Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e056476, 2022 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992122

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate compliance with the French National Authority for Health's (Haute Autorité de Santé, HAS) postbirth follow-up recommendations for newborns attending our paediatric emergency department (PED) and identify risk factors associated with non-compliance and unnecessary emergency department utilisation. DESIGN: Prospective, single centre. SETTING: Fourth biggest PED in France in terms of attendance (CHU-Lenval). PATIENTS: 280 patients of whom 249 were included in the statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the evaluation of compliance of the care pathway for newborns consulting at the PED with respect to the French postbirth follow-up recommendations. Secondary outcome was the assessment of whether the visit to the PED was justified by means of PED reception software and two postconsultation interviews RESULTS: 77.5% (193) of the newborns had non-compliant care pathways and 43% (107) of PED visits were unnecessary. Risk factors associated with a non-compliance regarding the HAS's postbirth follow-up recommendations were: unnecessary visit to the PED (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9), precariousness (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 6.2), birth in a public maternity hospital (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8) and no information about HAS's postbirth follow-up recommendations on discharge from maternity ward (OR 11.4, 95% CI 5.8 to 23.3). Risk factors for unnecessary PED visits were: non-compliant care pathway (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.9) and a first medical visit at a PED (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1). CONCLUSION: Postbirth follow-up may lead to decrease unnecessary emergency department visits unnecessary emergency department visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study bears the clinical trial number NCT02863627.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales Pediátricos , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Alta del Paciente , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
BMJ Open ; 11(9): e046324, 2021 09 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34531206

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections occur in around 1%-4% of boys and 3%-8% of girls under 2 years old. Diagnosis is difficult because of non-specific symptoms and the risk of urine analysis contamination depending on the sampling method used for precontinent infants. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommend transurethral catheterisation and suprapubic aspiration because of a low contamination rate but these techniques are invasive. On the other hand, while the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advocate clean catch urine for its minimal invasiveness and acceptable contamination rate, it is difficult to accomplish in precontinent infants. Two recent methods have been described: the Quick-Wee method by Kaufman et al (suprapubic stimulation with cold saline-soaked gauze); and bladder stimulation by Herreros et al then by Tran et al (pubic tapping alternating with lumbar massage). This study aims to compare the effectiveness in collecting midstream urine by bladder stimulation vs the Quick-Wee method in infants under 1 year, before walking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial of 230 infants under 1 year and before walking who need urine analysis, conducted in four paediatric emergency departments in France. Patients will be randomised into two groups: bladder stimulation and Quick-Wee method.The primary endpoint will be the success rate of voiding at least 2 mL of urine in less than 5 min.Secondary outcomes are the time to collect at least 2 mL of urine, comfort, quality of urine and the risk factors associated with failure of the two techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the French national ethic committee (consultative committee of the protection of persons). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials Registry - NCT04587999. DATE AND PROTOCOL VERSION IDENTIFIER: October 2020, V.1.


Asunto(s)
Vejiga Urinaria , Infecciones Urinarias , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Urinálisis , Micción , Toma de Muestras de Orina
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(5): 845-848, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418291

RESUMEN

After the deaths of 2 preterm neonates with Bacillus cereus systemic infection in the same intensive care unit, we investigated the pathogenic potential of this bacterium. Genetic and virulence analysis indicated the neonates were infected with 2 different strains with a virulence potential similar to environmental strains, indicating likely patient immune response failure.


Asunto(s)
Bacillus cereus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacillus cereus/genética , Bacillus cereus/patogenicidad , Infección Hospitalaria , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Virulencia/genética , Factores de Virulencia/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA