The effects of heated and room-temperature abdominal lavage solutions on core body temperature in dogs undergoing celiotomy.

To document the magnitude of temperature elevation obtained with heated lavage solutions during abdominal lavage, 18 dogs were lavaged with sterile isotonic saline intraoperatively (i.e., during a celiotomy). In nine dogs, room-temperature saline was used. In the remaining nine dogs, saline heated to 43+/-2 degrees C (110+/-4 degrees F) was used. Esophageal, rectal, and tympanic temperatures were recorded every 60 seconds for 15 minutes after initiation of the lavage. Temperature levels decreased in dogs lavaged with room-temperature saline. Temperature levels increased significantly in dogs lavaged with heated saline after 2 to 6 minutes of lavage, and temperatures continued to increase throughout the 15-minute lavage period.

Effects of a selective and a nonselective muscarinic cholinergic antagonist on heart rate and intestinal motility in dogs.

The effects of methoctramine, a cardioselective muscarinic cholinergic antagonist, on heart rate and small intestinal motor activity were compared to those of the nonselective competitive muscarinic antagonist, atropine. Methoctramine or atropine, 6, 10, 30, 60 micrograms/kg, or sterile isotonic saline, was administered intravenously to six conscious dogs in cross-over studies. Methoctramine administration caused dose-dependent tachycardia without affecting intestinal motility, while atropine administration caused dose-dependent tachycardia accompanied by significant reductions in small intestinal motility. Additionally, methoctramine did not inhibit intestinal smooth muscle contractile activity initiated by the muscarinic agonist bethanechol, while atropine inhibited bethanechol-induced contractile activity in a dose-dependent manner. Calculated, dosages of methoctramine and atropine required to produce a 50% increase in heart rate over baseline were 35.1 +/- 5.3 and 39.5 +/- 6.2 micrograms/kg, respectively. This dosage of atropine caused a 93 +/- 13.9% reduction in intestinal motility. These findings suggest that selective muscarinic antagonists may be useful drugs for those veterinary patients in which nonselective muscarinic antagonists have the potential to produce untoward effects on intestinal motility.

Epidural administration of bupivacaine, morphine, or their combination for postoperative analgesia in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic effects of epidural administration of morphine (MOR), bupivacaine hydrochloride (BUP), their combination (COM), and 0.9% sterile NaCl solution (SAL) in dogs undergoing hind limb orthopedic surgeries. DESIGN: Blinded, randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: 41 healthy dogs admitted for elective orthopedic surgeries involving the pelvis or hind limbs. PROCEDURE: Analgesic and control agents were administered postoperatively prior to recovery from isoflurane anesthesia. Ten dogs received MOR, 0.1 mg/kg of body weight; 10 received BUP, 0.5%, 1 ml/10-cm distance from the occipital protuberance to the lumbosacral space; 11 received COM; and 10 received SAL epidurally. Dogs were monitored for 24 hours after epidural injection for pain score, heart and respiratory rates, blood pressure, time to required administration of supplemental analgesic agent, total number of supplemental doses of analgesic agent required, and plasma concentrations of cortisol, MOR, and BUP. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in dogs in the COM and BUP groups than in dogs in the SAL group. Pain scores also were significantly lower in dogs in the COM group than in dogs in the MOR group. Time to required administration of supplemental analgesic agent was longer for dogs in the COM group than for dogs in the MOR and SAL groups. Total number of supplemental doses of analgesic agent required was lower for dogs in the BUP and COM groups than for dogs in the SAL group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Postoperative epidural administration of COM or BUP alone provides longer-lasting analgesia, compared with MOR or SAL.

Methoctramine, a cardioselective muscarinic cholinergic antagonist, prevents fentanyl-induced bradycardia in the dog.

A controlled study examining the effects of the cardioselective muscarinic cholinergic antagonist methoctramine on fentanyl-induced bradycardia was performed in six dogs. Five doses of methoctramine (6, 10, 20, 30 and 60 micrograms/kg) followed by fentanyl (20 micrograms/kg) were administered randomly on separate days. Fentanyl caused a significant reduction in heart rate from baseline values. Moreover, fentanyl produced a variety of arrhythmogenic actions indicative of vagal hyperactivity, including sinus bradycardia, second-degree atrioventricular block and ventricular and supraventricular escape beats. Administration of methoctramine 5 min before fentanyl injection prevented the bradycardic effects of fentanyl in a dose-dependent manner, with high doses of methoctramine causing sinus tachycardia. Using regression analysis, the dose of methoctramine necessary to prevent fentanyl-induced bradyarrhythmias without causing tachycardia was calculated as 14.4 micrograms/kg. The study confirmed that fentanyl administration in the conscious dog causes profound bradycardia with bradyarrhythmias. The cardioselective muscarinic antagonist agent methoctramine prevented the bradycardic effects of fentanyl.