Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 48(2): 157-168, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975406

RESUMEN

Introduction: Safe administration of critical care hyperbaric medicine requires specialized equipment and advanced training. Equipment must be tested in order to evaluate function in the hyperbaric environment. High-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) has been used in intensive care settings effectively, but it has never been tested in a hyperbaric chamber. Methods: Following a modified U.S. Navy testing protocol used to evaluate hyperbaric ventilators, we evaluated an HFPV transport ventilator in a multiplace hyperbaric chamber at 1.0, 1.9, and 2.8 atmospheres absolute (ATA). We used a test lung with analytical software for data collection. The ventilator uses simultaneous cyclic pressure-controlled ventilation at a pulsatile flow rate (PFR)/oscillatory continuous positive airway pressure (oCPAP) ratio of 30/10 with a high-frequency oscillation percussive rate of 500 beats per minute. Inspiratory and expiratory times were maintained at two seconds throughout each breathing cycle. Results: During manned studies, the PFR/oCPAP ratios were 26/6, 22/7, and 22.5/8 at an airway resistance of 20cm H2O/L/second and 18/9, 15.2/8.5, and 13.6/7 at an airway resistance of 50 cm/H2O/L/second at 1, 1.9, and 2.8 ATA. The resulting release volumes were 800, 547, and 513 mL at airway resistance of 20 cm H2O/L/sec and 400, 253, and 180 mL at airway resistance of 50 cm/H2O/L/sec at 1, 1.9, and 2.8 ATA. Unmanned testing showed similar changes. The mean airway pressure (MAP) remained stable throughout all test conditions; theoretically, supporting adequate lung recruitment and gas exchange. A case where HFPV was used to treat a patient for CO poisoning was presented to illustrate that HFPV worked well under HBO2 conditions and no complications occurred during HBO2 treatment. Conclusion: The HFPV transport ventilator performed adequately under hyperbaric conditions and should be considered a viable option for hyperbaric critical care. This ventilator has atypical terminology and produces unique pulmonary physiology, thus requiring specialized training prior to use.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación de Alta Frecuencia/instrumentación , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/instrumentación , Lesión por Inhalación de Humo/terapia , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Acidosis/etiología , Anciano , Resistencia de las Vías Respiratorias , Presión Atmosférica , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/complicaciones , Femenino , Ventilación de Alta Frecuencia/métodos , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Pulmón/fisiología , Respiración con Presión Positiva/instrumentación , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/fisiología , Flujo Pulsátil , Valores de Referencia , Respiración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...