Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trials ; 21(1): 159, 2020 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32041669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether they are injected peri- or intraocularly, corticosteroids are still essential tools in the therapeutic arsenal for treating inflammatory macular oedema. A few years ago, however, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. While this compound was initially developed for rheumatological or dermatological use, it has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, despite still being off-label. In 2011, the system for delivery of dexamethasone from a biodegradable, injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained approval for use in inflammatory macular oedema. While the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone in macular oedema, including inflammatory oedema, have already been studied, there are currently no publications on subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, which are simple, effective and well tolerated. To date, the dexamethasone 700 µg implant has been authorized for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, but there have been no studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different peri- and intraocular strategies, including the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. METHODS: This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intraocular corticosteroid injections in the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. In this ongoing study, 142 patients will be included, and the oedematous eye will be randomised to treatment with either subconjunctival triamcinolone injection or an intravitreal implant containing 700 µg dexamethasone. Follow-up is planned for 6 months with monthly visits. Each visit will include visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, laser flare measurement (if available) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have a real impact on public health if it is shown that a Kenacort retard® (i.e. triamcinolone) injection costing just €2.84 and performed in the physician's office (with no additional overhead costs) is at least as effective as the dexamethasone 700 µg implant (Ozurdex®; costing approximately €960 with the injection performed in a dedicated room), with no increased side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556424. Registered on 22 September 2015.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Triamcinolona Acetonida/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/economía , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fondo de Ojo , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triamcinolona Acetonida/efectos adversos , Triamcinolona Acetonida/economía , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA