Estimating the healthcare burden of Prurigo Nodularis in England: a CPRD database study.

Purpose: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a skin disease characterized by intensely itchy skin nodules and is associated with a significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study aimed to estimate the HCRU of patients in England with PN overall and moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) in particular.Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Patients with Mild PN (MiPN) were matched to patients with MSPN by age and gender for the primary analysis. Patients were enrolled in the study between 1st April 2007 and 1st March 2019. All-cause HCRU was calculated, including primary and secondary care contacts and costs (cost-year 2022).Results: Of 23,522 identified patients, 8,933 met the inclusion criteria, with a primary matched cohort of 2,479 PN patients. During follow up, the matched cohort's primary care visits were 21.27 per patient year (PPY) for MSPN group and 11.35 PPY for MiPN group. Any outpatient visits were 10.72 PPY and 4.87 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively. Outpatient dermatology visits were 1.96 PPY and 1.14 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively.Conclusion: PN, especially MSPN, has a high HCRU burden in England, highlighting the need for new and improved disease management treatments.

Prevalence, Incidence and Treatment Patterns of Prurigo Nodularis in England: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a pruritic skin disease characterised by multiple, intensely itchy skin nodules in symmetrically distributed areas of the extremities. There are very limited studies on the epidemiology and treatment pathways for PN, especially moderate-to-severe PN, from England. OBJECTIVES: To assess the epidemiology and treatment pathways of mild and moderate-to-severe PN in England. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a PN specific diagnosis code any time between 1 April 2007 and 1 March 2019 (patient identification period) were selected. Patients were included if their first PN diagnostic code (index diagnosis date, IDD) was recorded during the identification period, with data available 6 months pre- and ≥12 months post-IDD. Patients were classified into moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) or mild PN (MiPN) based on the presence or absence of a prescription record, post IDD, for either a systemic immunosuppressant or a gabapentinoid. Patients with MSPN and MiPN were matched 1:1 for age, gender and IDD. Prevalence and incidence were calculated for each year from 2007 to 2019. Drugs prescribed post IDD were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 8,933 patients (MSPN: 2,498 patients; MiPN: 6,539 patients) were included for the study; 2,462 patients each with MiPN and MSPN were included for the comparative analysis. Atopic dermatitis, asthma and eosinophilic oesophagitis were significantly higher (all p<0.001) in patients with MSPN (vs MiPN). The prevalence of overall PN cases increased during the study period. The incidence rate also showed a similar trend. The rates of prescription of potent and super potent topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors, first- and second- generation antihistamines, oral and injectable systemic corticosteroid, methotrexate, antidepressants and tacrolimus were significantly higher (all p <0.001) in patients with MSPN (vs MiPN). CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of PN was consistent with other European studies. Patients with MSPN received a significantly higher number of prescriptions for potent TCS and systemic drugs, as compared with milder patients.

Predicting hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: A UK population-based study and validation of risk scores.

BACKGROUND: HE is a common neurologic complication in cirrhosis associated with substantial disease and economic burden. HE symptoms are nonspecific and there are limited ways of identifying patients with cirrhosis at high risk of later developing HE. A risk score was previously developed to identify patients at risk of developing HE in a predominately male US cohort. Here, we evaluated the performance of the HE risk scores in a UK cohort study. METHODS: Health care records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and linked Hospital Episode Statistics were used to select patients with cirrhosis who were diagnosed with HE, confirmed by a diagnosis code for HE or a rifaximin-α prescription. The index date was the date of incident cirrhosis. The study period was from January 2003 to June 2019. RESULTS: A total of 40,809 patients with cirrhosis were selected in the UK cohort, of whom 59% were male. A total of 1561 patients were diagnosed with HE. Applying the UK cohort to the baseline sensitivity risk cutoff (≥-11) from the US cohort provided a sensitivity of 92% and a negative predictive value of 99%. Within a longitudinal model, applying a sensitivity cutoff of ≥-3 to this cohort gave a sensitivity of 89% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSIONS: Using data from the UK, the previously developed HE risk scores were found to be reliable for selecting those most likely to progress to HE in patients with liver cirrhosis. Despite the HE risk scores originally being estimated using the data from a predominately male US cohort, the scores were validated and found to be generalizable to female patients.

The absolute risk of incident type 2 diabetes following exposure to systemic corticosteroids in selected steroid-related and phenotypic groups.

AIMS: Exposure to corticosteroids is known to increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. We estimated the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in selected patient groups exposed to systemic corticosteroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective, observational cohort study, using real-world data from UK primary care, patients were selected who had at least one episode of exposure to oral or intravenous corticosteroids for any indication. Corticosteroid-exposed patients were matched with non-exposed patients. Relative dosage was estimated as a weight-based, prednisolone-equivalent dose. Crude rates of progression to type 2 diabetes were determined for patient groups defined by relevant steroid-related and phenotypic characteristics present at corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: Overall, rates of incidence of type 2 diabetes were 12.5 and 6.7 events per thousand person-years' (pkpy) exposure, respectively, in those who received at least one dose of corticosteroids versus those never exposed. This represented a rate ratio of 1.85 (95% CI 1.74-1.97). The incidence of type 2 diabetes was found to be associated with several of the selected characteristics, both individually and multi-dimensionally. The highest rate of incident type 2 diabetes was observed in very severely obese men aged 46-55 years having had the longest corticosteroid exposure and highest corticosteroid dose (190 incident events pkpy exposure). CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid exposure increased the risk of incident type 2 diabetes, and there was evidence of both a dose-response and a duration response. The impact of corticosteroid exposure upon the rate of incident type 2 diabetes appeared, however, to involve a complex, multi-dimensional interaction between the selected characteristics, some of which might be impacted by reverse causality.