RESUMEN
In the current ERP study, an active oddball task was carried out, testing pure tones and auditory, visual and audiovisual syllables. For pure tones, an MMN, an N2b, and a P3 were found, confirming traditional findings. Auditory syllables evoked an N2 and a P3. We found that the amplitude of the P3 depended on the distance between standard and deviant. A smaller distance required more attention, which was reflected in a larger amplitude. An analysis of audiovisual material, after correction for visual activity, showed that McGurk type stimuli evoked brain responses that differed from both the standard and the congruent deviants. Finally, we found that congruent audiovisual stimuli elicited an N2 with a shorter latency and a P3 with a smaller amplitude than auditory stimuli. The current ERP study, thus, shows that for audiovisual processing the whole is more than the sum of its parts.
Asunto(s)
Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Encéfalo/fisiología , Comprensión/fisiología , Potenciales Evocados Auditivos/fisiología , Potenciales Evocados Visuales/fisiología , Percepción Visual/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Anciano , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Percepción del Habla/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Individuals with aphasia have more problems detecting small differences between speech sounds than larger ones. This paper reports how phonemic processing is impaired and how this is influenced by speechreading. A non-word discrimination task was carried out with 'audiovisual', 'auditory only' and 'visual only' stimulus display. Subjects had to decide whether two presented stimuli were the same. Six aphasic subjects with speech sound processing difficulties and 14 non-brain-damaged control subjects participated in this study. It was found that the aphasic subjects have difficulties in discriminating pairs of non-words, which are more profound for small differences. Differences in 'voicing' were least often detected and therefore seem most difficult to perceive. This implies different processing of the phonetic dimensions in speech sound perception. Performance improved when speechreading was possible. As this improvement is not based on differences in place of articulation only, theories of audiovisual processing need to be revised.
