Checklist assessment tool to evaluate suitability and success of neonatal clamp circumcision: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Task Force on Circumcision has called for the development of standards of trainee proficiency in regards to evaluation and technique for neonatal clamp circumcision (NCC). At the present time, there is no standardized or general consensus on patient selection for NCC. An improved method to evaluate newborns for NCC is an important first step in this process. Therefore, the authors collaborated to identify criteria useful in the evaluation of newborns for suitability for NCC, and for assessment of success after NCC and have named it "Checklist Assessment for Neonatal Clamp Circumcision Suitability." METHODS: A national multi-institutional collaboration was created to obtain consensus on objective criteria for use in determining patient suitability for NCC, and for assessing post-circumcision success outcomes. Criteria included elements from detailed medical history, bedside physical examination, and post-circumcision follow-up. Patients desiring NCC were enrolled consecutively and prospectively. The Checklist was followed to determine which newborns were suited to NCC, and NCC was done in those cases. The patients' caretakers were given post-circumcision care instructions and a follow-up appointment. Post circumcision, the Checklist was followed to determine if the procedure resulted in a successful circumcision or if there were complications. RESULTS: A total of 193 cases were enrolled prospectively and consecutively from January 2014 through October 2014. The mean age was 15 days (1-30 days). Of those 193 patients, 129 (67%) were deemed suitable for circumcision and underwent NCC. Post-circumcision assessment showed a 100% success rate with no complications. A total of 64 (23%) cases were deemed unsuitable for NCC because at least one checklist criterion was not satisfied, most commonly: penile torsion (n = 25), chordee (n = 19), and penoscrotal webbing (n = 19). DISCUSSION: Use of the Checklist in the present study has demonstrated a method of patient screening resulting in a 100% success rate with no complications. A high proportion of patients (33%) was identified as unsuited for NCC; however, the patient population consisted of newborn males referred to pediatric urology, and thus does not represent the general population, which is expected to have a lower proportion of unsuited patients. Regardless, the Checklist has the potential to enhance the decision-making process for both urologic and non-urologic care providers. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the "Checklist Assessment for Neonatal Clamp Circumcision Suitability" assessment tool improves identification of patients unsuited for NCC and thereby potentially decreases the likelihood of circumcision-related complications.

Outcome after discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics in children with persistent vesicoureteral reflux.

PURPOSE: Treatment for vesicoureteral reflux remains controversial. Lacking an evidence-based treatment protocol, we offered the option of terminating prophylactic antibiotics in otherwise healthy patients with persistent vesicoureteral reflux at age 5 years or greater. We report outcomes with respect to the urinary tract infection incidence and to whether surgical intervention was eventually done. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained institutional review board approval to retrospectively review the records of all children with vesicoureteral reflux from December 1999 to February 2009. Of this group we selected children 5 years old or older who had been taken off prophylactic antibiotics. We assessed children with primary vesicoureteral reflux in detail. RESULTS: The records of 1,217 that we reviewed showed that antibiotics were discontinued in 185 patients, including 160 girls (89%) and 25 boys (11%), at an average age of 6.2 years. Average followup was 2.0 years with recorded followup up to 8 years off prophylaxis. In 50 girls (91%) and 5 boys (9%), urinary tract infection developed after discontinuing prophylaxis. Correction was done in 57 patients, including open repair in 34 and endoscopic injection in 23. Two patients underwent intervention at parent request after an average of 0.7 years of uneventful observation. We identified no parameter predicting patients at risk for urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary tract infection develops in 29% of patients 5 years old or older with persistent vesicoureteral reflux within 2 years after the cessation of prophylaxis. Most of these cases are febrile. Discontinuing antibiotics is reasonable but a prospective, randomized, long-term, multi-institutional trial is required to determine whether this approach is beneficial.