCLUSION: PCT reduction is a strong predictor for survival. However, the data show that overall use of PCT to monitor sepsis therapy is not yet routinely established. Hospitals should establish algorithms for sepsis treatment that include PCT for the assessment of adequacy and the monitoring of success of the antimicrobial therapy.

[Economic burden of Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in German hospitals based on routine DRG data]. / Ökonomische Auswirkungen einer Clostridium-difficile-Enterokolitis in deutschen Krankenhäusern auf der Basis von DRG-Kostendaten.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is not only a increasing medical but also economical problem. METHODS: Data from the DRG project group of the German society for digestive and metabolic diseases (DGVS) were analyzed for CDAD. Out of 430,875 cases from 37 German hospitals 2,767 cases were grouped by having CDAD either as primary (PD) or secondary diagnosis (SD; likely to be from a hospital source) in an initial or recurring hospital stay (RD). For comparison non-CDAD cases from the same hospitals from that year where matched using propensity score matching. As endpoints we defined LOS (length of stay), difference of LOS to national average LOS, total costs per case and difference between costs and revenue for all three groups. RESULTS: Patients from the PD group (n = 817) showed a mean LOS of 11.2 days compared to 8.5 days for the control group, 4,132 € mean cost per case (536 € more than control) and a mean loss of -1,064 € per case compared to -636 €. In the SD group (n = 1,840) patients stayed in the hospital for 28.8 days (control: 18.1 days), had costs of 19,381 € (control: 13,082 €) and a loss of -3,442 € compared to -849 € in the control group. Recurring cases (RD; n = 110) showed a LOS of 37.3 days (control: 21.3 days), had even higher costs (20.755 € vs. 13,101 €) and higher losses (-4,196 € vs. -1,109 €). CONCLUSION: By extrapolating these findings CDAD not only harms patients but generates a yearly cost burden of 464 million € for the German healthcare system including a loss of 197 million € for German hospitals. To the authors' opinion sufficient measures against CDAD should include pre hospital risk reduction programs, introduction of effective therapeutic and hygienic strategies in hospitals as well as improvements in documentation for these cases to support further developments of the German DRG system.

[Improvement of cost allocation in gastroenterology by introduction of a novel service catalogue covering the complete spectrum of endoscopic procedures]. / Verbesserung der Kostenkalkulation in der Gastroenterologie durch Einführung eines neuen Leistungskatalogs für alle endoskopischen Prozeduren.

BACKGROUND: The German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) is incomplete for endoscopic interventions and fails to differentiate between complex and simple procedures. This is caused by outdated methods of personnel-cost allocation. METHODS: To establish an up-to-date service catalogue 50 hospitals made their anonymized expense-budget data available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS). 2.499.900 patient-datasets (2011-2013) were used to classify operation-and-procedure codes (OPS) into procedure-tiers (e.g. colonoscopy with biopsy/colonoscopy with stent-insertion). An expert panel ranked these tiers according to complexity and assigned estimates of physician time. From June to November 2014 exact time tracking data for a total 38.288 individual procedures were collected in 119 hospitals to validate this service catalogue. RESULTS: In this three-step process a catalogue of 97 procedure-tiers was established that covers 99% of endoscopic interventions performed in German hospitals and assigned validated mean personnel-costs using gastroscopy as standard. Previously, diagnostic colonoscopy had a relative personnel-cost value of 1.13 (compared to gastroscopy 1.0) and rose to 2.16, whereas diagnostic ERCP increased from 1.7 to 3.62, more appropriately reflecting complexity. Complex procedures previously not catalogued were now included (e.g. gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: 16.74). DISCUSSION: This novel service catalogue for GI-endoscopy almost completely covers all endoscopic procedures performed in German hospitals and assigns relative personnel-cost values based on actual physician time logs. It is to be included in the national coding recommendation and should replace all prior inventories for cost distribution. The catalogue will contribute to a more objective cost allocation and hospital reimbursement - at least until time tracking for endoscopy becomes mandatory.

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Comparison between bromocriptine and lisuride.

27 patients (12 women and 15 men) with hyperprolactinemia were treated with the dopamine agonists lisuride (Dopergin) and bromocriptine on a cross-over basis for 3-6 months. By this treatment, plasma prolactin levels were reduced by 83 and 87%, and normalization was achieved in 13 patients in the lisuride group (average dosage 1 mg/d) and in 15 patients in the bromocriptine group (average dosage 10 mg/d). Side effects, consisting of orthostatic hypotension, vomiting and nausea, occurred in 11 patients treated with lisuride and 13 patients treated with bromocriptine, and 2 patients in the lisuride group and one in the bromocriptine group stopped the medication for this reason. There was a good correlation in the doses of both drugs used. There was a tendency for the prolactin-lowering effect of lisuride to last longer upon cessation of therapy which might be related to the higher receptor affinity of both drugs. In general, however, the present results indicate that bromocriptine and lisuride are comparable in efficacy and side effects, but that individual patients respond better to one or the other drug.