Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(6): 1549-1557.e3, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma affects 5% to 13% of pregnant women, and many require daily pharmacotherapy to achieve asthma control; however, adherence to medication during pregnancy often decreases. OBJECTIVE: To understand the association between the use of or adherence to asthma medication with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Using linked population-based administrative databases from Alberta, Canada (2012-2018), pregnant women with asthma were categorized based on asthma medication use 1 year before pregnancy: short-acting ß-agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and ICS with long-acting ß-agonists (ICS+LABA). Women on ICS+LABA were grouped by trajectory of adherence during pregnancy using group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between the use of or trajectories of adherence to asthma medication during pregnancy with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 13,509 of 238,751 (5.7%) pregnant women had asthma before pregnancy (SABA: 24.7%; ICS: 12.5%; ICS+LABA: 25.1%; none: 36.1%). The use of SABA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 2.64), ICS (aOR: 3.37, 95% CI: 2.10, 5.39), and ICS+LABA (aOR: 3.64, 95% CI: 2.57, 5.17) had greater odds of disease exacerbation than no asthma medication during pregnancy. ICS+LABA adherence groups during pregnancy included low (79.8%), moderate-to-decreasing (14.0%), and moderate-to-increasing (6.2%). The moderate-to-decreasing (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84) and moderate-to-increasing (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.83) adherence groups had greater odds of disease exacerbation than the low adherence group. ICS use during pregnancy decreased odds of preterm birth (aOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.97). Other group comparisons were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the importance of continuing asthma maintenance medication during pregnancy to improve outcomes. Future research should study the postpartum and long-term outcomes with asthma medication during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Adulto , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Recién Nacido , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Alberta/epidemiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Administración por Inhalación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico
2.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 38(4): 291-301, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, access to prenatal care was lower among some socio-demographic groups. This pandemic caused disruptions to routine preventative care, which could have increased inequalities. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the COVID-19 pandemic increased inequalities in access to prenatal care among those who are younger, live in rural areas, have a lower socio-economic situation (SES) and are recent immigrants. METHODS: We used linked administrative datasets from ICES to identify a population-based cohort of 455,245 deliveries in Ontario from January 2018 to December 2021. Our outcomes were first-trimester prenatal visits, first-trimester ultrasound and adequacy of prenatal care. We used joinpoint analysis to examine outcome time trends and identify trend change points. We stratified analyses by age, rural residence, SES and recent immigration, and examined risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) between groups at the beginning and end of the study period. RESULTS: For all outcomes, we noted disruptions to care beginning in March or April 2020 and returning to previous trends by November 2020. Inequalities were stable across groups, except recent immigrants. In July 2017, 65.0% and 69.8% of recent immigrants and non-immigrants, respectively, received ultrasounds in the first trimester (RD -4.8%, 95% CI -8.0, -1.5). By October 2020, this had increased to 75.4%, with no difference with non-immigrants (RD 0.4%, 95% CI -2.4, 3.2). Adequacy of prenatal care showed more intensive care as of November 2020, reflecting a higher number of visits. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that inequalities between socio-economic groups that existed prior to the pandemic worsened after March 2020. The pandemic may be associated with increased access to care for recent immigrants. The introduction of virtual visits may have resulted in a higher number of prenatal care visits.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Atención Prenatal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Ontario/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estudios de Cohortes , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente
3.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 23(1): 295, 2023 12 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prospective cohorts may be vulnerable to bias due to attrition. Inverse probability weights have been proposed as a method to help mitigate this bias. The current study used the "All Our Families" longitudinal pregnancy cohort of 3351 maternal-infant pairs and aimed to develop inverse probability weights using logistic regression models to predict study continuation versus drop-out from baseline to the three-year data collection wave. METHODS: Two methods of variable selection took place. One method was a knowledge-based a priori variable selection approach, while the second used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). The ability of each model to predict continuing participation through discrimination and calibration for both approaches were evaluated by examining area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and calibration plots, respectively. Stabilized inverse probability weights were generated using predicted probabilities. Weight performance was assessed using standardized differences of baseline characteristics for those who continue in study and those that do not, with and without weights (unadjusted estimates). RESULTS: The a priori and LASSO variable selection method prediction models had good and fair discrimination with AUROC of 0.69 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.67-0.71) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively. Calibration plots and non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit Tests indicated that both the a priori (p = 0.329) and LASSO model (p = 0.242) were well-calibrated. Unweighted results indicated large (> 10%) standardized differences in 15 demographic variables (range: 11 - 29%), when comparing those who continued in the study with those that did not. Weights derived from the a priori and LASSO models reduced standardized differences relative to unadjusted estimates, with the largest differences of 13% and 5%, respectively. Additionally, when applying the same LASSO variable selection method to develop weights in future data collection waves, standardized differences remained below 10% for each demographic variable. CONCLUSION: The LASSO variable selection approach produced robust weights that addressed non-response bias more than the knowledge-driven approach. These weights can be applied to analyses across multiple longitudinal waves of data collection to reduce bias.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Prospectivos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Probabilidad , Recolección de Datos
4.
PLoS One ; 18(8): e0288952, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561748

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant people have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease. They have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 infection control policies, which exacerbated conditions resulting in intimate partner violence, healthcare access, and mental health distress. This project examines the impact of accumulated individual health decisions and describes how perinatal care and health outcomes changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: Quantitative strand: Describe differences between 2019, 2021, and 2022 birth groups related to maternal vaccination, perinatal care, and mental health care. Examine the differential impacts on racialized and low-income pregnant people.Qualitative strand: Understand how pregnant people's perceptions of COVID-19 risk influenced their decision-making about vaccination, perinatal care, social support, and mental health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a Canadian convergent parallel mixed-methods study. The quantitative strand uses a retrospective cohort design to assess birth group differences in rates of Tdap and COVID-19 vaccination, gestational diabetes screening, length of post-partum hospital stay, and onset of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder, using administrative data from ICES, formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Ontario) and PopulationData BC (PopData) (British Columbia). Differences by socioeconomic and ethnocultural status will also be examined. The qualitative strand employs qualitative description to interview people who gave birth between May 2020- December 2021 about their COVID-19 risk perception and health decision-making process. Data integration will occur during design and interpretation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from McMaster University and the University of British Columbia. Findings will be disseminated via manuscripts, presentations, and patient-facing infographics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05663762.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Colombia Británica
5.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 26(4): 565-570, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37382647

RESUMEN

Longitudinal changes in maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms and predictors of symptom variation among a group of middle-to-upper income Canadian women (n = 2152) were examined prior to the pandemic (2017-2019) and at three pandemic timepoints (May-July 2020, March-April 2021, November-December 2021). Mean maternal depression and anxiety scores were elevated throughout the pandemic. Pre-pandemic depressive symptoms were associated with greater increases in depressive symptoms. Coping and relationship quality were protective factors. Supporting the development of coping strategies may mitigate mental health concerns among mothers.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Canadá/epidemiología , Pandemias , Madres , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología
6.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 77(6): 410-416, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Tabora Maternal and Newborn Health Initiative project was a multicomponent intervention to improve maternal and newborn health in the Tabora region of Tanzania. Components included training healthcare providers and community health workers, infrastructure upgrades, and improvements to health management. This study aimed to examine the impact of trainings on four key outcomes: skilled birth attendance, antenatal care, respectful maternity care and patient-provider communication. METHODS: Trainings were delivered sequentially at four time points between 2018 and 2019 in eight districts (two districts at a time). Cross-sectional surveys were administered to a random sample of households in all districts at baseline and after each training wave. Due to practical necessities, the original stepped wedge cluster randomised design of the evaluation was altered mid-programme. Therefore, a difference-in-differences for multiple groups in multiple periods was adopted to compare outcomes in treated districts to not yet treated districts. Risk differences were estimated for the overall average treatment effect on the treated and group/time dynamic effects. RESULTS: Respondents reported 3895 deliveries over the course of the study. The intervention was associated with a 12.9 percentage point increase in skilled birth attendance (95% CI 0.4 to 25.4), which began to increase 4 months after the end of training in each district. There was little evidence of impact on antenatal care visits, respectful treatment during delivery and patient-provider communication. CONCLUSION: Interventions to train local healthcare workers in basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care increased skilled birth attendance but had limited impact on other pregnancy-related outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Recién Nacido , Niño , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Tanzanía , Salud Infantil , Estudios Transversales , Atención Prenatal
7.
Can J Psychiatry ; 68(4): 269-282, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36947012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence of elevated maternal anxiety and/or depression symptoms up to eight years after childbirth and the association between role and relationship strains during parenting and mental health challenges from three to eight years after childbirth. METHODS: This study used data from the All Our Families longitudinal pregnancy cohort. Role and relationship strain factors and anxiety and depression symptoms were measured at repeated time points from four months to eight years after childbirth. The proportion of women with elevated anxiety and/or depression was calculated at each available time point. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine the association between role and relationship strain factors and anxiety and/or depression from three to eight years after childbirth. Predicted probability of having anxiety and/or depression was estimated across those with and without challenges with roles and relationships. The models were adjusted for known risk factors such as maternal income and perinatal anxiety and/or depression. RESULTS: The prevalence of elevated anxiety and/or depression ranged from 18.8% (at four months) to 26.2% (at eight years). The adjusted odds ratio of anxiety and/or depression was 3.5 (95% CI = 2.9, 4.3) for those juggling family responsibilities and 2.4 (95% CI = 2.0, 3.0) for those with stressful partner relationship compared to their counterparts. Similarly, experiencing financial crunch and poor partner relationship were associated with increased mental health difficulties. Women without challenges in roles or relationships had a 23% lower predicted probability of anxiety and/or depression than those with the challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring mothers for anxiety and depression beyond the postpartum period and strategies that address role and relationship challenges may be valuable to women at risk of anxiety and depression.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Salud Mental , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Madres/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico
9.
CMAJ Open ; 10(2): E296-E303, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35383034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence affects up to half of women, yet few speak to their health care provider about or receive treatment for the condition. To aid with identifying subpopulations at risk for urinary incontinence, we examined the associations between 10 chronic health conditions and urinary incontinence among Canadian adult females. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013-2014) involving female respondents aged 25 years or older living in a private dwelling. Presence of chronic conditions and urinary incontinence were measured by self-report. We used logistic regression modelling with sampling weights, controlling for age, income, ethnicity, body mass index and smoking. Multiple imputation and probabilistic bias analysis were used to address missing covariate data and unmeasured confounding from parity. RESULTS: Our analysis included 60 186 respondents representing more than 12 million Canadian females, of whom 45.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.0%-46.6%) reported at least 1 chronic condition. Chronic conditions were associated with more than twice the odds of urinary incontinence (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% CI 2.02-2.89). Associations were largest for bowel disorders (adjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 2.44-3.49); modest for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.63-2.45), asthma (adjusted OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.52-2.19), arthritis (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.74-2.24) and heart disease (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.48-2.02); and smallest for diabetes (adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.41) and high blood pressure (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.44). Results slightly attenuated but did not substantively change after imputation and bias analysis. INTERPRETATION: We found that chronic conditions are associated with significantly higher odds of comorbid urinary incontinence among Canadian adult females, which is consistent with previous research. Our findings support routine inquiry regarding urinary incontinence symptoms among women accessing health care for chronic conditions.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Urinaria , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(2): 148-156, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416358

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in the rate of cesarean delivery between Canadian-born women and immigrants to Canada and by duration of time in Canada and rate of cesarean delivery in their country-of-origin. METHODS: We used linked data from hospitalization records and the Canadian Community Health Survey for all deliveries after 20 weeks gestation between 2002 and 2017 in Canada (excluding Québec). Odds of cesarean delivery in recent immigrants (<5 y in Canada) and non-recent immigrants (≥5 y in Canada) were compared with those of Canadian-born women using multivariable logistic regression. Immigrants were further categorized using the cesarean delivery rate in their country-of-origin as low (<10%), medium (≥10 to <35%), or high (≥35%). RESULTS: Of the 53 505 women included, 89% were Canadian-born, 4% were recent immigrants and 7% were non-recent immigrants. Overall, 28.6% of women had a cesarean delivery. After adjusting for medical and socio-economic factors, the odds of cesarean delivery among recent immigrants (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.95-1.34) and non-recent immigrants (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.98-1.25) did not differ statistically from those of Canadian-born women. Recent immigrants from countries with lower cesarean delivery rates had higher odds of cesarean delivery (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05-1.70), whereas the odds of cesarean for recent immigrants from medium- and high-rate countries did not differ from those of Canadian-born women. CONCLUSION: After accounting for demographic and medical factors, few differences remained in cesarean delivery rates between immigrants and Canadian-born women. Country-of-origin practices are unlikely to reflect preferences for cesarean delivery in immigrant women in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Canadá/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260590, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852012

RESUMEN

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are associated with increased risk of offspring neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting long-term adverse impacts on fetal brain development. However, the relationship between HDP and deficits in general child development is unclear. Our objective was to assess the association between HDP and motor and cognitive developmental delay in children at 36 months of age. We analyzed data from the All Our Families community-based cohort study (n = 1554). Diagnosis of HDP-gestational or chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia-was measured through medical records. Child development was measured by maternal-report on five domains of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3). Standardized cut-off scores were used to operationalize binary variables for any delay, motor delay, and cognitive delay. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression, sequentially controlling for potential confounders followed by factors suspected to lie on the causal pathway. Overall, 8.0% of women had HDP and hypertension-exposed children had higher prevalence of delay than unexposed children. Hypertension-exposed children had elevated risk for developmental delay, but CIs crossed the null. The aRRs quantifying the fully adjusted effect of HDP on child development were 1.19 (95% CI 0.92, 1.53) for any delay, 1.18 (95% CI 0.86, 1.61) for motor delay, and 1.24 (95% CI 0.83, 1.85) for cognitive delay. We did not find a statistically significant association between HDP and developmental delay. Confidence intervals suggest that children exposed to HDP in utero have either similar or slightly elevated risk of any, motor, and cognitive delay at 36 months after controlling for maternal and obstetric characteristics. The observed direction of association aligns with evidence of biological mechanisms whereby hypertensive pathology can disrupt fetal neurodevelopment; however, more evidence is needed. Findings may have implications for early developmental monitoring and intervention following prenatal hypertension exposure.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/etiología , Factores de Edad , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Eclampsia/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Preeclampsia/etiología , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Front Glob Womens Health ; 2: 648428, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816203

RESUMEN

As the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) spread across Canada in March 2020, provinces imposed restrictions. These changes impacted how pregnant individuals received prenatal care and experienced childbirth. The stress caused by these changes may negatively affect the well-being of pregnant individuals with impacts on the developing child. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on prenatal care and birth plans of pregnant individuals in Canada and potential associations with maternal mental health. Data from 4,604 participants was collected from English- and French-speaking Canadians between April 5 and June 1, 2020 as part of the Canada-wide Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic study. Symptoms of maternal depression, general anxiety, and pregnancy-related anxiety were assessed. Participants also answered questions about disruptions and changes to prenatal care and their birth plans due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between prenatal care disruptions and maternal mental health. Cancellation of prenatal appointments and birth plan changes (specifically changes to childcare during birth and change of support person attending the birth) were significantly associated with greater odds of experiencing clinically elevated depression, anxiety, and/or pregnancy-related anxiety symptoms. These results highlight the need for reliable and accessible prenatal care during the pandemic, such as the integration of mental health screenings and co-ordination of prenatal care providers.

13.
Front Psychiatry ; 12: 597759, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34239455

RESUMEN

Objectives: Our aim is to understand the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on families who have been followed longitudinally in two cohorts studied in Alberta, Canada. We will examine household infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, financial impact, domestic violence, substance use, child school and daily life and relationships in the home. We will identify risk and protective factors for maternal mental health outcomes using longitudinal data that can inform policy and government resource allocation in future disasters. Methods: Mothers who are currently participating in two longitudinal studies, Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON; N = 1,800) and All Our Families (AOF: N = 2,534) were eligible to participate. Mothers were invited to complete the baseline COVID-19 Impact Survey (20-30 min) within 4 months of March 15, 2020, which was when the province of Alberta, Canada, implemented school closures and physical-distancing measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Mothers were asked to report on their own, their child's and their family's functioning. Mothers were re-surveyed at 6 months after completion of the initial COVID-19 Impact Survey, and will be re-surveyed again at 12 months. Results: Responses from participants in both cohorts will be examined in harmonized analyses as well as separately. Descriptive, multivariable analysis will be undertaken to examine risk and resiliency over time and factors that predict mental health and well-being. Conclusions: This study will provide timely information on the impact of COVID-19 for Albertan families. It will identify risk and protective factors for mental health and well-being among contemporary urban families supported by a publicly funded health care system to inform allocation of resources to support those most vulnerable during a global pandemic.

14.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E548-E555, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021012

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acceptance of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is critical to achieving high levels of immunization. The objectives of this study were to understand mothers' SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions to explore reasons for and against SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: Participants from the All Our Families pregnancy longitudinal cohort whose children had reached ages 9-12 years were invited in May-June 2020 to complete a survey on the impact of COVID-19. The survey covered topics about the impact of the pandemic and included 2 specific questions on mothers' intentions to vaccinate their child against SARS-CoV-2. Current responses were linked to previously collected data, including infant vaccine uptake. Multinomial regression models were run to estimate associations between demographic factors, past vaccination status and vaccination intention. Qualitative responses regarding factors affecting decision-making were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The response rate was 53.8% (1321/2455). A minority of children of participants had partial or no vaccinations at age 2 (n = 200, 15.1%). A total of 60.4% of mothers (n = 798) intended to vaccinate their children with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 8.6% (n = 113) did not intend to vaccinate and 31.0% (n = 410) were unsure. Lower education, lower income and incomplete vaccination history were inversely associated with intention to vaccinate. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses showed 10 themes, including safety and efficacy, long-term effects and a rushed process. INTERPRETATION: Within a cohort with historically high infant vaccination, a third of mothers remained unsure about vaccinating their children against SARS-CoV-2. Given the many uncertainties about future SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, clear communication regarding safety will be critical to ensuring vaccine uptake.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Intención , Madres/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Canadá , Niño , Escolaridad , Etnicidad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Renta , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(4): 422.e1-422.e11, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity is important to identify temporal trends, evaluate the impact of clinical practice changes or interventions, and monitor quality of care. A common source for severe maternal morbidity surveillance is hospital discharge data. On October 1, 2015, all hospitals in the United States transitioned from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding for diagnoses and procedures. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding systems on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the United States in hospital discharge data. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the National Inpatient Sample, obstetrical deliveries between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, were identified using a validated case definition. Severe maternal morbidity was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (January 1, 2012, to September 30, 2015) and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (October 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017) codes provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An interrupted time series and segmented regression analysis was used to assess the impact of the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity per 1000 obstetrical deliveries. RESULTS: From 22,751,941 deliveries, the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding era was 19.04 per 1000 obstetrical deliveries and decreased to 17.39 per 1000 obstetrical deliveries in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding era (P<.001). The transition to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding led to an immediate decrease in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (-2.26 cases of 1000 obstetrical deliveries) (P<.001). When blood products transfusion was removed from the case definition, the magnitude of the decrease in the incidence of SMM was much smaller (-0.60 cases/1000 obstetric deliveries), but still significant (P<.001). CONCLUSION: After the transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding for health diagnoses and procedures in the United States, there was an abrupt statistically significant and clinically meaningful decrease in the incidence of severe maternal morbidity in hospital discharge data. Changes in the underlying health of the obstetrical population are unlikely to explain the sudden change in severe maternal morbidity. Although much work has been done to validate the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe maternal morbidity, it is critical that validation studies be undertaken to validate the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for severe maternal morbidity to permit ongoing surveillance, quality improvement, and research activities that rely on hospital discharge data.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Mortalidad Materna , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Trastornos Puerperales/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/terapia , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/epidemiología , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/mortalidad , Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/terapia , Eclampsia/epidemiología , Eclampsia/mortalidad , Eclampsia/terapia , Embolia Aérea/epidemiología , Embolia Aérea/mortalidad , Embolia Aérea/terapia , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Morbilidad , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/mortalidad , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Trastornos Puerperales/mortalidad , Trastornos Puerperales/terapia , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Edema Pulmonar/mortalidad , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque/epidemiología
16.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 8(5): 405-415, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parents have faced substantial social and economic challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary cross-sectional research has demonstrated increases in mental health problems in mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with pre-pandemic estimates. We aimed to study an existing longitudinal cohort of mothers to assess changes in the prevalence of maternal depression and anxiety symptoms as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic over time and at the individual level. METHODS: In this longitudinal observational study, women who took part in the All Our Families pregnancy cohort in Canada were invited to complete a COVID-19 impact survey between May 20 and July 15, 2020. Women who had not agreed to additional research, had discontinued, were lost to follow-up, or who were not contactable via email were excluded. Maternal depression and anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared with three previous estimates collected at 3, 5, and 8-year timepoints (between April, 2012, and October, 2019). Depression symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Repeated cross-sectional analyses were done to assess temporal trends and fixed-effects regression models were fitted to assess within-person change over time. FINDINGS: Of the 3387 women included in the All Our Families study, 2445 women were eligible and were invited to participate in the COVID-19 impact study, of whom 1333 consented to participate, and 1301 were included in the longitudinal analysis. At the COVID-19 impact survey timepoint, a higher proportion of mothers had clinically significant depression (35·21%, 95% CI 32·48-38·04) and anxiety symptoms (31·39%, 28·76-34·15) than at all previous data collection timepoints. The mean depression score (8·31, 95% CI 7·97-8·65) and anxiety score (11·90, 11·66-12·13) at the COVID-19 pandemic timepoint were higher than previous data collection waves at the 3-year timepoint (mean depression score 5·05, 4·85-5·25; mean anxiety score 9·51, 9·35-9·66), 5-year timepoint (mean depression score 5·43, 5·20-5·66; mean anxiety score 9·49, 9·33-9·65), and 8-year timepoint (mean depression score 5·79, 5·55-6·02; mean anxiety score 10·26, 10·10-10·42). For the within-person comparisons, depression scores were a mean of 2·30 points (95% CI 1·95-2·65) higher and anxiety scores were a mean of 1·04 points (0·65-1·43) higher at the COVID-19 pandemic timepoint, after controlling for time trends. Larger increases in depression and anxiety symptoms were observed for women who had income disruptions, difficulty balancing home schooling with work responsibilities, and those with difficulty obtaining childcare. White mothers had greater increases in anxiety scores than non-white mothers and health-care workers had smaller increases in depressive symptoms than non-health-care workers. INTERPRETATION: Compared with previous estimates, the prevalence of maternal depression and anxiety among mothers in a Canadian cohort increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Financial support, childcare provision, and avoiding the closure of schools, might be key priorities for preventing future increases in maternal psychological distress. FUNDING: Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Interdisciplinary Team, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alberta Innovates, and Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , COVID-19 , Depresión , Estrés Financiero , Madres/psicología , Estrés Psicológico , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Canadá/epidemiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estrés Financiero/epidemiología , Estrés Financiero/psicología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/tendencias , Evaluación de Necesidades , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de la Mujer/tendencias
17.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246670, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33571314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In June 2013, the city of Calgary, Alberta and surrounding areas sustained significant flooding which resulted in large scale evacuations and closure of businesses and schools. Floods can increase stress which may negatively impact perinatal outcomes and mental health, but previous research is inconsistent. The objectives of this study are to examine the impact of the flood on pregnancy health, birth outcomes and postpartum mental health. METHODS: Linked administrative data from the province of Alberta were used. Outcomes included preterm birth, small for gestational age, a new diagnoses of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, and a diagnosis of, or drug prescription for, depression or anxiety. Data were analyzed using a quasi-experimental difference in difference design, comparing flooded and non-flooded areas and in affected and unaffected time periods. Multivariable log binomial regression models were used to estimate risk ratios, adjusted for maternal age. Marginal probabilities for the difference in difference term were used to show the potential effect of the flood. RESULTS: Participants included 18,266 nulliparous women for the pregnancy outcomes, and 26,956 women with infants for the mental health analysis. There were no effects for preterm birth (DID 0.00, CI: -0.02, 0.02), small for gestational age (DID 0.00, CI: -0.02, 0.02), or new cases of preeclampsia (DID 0.00, CI: -0.01, 0.01). There was a small increase in new cases of gestational hypertension (DID 0.02, CI: 0.01, 0.03) in flood affected areas. There were no differences in postpartum anxiety or depression prescriptions or diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The Calgary 2013 flood was associated with a minor increase in gestational hypertension and not other health outcomes. Universal prenatal care and magnitude of the disaster may have minimized impacts of the flood on pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Alberta , Estudios de Cohortes , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Inundaciones , Humanos , Lactante , Edad Materna , Salud Mental , Desastres Naturales , Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión
18.
Children (Basel) ; 7(10)2020 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33081229

RESUMEN

Self-regulation is the ability to manage emotions, modulate behaviors, and focus attention. This critical skill begins to develop in infancy, improves substantially in early childhood and continues through adolescence, and has been linked to long-term health and well-being. The objectives of this study were to determine risk factors and moderators associated with the three elements of self-regulation (i.e., inattention, emotional control, or behavioral control) as well as overall self-regulation, among children at age 5. Participants were mother-child dyads from the All Our Families study (n = 1644). Self-regulation was assessed at age 5. Risk factors included income, maternal mental health, child sex, and screen time, and potential moderation by parenting and childcare. Adjusted odds ratios of children being at risk for poor self were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Twenty-one percent of children had poor self-regulation skills. Risk factors for poor self-regulation included lower income, maternal mental health difficulties, and male sex. Childcare and poor parenting did not moderate these associations and hostile and ineffective parenting was independently associated with poor self-regulation. Excess screen time (>1 h per day) was associated with poor self-regulation. Self-regulation involves a complex and overlapping set of skills and risk factors that operate differently on different elements. Parenting and participation in childcare do not appear to moderate the associations between lower income, maternal mental health, male sex, and screen time with child self-regulation.

19.
CMAJ Open ; 8(2): E352-E359, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32381686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The negative effect of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on physical and mental health has led to calls for routine screening for ACEs in primary care settings. We aimed to examine the association between maternal ACEs and children's behaviour problems (externalizing and internalizing) at age 5 in the context of other known predictors. METHODS: We analyzed data from mother-and-child dyads participating in the All Our Families cohort in Calgary, Canada, between 2011 and 2017. Data were collected for factors related to the individual child (sex, age, temperament and behaviour), the mother (adverse childhood experiences, mental health, personality and parenting) and sociodemographic characteristics (family income, ethnicity and family structure) when the children were 3 and 5 years of age. We used logistic regression models to estimate crude and adjusted associations between maternal ACEs and children's externalizing (hyperactivity and aggression) and internalizing (anxiety, depression and somatization) behaviours. RESULTS: Data were available for 1688 mother-and-child dyads. In the crude models, the presence of 4 or more maternal ACEs was associated with children's externalizing and internalizing behaviours at age 5. However, these associations were attenuated with adjustment. Persistent maternal mental health symptoms were associated with both externalizing and internalizing behaviours at age 5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.50-7.05, and adjusted OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.66-3.81, respectively). High levels of ineffective parenting behaviours were also associated with both externalizing and internalizing behaviours at age 5 (adjusted OR 6.27, 95% CI 4.30-9.14, and adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03-1.99, respectively). INTERPRETATION: The association between maternal ACEs and children's behaviour at age 5 was weakened in the presence of other maternal and family-level factors. Assessments of maternal mental health and parenting behaviours may be better targets for identifying children at risk of behavioural problems.


Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Conducta Infantil , Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Canadá/epidemiología , Salud Infantil , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Salud Materna , Salud Mental , Responsabilidad Parental , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 55(2): 259-267, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31256206

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Low social support during the perinatal period can increase the risk of postpartum depression and anxiety after giving birth but little is known about women's trajectories of social support during this time. This study will identify trajectories of social support among women from second trimester to 4-month postpartum, and the characteristics associated with different trajectories. METHODS: Data from the All Our Families longitudinal birth cohort was used to assess women's perceived social support during their second trimester, third trimester, and at 4-month postpartum (n = 3387). Group-based trajectory modeling was used to determine the number of groups, shape of trajectories, and proportion of women with differing trajectories. Multinomial regression was used to compare probability of group membership. RESULTS: Six distinct trajectory groups were identified, with the majority of participants belonging to groups with stable, high social support (60.6%). Only 2.7% of women had consistently low levels of social support, and 2.3% had rising levels. Membership in groups with lower levels of social support was associated with lower incomes and minority ethnicity. Women whose support improved over time may be more likely to be employed in pregnancy than those whose support remained low. CONCLUSION: Trajectories of social support are relatively stable in pregnancy and early postpartum. Socio-demographic indicators of vulnerability predict initial levels of support, and participating in the workforce may help improve perception of support over time.


Asunto(s)
Madres/psicología , Atención Posnatal/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión Posparto/psicología , Empleo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Trimestres del Embarazo/psicología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...