Braun Anastomosis: A Technique for Bile Reflux Improvement After Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass; a Pilot Study.

Background. Single anastomotic surgeries can increase the risk of reflux, marginal ulceration, and gastrointestinal complications. Braun anastomosis prevents bile reflux after gastric resection and gastrojejunal anastomosis surgeries. The present pilot study evaluated Braun's efficacy in a single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass surgery.Methods. 28 patients with a history of SASI bypass surgery from October 2017 to September 2021 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on having Braun anastomosis to this surgical procedure; group A: underwent SASI bypass without Braun anastomosis; group B: underwent SASI bypass with Braun anastomosis. The surgical complications in terms of bile reflux, marginal ulcer, reflux esophagitis, and gastritis were evaluated and compared between the groups. Results. Bile reflux and reflux esophagitis were seen more in group A than in group B (37.5% vs 8.3% and 18.8% vs 8.3%, respectively). In contrast, 2 patients (16.7%) in group B had marginal ulcers compared to 1 (6.3%) in group A. Also, gastritis was seen in 1 patient in each group (6.3% in group A vs 8.3% in group B). However, the differences were not statistically different. Conclusions. Braun anastomosis is probably an effective procedure to reduce bile reflux, a concern of SASI bypass. Besides, further studies with a larger study population are needed.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Success of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Severe Obesity.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) pandemic may influence the weight outcomes of bariatric surgeries (BS). Here, we intended to compare the weight outcome of patients who underwent BS before and during the pandemic time. METHODS: In a retrospective, single-center study, the information of two groups of patients; first COVID-19 group (n = 51) consisted of those that underwent BS during the pandemic and completed a year of follow-up, second non-COVID-19 group included 50 patients who underwent BS and were followed up before the pandemic. All the patients' anthropometric and obesity-related disease data were compared between groups. RESULTS: Weight loss and the decrease of body mass index 1 year after the surgery, as well as excess weight loss and total weight loss, were significantly higher in the non-COVID-19 group compared to the COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). Although the rate of remission for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was higher in the non-COVID-19 group, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We showed a significantly poorer weight outcome at the 1-year follow-up of the BS during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic. These results need further investigations to determine the preventive measures and management by evaluating the associated factors.

The impact of gastric pouch size, based on the number of staplers, on the short-term weight outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Introduction: No standard of anatomical variables, including stoma size, limb length, pouch size, and volume, has been determined for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass yet. Herein, we evaluated the effect of two different techniques for creating the gastric pouch on short-term postoperative weight loss. Methods: This retrospective cohort was conducted on patients with a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history from January 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: in one group, patients' gastric pouch was made using two 60 mm linear staplers, while in the other group, the gastric pouch was made using three 60 mm linear staplers. Anthropometric data, including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), were measured preoperatively and six months following surgery. Weight outcomes, such as weight loss, a decrease in BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), and total weight loss (%TWL), were calculated as short-term weight outcomes. Results: Two groups, each containing 50 patients, were included. Patients with smaller pouches (two staplers) had 32.4 ± 9.2 kg weight loss, and those with larger pouches (three staplers) had a 31.42 ± 10.3 kg weight loss. Also, %EWL was 69.7 ± 14.9 and 63.0 ± 20.9, and %TWL was 28.2 ± 6.0 and 26.14 ± 7.5 in patients with two stapler pouches and three stapler pouches, respectively. None of the weight outcome parameters were significantly different between the groups (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: Various studies have been conducted, resulting in different conclusions regarding the effect of the size of the gastric pouch on weight loss. One of the major differences contributing to varying literature studies results is the measurement method used for gastric pouch size. We conclude that using two staplers is not a way to achieve a better result. As the best measurement method has not been defined, studies comparing different methods are suggested; here, the aim was to use a more simple and clinical method regarding this issue.

Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery. RESULTS: At 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.