Midostaurin in combination with chemotherapy is most effective in patients with acute myeloid leukemia presenting with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio who proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation while in first complete remission.

OBJECTIVES: Midostaurin, a multikinase and FLT3 inhibitor, is the first non-chemotherapy agent approved and widely adopted for the treatment of FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Yet, its role in improving survival of patients referred to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in first complete remission (CR1) needs to be defined. METHODS: This multicenter study retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 119 FLT3-ITD AML patients [59 (49.6%) males and 60 females] intensively treated between 2015 and 2019 at five Israeli centers. In our cohort, allo-SCT in CR1 was widely implemented (47%) and patient stratification was based on the current allelic ratio (AR) cutoff of 0.5. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (82.3%) achieved CR1/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Death during induction was reported in 7 (5.9%) patients. In multivariate analysis, midostaurin use and allo-SCT in CR1 were the most significant factors affecting overall survival (OS). Midostaurin incorporation in chemotherapy regimens significantly improved CR + CRi rates (P = .002), reduced relapse rates (P = .02), and was remarkably advantageous for high-AR patients (2-year OS 82%). In low-AR patients, the midostaurin effect was much less prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate benefits of midostaurin incorporation in intensive chemotherapy regimens, particularly for high-AR AML patients to whom it should be offered along with allo-SCT in CR1.

Midostaurin in combination with intensive chemotherapy is safe and associated with improved remission rates and higher transplantation rates in first remission-a multi-center historical control study.

The addition of midostaurin, a FLT3-inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy (IC) was previously shown to improve outcome of younger patients with FLT3-mutated AML. The toxicity and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in patients not originally included in the RATIFY study or with intensified daunorubicin dosing are unknown. We conducted a retrospective, multi-center, historical-control study to characterize the safety and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in a "real-world" setting. Sixty-nine adult patients were included in the analysis (midostaurin n = 34, historical controls n = 35) with a mean follow-up of 18.4 (± 15) months. Median age of patients was 60 (range 26-82) years; 32% and 20% of patients were > 65 and 70 years, respectively. No differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups. Midostaurin was administered with 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin in 29% of patients; One-third of patients experienced dose reductions/interruptions during midostaurin therapy. Overall toxicity was comparable between the midostaurin and control groups.CR/CRi rates were higher in patients treated with midostaurin compared with controls (80% vs. 57%, p = 0.047) and significantly more patients in the midostaurin group were transplanted in first remission (95% vs. 68%, p = 0.04).Median OS and DFS were higher in the midostaurin vs. control group (not reached vs. 11 months (p = 0.085) and 13 vs. 6 months (p = 0.09), respectively). In our analysis, midostaurin was not associated with increased toxicity including in older patients, in those with secondary AML or when administered with intensified daunorubicin dosage. Higher remission rates in the midostaurin group and increased transplantation rates in first CR were associated with a trend towards better outcomes.

Cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin induction therapy in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia on chronic hemodialysis.

The combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine is the cornerstone of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Little data are available on the optimal chemotherapy regimen for patients with AML and advanced renal failure, with some authors recommending administration of reduced daunorubicin doses. We report the case of a 54-year-old AML patient on chronic hemodialysis who was treated with a modified induction regimen with reduced-dose daunorubin. Daunorubicin levels were measured during the treatment schedule. Although daunorubicin terminal t1/2 appears to be unaffected in hemodialysis patients, the estimated 0-23 h area under the curve was comparable with that of patients receiving full-dose daunorubicin. Therefore, dose adjustment in this patient group may be prudent.

Prospective comparison of early bone marrow evaluation on day 5 versus day 14 of the "3 + 7" induction regimen for acute myeloid leukemia.

Evaluation of early response during induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is used for prognostication and re-induction strategy, yet the optimal evaluation time point is unknown. Clearance of bone marrow (BM) blasts by day 14 of therapy does not ensure remission; thus, some patients requiring re-induction are neglected. This study aimed to examine the role of earlier BM evaluation during induction for predicting remission and overall survival. Results of BM testing on the 5th and 14th day of intensive induction were prospectively compared in 127 adult patients with AML. Re-induction was given, based on Day 14 results, to 25 patients. Reduction of the BM blast count to <5% as early as by the fifth day of induction was more specifically associated with the achievement of remission compared to Day 14 (88.2% vs. 60%, respectively). Rapid responders have a better 3-year overall survival (OS). Day 5 results are a stronger predictor of OS by multivariate analysis and better segregate long-term survivors than the Day 14th BM count (66% vs. 30%, P = 0.0001 and 48% vs. 37%, respectively, P = 0.04). The Day 5 evaluation of BM carries significant clinical information. The benefit of prescribing re-induction based on such early evaluation should be prospectively studied.

Higher infection rate after 7- compared with 5-day cycle of azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Azacitidine (AZA) dose reduction is a common practice in cytopenic patients. However, a correlation between AZA dose and infection complications has never been studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia treated with AZA in 18 Israeli hospitals between the years 2008 and 2011 were included in a former national survey. To reveal the effect of AZA dosage on infection risk we limited our analysis to the infection rate after the first AZA dose alone. We excluded subsequent cycles of AZA from the analysis, because infectious events during these cycles might be related to other cofactors such as disease response to AZA therapy. RESULTS: After the first AZA cycle, infectious events were more frequent after doses of 75 mg/m(2) for 7 days than 75 mg/m(2) for 5 days (36/106 [34%] and 10/67 [14.9%], respectively; P = .008), regardless of the patient's age. Of the 46 recorded infectious events, the causative pathogen was identified as bacterial in 25 (54.3%) and as viral or fungal in 2 (4.3%) and 2 (4.3%) cases, respectively. No pathogen was identified in 17 (37%) cases. Infections were significantly more prevalent among patients who presented with platelet counts < 20,000 (43.6% vs. 23.6%; P = .012) and poor risk cytogenetics (40.7% vs. 19.8%; P = .008). CONCLUSION: Reduction of AZA dose might decrease infection rate and therefore should be considered in patients with high infection risk.

Predicting infections in high-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine: a retrospective multicenter study.

Hypomethylating agents have become the standard therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Israel, azacitidine (AZA) is routinely used. Yet, infectious complications are common during AZA therapy. The current study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and predisposing risk factors for infections in AZA-treated patients. This retrospective study included patients treated with AZA in 18 Israeli medical institutions between 2008 and 2011. Data on 184 patients [157 high-risk MDS and 27 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], with a median age of 71.6 (range 29-92) were recorded. Overall, 153 infectious events were reported during 928 treatment cycles (16.5%) administered to 100 patients. One hundred fourteen, 114/153 (75%) events required hospitalization and 30 (19.6%) were fatal. In a univariate analysis, unfavorable cytogenetics, low neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) counts were found to be associated with infections (24.4% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001; 27% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001; 20.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001 and 29.2% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low Hb level, low PLT count, and unfavorable cytogenetics remained significant. Prior to therapy, poor cytogenetics, PLT count below 20 × 109/L and neutrophil count below 0.5 × 109/L were predictive of the risk of infection during the first two cycles of therapy. In conclusion, patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, presenting with low neutrophil and PLT counts, are susceptible to infections. Evaluation of infection risk should be repeated prior to each cycle. Patients with poor cytogenetics in whom AZA is prescribed despite low PLT count are particularly at high risk for infections and infection prophylaxis may be considered.