KRAS-Mutant non-small cell lung cancer: From biology to therapy.

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most frequent oncogene driver mutation in Western countries is Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and KRAS-mutant NSCLC is associated with smoking. There are various sources of biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, including different genotypes that may be associated with specific clinical outcomes, the presence of other co-mutations that exhibit different biological features and drug sensitivity patterns, and mutant allelic content. The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC is generally poor and numerous novel therapeutic strategies have been developed. These approaches include targeting KRAS membrane associations, targeting downstream signalling pathways, the use of KRAS synthetic lethality, direct targeting of KRAS, and immunotherapy. Of these, immunotherapy may be one of the most promising treatment approaches for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Recent data also suggest the potential for distinct efficacy of immunotherapy according to the presence of other co-mutations. In view of the biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, treatment will likely need to be individualised and, in future, may require the use of rational combinations of treatment, many of which are currently under investigation.

Clinical development of galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate), a small molecule inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) signaling regulates a wide range of biological processes. TGF-ß plays an important role in tumorigenesis and contributes to the hallmarks of cancer, including tumor proliferation, invasion and metastasis, inflammation, angiogenesis, and escape of immune surveillance. There are several pharmacological approaches to block TGF-ß signaling, such as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, antisense oligonucleotides, and small molecule inhibitors. Galunisertib (LY2157299 monohydrate) is an oral small molecule inhibitor of the TGF-ß receptor I kinase that specifically downregulates the phosphorylation of SMAD2, abrogating activation of the canonical pathway. Furthermore, galunisertib has antitumor activity in tumor-bearing animal models such as breast, colon, lung cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Continuous long-term exposure to galunisertib caused cardiac toxicities in animals requiring adoption of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based dosing strategy to allow further development. The use of such a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model defined a therapeutic window with an appropriate safety profile that enabled the clinical investigation of galunisertib. These efforts resulted in an intermittent dosing regimen (14 days on/14 days off, on a 28-day cycle) of galunisertib for all ongoing trials. Galunisertib is being investigated either as monotherapy or in combination with standard antitumor regimens (including nivolumab) in patients with cancer with high unmet medical needs such as glioblastoma, pancreatic cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The present review summarizes the past and current experiences with different pharmacological treatments that enabled galunisertib to be investigated in patients.

Pharmacologic inhibition of mTOR antagonizes the cytotoxic activity of pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed, an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase (TS) and additional folate-dependent enzymes, is clinically active in patients suffering from "non-squamous" non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). High expression of TS has been implied as biomarker predictive of resistance to pemetrexed. Against this background, we studied whether inhibition of mTOR could lower expression of TS and thus sensitize NSCLC cells to pemetrexed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma NSCLC cell lines, we observed that constitutive TS expression levels failed to correlate with sensitivity to growth inhibition or apoptosis imposed by pemetrexed in vitro. Interestingly, pemetrexed strongly induced TS RNA and protein expression in all cell lines. The allosteric "rapalogue" mTOR inhibitor everolimus suppressed constitutive, but not pemetrexed-induced TS expression. Surprisingly, cotreatment with everolimus protected NSCLC cells against pemetrexed-induced apoptosis. This resulted in increased long-term clonogenic survival of NSCLC cells treated with pemetrexed plus everolimus as compared to pemetrexed alone. No such negative interaction was observed when everolimus was combined with recombinant TRAIL, a proliferation-independent proapoptotic agent. CONCLUSIONS: Rapalogues may suppress the antitumor activity of pemetrexed by slowing cell cycle progression. This should be considered when combining pemetrexed and mTOR inhibitors in NSCLC treatment.

The SRCR/SID region of DMBT1 defines a complex multi-allele system representing the major basis for its variability in cancer.

Deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 (DMBT1) at 10q25.3-q26.1 has been proposed as a candidate tumor-suppressor gene for brain and epithelial cancer. DMBT1 encodes a multifunctional mucin-like protein presumably involved in epithelial differentiation and protection. The gene consists of highly homologous and repeating exon and intron sequences. This specifically applies to the region coding for the repetitive scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) domains and SRCR-interspersed domains (SIDs) that constitutes the major part of the gene. This particular structure may previously have interfered with the delineation of DMBT1 alterations in cancer. Uncovering these, however, is of mechanistic importance. By a combined approach, we conducted a detailed mutational analysis, starting from a panel of 51 tumors, including 46 tumor cell lines and five primary tumors. Alterations in the repetitive region were present in 22/31 (71%) tumors that were investigated in detail. Six tumors showed presumably de novo mutations, among these three with point mutations in combination with a loss of heterozygosity. However, none of the alterations unambiguously would be predicted to lead to an inactivation of DMBT1. We define seven distinct DMBT1 alleles based on variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs). At least 11 tumors exclusively harbored these VNTRs. The data suggest that the SRCR/SID region defines a complex multi-allele system that has escaped previous analyses and that represents the major basis for the variability of DMBT1 in cancer. DMBT1 thus compares to mucins rather than to conventional tumor suppressors.

Sequential changes of the DMBT1 expression and location in normal lung tissue and lung carcinomas.

Deleted in Malignant Brain Tumors 1 (DMBT1) at chromosome region 10q25.3-q26.1 has been proposed as a candidate tumor-suppressor gene for brain, digestive tract, and lung cancer. Recent studies on its expression in lung cancer have led to divergent results and have raised a controversial discussion. Moreover, DMBT1 has been implicated with epithelial protection in the respiratory tract. We thus wondered how a loss of its expression could be related to carcinogenesis in the lung. To address these issues, we investigated the DMBT1 expression and location in the normal lung and lung cancer. By reverse-transcription PCR, a down-regulation of the DMBT1 expression in lung cancer cell lines is commonly detected. Immunohistochemical studies in situ demonstrate that there are also low steady-state levels of DMBT1 in the normal respiratory epithelium. However, an up-regulation takes place in the tumor-flanking epithelium and upon respiratory inflammation. Lung carcinomas show increased DMBT1 expression compared to that of undiseased lung tissue, but decreased DMBT1 levels compared to that of tumor-flanking and inflammatory tissue. A switch from a lumenal secretion to a secretion to the extracellular matrix takes place during lung carcinogenesis. Our data may resolve the controversial discussion on its expression in lung carcinomas. We hypothesize that the changes of the DMBT1 expression and location do reflect a time course that may point to possible mechanisms for its role in epithelial cancer.