RESUMEN
Variation in availability, format, and standardization of patient attributes across health care organizations impacts patient-matching performance. We report on the changing nature of patient-matching features available from 2010-2020 across diverse care settings. We asked 38 health care provider organizations about their current patient attribute data-collection practices. All sites collected name, date of birth (DOB), address, and phone number. Name, DOB, current address, social security number (SSN), sex, and phone number were most commonly used for cross-provider patient matching. Electronic health record queries for a subset of 20 participating sites revealed that DOB, first name, last name, city, and postal codes were highly available (>90%) across health care organizations and time. SSN declined slightly in the last years of the study period. Birth sex, gender identity, language, country full name, country abbreviation, health insurance number, ethnicity, cell phone number, email address, and weight increased over 50% from 2010 to 2020. Understanding the wide variation in available patient attributes across care settings in the United States can guide selection and standardization efforts for improved patient matching in the United States.
RESUMEN
To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted (RARC) vs. open radical cystectomy (ORC) at a single academic institution. We retrospectively identified patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder at our institution from 2007 to 2017. Data collected included age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), Charlson Age-Adjusted Comorbidity Index (CCI), final pathologic stage, surgical margins, lymph-node yield, estimated blood loss (EBL), 90-day complication rate, and length of stay (LOS). We evaluated overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for covariates. We identified 232 patients (73 RARC, 159 ORC) who underwent radical cystectomy. Patients who underwent RARC were older (71.8 vs. 67.5, p < 0.05) and had higher CCI scores (6.2 vs. 5.3, p < 0.05). In comparing perioperative outcomes, RARC patients had lower EBL (500 vs. 850, p < 0.01), lower blood transfusion rate (p < 0.01), and lower lymph-node yield (12 vs. 20, p < 0.01), and higher ICU admission rate (29% vs. 16% p < 0.01). There was no difference in BMI (p = 0.93), sex (p = 0.28), final pathological stage (p = 0.35), positive surgical margins (p = 0.47), complications (p = 0.58), or LOS (p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in OS (p = 0.26) or RFS (p = 0.86). There was no difference in restricted mean survival time for OS (53 vs. 56 months, p = 0.81) or for RFS (65 vs. 64 months, p = 0.90). Cox multivariate regression models showed that surgical approach does not have a significant impact on OS (p = 0.46) or RFS (p = 0.35). Our study indicates that in our 10-year experience, patients undergoing there was no difference between RARC and ORC patients with respect to OS and RFS despite being older and having more comorbidities. Our work supports the importance of patient selection to optimize outcomes.
