Sex Differences in Trends in Incidence of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Aortic Dissection: 2005-2015.

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine trends in the incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) repair and aortic dissection. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of patients from the period 2005-2015 with thoracic aortic disease. Unadjusted mortality was compared in women vs men. Rates of scheduled TAA repair, dissection events, acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair, and aorta-related mortality were obtained from our institution's clinical registry and administrative data sources and used to calculate the age-adjusted incidence for each sex, adjusted to the Canadian standard population. Weighted linear regression was performed to analyze trends over time. Results: A total of 382 scheduled TAA repair operations, 345 dissection events, 85 TAAD repairs, and 182 aorta-related mortalities were identified. Women accounted for 23% of TAA repairs, 39% of dissection events, 22% of TAAD repairs, and 45% of aorta-related mortalities. The incidence of TAA repair was 3.5 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-3.9), and increased in men (P = 0.02) but not women (P = 0.10) over time. The incidence of aortic dissection was 3.4 per 100,000 (95% CI: 3.1-3.8) and was stable over time (P = 0.43). The average annual age-adjusted incidence of TAAD repair was 0.8 per 100,000 (95% CI: 0.6-1.0) and increased over time (P = 0.001). The overall incidence of aorta-related mortality was 1.8 per 100,000 (95% CI: 1.5-2.0) and decreased over time (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The incidence of TAA repair is increasing in men but not women. Although aorta-related mortality is decreasing overall, disparities exist between the male and female population.

Introduction: L'objectif de cette étude était d'examiner les tendances relatives à l'incidence des réparations d'anévrisme de l'aorte thoracique (AAT) et de dissection aortique. Méthodes: Nous avons mené une étude rétrospective de patients atteints d'une maladie de l'aorte thoracique de la période 2005-2015. Nous avons comparé la mortalité non ajustée entre les femmes et les hommes. Nous avons obtenu les taux de réparations planifiées d'AAT, de dissections, de dissections aortiques de type A (DATA) à la phase aiguë et de mortalité d'origine aortique du registre clinique de notre établissement et des sources de données administratives, et les avons utilisés pour calculer l'incidence ajustée selon l'âge pour chacun des sexes, ajustée à la population canadienne type. Nous avons effectué une régression linéaire pondérée pour analyser les tendances temporelles. Résultats: Nous avons recensé un total de 382 réparations planifiées d'AAT, 345 dissections, 85 réparations de DATA et 182 cas de mortalité d'origine aortique. Les femmes représentaient 23 % des cas de réparation d'AAT, 39 % des cas de dissection, 22 % des cas de réparations de DATA et 45 % des cas de mortalité d'origine aortique. L'incidence des réparations d'AAT était de 3,5 par 100 000 années-personnes (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 3,2-3,9) et augmentait chez les hommes (P = 0,02), mais non chez les femmes (P = 0,10) avec le temps. L'incidence des dissections aortiques était de 3,4 par 100 000 (IC à 95 % : 3,1-3,8) et était stable au fil du temps (P = 0,43). L'incidence moyenne annuelle selon l'âge de réparations de DATA était de 0,8 par 100 000 (IC à 95 % : 0,6-1,0) et augmentait avec le temps (P = 0,001). L'incidence globale de mortalité d'origine aortique était de 1,8 par 100 000 (IC à 95 % : 1,5-2,0) et diminuait avec le temps (P = 0,02). Conclusion: L'incidence des réparations d'AAT augmente chez les hommes, mais non chez les femmes. Bien que la mortalité d'origine aortique tende dans l'ensemble à diminuer, il existe des disparités entre la population masculine et la population féminine.

Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) require revascularization to improve limb perfusion and thereby limit the risk of amputation. It is uncertain whether an initial strategy of endovascular therapy or surgical revascularization for CLTI is superior for improving limb outcomes. METHODS: In this international, randomized trial, we enrolled 1830 patients with CLTI and infrainguinal peripheral artery disease in two parallel-cohort trials. Patients who had a single segment of great saphenous vein that could be used for surgery were assigned to cohort 1. Patients who needed an alternative bypass conduit were assigned to cohort 2. The primary outcome was a composite of a major adverse limb event - which was defined as amputation above the ankle or a major limb reintervention (a new bypass graft or graft revision, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis) - or death from any cause. RESULTS: In cohort 1, after a median follow-up of 2.7 years, a primary-outcome event occurred in 302 of 709 patients (42.6%) in the surgical group and in 408 of 711 patients (57.4%) in the endovascular group (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.79; P<0.001). In cohort 2, a primary-outcome event occurred in 83 of 194 patients (42.8%) in the surgical group and in 95 of 199 patients (47.7%) in the endovascular group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.06; P = 0.12) after a median follow-up of 1.6 years. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups in the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CLTI who had an adequate great saphenous vein for surgical revascularization (cohort 1), the incidence of a major adverse limb event or death was significantly lower in the surgical group than in the endovascular group. Among the patients who lacked an adequate saphenous vein conduit (cohort 2), the outcomes in the two groups were similar. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; BEST-CLI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02060630.).

Increased Travel Time to the Tertiary Centre Is Associated With Decreased Long-term Survival Following Ascending Aortic Operations.

BACKGROUND: The association between travel time from tertiary care centre and outcomes after ascending thoracic aortic surgery is unknown. We determined the effect of travel time from the tertiary care centre on outcomes in ascending aortic repair in Nova Scotia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective and emergent ascending thoracic aortic operations from 2005 to 2015 was carried out. Patient's residential geographic coordinates were used to calculate travel time to the tertiary care centre, and patients who resided < 1 hour vs ≥ 1 hour were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of travel time on in-hospital outcomes. Cox-proportional hazard modelling and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were created to determine the effect on long-term survival. RESULTS: A total of 476 patients underwent ascending thoracic aortic surgery from 2005 to 2015. Patients who resided < 1 hour from the tertiary care centre vs patients who resided ≥ 1 hour had similar rates of in-hospital mortality (4.4% vs 6.1%, P = 0.42), in-hospital composite complications (66.7% vs 67.7%, P = 0.80), hospital length of stay (median 9 days; interquartile range [7-16] vs 10 [7-17], P = 0.41), and discharge disposition other than home (9.7% vs 11.7%, P = 0.55). Compared with patients who resided < 1 hour from the tertiary centre, patients who resided ≥ 1 hour were at higher risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-4.28; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who reside remotely from the tertiary centre experience equivalent in-hospital outcomes but decreased long-term survival following ascending aortic operations. These findings may guide resource expansion for postoperative follow-up.

Impact of Clopidogrel Stop Interval on Major Adverse Bleeding Events in Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major societal guidelines recommend a 5-day stop interval before cardiac surgery for patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving clopidogrel. Yet, many such patients present with high acuity, generating surgeon inclination toward use of shorter stop intervals. Thus, this study aimed to determine the impact of the duration and timing of the interval of clopidogrel cessation on adverse bleeding events. METHODS: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2009 and 2016 at a tertiary-care centre were included in this retrospective cohort study. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for clopidogrel stop interval, age, urgency of procedure, and procedure type were used to quantify the effect of clinically relevant baseline demographic characteristics on incidence of massive transfusion as well as hemorrhagic complication outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5748 patients underwent cardiac surgery. In this cohort, 1743 patients (30.3%) received clopidogrel preoperatively, and 884 (50.7%) of these patients discontinued clopidogrel 5 days before presenting to the operating room. The administration of clopidogrel 1-2 days before surgery (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 3.29) was an independent predictor for massive transfusions and hemorrhagic complications (odds ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 3.37). The 3-4 day group did not have an increased risk of major bleeding complications. The risk for both massive transfusions and hemorrhagic complications also increased with the urgency and complexity of surgery. CONCLUSION: A clopidogrel stop interval of 3-4 days preoperatively was not associated with an increased risk for major bleeding complications.

INTRODUCTION: Les grandes lignes directrices sociétales recommandent une interruption de cinq jours avant l'intervention chirurgicale du cœur des patients atteints d'un syndrome coronarien aigu qui prennent du clopidogrel. Toutefois, comme il s'agit pour plusieurs d'entre eux de patients de haute acuité, le chirurgien penche vers l'utilisation d'une interruption plus courte. Par conséquent, la présente étude avait pour objectif de déterminer les conséquences de la durée et du moment de la cessation du clopidogrel sur les événements hémorragiques indésirables. MÉTHODES: La présente étude de cohorte rétrospective portait sur les patients qui avaient subi une intervention chirurgicale au cœur entre 2009 et 2016 dans un centre de soins tertiaires. Nous avons utilisé les modèles multivariés de régression logistique ajustés à l'interruption du clopidogrel, à l'âge, à l'urgence de l'intervention chirurgicale et au type d'intervention chirurgicale pour quantifier les effets des caractéristiques démographiques initiales cliniquement pertinentes sur la fréquence des transfusions massives ainsi que sur les issues des complications hémorragiques. RÉSULTATS: Un total de 5 748 patients ont subi une intervention chirurgicale au cœur. Dans cette cohorte, parmi les 1 743 patients (30,3 %) qui avaient reçu du clopidogrel avant l'opération, 884 (50,7 %) avaient cessé le clopidogrel cinq jours avant leur admission à la salle d'opération. L'administration du clopidogrel un à deux jours avant l'intervention chirurgicale (ratio d'incidence approché 1,97; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 1,18 à 3,29) était un prédicteur indépendant des transfusions massives et des complications hémorragiques (ratio d'incidence approché 1,85; [IC] à 95 % : de 1,01 à 3,37). Le groupe de l'interruption de trois à quatre jours n'a pas montré de risque accru de complications hémorragiques graves. Le risque de transfusions massives et de complications hémorragiques a aussi contribué à l'augmentation de l'urgence et de la complexité de l'intervention chirurgicale. CONCLUSION: Une interruption du clopidogrel de trois à quatre jours avant l'opération n'a pas été associée à un risque accru de complications hémorragiques graves.

Long-term laryngotracheal complications following cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Long-term laryngotracheal complications have not been described in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for laryngotracheal complications following cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients at high risk for laryngotracheal complications following cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2016 was performed. High-risk patients were reviewed to determine the presence of laryngotracheal complications including laryngotracheal stenosis, keyhole deformity, or vocal cord immobility. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of long-term laryngotracheal complications. RESULTS: Of 11,417 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, 1099 were identified as at high risk. Of these, 24 (2.2%) developed laryngotracheal complications following their surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Laryngotracheal stenosis and keyhole deformity were present in 13 (1.2%) and 6 (0.5%) patients, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated older age (age ≥ 70 odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.83) was protective, while readmission to ICU for ventilation (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.17-8.25) and receiving a tracheostomy (OR 7.83, 95% CI 2.22-27.6) were associated with laryngotracheal complications. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of long-term laryngotracheal complications following cardiac surgery was 2.2%. Readmission to ICU for ventilation and having a tracheostomy performed were associated with laryngotracheal complications.

Predicting acute kidney injury following nonemergent cardiac surgery: A preoperative scorecard.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) following nonemergent cardiac surgery among patients with variable preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent elective or in-hospital cardiac surgical procedures was performed between January 2006 and November 2015. The procedures included isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), or combined CABG and AVR. The primary outcome AKI (any stage) following nonemergent cardiac surgery utilizing the 2012 Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Patients were categorized based on the following renal outcomes: mild AKI, severe AKI (KDIGO stage 2 or 3), and postoperative dialysis. Patients with G5 preoperative kidney function (including dialysis patients) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 6675 patients were included in our study. The mean age was 66.8 years (SD ± 10.4), with 76.3% being males. A total of 4487 patients had normal or mildly decreased eGFR (G1 or G2) preoperatively (67.2%), while 1960 patients were in the G3 category (29.4%). Only 228 patients (3.4%) had G4 renal function. A total of 1453 (21.7%) patients experienced postoperative AKI. The need for postoperative dialysis occurred in 3.2% of the AKI subgroup. In-hospital mortality was higher among the AKI subgroup (7.2% vs. 0.5%; p < .0001). In an adjusted model, a lower preoperative eGFR category was the strongest predictor of AKI. A practical scorecard for the preoperative estimation of severe AKI for nonemergent cardiac procedures incorporating these parameters was developed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative eGFR is the strongest predictor of postoperative AKI in individuals undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery. A practical scorecard incorporating preoperative predictors of AKI may allow informed decision-making and predict AKI following nonemergent cardiac surgery.

Prediction of temporary epicardial pacing wire use in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires (TEPW) at the end of open heart surgery cases is routine but can be associated with complications. Identification of patients who are high risk for requiring pacing would be beneficial on guiding selective TEPW placement. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of temporary pacing immediately post cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2005 to 2016 at the Maritime Heart Center was conducted. Analysis was performed of patients who require pacing on arrival to the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) compared with those who were not paced. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine each variable's risk adjusted likelihood of pacing for the entire cohort. Subgroup analysis was performed in the isolated procedures. RESULTS: A total of 11 752 patient underwent surgery from the year 2005 to 2016. Two thousand and fifty-one (17.5%) required pacing on arrival to CVICU. Older age, female sex, preoperative renal failure, lower ejection fraction (EF), preoperative arrhythmia, preoperative use of calcium channel blockers, and longer cross-clamp times were risk factors for pacing. In the isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement groups, findings were similar to the overall cohort. Only age, obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors for pacing in the isolated mitral valve (MV) repair group and only preoperative arrhythmia in the isolated MV replacement group. CONCLUSION: We have identified risk factors for TEPW use following cardiac surgery and in isolated procedure subgroups. These risk factors may help guide selective TEPW placement.

Safety and effectiveness of single ProGlide vascular access in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of single ProGlide use per bilateral access site for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for all elective percutaneous EVARs from November 2015 to December 2017 at the QEII Health Sciences Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada). Exposure of interest was number of ProGlides used per access site, dichotomized into bilateral single ProGlide closure vs nonsingle ProGlide closure on at least one femoral arteriotomy. Outcomes included Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. Groups were compared with Fisher exact test, analysis of variance, or Wilcoxon rank sum, as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to compare the effect of single ProGlide use on VARC-2 and BARC criteria. RESULTS: A total of 131 cases were included, of which 116 had bilateral single ProGlide use for access closure. Baseline characteristics including comorbidities and smoking status were compared between groups. Groups were similar for all characteristics except smoking status, with an increased proportion of former smokers in the nonsingle ProGlide group. There were 119 (90.8%) patients who had single ProGlide use on the right femoral artery and 121 (92.4%) on the left; 16 (12.2%) patients had ProGlide deployment issues. Median maximal right and left femoral sheath diameters were 16F (interquartile range [IQR], 16F-18F) and 14F (IQR, 14F-16F), respectively. Median length of stay was 1 day (IQR, 1-1 day). VARC-2 criteria occurred in 8 of 131 (6.11%) patients, 6 of 116 (5.17%) with bilateral single ProGlides and 2 of 15 (13.3%) with nonsingle ProGlides. BARC criteria occurred in 6 of 131 (4.58%) patients, 5 of 116 (4.31%) with bilateral single ProGlides and 1 of 15 (6.67%) with nonsingle ProGlides. Single ProGlide use was not associated with a difference in VARC-2 (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.94) or BARC (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-6.79) criteria. No patients developed pseudoaneurysms or required repeated intervention for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Single ProGlide use per vascular access site in patients undergoing EVAR is a safe and effective method for access closure with sheath diameters up to and including 16F.

Surgically positioned paravertebral catheters and postoperative analgesia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative morphine equivalent intake after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair among analgesic modalities: systemic analgesia (SA) only with no regional anesthesia, surgically positioned paravertebral catheter (PVC), and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective open AAA at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Demographics, morphine equivalents, methods of analgesia administration, and outcomes data were collected on all patients from 2005 to 2016. Total morphine equivalent (MEQ) on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 3 were compared among patients with SA, PVC, and TEA. A multivariable zero-inflated log-linear regression was used to determine the association between analgesic modality and MEQ. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine associations between analgesic modality and postoperative pain, rates of discharge from intensive care within 1 day and opioid-related adverse events. RESULTS: The study cohort included 355 patients: 177 retroperitoneal and 178 transperitoneal repairs; 173 patients underwent SA, 117 PVC, and 65 TEA. On POD1, median MEQs were 984 (interquartile range [IQR], 342-1525) for SA, 89 (33-246) for PVC, and 49 (0-90) for TEA. On POD2, the median MEQs were 105 (IQR, 57-210) for SA, 45 (15-99) for PVC, and 30 (0-64) for TEA. On POD3, the median MEQs were 45 (IQR, 15-120) for SA, 30 (0-60) for PVC, and 10 (0-45) for TEA. On multivariable log-linear regression, compared with SA, PVC and TEA were associated with increased odds of receiving no opioids on POD1 (odds ratio [OR], 66.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.49-255.57; and OR, 214.68; 95% CI, 60.20-766.38; respectively), POD 2 (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 3.61-13.46; and OR, 28.73; 95% CI, 15.68-52.62; respectively), and POD 3 (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.72-5.67; and OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 3.20-6.86; respectively). If patients did receive opioids, compared with SA, PVC and TEA were associated with decreased consumption on POD1 (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.18-0.27; and RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.20; respectively), POD2 (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.42-0.58; and RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56; respectively), and POD3 (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; and RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93; respectively). Compared with SA, PVC was associated with earlier discharge from intensive care (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.17-6.45) and TEA was not (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.56-2.2). Compared with TEA, PVC was not associated with increased rate of opioid-related adverse events (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.08-2.44). CONCLUSIONS: PVC and TEA are associated with decreased MEQ compared with SA. PVC is associated with earlier discharge from intensive care compared with SA and similar rates of opioid-related adverse events compared with TEA. Paravertebral analgesia appears to be a safe and effective analgesic modality in patients undergoing retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aneurysm repair.

Long-term survival after endovascular and open repair in patients with anatomy outside instructions for use criteria for endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials of long-term survival for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms have compared open surgical repair (OSR) with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with suitable aortic anatomy for EVAR. However, in clinical practice, patients who do not meet instructions for use (IFU) criteria are often still treated by EVAR despite that some studies show higher graft-related adverse events. The goal of this study was to compare the long-term survival of EVAR and OSR in patients with anatomy outside IFU criteria for EVAR. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with at least one anatomic IFU violation for EVAR undergoing either elective EVAR or elective OSR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Demographics, anatomic data, and follow-up data of patients were collected from three academic centers from 2003 to 2016. Device-specific IFU were used for EVAR patients, whereas generic IFU for EVAR were applied to the OSR patients. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were aneurysm-related mortality and perioperative complications at 30 days. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed. Inverse propensity score weights were used to adjust for differences in treatment selection. RESULTS: The study population included 202 EVAR patients and 224 OSR patients with at least one anatomic IFU violation for EVAR. EVAR patients were older (78.1 ± 7.3 vs 70.9 ± 7.0 years; P < .001) and less likely to be hypertensive (69.3% vs 79.0%; P = .02) compared with OSR patients. OSR patients were more likely to have proximal aortic neck IFU violations (75.0% vs 47.1%; P < .001) and were less likely to have iliac IFU violations (65.2% vs 79.2%; P < .001). All-cause mortality was 37.6% in the EVAR group and 24.1% in the OSR group with a median follow-up time of 5.2 (3.5-7.2) and 5.4 (2.8-9.3) years, respectively (P < .002). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant association between patients undergoing OSR and increased long-term survival (log-rank P < .0001). When adjusted for possible confounders and weighted for propensity for treatment through Cox hazard modeling, the association remained significant (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.9). Aneurysm-related mortality was 3.5% in the EVAR group and 2.2% in the OSR group during long-term follow-up (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified that patients with IFU violations have higher overall long-term survival with open surgery compared with EVAR. Caution should be applied in considering standard EVAR for patients with anatomy outside of IFU.

Cerebral embolic protection during endovascular arch replacement.

Despite excellent results in high volume centers, open repair of aortic arch pathology is highly invasive, and can result in significant morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. Near-total and hybrid approaches to aortic arch disease states have emerged as an alternative for patients deemed moderate to high risk for conventional repair. Advantages of these approaches include avoidance of extracorporeal circulation and hypothermic circulatory arrest as well as avoidance of cross clamping, all of which are not well tolerated in high risk patients. Anatomically high-risk patients with anastomotic aneurysms from previous arch reconstruction may also benefit from these less invasive approaches. Medical devices designed specifically for the aortic arch are developing at a rapid pace and continue to evolve. Dedicated devices for zone 0-2 aortic arch repair are currently available under special access or being studied in clinical trials. Unfortunately, stroke continues to be the Achilles heel of endovascular approaches to the aortic arch, with cerebral embolism being the culprit in the majority of such cases. This perspective article describes the epidemiology, procedures, and mitigation strategies for current near-total and hybrid approaches to aortic arch pathology, and specifically addresses current means of embolic protection and future direction.

Intraoperative insertion of paravertebral catheter for postoperative analgesia in retroperitoneal aortic aneurysm repair.

Paravertebral catheters are a well-established analgesic modality in thoracic surgery but have not been described in abdominal aortic surgery. We describe a simple, safe, and effective technique of paravertebral catheter insertion by the operative surgeon after a retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Once the aneurysm repair is complete, an extrapleural plane between the parietal pleura and the twelfth rib is created through blunt dissection. A catheter is advanced into the space percutaneously under direct vision, and a continuous infusion of local anesthetic is administered. Paravertebral catheters typically remain in place for 3 to 5 days and provide excellent postoperative non-narcotic analgesia.

Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: A variety of devices exist for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Device-specific instructions for use (IFU) detail anatomic constraints to application and deployment of devices and are developed from rigorous bench testing. Nonadherence to IFU occurs frequently to avoid open surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if IFU violations are associated with increased risk of graft-related adverse events (GRAEs) during follow-up. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective observational study included patients undergoing elective endovascular repair for abdominal aneurysmal disease with three different devices. Demographics, anatomic data, and follow-up data were collected on patients from 2005 to 2014. IFU violations were device specific and included neck diameter, length, and angulation and iliac artery diameter and length. GRAEs included a composite outcome of reintervention, migration, endoleak (type II excluded), rupture, limb occlusion, sac growth, and aneurysm-related mortality during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed. Any IFU violations as well as neck-specific IFU violations were analyzed. RESULTS: In 461 patients undergoing EVAR, 43.8% had at least one IFU violation. Patients with IFU violations were more likely to have peripheral vascular disease (12.4% vs 7.3%) and were less likely to be male (78.7% vs 90.3%). The most frequent IFU violations included diameter deviations of the neck (15.2%) and of the iliac artery (21.4%). Overall, the GRAE rate was 12.8%. Median follow-up time was 1.9 and 2.1 years for patients with and without an IFU violation, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival revealed a significant association between the presence of an IFU violation and GRAEs (log-rank, P = .031). When adjusted for clinical variable through Cox hazard modeling, the association remained significant (hazard ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.1). When neck-specific violations were considered independently, Kaplan-Meier survival (log-rank, P = .003) and Cox modeling (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.0) revealed a significant association between neck-specific IFU violation and GRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43.8% of patients undergoing EVAR had a device-specific IFU violation, indicating that implanters are pushing the boundaries of device capabilities. Our study identified that any IFU violation was significantly associated with GRAEs over time. Caution should be applied to patients being considered for EVAR when IFU deviations exist.

Salvage of bilateral renal artery occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair with open splenorenal bypass.

We report renal salvage maneuvers after accidental bilateral renal artery coverage during endovascular aneurysm repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. A 79-year-old man with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm was treated with endovascular aneurysm repair. Completion angiography demonstrated coverage of the renal arteries. Several revascularization techniques were attempted, including endograft repositioning and endovascular stenting through the femoral and brachial approach. The patient eventually underwent open splenorenal bypass with a Y Gore-Tex graft (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz). After 3 months, computed tomography showed no evidence of endoleak and patent renal arteries. Renal function was well maintained, and the patient did not require dialysis.

Are intraoperative precursor events associated with postoperative major adverse events?

OBJECTIVES: Precursor events are undesirable events that can lead to a subsequent adverse event and have been associated with postoperative mortality. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether precursor events are associated with a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, acute renal failure, stroke, infection) in a low- to medium-risk coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, and valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting population. These events might be targets for strategies aimed at quality improvement. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective cohort design performed at the Queen Elizabeth Health Science Centre. Low- to medium-risk patients who had experienced postoperative MACE were matched 1:1 with patients who had not experienced postoperative MACE. The operative notes, for both groups, were scored by 5 surgeons to determine the frequency of 4 precursor events: bleeding, difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, repair or regrafting, and incomplete revascularization or repair. A univariate comparison of ≥1 precursor events in the matched groups was performed. RESULTS: A total of 311 MACE patients (98.4%) were matched. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in the MACE group than in the non-MACE group (33% vs 24%; P = .015). The incidence of the individual events of bleeding and difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was significantly higher in the MACE group. Those patients with a precursor event in the absence of MACE also appeared to have a greater prevalence of other important postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are exposed to intraoperative precursor events were more likely to experience a postoperative MACE. Quality improvement techniques aimed at mitigating the consequences of precursor events might improve the surgical outcomes for cardiac surgical patients.

Development of a predictive model for major adverse cardiac events in a coronary artery bypass and valve population.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement initiatives in cardiac surgery largely rely on risk prediction models. Most often, these models include isolated populations and describe isolated end-points. However, with the changing clinical profile of the cardiac surgical patients, mixed populations models are required to accurately represent the majority of the surgical population. Also, composite model end-points of morbidity and mortality, better reflect outcomes experienced by patients. METHODS: The model development cohort included 4,270 patients who underwent aortic or mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair with/without coronary artery bypass grafting, or isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A composite end-point of infection, stroke, acute renal failure, or death was evaluated. Age, sex, surgical priority, and procedure were forced, a priori, into the model and then stepwise selection of candidate variables was utilized. Model performance was evaluated by concordance statistic, Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit, and calibration plots. Bootstrap technique was employed to validate the model. RESULTS: The model included 16 variables. Several variables were significant such as, emergent surgical priority (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.9-7.4), CABG + Valve procedure (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.8-3.0), and frailty (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.5), among others. The concordance statistic for the major adverse cardiac events model in a mixed population was 0.764 (95% CL; 0.75-0.79) and had excellent calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Development of predictive models with composite end-points and mixed procedure population can yield robust statistical and clinical validity. As they more accurately reflect current cardiac surgical profile, models such as this, are an essential tool in quality improvement efforts.

Clopidogrel increases blood transfusion and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of the irreversible antiplatelet agent clopidogrel is increasing in the treatment acute coronary syndrome patients. Consequently, more patients are presenting for urgent cardiac surgery with an irreversible defect in platelet function. The objective of this study was to determine whether recent clopidogrel administration predicts transfusion and hemorrhagic complication in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), isolated valve, or CABG plus valve at a single center between 2004 and 2008. The outcomes of interest were transfusion and hemorrhagic complication. Clopidogrel stop interval was defined as the time between last dose and presentation to the operating room, and was examined in daily increments from 0 to 5 days, more than 5 days, and not receiving clopidogrel preoperatively. By logistic regression, the association of clopidogrel stop interval with transfusion and with hemorrhagic complication was examined after adjusting for other risk factors. RESULTS: Of 3,779 patients included in this study, 26.4% (999) received clopidogrel preoperatively. The overall rates of transfusion and hemorrhagic complication were 34.1% and 4.1%, respectively. Clopidogrel use within 24 hours was an independent predictor of transfusion (odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 3.3) and of hemorrhagic complication (odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving clopidogrel within 24 hours of surgery are at increased risk for transfusion and hemorrhagic complication. Timing of surgery for patients receiving clopidogrel should take into account the interval from the last dose.