Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Soins ; (788): 19-21, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25464630

RESUMEN

The medical chain which assures the treatment of casualties from the theatre of operations back to France comprises several links connected by medical air transport. Whether it is tactical or strategic, it forms an integral part of the treatment pathway and offers casualties the best possible conditions for medical treatment with a high degree of safety, speed and traceability.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias Aéreas , Medicina Militar , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Francia , Humanos
2.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 32(4): 405-9, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21792573

RESUMEN

Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been studied in several trials, but they have produced unsatisfactory results even in the most recent Thrombolysis in Cardiac Arrest (TROICA) study. This study aimed to assess the impact of FT provided by an out-of-hospital emergency physician on the immediate prognosis of patients with OHCA. We performed a retrospective study in which the primary endpoint was survival to hospital admission. Among 5,102 patients with OHCA in Paris and the suburban area who received medical care from the Fire Brigade of Paris, 1,261 met the following inclusion criteria: age above 18 years with non-traumatic OHCA. Among 107 patients who received FT, 51 (47.7%) survived to hospital admission whereas 272 out of 1,154 (23.6%) patients who did not receive FT survived to hospital admission. A matching process based on a propensity score used to equalise potential prognosis factors in both groups demonstrated that FT was associated with more frequent survival to hospital admission (OR adjusted: 1.7; CI 95% [1.09-2.68]). This result was observed particularly in patients who were not initially shocked by automatic electrical defibrillator (AED) (OR(a) = 3.61; CI 95% [1.88-6.96]). This study showed that fibrinolysis was associated with improved survival to hospital admission, after performing a propensity analysis. FT may be beneficial in out-of-hospital arrest patients. However, any conclusions drawn are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinólisis , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paris , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Circulation ; 121(14): 1614-22, 2010 Apr 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20351239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that implement the Guidelines 2000 resuscitation protocol constrains administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to <50% of AED connection time. We tested a different AED protocol aimed at increasing the CPR administered to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized controlled trial, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring defibrillation were treated with 1 of 2 AED protocols. In the control protocol, based on Guidelines 2000, sequences of up to 3 stacked countershocks were delivered, with rhythm analyses initially and after the first and second shocks. The study protocol featured 1 minute of CPR before the first shock, shorter CPR interruptions before and after each shock, and no stacked shocks. The primary end point was survival to hospital admission. Of 5107 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients connected to an AED, 1238 required defibrillation, and 845 were included in the final analysis. Study patients (n=421) had shorter preshock pauses (9 versus 19 seconds; P<0.001), had shorter postshock pauses (11 versus 33 seconds; P<0.001), and received more CPR (61% versus 48%; P<0.001) and fewer shocks (2.5 versus 2.9; P<0.001) than control patients (n=424). Similar proportions survived to hospital admission (43.2% versus 42.7%; P=0.87), survived to hospital discharge (13.3% versus 10.6%; P=0.19), achieved return of spontaneous circulation before physician arrival (47.0% versus 48.6%; P=0.65), and survived to 1 year (P=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Following prompts from AEDs programmed with a protocol similar to Guidelines 2005, firefighters shortened pauses in CPR and improved overall hands-on time, but survival to hospital admission of patients with ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00139542.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Desfibriladores/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Automatización , Circulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Diseño de Equipo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Probabilidad , Distribución Aleatoria , Trabajo de Rescate , Programas Informáticos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA