Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Neurocrit Care ; 27(1): 68-74, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28054291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The neurological prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is difficult to assess. GFAP is an astrocytic intermediate filament protein released into bloodstream in case of cell death. We performed a prospective study aiming to compare the predictive potential of GFAP after resuscitation to the more widely used biomarker neuron-specific enolase (NSE). METHODS: One hundred patients were included at 48 h (tolerance interval ±12 h) after cardiac arrest. A serum sample was collected immediately after study inclusion. We determined serum levels of GFAP and NSE by means of immunoassays. Primary outcome was the modified Glasgow outcome scale at 4 weeks. Values below four were considered as a poor functional outcome. RESULTS: Median GFAP levels in poor outcome (n = 61) and good outcome (n = 39) patients were 0.03 µg/L (interquartile range 0.01-0.07 µg/L) and 0.02 µg/L (0.01-0.03 µg/L; p = 0.014), respectively. GFAP revealed a sensitivity of 60.7% and a specificity of 66.7% to predict a poor functional outcome. All patients having a GFAP level >0.08 µg/L had a poor functional outcome. For NSE, sensitivity was 44.3% and specificity was 100.0% for predicting a poor outcome. Multivariate regression analysis revealed GFAP, NSE, and the Karnofsky index to be independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The release patterns of GFAP and NSE after CPR show differences. GFAP levels above 0.08 µg/L were associated with a poor outcome in all cases, and patients with strongly elevated values (>3 µg/L) consistently had severe brain damage on brain imaging. Both biomarkers independently contribute to outcome prediction after CPR.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/sangre , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 141(5): 317-21, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26939100

RESUMEN

Using bedside ultrasound in the emergency room includes point of care sonography (echoscopy) and several protocols (RUSH, FATE, etc.). The aim of these protocols is to evaluate the life threatening emergency care situation without interrupting the clinical work flow. This article also compares the definition of emergency care echocardiography and focused ultrasound of the heart. In addition this article gives an overview about compression sonography of veins. Examples are presented on how to use bedside ultrasound in clinical settings.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Ecocardiografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Conducta Cooperativa , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Resucitación , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Flujo de Trabajo , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...