Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nucl Med Technol ; 50(3): 274-277, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34933922

RESUMEN

177Lu-DOTATATE has gained wide clinical acceptance for the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; however, little is known regarding its accumulation in ascites. As such, clinical staff performing paracenteses shortly after a treatment dose may be concerned about their potential radiation exposure or the risk of contamination. Methods: In this report, therapeutic paracenteses were performed on a patient with metastatic intestinal carcinoid complicated by recurrent chylous ascites at various time intervals after a standard 7.4 GBq dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE. Samples of the fluid were analyzed in a scintillation counter to estimate the concentration of radioactivity. Results: The concentration of activity in the ascitic fluid obtained 3 d after an infusion was exceptionally low (175.3 ± 25.9 Bq/mL). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that paracenteses conducted as soon as 3 d after a standard dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE pose little to no risk in terms of radiation safety to staff performing the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Ascitis Quilosa , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Compuestos Organometálicos , Exposición a la Radiación , Ascitis Quilosa/etiología , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Octreótido/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Paracentesis , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Cintigrafía , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico
2.
Hum Resour Health ; 18(1): 49, 2020 07 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32680524

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on access to radiotherapy services for CARICOM nations. METHODS: This was a descriptive mixed-methods observational study which used data collected via survey from staff working in Radiation Oncology in 14 CARICOM countries. Benchmark recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency were compared to existing numbers. The Directory of Radiotherapy Centers, World Bank, and Global Cancer Observatory databases were all accessed to provide information on radiotherapy machines in the region, population statistics, and cancer incidence data respectively. Both population and cancer incidence-based analyses were undertaken to facilitate an exhaustive review. RESULTS: Radiotherapy machines were present in only 50% of the countries. Brachytherapy services were performed in only six countries (42.9%). There were a total of 15 external beam machines, 22 radiation oncologists, 22 medical physicists, and 60 radiation therapists across all nations. Utilizing patient-based data, the requirement for machines, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and radiation therapists was 40, 66, 44, and 106, respectively. Only four (28.6%) countries had sufficient radiation oncologists. Five (35.7%) countries had enough medical physicists and radiation therapists. Utilizing population-based data, the necessary number of machines, radiation oncologists, and medical physicists was 105, 186, and 96 respectively. Only one county (7.1%) had an adequate number of radiation oncologists. The number of medical physicists was sufficient in just three countries (21.4%). There were no International Atomic Energy Agency population guidelines for assessing radiation therapists. A lower economic index was associated with a larger patient/population to machine ratio. Consequentially, Haiti had the most significant challenge with staffing and equipment requirements, when compared to all other countries, regardless of the evaluative criteria. Depending on the mode of assessment, Haiti's individual needs accounted for 37.5% (patient-based) to 59.0% (population-based) of required machines, 40.1% (patient-based) to 59.7% (population-based) of needed radiation oncologists, 38.6% (patient-based) to 58.3% (population-based) of medical physicists, and 42.5% (patient-based) of radiation therapists. CONCLUSION: There are severe deficiencies in radiotherapy services among CARICOM nations. Regardless of the method of comparative analysis, the current allocation of equipment and staffing scarcely meets 50% of regional requirements.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Oncología por Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Región del Caribe/epidemiología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Equipos y Suministros de Radiación/provisión & distribución
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...