Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 2023 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062656

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although there is limited data about the role of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (IDCM) consultations in the Emergency Department (ED), they have a key role in deciding on hospitalization and appropriate use of antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who visited the ED of our hospital and underwent an IDCM consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the medical records of adult patients who visited the ED of our hospital between May and August 2021 and needed IDCM consultation. The demographic data, the date and time of admission and consultation, the departments that were consulted before IDCM, laboratory results, diagnosis, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 42,116 ED visits, 1,007 (2.4%) IDCM consultations were requested. The median time between admission and IDCM consultation was 239 min (150.0-373.5). Before 56.9% of IDCM consultations, pre-consultations were requested from other departments, and the time interval was significantly longer. The median age of patients was 68 years (51-77 years). Infections were confirmed by the IDCM physician in 79.6% of the consultations. The most diagnosed infections were urinary tract infections (32.4%), skin-soft tissue infections (16.9%) and lower respiratory tract infections (10.3%), whereas 9.3% of the consultations resulted in hospitalization to the infection ward, 25.1% to other wards, and 5% to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: Two of 3 consultations resulted in hospitalization in other wards, and this shows that IDCM consultations are beneficial for managing patients with infectious diseases hospitalized in other departments. Communication between IDCM specialists and ED colleagues is important, especially in the management of elderly patients who require a multidisciplinary approach.

2.
Thorac Res Pract ; 24(6): 284-291, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721490

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite the efforts in vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), breakthrough infections occur and the need for hospitalization continues. We aimed to determine the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination and the severity of COVID-19 and mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2021 and February 2022 in a university hos- pital in Turkey. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (both in clinics and in intensive care units), ≥18 years old, and who had no previous COVID-19 were included in the study. The demographic characteristics, clinical data, vaccination status, and outcome of the patients were analyzed retrospectively and the relationship between vaccination status and mortality was determined statistically. RESULTS: Of the 674 patients, 180 (26.7%) had no vaccination, 282 (41.8%) had incomplete vaccination, and 212 (31.5%) were fully vaccinated according to the updated vaccination recommendations. While 44.0% of the patients were fully vaccinated before the occur- rence of omicron variant, 15.9% of the patients were fully vaccinated during the wave of the omicron variant. The patients with no vaccination were younger and had fewer comorbidities. The overall mortality was 31.8%. Under 50 years old, all the patients with fully vaccination survived and the patients with no vaccination or incomplete vaccination had higher (10.1%) mortality. During the omicron period, mortality was lower in fully vaccinated pateints. CONCLUSION: Immunization with and booster doses of BNT162b2 should be encouraged to protect both healthy and vulnerable populations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...