Instructing to Impact: Exploration of Doctor of Physical Therapy Education Instruction of Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity for People with Disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore instruction of social determinants of health (SDOH) for people with disabilities (PWD) in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education programs. METHODS: A sequential mixed methods study informed by a 5-member disability community advisory panel was conducted. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with educators (n = 10) across 4 DPT programs in the Midwest were conducted and analyzed thematically. The qualitative findings formed the basis of the quantitative phase. An online survey was conducted with faculty of DPT programs in the United States (n = 254) with the most knowledge of instruction of SDOH and health equity for PWD (n = 74; 29% response rate). Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and triangulated with qualitative data. RESULTS: SDOH for PWD is an emerging component of instruction in DPT curricula. Five themes included: emerging instruction of SDOH for PWD; conceptual frameworks informing instruction; instructional strategies; barriers to integration of SDOH for PWD; and facilitators to integration of SDOH for PWD. Quantitative analysis revealed that 71 respondents (95.9%) included disability in health equity discussions primarily focused on health care access. Limited time (n = 49; 66.2%) was the most frequently reported barrier, and educator interest in disability health equity was the most frequently reported facilitator (n = 62; 83.7%) to inclusion of the SDOH for PWD in health equity discussions. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist in DPT curricula to build on instructional strategies, integrate SDOH frameworks, and amplify facilitators to integration of SDOH for PWD. IMPACT: To meet the needs of the 67 million Americans living with disabilities, students must have the knowledge and skills to address the complex needs of this historically marginalized population. Understanding the DPT education landscape around SDOH for PWD can guide DPT educators to more fully prepare their students to recognize and ameliorate health disparities faced by PWD.

BEhavioral Health Stratified Treatment (B.E.S.T.) to optimize transition to adulthood for youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

Youth with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) often struggle with depression and anxiety, which adversely impacts transition to adulthood. Integrated behavioral health care coordination, wherein care coordinators and behavioral health specialists collaborate to provide systematic, cost-effective, patient-centered care, is a promising strategy to improve access to behavioral health services and address factors that impact transition to adulthood, including depression/anxiety symptoms. Current care coordination models (e.g., Title V Maternal and Child Health Bureau [MCHB]) do not include behavioral health services. The CHECK (Coordinated HealthCarE for Complex Kids) mental health model, hereby refined and renamed BEhavioral Health Stratified Treatment (B.E.S.T.), is a behavioral health intervention delivery program designed for integration into care coordination programs. This study aims to determine whether an integrated behavioral health care coordination strategy (i.e., MCHB care coordination plus B.E.S.T.) would be more acceptable and lead to better youth health and transition outcomes, relative to standard care coordination (i.e., MCHB care coordination alone). Results would guide future investment in improving outcomes for youth with IDD. This study is a two-arm randomized clinical trial of 780 transition-aged youth with IDD (13-20 years) to evaluate the comparable efficacy of MCHB Care Coordination alone vs. MCHB Care Coordination plus B.E.S.T. on the following outcomes: 1) decreased symptoms and episodes of depression and anxiety over time; 2) improved health behaviors, adaptive functioning and health related quality of life; 3) increased health care transition (HCT) readiness; and 4) improved engagement and satisfaction with care coordination among stakeholders.

Relationships at Work: Integrating the Perspectives of Disability Partners to Enhance a Peer Navigation Intervention.

Objective: The Our Peers-Empowerment and Navigational Support (OP-ENS) community-based participatory research study developed, implemented, and evaluated a peer navigator intervention aimed at improving health and healthcare access among Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities. Peer navigators are community partners with physical disabilities trained to deliver structured peer support interventions that can address barriers to care. The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, it explicates the relational work the peer navigators do with peers in delivering the intervention. Second, it illustrates how our community-based participatory approach empowered peer navigators to share their knowledge to refine the intervention. Methods: Clinical coordinator team meeting notes, critical incident documentation reports, peer navigator reflections (n = 20) were analyzed thematically to understand the peer navigators' relational work and intervention refinements. Following Labov's 6-stage approach to personal narratives and a collaborative writing process academic, clinical, and disability partners co-wrote descriptive exemplars to showcase these processes. Findings: Through the manualized OP-ENS intervention process, peer navigators helped peers achieve incremental successes. Peer navigators used their training and personal experiences to engage with peers and forge deep connections and relationships of trust. As a result, peers identified a wide-range of social health concerns, including poverty, social isolation, and racial and disability related discrimination that might otherwise go unaddressed. True to the principles of community-based participatory research, by fostering an equity-focused collaboration and listening to peer navigators, the project team implemented subtle but salient refinements to the intervention. Refinements included an explicit focus on social determinants of health affecting peers' health and wellbeing and supplemental trainings to help peer navigators support peers with significant mental health needs. Conclusion: The peer navigators were intentional and skilled at relationship building, thus complex elements which impact peers' health were addressed. Peer navigators were empowered to communicate their perspectives with the study team, who worked together to strengthen the intervention processes and infrastructure. This atmosphere of trust and collaboration amongst diverse stakeholders was instrumental to OP-ENS' successful implementation. Healthcare systems should consider implementing peer support interventions that are responsive to consumer input to address social determinants of health for persons with disabilities.