Traumatic Proximal Tibiofibular Dislocation: A Marker of Severely Traumatized Extremities.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis is to report on the epidemiology and clinical implications of traumatic proximal tibiofibular dislocation (PTFD). DESIGN: Retrospective chart and radiographic review. SETTING: Level 1 regional trauma center. PATIENTS: Skeletally mature patients with a traumatic PTFD between July 1, 2006, and December 31, 2013. INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patient demographics and associated musculoskeletal and neurovascular injuries were recorded as data points. RESULTS: There were a total of 30 PTFDs in 30 patients during the course of the defined study period. The incidence of PTFD was 1.5% (15 of 1013) of operative tibial shaft fractures and 1.9% (15 of 803) of operative tibial plateau fractures (P = 0.5810). Fifty percent (15 of 30) of PTFD were associated with a tibial shaft fracture, and 50% (15 of 30) with tibial plateau fractures. PTFD was associated with an open fracture in 63% (19 of 30) of cases. Two patients (6.7%) presented with a vascular injury who underwent a successful repair without vascular sequelae. Two different patients (6.7%) ultimately underwent an amputation (one above the knee and one below the knee) for a nonreconstructable extremity. In the remaining 28 patients without amputation, the incidence of compartment syndrome was 29% (8 of 28) and the incidence of peroneal nerve palsy was 36% (10 of 28). Only 30% (3 of 10) of the peroneal nerve palsies recovered clinically within the follow-up period, which averaged 11 months (range: 6 months to 4 years). CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations can be found in approximately 1%-2% of both tibial plateau and shaft fractures. PTFD is associated with a high rate of compartment syndrome (29%), open fracture (63%), and peroneal nerve palsy (36%). The majority (70%) of peroneal nerve palsies do not recover. Proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation is a marker for a severely traumatized limb. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcome of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients.

Standard treatment for most humeral shaft fractures is nonoperative functional bracing; however, certain clinical scenarios necessitate operative intervention. There have been few studies in the literature comparing nonoperative and operative fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Two-hundred thirteen adult patients with a humeral shaft fracture who satisfied inclusion criteria were treated at 2 level 1 trauma centers with either a functional brace (nonoperative treatment group) or compression plating (operative treatment group). Main outcome measures were evaluated retrospectively and included time to union, nonunion, malunion, infection, incidence of radial nerve palsy, and elbow range of motion (ROM). The occurrence of nonunion (20.6% vs 8.7%; P=.0128) and malunion (12.7% vs 1.3%; P=.0011) was statistically significant and more common in the nonoperative group. There was no significant difference in infection rate between nonoperative and operative treatment (3.2% vs 4.7%; P=1.0000). Radial nerve palsy presented after fracture treatment in 9.5% of patients in the nonoperative group and in 2.7% of patients managed operatively (P=.0678). No difference in time to union or ultimate ROM was found between the 2 groups. Closed treatment of humerus fractures had a significantly higher rate of nonunion and malunion while operative intervention demonstrated no significant differences in time to union, infection, or iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Nonoperative management has historically been the treatment of choice for many humeral shaft fractures, however, in certain clinical scenarios these fractures may be well served by compression plating.