Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(5): 313-319, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301626

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the 2 most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regularly publishes and updates STI Treatment Guidelines. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare treatment rates for CT and GC among public and private providers. METHODS: Data from multiple sources, including electronic health records and Medicaid claims, were linked and integrated. Cases observed during 2016-2020 were defined based on positive laboratory results. We calculated descriptive statistics and odd ratios based on characteristics of providers and patients, stratifying by public versus private providers. Univariate logistic regression models were used to examine the factors associated with recommended treatment. RESULTS: Overall, we found that 82.2% and 63.0% of initial CT and GC episodes, respectively, received Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended treatment. The public STI clinic treated more than 90% of CT and GC cases consistently across the 5-year period. Private providers were significantly less likely to treat first episodes for CT (79.6%) and GC (53.3%; P < 0.01). Other factors associated with a higher likelihood of recommended treatment included being male, being HIV positive, and identifying as Black or multiracial. Among GC cases, 10.8% received nonrecommended treatment; all CT cases with treatment occurred per guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Although these treatment rates are higher than previous studies, there remain significant gaps in STI treatment that require intervention from public health.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Gonorrea , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Chlamydia trachomatis , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Gonorrea/prevención & control , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/prevención & control , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevalencia
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(4): 209-214, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36584164

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the 2 most common reported sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Current recommendations are to presumptively treat CT and/or GC in persons with symptoms or known contact. This review characterizes the literature around studies with presumptive treatment, including identifying rates of presumptive treatment and overtreatment and undertreatment rates. Of the 18 articles that met our inclusion criteria, 6 pertained to outpatient settings. In the outpatient setting, presumptive treatment rates, for both asymptomatic and symptomic patients, varied from 12% to 100%, and the percent positive of those presumptively treated ranged from 25% to 46%. Three studies also reported data on positive results in patients not presumptively treated, which ranged from 2% to 9%. Two studies reported median follow-up time for untreated, which was roughly 9 days. The remaining 12 articles pertained to the emergency setting where presumptive treatment rates, for both asymptomatic and symptomic patients, varied from 16% to 91%, the percent positive following presumptive treatment ranged from 14% to 59%. Positive results without presumptive treatment ranged from 4% to 52%. Two studies reported the percent positive without any treatment (6% and 32%, respectively) and one reported follow-up time for untreated infections (median, 4.8 days). Rates of presumptive treatment, as well as rates of overtreatment or undertreatment vary widely across studies and within care settings. Given the large variability in presumptive treatment, the focus on urban settings, and minimal focus on social determinants of health, additional studies are needed to guide treatment practices for CT and GC in outpatient and emergency settings.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Gonorrea , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Chlamydia trachomatis
3.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 20(6): 11, 2018 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666937

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Effective HIV prevention techniques for women are of critical importance, as nearly half of all HIV infections globally are in women. This article reviews the recent literature on biomedical approaches to HIV prevention in women. RECENT FINDINGS: In trials in which women were adherent to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP was equally efficacious in men and women. However, in studies of oral PrEP exclusively in women, adherence was low, and it was not efficacious. In trials of topical PrEP, including vaginal tenofovir gel and the monthly dapivirine ring, efficacy was also dependent upon adherence. Treatment as prevention (TasP) is a very effective HIV prevention strategy, though limited in that it is not controlled by the HIV-uninfected partner. Adherence is an important factor in the efficacy of biomedical interventions for HIV prevention in women; continued research is needed to identify the most efficacious and acceptable agents for women. Oral PrEP is currently recommended for the following groups of HIV-negative women: heterosexual women in ongoing sexual relationships with a partner infected with or at substantial risk of HIV infection and women who inject drugs and share injection or drug preparation equipment.

4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(5): 266-271, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28407641

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea) remains an important cause of reproductive and obstetric complications. There has been limited population-based research to evaluate the association between maternal gonorrhea and adverse birth outcomes. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted of women with singleton pregnancies in Washington State from 2003 to 2014 using linked birth certificate and birth hospitalization discharge data. The exposed cohort consisted of women with gonorrhea diagnosed during pregnancy. The unexposed group, defined as pregnant women without gonorrhea, was selected by frequency-matching by birth year in a 4:1 ratio. Logistic regression was used to determine crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the association of maternal gonorrhea and adverse birth outcomes. RESULTS: Women with gonorrhea during pregnancy (N = 819) were more likely to be younger, black, single, less educated, multiparous, and smokers compared with women without gonorrhea (N = 3276). Maternal gonorrhea was significantly associated with a 40% increased odds (adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.8) of low birth weight infants compared with women without gonorrhea when adjusted for marital and smoking status. Maternal gonorrhea was associated with a 60% increased odds (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0) of small for gestational age infants compared with women without gonorrhea. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that pregnant women with gonorrhea were more likely to have low birth weight infants, consistent with prior literature, and provided new evidence that maternal gonorrhea is associated with small for gestational age infants. These findings support increased public health efforts to prevent, identify, and treat gonorrhea infection during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Gonorrea/epidemiología , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/microbiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Gonorrea/microbiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Edad Materna , Registros Médicos , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/microbiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Washingtón/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(4): 249-254, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28282653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of in-person versus telephone interviews for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/sexually transmitted disease partner services (PS) is uncertain. METHODS: We compared outcomes of in-person versus telephone PS interviews for early syphilis (ES) and newly diagnosed HIV in King County, Washington from 2010 to 2014. We used multivariable Poisson regression to evaluate indices (number of partners per original patient [OP]) for partners named, notified, tested, diagnosed, and treated (ES only). Analyses controlled for OP age, sex, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, time to interview, place of diagnosis, and staff performing interviews. RESULTS: For ES, 682 and 646 OPs underwent in-person and telephone interviews, respectively. In-person syphilis PS were associated with higher indices of partners named (in-person index [IPI], 3.43; telephone index [TI], 2.06; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.82), notified (IPI, 1.70; TI, 1.13; aRR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.24-1.56), tested (IPI, 1.15; TI, 0.72; aRR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16-1.54), and empirically treated (IPI, 1.03; TI, 0.74; aRR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37), but no difference in infected partners treated (IPI, 0.28; TI, 0.24; aRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.21). For HIV, 358 and 489 OPs underwent in-person and telephone interviews, respectively. In-person HIV PS were associated with higher indices of partners named (IPI, 1.87; TI, 1.28; aRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18-1.62), notified (IPI, 1.38; TI, 0.92; aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50), and newly diagnosed with HIV (IPI, 0.10; TI, 0.05; aRR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.04-4.50), but no difference in partners tested (IPI, 0.61; TI, 0.48; aRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Although in-person syphilis PS were associated with some increased PS indices, they did not increase the treatment of infected partners. In contrast, in-person HIV PS resulted in increased HIV case finding. These data support prioritizing in-person PS for HIV and suggest that in-person PS for syphilis may not have major public health benefit.


Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Parejas Sexuales , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Distribución de Poisson , Análisis de Regresión , Sífilis/psicología , Washingtón
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...