Hypoalbuminemia is also a marker of fluid excess determined by bioelectrical impedance parameters in dialysis patients.

Hypoalbuminemia may be secondary to volume expansion conditions and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is an accurate, non-invasive method to measure body composition, especially the water compartments in humans. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to evaluate the relationship between serum albumin concentration (SA) and hydration state measured by whole BIA. The study investigated 108 non-selected patients (73 on hemodialysis, 35 on peritoneal dialysis) with a mean age of 61.4 +/- 15.6 years, 42.7% of whom were female. The patients were allotted to groups according to their SA: Group 1, < or = 3.5 g/dL; Group 2, 3.6-4.0 g/dL; and Group 3, >4.0 g/dL. The BIA parameters used included: total body water, intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), phase angle (PA), body cell mass (BCM), ICW/ECW ratio and ICW/ECW ratio patients/controls (fluid index). Seventy-five healthy volunteers formed the control group. A strong positive correlation was found between the PA and fluid index (r (2) = 0.993, P < 0.001), as well as between the PA and SA (r = 0.386, P < 0.001), and the ICW/ECW ratio and SA (r = 0.227, P < 0.001). The ECW was negatively correlated with SA (r = -0.330, P < 0.001). Every 0.1 g/dL decrease in SA was associated with a 0.33 L increase in ECW. Group 1 patients had lower reactance (P = 0.006), PA (P < 0.001), BCM (P = 0.012), fluid index (P < 0.001) and ICW/ECW ratio (P = 0.015), and an increased ECW (NS) than groups 2 and 3. We conclude that hypoalbuminemia is also a marker of fluid excess. The SA is associated to the fluid index and the PA allows assessment of the dry weight and its variations in an individualized manner in dialysis patients.

Return to dialysis after renal transplantation. Which would be the best way?

The exact moment to return to dialysis when a graft fails has not clearly been established. Furthermore, there is no agreement with respect to whether the guidelines accepted for patients entering dialysis for the first time are adequate for this subgroup of patients with advanced renal failure, due to the special characteristics of these patients, derived from the immunosuppressive medications they are taking among other accompanying factors. We reviewed a group of renal transplant patients who returned to dialysis and compared them with a group of patients entering dialysis for the first time. Patients with chronic renal failure due to graft failure had a poorer renal function at the time entering dialysis and a more profound anemia. Additionally, complications considered such as the number of hospital admissions during the first year after initiation of dialysis were considerably higher in the group of transplanted patients. We advocate for an earlier referral to the dialysis unit, a more aggressive erythropoietin therapy in the phase of advanced renal failure due to chronic allograft nephropathy, and in selected cases retransplantation before definitive graft loss.