Prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference during the first 24 hours of septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (cv-art CO 2 gap) during septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 10 French intensive care units. Patients suffering from septic shock were assigned to the impaired cardiac function group ('cardiac group', n =123) if they had atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% at study entry and to the non-cardiac group ( n =240) otherwise. RESULTS: Central venous and arterial blood gases were sampled every 6 h during the first 24 h to calculate cv-art CO 2 gap. Patients in the cardiac group had a higher cv-art CO 2 gap [at study entry and 6 and 12 h (all P <0.02)] than the non-cardiac group. Patients in the cardiac group with a cv-art CO 2 gap >0.9 kPa at 12 h had a higher risk of day 28 mortality (hazard ratio=3.18; P =0.0049). Among the 59 patients in the cardiac group with mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm Hg, central venous pressure (CVP) ≥8 mm Hg and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) ≥70% at 12 h, those with a high cv-art CO 2 gap (>0.9 kPa; n =19) had a higher day 28 mortality (37% vs. 13%; P =0.042). In the non-cardiac group, a high cv-art CO 2 gap was not linked to a higher risk of day 28 death, whatever the threshold value of the cv-art CO 2 gap. CONCLUSION: Patients with septic shock and with AF and/or low LVEF were more prone to a persistent high cv-art CO 2 gap, even when initial resuscitation succeeded in normalizing MAP, CVP, and ScvO 2 . In these patients, a persistent high cv-art CO 2 gap at 12 h was significantly associated with higher day 28 mortality.

Diagnostic accuracy of urinary dipstick to exclude catheter-associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients: a reappraisal.

OBJECTIVES: We wanted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of urinary dipstick testing in excluding catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with fever or hypothermia. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study in a medical-surgical ICU. Patients with new-onset fever >38.3 °C or hypothermia <36 °C at least 48 h after urinary catheter insertion were included over a 2-year period. At each episode, a urinary dipstick test and a urine culture were performed as the criterion standard. Extensive microbiological investigations for extra-urinary infections were performed also. The performances of various urinary dipstick result combinations in ruling out CAUTI were compared based on the likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-). RESULTS: Symptomatic CAUTI was diagnosed in 31 (24.4 %) of the 127 included patients (195 episodes of fever or hypothermia). LR+ was best for combined leukocyte esterase-positive and nitrite-positive dipstick results (overall population: 14.91; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI], 5.53-40.19; patients without urinary symptoms: 15.63; 95 % CI, 5.76-42.39). LR- was best for either leukocyte esterase-positive or nitrite-positive dipstick results (overall population: 0.41; 95 % CI, 0.57-0.65; patients without urinary symptoms, 0.36; 95 % CI, 0.21-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary dipstick testing at the bedside does not help to rule out symptomatic CAUTI in medical or surgical ICU patients with fever or hypothermia.