Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Inmunidad Colectiva/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Aborto Veterinario/historia , Animales , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Bovinos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Difteria/inmunología , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Veterinarios/historiaRESUMEN
Microbial life has been much in the news. From outbreaks of Escherichia coli to discussions of the benefits of raw and fermented foods to recent reports of life forms capable of living in extreme environments, the modest microbe has become a figure for thinking through the presents and possible futures of nature, writ large as well as small. Noting that dominant representations of microbial life have shifted from an idiom of peril to one of promise, we argue that microbes--especially when thriving as microbial communities--are being upheld as model ecosystems in a prescriptive sense, as tokens of how organisms and human ecological relations with them could, should, or might be. We do so in reference to two case studies: the regulatory politics of artisanal cheese and the speculative research of astrobiology. To think of and with microbial communities as model ecosystems offers a corrective to the scientific determinisms we detect in some recent calls to attend to the materiality of scientific objects.
Asunto(s)
Queso/microbiología , Exobiología , Manipulación de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Microbiología , Política , Bacterias , Ecología , Ecosistema , Regulación Gubernamental , Modelos BiológicosRESUMEN
Seawater has occupied an ambiguous place in anthropological categories of "nature" and "culture." Seawater as nature appears as potentiality of form and uncontainable flux; it moves faster than culture - with culture frequently figured through land-based metaphors - even as culture seeks to channel water's (nature's) flow. Seawater as culture manifests as a medium of pleasure, sustenance, travel, disaster. I argue that, although seawater's qualities in early anthropology were portrayed impressionistically, today technical, scientific descriptions of water's form prevail. For example, processes of globalization - which may also be called "oceanization" - are often described as "currents," "flows," and "circulations." Examining sea-set ethnography, maritime anthropologies, and contemporary social theory, I propose that seawater has operated as a "theory machine" for generating insights about human cultural organization. I develop this argument with ethnography from the Sargasso Sea and in the Sea Islands. I conclude with a critique of appeals to water's form in social theory.
Asunto(s)
Antropología , Cultura , Naturaleza , Agua de Mar , Sociología , Simbolismo , Antropología/educación , Antropología/historia , Océano Atlántico/etnología , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/historia , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Algas Marinas , Sociología/educación , Sociología/historia , Indias Occidentales/etnologíaRESUMEN
This review essay surveys recent literature in the history of science, literary theory, anthropology, and art criticism dedicated to exploring how the artificial life enterprise has been inflected by--and might also reshape--existing social, historical, cognitive, and cultural frames of thought and action. The piece works through various possible interpretations of Kevin Kelly's phrase "life is a verb," in order to track recent shifts in cultural studies of artificial life from an aesthetic of critique to an aesthetic of conversation, discerning in the process different styles of translating between the concerns of the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, and sciences of the artificial.