Radiology Reports Do Not Accurately Portray the Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiology reports to a validated grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis (FS) and (2) to evaluate whether the severity of cervical neural FS on MRI correlates to motor weakness or patient-reported outcomes. BACKGROUND: Radiology reports of cervical spine MRI are often reviewed to assess the degree of neural FS. However, research looking at the association between these reports and objective MRI findings, as well as clinical symptoms, is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all adult patients undergoing primary 1 or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at a single academic center for an indication of cervical radiculopathy. Preoperative MRI was assessed for neural FS severity using the grading system described by Kim and colleagues for each level of fusion, as well as adjacent levels. Neural FS severity was recorded from diagnostic radiologist MRI reports. Motor weakness was defined as an examination grade <4/5 on the final preoperative encounter. Regression analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the degree of FS by either classification was related to patient-reported outcome measure severity. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were included in the study, and 998 total levels were assessed. There were significant differences between the MRI grading system and the assessment by radio-logists (P< 0.001). In levels with moderate stenosis, 28.9% were classified as having no stenosis by radiology. In levels with severe stenosis, 29.7% were classified as having mild-moderate stenosis or less. Motor weakness was found similarly often in levels of moderate or severe stenosis (6.9% and 9.2%, respectively). On regression analysis, no associations were found between baseline patient-reported outcome measures and stenosis severity assessed by radiologists or MRI grading systems. CONCLUSION: Radiology reports on the severity of cervical neural FS are not consistent with a validated MRI grading system. These radiology reports underestimated the severity of neural foraminal compression and may be inappropriate when used for clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Does operative level impact dysphagia severity following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? a multicenter prospective analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multi-center cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between operative level and postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dysphagia is common following ACDF and has several risk factors including soft tissue edema. The degree of prevertebral soft tissue edema varies based upon the operative cervical level. However, the operative level has not been evaluated as a source of postoperative dysphagia. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective ACDF were prospectively enrolled at three academic centers. Dysphagia was assessed using the Bazaz questionnaire, Dysphagia Short Questionnaire (DSQ), and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) preoperatively and at 2, 6, 12, and 24-weeks postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on inclusion of specific surgical levels in the fusion construct. Multivariable regression analyses were performed evaluating the independent effects of number of surgical levels and inclusion of each particular level on dysphagia symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were included. Overall, 24 (18.5%) patients had persistent postoperative dysphagia at 24 weeks and were older, female, and less likely to be drink alcohol. There was no difference in operative duration or dexamethasone administration. Patients with persistent dysphagia were significantly more likely to have C4-C5 included in the fusion construct (62.5% vs. 34.9%, P=0.024) but there were no differences based on inclusion of other levels. On multivariable regression, inclusion of C3-C4 or C6-C7 were associated with more severe EAT-10 (ß:9.56, P=0.016 and ß:8.15, P=0.040) and DSQ (ß:4.44, P=0.023 and (ß:4.27, P=0.030) at 6 weeks. At 12-weeks, C3-C4 fusion was also independently associated with more severe dysphagia (EAT-10 ß:4.74, P=0.024). CONCLUSION: The location of prevertebral soft tissue swelling may impact the duration and severity of patient-reported dysphagia outcomes at up to 24 weeks postoperatively. In particular, inclusion of C3-C4 and C4-C5 into the fusion may be associated with dysphagia severity.

Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state.

PURPOSE: While patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) define value in spine surgery, several values such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) help guide the interpretation of PROMs and identify thresholds of clinical significance. Significant variation exists in reported values and their calculation, so the primary objective of this study was to systematically review the spine surgery literature for metrics of clinical significance derived from PROMs. METHODS: We conducted a query of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases from inception to January 1, 2023, for studies that derived quantitative metrics (e.g., SCB, MCID, PASS) from PROMs in the setting of spine surgery with minimum 1-year follow-up. Details regarding the specific PROMs were collected including which PROM was measured, whether anchor- or distribution-based methods were utilized, the specific calculations, and the recommended value for a given PROM based on all evaluated calculations. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies of 21,780 patients were included. The most commonly evaluated PROM-derived value was the MCID (n = 28), followed by PASS (n = 6) and SCB (n = 4). Twenty-one studies only utilized anchor-based calculations, 15 utilized both anchor-based and distribution-based methods, and one only utilized distribution-based calculations. The most commonly evaluated legacy PROMs were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (N = 11, MCID range 4-20) and visual analog scale back pain (N = 5, MCID range 0.5-4.6). All 10 studies that derived SCB or PASS utilized the receiver operating characteristic methods. Among the six studies deriving a PASS value, four only evaluated ODI, identifying PASS ranging from 5 to 22. CONCLUSION: While calculated measures of clinical significance such as MCID, PASS, and SCB exist, significant heterogeneity exists in the current literature. Current shortcomings include a wide variability of reported value thresholds across the literature, and limited applicability to more heterogenous patient populations than the targeted cohorts included in published investigations. Continued investigations that apply these methods to heterogenous, large-scale populations can help increase generalizability and validity of these measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Infection Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

Background: Deep infection after rotator cuff repair (RCR) can cause significant morbidity and healthcare burden. Outcomes of surgical treatment of infection following RCR are limited. This study aimed to assess the clinical course and outcomes related to surgical management of deep infection following RCR. Methods: Patients treated with debridement for infection after RCR at a single institution were included. Postoperative deep infection included the following criteria: persistent drainage more than five days from index surgery, development of a sinus tract to the joint, ≥ 2 positive cultures at the time of revision surgery with the same bacteria, or presence of purulence. Functional outcomes (ASES, SANE, SF-12) were assessed at a minimum of 1-year post-debridement. Results: Twenty-three patients were included and analyzed at mean six years post-debridement. All were free of infection at the final follow-up. The average age was 55 years; fifteen (65.2%) had infection after primary RCR and eight (34.8%) after revision RCR. Twelve (52.2%) patients required a repeat debridement prior to eradicating infection for an average of 1.9 surgeries before clearance of infection. Statistically significant predictors of need for a repeat debridement included initial open RCR (P = .02), open debridement (P = .002) and infection requiring IV antibiotics (P = .014). Postoperative ASES, SANE, SF-12M, SF-12P, and satisfaction scores were 71.7±25.7, 67.0±28.1, 55.5±6.5, 38.4±14.3 and 3.7±1.3, respectively. Conclusion: Deep infection after RCR can be treated with open or arthroscopic debridement. However, more than 50% of patients may require multiple debridements. Final functional results after infection control following RCR are satisfactory. However, chronic infection predicts worse functional outcomes.

The severity of preoperative anemia escalates risk of poor short-term outcomes after lumbar spine fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how preoperative anemia severity affects 90-day outcomes of spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult lumbar fusion patients at a tertiary medical center. Patients were classified by World Health Organization anemia severity definitions for comparisons. Multivariate regression models were created to control for confounding variables, for all primary outcomes of transfusion requirements, non-home discharge, readmissions, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 2582 patients were included: 2.7% with moderate-severe anemia, 11.0% with mild anemia, and 86.3% without anemia. Moderate-severe patients had the longest hospital stay (5.03 days vs 4.14 and 3.59 days, p < 0.001) and highest risk of transfusion (52.2% vs 13.0% vs 2.69%, p < 0.001), non-home discharge (39.1% vs 27.8% vs 15.4%, p < 0.001), readmission (7.25% vs 5.99% vs 3.36%, p = 0.023), and complications (13.0% vs 9.51% vs 6.20%, p = 0.012). On multivariable logistic regression, both patients with mild and moderate-severe anemia had an increased risk of transfusion (OR: 37.3, p < 0.001; OR: 5.25, p < 0.001, respectively) and non-home discharge (OR: 2.00, p = 0.021; OR: 1.71, p = 0.001, respectively) compared to patients without anemia. Anemia severity was not independently associated with complications or 90-day readmission. On multivariable linear regression, mild anemia (ß: 0.37, p = 0.001) and moderate-severe anemia (ß: 1.07, p < 0.001) were independently associated with length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-severe preoperative anemia are at increased risk for longer length of stay, transfusions, and non-home discharge. Improved optimization of preoperative anemia may significantly reduce healthcare utilization, and surgeons should consider these risks in preoperative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does decompression adjacent to arthrodesis in the lumbar spine predispose patients to adjacent segment degeneration and disease: A retrospective analysis.

Background: The treatment for multi-level spinal stenosis in the setting of single-level instability is a common operative scenario for surgeons who treat degenerative lumbar spine pathology. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the inclusion of adjacent "stable" levels in the arthrodesis construct because of the potential for iatrogenic instability placed on those segments with decompressive laminectomy alone. This study aims to determine whether decompression adjacent to arthrodesis in the lumbar spine is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease (AS Disease). Methods: A retrospective analysis identified consecutive patients over a three-year period who underwent single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) in the setting of single or multi-level spinal stenosis. Patients were required to have a minimum of two-year follow-up. AS Disease was defined as the development of new radicular symptoms referable to a motion segment adjacent to the lumbar arthrodesis construct. The incidence of AS Disease and reoperation rates were compared between cohorts. Results: 133 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 54 months. Fifty-four patients had a PLF with adjacent segment decompression, and 79 underwent a single-segment decompression and PLF. 24.1% (13/54) of patients who had a PLF with adjacent level decompression developed AS Disease resulting in a 5.5% (3/54) reoperation rate. 15.2% (12/79) of patients who did not receive an adjacent level decompression developed AS Disease resulting in a reoperation rate of 7.5% (6/79). There was neither a significantly higher rate of AS Disease (p = 0.26) nor reoperation (p = 0.74) between the cohorts. Conclusions: Decompression adjacent to single-level PLF was not associated with an increased rate of AS Disease relative to single-level decompression and PLF.

Functional Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Repair in the Fingers: A Comparison of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Versus Traditional Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon lacerations in the fingers are challenging injuries that can be repaired using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique or under traditional anesthesia (TA). The purpose of our study was to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair under WALANT versus TA. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary flexor tendon repair in zone I and II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record and compare patient demographics, range of motion, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: Sixty-five zone I (N = 21) or II (N = 44) flexor tendon repairs were included in the final analysis: 23 WALANT and 42 TA. There were no statistical differences in mean age, length of follow-up, proportion of injured digits, or zone of injury between the groups. The final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the WALANT group was 17.2 (SD: 14.4) versus 23.3 (SD: 18.5) in the TA group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with any final range of motion (ROM) parameters, grip strength, or Visual Analog Scale pain scores at the final follow-up. The WALANT group was found to have a slightly higher reoperation rate (26.1% vs 7.1%; P = .034) than the TA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first clinical studies reporting outcomes of flexor tendon repairs performed under WALANT. Overall, we found no difference in rupture rates, ROM, and functional outcomes following zone I and II flexor tendon repairs when performed under WALANT versus TA.

Outcomes After Surgically Managed Oblique Extra-Articular Proximal Phalanx Fractures: A Comparison of Closed-Reduction Percutaneous Pinning and Open-Reduction Internal Fixation With Lag Screws.

BACKGROUND: Long oblique extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures are common orthopedic injuries. When unstable and without substantial comminution, treatment options include closed-reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and open-reduction internal fixation using lag screws (ORIF-screws). The aims of this study are primarily to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates between these techniques and secondarily to assess potential factors affecting outcomes after surgery. METHODS: All patients with long oblique extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures treated surgically within a single orthopedic institution from 2010 to 2017 were identified. Outcome measures and complications were assessed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study with a mean time to the final follow-up of 41 weeks (range: 12-164 weeks). Thirty-four patients (57%) were treated with CRPP and 26 patients (43%) with ORIF-screws. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score across both fixation types was 8 (range: 0-43) and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Mean proximal interphalangeal extension at the final follow-up was 9° short of full extension after CRPP and 13° short of full extension after ORIF-screws. The rates of flexion contracture and extensor lag were 15% and 41% in the CRPP group compared with 12% and 68% in the ORIF-screws group. Reoperation rates and complication rates did not differ significantly between fixation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable outcomes can be achieved after surgical fixation of long oblique extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures using both CRPP and ORIF-screws. Extensor lag may be more common after ORIF-screws.

Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described. METHODS: Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence. RESULTS: The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Does Surgery Improve Healing After Isolated Diaphyseal Ulna Fractures?

PURPOSE: Isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures can be treated nonsurgically or with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). It is unclear whether ORIF provides quicker and/or more predictable healing. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing characteristics of isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures after surgical and nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: All patients treated for an isolated diaphyseal (distal- or middle-third) ulna fracture between 2010 and 2018, with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up, were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record patient demographics, assess the treatments used, and compare outcomes. We determined healing and nonunion rates, complications, reoperations, and final radiographic fracture alignment. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included with a median follow-up of 20 weeks. Of these, 56 patients were treated nonsurgically and 39 patients were treated with ORIF. At the time of the final follow-up, 51 of the 56 (91.1%) nonsurgically treated fractures had healed and 38 of the 39 (97.4%) surgically managed fractures had healed. There were 5 nonunions after nonsurgical treatment (8.9%) and 1 nonunion after ORIF (2.6%). Eleven patients (19.6%) treated nonsurgically required conversion to ORIF, whereas 4 patients (10.3%) treated with ORIF required reoperation. Middle-third fractures treated nonsurgically had a higher rate of nonunion (30.8%) compared with distal-third fractures treated nonsurgically (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The healing characteristics of isolated ulnar shaft fractures do not appear to differ substantially between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. However, nearly 20% of the patients treated nonsurgically may require eventual ORIF. Distal-third fractures may be at a higher risk of conversion to ORIF, and middle-third fractures may be at a higher risk of nonunion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Radiographic Outcomes of Casting Versus Splinting for Conservatively Treated Metacarpal Fractures.

Introduction While many have studied alternate forms of casting for conservative treatment of metacarpal fracture, few have compared casting and splinting. This study aims to compare radiographic alignment in metacarpal shaft and neck fractures immobilized with splints to those treated with casts. Methods A retrospective review was conducted to identify all metacarpal fractures treated by a single orthopedic hand surgeon from 2016-2020. Patients with metacarpal shaft or neck fractures treated nonoperatively, immobilized with either a cast or a splint, and with a minimum of one follow-up visit were included. Degrees of radial/ulnar angulation, dorsal/volar angulation, and changes in angulation were measured. Mean angulation measurements and changes in angulation were compared across groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results A total of 61 patients, 45 treated with casts and 16 with splints, met our inclusion criteria. The average immobilization time was 28 days for both groups (p=0.958). Change in radial/ulnar angulation was similar between the two groups (splint = -3°, cast = -3°, p=0.79). No significant differences were found when comparing changes in dorsal/volar angulation across groups (splint = -0.3°, cast = -0.1°, p=0.57). No complications were reported in either group. Conclusions Our results suggest that metacarpal shaft and neck fractures treated with splints can maintain fracture reduction and angulation comparable to casting. Splints offer additional benefits of reduced costs with improved patient hygiene and satisfaction. Further studies on the utility and cost-effectiveness of splints for treating metacarpal fractures are warranted.

Do Postoperative Telehealth Visits Require a High Rate of Redundant In-Person Evaluation After Upper Extremity Surgery?

Background Telehealth platforms may save resources for patients and providers, but the precise impact of their incorporation during the postoperative period is not well understood. The goal of this study is to determine whether telehealth incorporation in the postoperative period leads to an overall increase in healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Methodology Patients seen for a postoperative telehealth visit after upper extremity surgery were randomly selected and retrospectively enrolled. Complications and the total number of postoperative visits before clinical discharge were recorded and compared to controls matched by surgery type and surgeon. Results A total of 56 patients were seen for 60 telehealth visits. The most common surgical procedures were distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (n = 8), open carpal tunnel release (n = 8), and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (n = 6). One telehealth visit (1.7%) required conversion to in-person evaluation due to suspected superficial infection necessitating in-person physical examination. The average number of postoperative visits prior to clinical discharge was 2.6 in the telehealth group compared to 2.7 in matched controls (p = 0.886). Complication rates were similar between groups. Conclusions The rate of necessary in-person evaluation after postoperative telehealth visits was less than 2%. The incorporation of telehealth visits did not appear to increase healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Accordingly, the postoperative period is likely an ideal application for safe and effective telehealth implementation.

A Rare Presentation of Extensor Pollicis Longus Tendon Rupture After Nondisplaced Scaphoid Fracture.

Extensor pollicis longus tendon rupture is a reported complication after nondisplaced distal radius fractures. These are thought to occur secondary to mechanical irritation or compromised blood supply. We present a case of extensor pollicis longus rupture after a healed nondisplaced scaphoid fracture, which may have involved a similar attritional process. We are unaware of any prior reports of extensor pollicis longus rupture after this type of injury.

Outcomes of Type I Open Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of Delayed and Urgent Open Reduction Internal Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Type I open distal radius fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) have demonstrated minimal risk of infection. For this reason, they may not require urgent surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with type I open distal radius fractures treated with delayed ORIF compared with urgent ORIF. METHODS: We identified all Gustilo-Anderson type I open distal radius fractures that had undergone ORIF using volar plating over a 5-year period. Patients were stratified into those treated urgently within 24 hours and those scheduled for delayed surgery. Outcomes including functional scores, complications, reoperations, and radiographic measures were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (17 treated urgently and 7 treated delayed) had open type I distal radius fractures. All patients were started on empiric antibiotics at initial presentation-patients in the delayed treatment group were prescribed oral antibiotics, whereas those admitted for urgent treatment received intravenous antibiotics. There were no infections in either group and a single reoperation in each group. The mean postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 29 (range = 0-77) and did not differ significantly between delayed (mean = 19) and urgent (mean = 38) treatment. Rate of complications and radiographic measures did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Type I open distal radius fractures appear amenable to delayed outpatient ORIF provided that the wound is clean at the time of initial presentation and that antibiotics are initiated appropriately. Further prospective studies comparing delayed and urgent treatment strategies are warranted.

Unplanned Office Visits Following Outpatient Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Returning to the office for an unplanned visit postoperatively can be burdensome to both the patient and provider. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of unplanned office visits after common soft tissue hand surgeries and assess the reasons for these unplanned visits. METHODS: Patients who underwent common soft tissue hand surgeries over a 6-month time period were queried from an electronic medical record database. Manual chart review was performed to record patient demographics, unplanned visits within 3 months postoperatively, and specific reasons for unplanned visits. A total of 1648 postoperative follow-up visits in 1224 patients were included in analysis. RESULTS: Within 3 months of surgery, 6.3% (103/1648) of postoperative visits were found to be unplanned. There was no difference in the rate of unplanned visits among the included surgeries (P = .46). The most common reasons for an unplanned office visit overall were wound problems (34%), pain (23.3%), and stiffness (17.5%). The trigger finger release group had significantly more patients return to the office for stiffness (P = .01), the De Quervain release group had significantly more patients return for pain (P = .02), and the carpal tunnel release group had significantly more patients return for persistent symptoms (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned office visits represented about 1 of 16 postoperative visits. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the most common reasons for these visits and be prepared to address these problems promptly. Preoperative patient education on these potential problems may help decrease the frequency of unplanned follow-up visits.

Reliability of Routine Radiographs for Conservatively Treated Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures.

Background: To investigate the reliability of orthopedic hand surgeons to evaluate radiographic healing in initial and follow-up radiographs of the conservatively treated metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. The rationale for this study was to reduce the rate of unnecessary, routine radiographs when treating metacarpal fractures. Methods: Forty sets of digital x-rays, twenty at the initial visit and twenty at the 4-week follow-up, were randomly selected and reviewed. Three hand surgeons evaluated the x-rays for (1) fracture location, (2) radiograph timing, (3) healing status, (4) percentage healed, (5) angulation, and (6) confidence in healing status. Observers reviewed studies in random order and evaluated the same set of radiographs one month after the initial review. Intra- and interobserver agreements were analyzed using Fleiss' kappa (κ) for all parameters and all possible observer pairings. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was highest when evaluating fracture location and lowest when assessing the percentage healed. The interobserver reliability was fair for radiograph timing and healing status and fair-to-moderate for angulation. The intraobserver reliability was moderate for radiograph timing and healing status and moderate-to-substantial for angulation. Observers correctly differentiated initial vs. follow-up images 62% of the time and reported to feel somewhat certain in their evaluation of healing status. Conclusion: When evaluating initial and 4-week follow-up radiographs, hand surgeons were somewhat confident in their assessment of healing but had less than substantial intra- and interobserver reliability following radiographic evaluation. Due to their poor reproducibility, routine radiographs may be unnecessary when evaluating conservatively treated metacarpal fractures. Further studies and guidelines that identify clear indications for the use of routine imaging in metacarpal fracture care are warranted.

The Five-Year Growth of an Orthopedic Urgent Care Center: Identifying Patient and Center Trends.

INTRODUCTION: With emergency department utilization rising at a dramatic rate, orthopedic urgent care centers (oUCCs) have become increasingly popular. The financial viability and basic advantages of oUCCs have been described in the literature, but little is known about the characteristics of patients treated and the diagnoses encountered. The purpose of this study is to report and evaluate the patients and diagnoses that are most commonly seen in an oUCC so that future care may be better tailored to the needs of the patients seeking these services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients seen at a single suburban oUCC in its first and fifth years of operation (2014 and 2019) were identified. The medical records were reviewed to assess patient demographics, diagnoses encountered, and services rendered. The clinical courses of patients treated were also reviewed to identify those who underwent eventual surgery for their presenting complaint. RESULTS: A total of 24,756 patient visits occurred during the study period, and the number of visits nearly doubled between the first and fifth years (8,301 in 2014 and 16,455 in 2019). The most common diagnoses encountered were lower leg pain, back pain, and foot/ankle pain. Radiographs were obtained in 17,236 visits (70%), most commonly of the knee, elbow, foot, or ankle. A total of 1,334 patients (5.4%) underwent eventual surgery for their presenting complaint - defined as a surgical conversion. Of all the orthopedic subspecialties, sports medicine had the highest rate of surgical conversion (29% of all conversions). The surgical conversion rate increased slightly from year one (4.7%) to year five (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: OUCCs are an effective means of expanding access to care for patients and increasing the volume of an orthopedic practice. Continued monitoring of the types of patients seen within oUCCs will further optimize care delivery.

Evaluating Patient Interest in Orthopedic Telehealth Services Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background Patient interest and demand may have an impact on dictating the scope of orthopedic telehealth utilization beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess whether current interest in orthopedic telehealth services is higher than pre-pandemic levels. Specific trends in interest, subspecialty differences, and regional differences were secondarily assessed. Methodology A Google Trends search was performed to assess orthopedic telehealth search interest over the last five years using the terms "Orthopedic surgeon/doctor/injury/pain + Telehealth" as well as subspecialty-specific terms. The results were formulated into combined search interest values (CSIVs), with a maximum possible value of 400, and compared between the pre-pandemic period, pre-vaccine period during the pandemic, and post-vaccine period. Results The pre-pandemic period mean CSIV was 40.3 (SD = 6.3), compared to 134.7 (SD = 72.1) during the pre-vaccine period, and 96.3 (SD = 4.4) during the post-vaccine period (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between CSIV and time (increasing weeks) during the pre-pandemic period (rs = .77, p < 0.001) and no significant correlation between CSIV and time during the post-vaccine period (rs = -.12, p = 0.610). Using the slope of the interest line during the post-vaccine period (y = 97.06 - 0.08x) it would take an additional 13.3 years beyond the study period to reach the mean pre-pandemic CSIV level of 40.3. Hand surgery was the subspecialty with the highest mean CSIV over the study period and general search interest was highest in Northeastern and Southeastern states during the post-vaccine period. Conclusions Orthopedic telehealth interest was growing before the COVID-19 pandemic and remains significantly elevated beyond pre-pandemic levels despite the reopening of clinical offices and vaccine availability across the country. It appears that a subset of patients will continue to seek telehealth services beyond the pandemic.

The Surgical Treatment of Deep Infection in the Native Shoulder Joint.

BACKGROUND: The overall clinical picture surrounding native shoulder infections, and, in particular, the associated long-term functional outcomes of treatment are presently underreported. The purpose of this study is to examine the demographics, diagnostic and treatment strategies, and functional outcomes of isolated shoulder joint sepsis treated with surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D). METHODS: All patients treated with I&D for native shoulder sepsis between 2007 - 2017 were identified. Those without a minimum of one-year follow-up were excluded. Functional outcomes scores, reoperations, and predictors of poor outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in the final study population. Mean age-adjusted CCI score was 4.1 (SD = 3.4, Range = 0 - 10). Twelve patients (52.2%) were treated with open I&D, while 11 patients (47.8%) were treated arthroscopically. Nine patients (39.1%) required multiple I&Ds (mean total number of I&Ds = 1.7, SD = 1.0, Range: 1 - 4). Five patients (21.7%) had at least one documented reinfection after their initial hospitalization, with the initial recurrence of infection occurring 2 - 15 months after the index procedure. Mean ASES score at final follow-up was 55.3 (SD = 26.7, Range: 5.8 - 98.3) and mean SANE score was 53.3 (SD = 30.6, Range: 0 - 100). Stepwise multiple linear regression modeling identified intravenous drug abuse as the most significant predictor for final ASES score [F(1,18) = 6.12, p = .024, adjusted R2 = .254]. CONCLUSION: Following isolated shoulder joint sepsis, infection clearance and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved using surgical I&D followed by a course of antibiotics, but outcomes are variable.

Deep Infection after Distal Radius Open-reduction Internal Fixation: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Given its low incidence, the management of deep infection following distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (ORIF) has not been well reported. In an effort to expand our current understanding, the purpose of this case series is to present the treatment strategies and functional outcomes associated with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. METHODS: All patients with deep infections after distal radius ORIF over a ten-year period were identified and their treatment courses asessed. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of three women and one man with an average age of 55.5 ± 17.6 years. Mean time from infection presentation to irrigation and debridement (I&D) with removal of hardware (ROH) was 16 days (Range: 3 - 44 days). The identified bacterial species in all cases was Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA = 2, MSSA = 2). Three patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics, while one patient was treated with oral antibiotics. Mean time from infection presentation to final clinical follow-up was 11 months (Range: 3 - 20 months). Two patients required repeat I&D. A clinical determination of successful infection eradication was made in all cases. CONCLUSION: The reported rate of deep infection after distal radius ORIF is less than 1%. There is no well-defined treatment algorithm for patients with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. However, removal of hardware and post-operative oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy appears effective, and is consistent with the standard practices of treating infection after other orthopaedic surgeries.