RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: At least partially technically related, a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis has a 12% to 14% leak rate, which is theoretically reducible with simulator practice. Preliminary development and testing of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator are described. METHODS: A portable, low-cost, scale reproduction of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis operative site was engineered around a 19 × 11 × 6-cm plastic box. Silicone "esophageal" and "gastric tip" castings permitted construction of a stapled side-to-side cervical esophagogastric anastomosis guided by an illustrated curriculum. In a 2-phase pilot study, the simulator and curriculum were evaluated. Phase 1: Seven faculty evaluated fidelity using a 5-point, 24-item survey of (1) physical attributes, (2) realism of materials, (3) realism of experience, (4) value, and (5) relevance, and (6) ability to perform tasks. Overall impression of the simulator was also measured. Phase 2: Eight thoracic surgical trainees similarly evaluated the simulator and the quality of the curriculum. Faculty and trainee ratings were compared using a Rasch model, and inter-rater agreement was estimated. RESULTS: There were no overall fidelity differences across faculty and resident ratings. Combined observed averages ranged from 4.52 (Realism of Materials) to 5.00 (Relevance). Lifelike feel of esophagus had the lowest ratings (observed average = 4.40). Residents rated interrupted outer layer of anterior closure to be more difficult (observed average = 4.13) than faculty (observed average = 4.86; P = .016, d = 1.99). Global ratings (observed average = 3.33/4.00) indicated participants believed the simulator could be used for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis training now, but could be improved slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests the novel cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator is valuable as a surgical training tool.
