Long COVID: Factors influencing persistent symptoms and the impact of gender.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the prevalence as well as clinical and epidemiological features of persistent symptoms after acute COVID-19, focusing on gender-specific differences in a primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 1542 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. The study population comprised 55.77% females (mean age: 45.04 years). Risk factors for persistent COVID-19 were analyzed, revealing disparities between men and women. Symptom clusters and their prevalence were assessed over time, along with functional status using the post-COVID-19 functional status scale. RESULTS: The prevalence of persistent COVID-19 was 12.38%, with females exhibiting a 1.5 times higher risk. Females displayed a higher number of visits and persistent symptoms at 90 days, decreasing after one year. Symptom clusters varied between genders, with females experiencing more dermatological issues. Functional status analysis revealed that females had a better pre-infection status, similar status to males at 90 days, and improved status at 180-, 270-, and 365-days post-infection. Logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between persistence, gender, hospitalization, radiological abnormalities, age, and immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the prevalence and clinical characteristics of persistent COVID-19 in a primary care population. Females exhibited a higher risk of persistent symptoms and displayed distinct patterns in symptom clusters and functional status compared to males. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the long-term effects of COVID-19 and highlight the importance of gender-specific considerations in post-acute care.

¿Desechan correctamente los pacientes sus dispositivos de inhalación? Proyecto AIRE / Do patients deliver inhalers correctly? The AIRE project

Objetivos: Conocer las actitudes y conocimientos de los usuarios respecto a cómo y dónde se desechan los inhaladores tras finalizar su uso, y describir su opinión sobre el uso de inhaladores recargables. Métodos: Estudio transversal, multicéntrico y de opinión, diseñado para conocer el comportamiento y actitudes respecto al circuito de desecho de los inhaladores y a la utilización de inhaladores recargables. La información se obtuvo mediante la aplicación de un cuestionario ad hoc de conocimientos y actitudes, conteniendo datos de uso y reciclado de inhaladores. Resultados: Se incluyeron 303 sujetos (57,5 ± 19,9 años; tiempo de empleo de inhaladores 9,6±9,8 años; asma/EPOC: 46,2/25,7%). El inhalador más empleado fue el aerosol presurizado en suspensión (30,5%). La mayoría otorgaban una elevada importancia al reciclado de inhaladores (7,75±2,76, sobre 10), y a disponer cada seis meses del mismo inhalador recargable mensualmente (7,77±2,79, sobre 10). El 33% refería haber sido informado alguna vez sobre dónde depositar el inhalador. En cuanto al reciclado, el 42,9% lo hacía en el punto SIGRE de la farmacia. Respecto al destino final de los inhaladores, el 43,6% creía que los dispositivos entregados se reciclaban o destruían y un 35,3% desconocía qué ocurre con los inhaladores después de depositarlos en el punto SIGRE. Conclusiones: A pesar de que los usuarios consideran importante el reciclado de inhaladores y disponer de inhaladores recargables, un porcentaje significativo no los deposita en el punto SIGRE, no han sido informados sobre el lugar correcto de depósito, y desconocen qué ocurre con los inhaladores desechados. Son necesarias campañas de información (AU)

Objectives: To assess users’ attitudes and knowledge of users about how and where inhalers are removed after finalizing their use, and to describe their opinion about utilizing re-usable inhalers. Methods: Cross-sectional, multi-center, and opinion survey, conducted to assess behavior and attitudes regarding the disposal of inhalers recycling and the use of re-usable inhalers, through the application of an ad hoc questionnaire about the knowledge and attitudes, with data about the use and recycling of inhalers. Results: A total of 303 subjects (57.5±19.9 years; time of inhalers’ use 9.6±9.8 years; asthma/COPD: 46.2%/25.7%) were included. Pressurized metered-dose inhalers were the most commonly used inhalers (30.5%). Most users considered the recycling of inhalers to be very important (7.75±2.76, out of 10), and rated highly the availability of having a monthly rechargeable inhaler every 6 months (7.77±2.79, out of 10). Only 33% of users had been informed by their healthcare professionals about the place of delivering the inhaler. With respect to recycling, 42.9% of all users recycled in the SIGRE point of the pharmacy. Regarding the final destination of inhalers, 43.6% thought that the removed inhalers were recycled or destroyed, but 35.3% did not know what would happen to the inhalers after placing in the SIGRE point. Conclusions: Despite users considered the importance of inhalers recycling and the availability of re-usable inhalers, a significant proportion does not recycle in the SIGRE point, has not been informed about the appropriate place of delivering the inhaler and ignores what happens to inhalers. Information campaigns are warranted (AU)

[Do patients deliver inhalers correctly? The AIRE project]. / ¿Desechan correctamente los pacientes sus dispositivos de inhalación? Proyecto AIRE.

OBJECTIVES: To assess users' attitudes and knowledge of users about how and where inhalers are removed after finalizing their use, and to describe their opinion about utilizing re-usable inhalers. METHODS: Cross-sectional, multi-center, and opinion survey, conducted to assess behavior and attitudes regarding the disposal of inhalers recycling and the use of re-usable inhalers, through the application of an ad hoc questionnaire about the knowledge and attitudes, with data about the use and recycling of inhalers. RESULTS: A total of 303 subjects (57.5±19.9 years; time of inhalers' use 9.6±9.8 years; asthma/COPD: 46.2%/25.7%) were included. Pressurized metered-dose inhalers were the most commonly used inhalers (30.5%). Most users considered the recycling of inhalers to be very important (7.75±2.76, out of 10), and rated highly the availability of having a monthly rechargeable inhaler every 6 months (7.77±2.79, out of 10). Only 33% of users had been informed by their healthcare professionals about the place of delivering the inhaler. With respect to recycling, 42.9% of all users recycled in the SIGRE point of the pharmacy. Regarding the final destination of inhalers, 43.6% thought that the removed inhalers were recycled or destroyed, but 35.3% did not know what would happen to the inhalers after placing in the SIGRE point. CONCLUSIONS: Despite users considered the importance of inhalers recycling and the availability of re-usable inhalers, a significant proportion does not recycle in the SIGRE point, has not been informed about the appropriate place of delivering the inhaler and ignores what happens to inhalers. Information campaigns are warranted.

[Comparing group educational intervention to individual and self-learning in COPD]. / Comparación de intervención educacional grupal frente a una individual y el autoaprendizaje en EPOC.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered a public health issue which affects 10.2% of Spanish population between 40 and 80 years of age. Many patients do not perform well the inhalation technique. Error rates vary between 50-80% depending on the device under study. These values haven been proven to decrease with educational interventions. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether a group educational intervention is superior to an individual intervention or to a conventional approach in these patients as regards quality of life measured by means of the total score of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT),of adherence to treatment, exacerbations and hospitalizations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter, multidisciplinary cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial with three branches (conventional intervention, individual intervention and group intervention) in a cohort of COPD-patients. Sociodemographic data and risk factors were collected and several questionnaires were completed (CAT, BODEx, Barthel, Lawton y Brody). A descriptive analysis of qualitative and quantitative variables and a multiple linear regression were conducted. OUTCOMES: 149 patients of average age 69.08 (SD 1.26). Significant differences were observed in CAT in the different intervention groups according to the level of severity on BODEx. The rate of patients performing well the inhalation technique was significantly lower at the beginning of the study and the number of exacerbations was lower after the intervention. Last year's exacerbations were linearly related to post-intervention suffering. CONCLUSIONS: Better results are obtained using the traditional and individual interventions. There is a decrease in number of exacerbations, hospitalizations, CAT score and post-intervention inhalation technique.

Mortalidad por asma en España, 1990-2015 / Mortality due to asthma in Spain, 1990-2015

INTRODUCCIÓN: El asma es un importante problema de salud pública que afecta a más de 300 millones de personas en el mundo. La importancia de una enfermedad se puede medir por su prevalencia, la carga asistencial, la morbimortalidad. OBJETIVOS: Conocer la carga asistencial o la morbimortalidad por asma en España en el periodo 1990-2015. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se han obtenido del Instituto Nacional de Estadística el número de defunciones atribuidas al asma por sexo y grupos quinquenales junto con la población a 1 de julio entre los años 1990-2015. A partir de los datos se calcula la tasa de mortalidad bruta por 100.000 habitantes globales, por sexo y grupos etarios. RESULTADOS: En 2015 fallecieron en España con diagnóstico de asma como causa principal 1.134 personas (195 varones y 939 mujeres), con tasas del 0,82/100.000 habitantes frente a 2,58, respectivamente. Las tasas de mortalidad por asma en España se mantienen estables en los últimos 25 años y son ligeramente superiores a las de los países de nuestro entorno. Mientras que la mortalidad por asma ha disminuido en varones más de un 67%, se han incrementado en un 32% en las mujeres. Los fallecimientos se concentran en mayores de 65 y sobre todo 80 años en los que el valor de los certificados de defunción es más limitado. La mortalidad en los grupos de 5-35 años está entre las más bajas de Europa

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a major public health problem affecting more than 300 million people worldwide. The importance of a disease can be measured by its prevalence, burden of care, and its morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the mortality rates for asthma in Spain in the period 1990-2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The number of deaths attributed to asthma by gender and five-year age groups, together with the population as of July 1 between the years 1990-2015 were obtained from the National Institute of Statistics. Based on these data, the gross mortality rate per 100,000 global inhabitants was calculated, by gender and age groups. RESULTS: In 2015, 1,134 people (195 men and 939 women) died in Spain with a diagnosis of asthma as the main cause, with rates of 0.82 / 100,000 inhabitants compared to 2.58, respectively. The asthma mortality rates in Spain have remained stable for the last 25 years, and are slightly higher than those in the surrounding countries. While asthma mortality has declined by over 67% in males, it has increased by 32% in females. The deaths are concentrated in those over 65 years, and particularly over 80 years, where the value of death certificates is more limited. Mortality in the 5-35 years age groups is among the lowest in Europe

[Mortality due to asthma in Spain, 1990-2015]. / Mortalidad por asma en España, 1990-2015.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a major public health problem affecting more than 300 million people worldwide. The importance of a disease can be measured by its prevalence, burden of care, and its morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the mortality rates for asthma in Spain in the period 1990-2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The number of deaths attributed to asthma by gender and five-year age groups, together with the population as of July 1 between the years 1990-2015 were obtained from the National Institute of Statistics. Based on these data, the gross mortality rate per 100,000 global inhabitants was calculated, by gender and age groups. RESULTS: In 2015, 1,134 people (195 men and 939 women) died in Spain with a diagnosis of asthma as the main cause, with rates of 0.82 / 100,000 inhabitants compared to 2.58, respectively. The asthma mortality rates in Spain have remained stable for the last 25 years, and are slightly higher than those in the surrounding countries. While asthma mortality has declined by over 67% in males, it has increased by 32% in females. The deaths are concentrated in those over 65 years, and particularly over 80 years, where the value of death certificates is more limited. Mortality in the 5-35 years age groups is among the lowest in Europe.

Referral Criteria for Asthma: Consensus Document.

Asthma is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in Spain. Current treatments ensure that the disease is controlled in most cases. However, disease is often uncontrolled in daily clinical practice, mainly owing to underdiagnosis, loss to follow-up, and poor adherence to therapy. In order to improve this situation, we must coordinate all those health professionals who intervene in patient care. Therefore, the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (semFYC), the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians (SEMG), and the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have drawn up a consensus document in which they establish criteria for referral and guidelines for the diagnosis, control, and follow-up of patients with asthma. The document aims to facilitate continuing and improved care in this area.

Referral criteria for asthma: consensus document

Asthma is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in Spain. Current treatments ensure that the disease is controlled in most cases. However, disease is often uncontrolled in daily clinical practice, mainly owing to underdiagnosis, loss to follow-up, and poor adherence to therapy. In order to improve this situation, we must coordinate all those health professionals who intervene in patient care. Therefore, the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (semFYC), the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians (SEMG), and the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have drawn up a consensus document in which they establish criteria for referral and guidelines for the diagnosis, control, and follow-up of patients with asthma. The document aims to facilitate continuing and improved care in this area

El asma es una de las enfermedades crónicas más prevalentes en España. Los tratamientos disponibles permitirían tener controlados a la mayoría de los pacientes; aunque, en la práctica diaria, no se alcanza en muchos casos debido, fundamentalmente, al infradiagnóstico, pérdida de seguimiento y escasa adhesión terapéutica. Para mejorar esta situación es fundamental la coordinación de todos los profesionales que intervienen en la atención del paciente asmático. La Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología Clínica (SEAIC), la Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN), la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria (semFYC), la Sociedad Española de Médicos Generales y de Familia (SEMG) y la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) han consensuado un documento donde se establecen criterios de derivación y pautas de actuación en el diagnóstico, control y seguimiento del paciente asmático que faciliten la continuidad asistencial y una mejor atención en cada ámbito

Hipotiroidismo adulto en una zona básica de salud / Hypothyroidism in adults in a basic health area

Introducción. El objetivo del presente trabajo es estudiar la prevalencia y las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de la enfermedad hipotiroidea en el adulto, a través del registro de datos electrónicos de la historia clínica. Material y métodos. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal. La población diana eran los pacientes de los centros de salud de Lucena I y II (Córdoba). Criterios de inclusión: pacientes que tuvieran 14 años o más, diagnosticados de hipotiroidismo, nacidos y con residencia en Lucena. Se seleccionaron 214 pacientes a través de un muestreo aleatorio, los cuales se sometieron a una entrevista clínica mediante un cuestionario. Resultados. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 49,71 años (DT 17,03; IC 95% 47,34-51,98), siendo el 85,5% mujeres. El 74,8% son diagnosticados de hipotiroidismo subclínico frente al 18,7% de hipotiroidismo primario y un 6,5% de hipotiroidismo secundario. El 53,7% (IC 95% 46,81-60,59) de los pacientes diagnosticados de hipotiroidismo no tienen pedidos los anticuerpos tiroideos; sin embargo, un 75,2% (IC 95% 68,89-80,86) están recibiendo tratamiento con levotiroxina. La prevalencia de hipotiroidismo fue de un 5,7% (IC 95% 5,46-5,96). Conclusiones. El hipotiroidismo subclínico es muy frecuente en las consultas de Atención Primaria. Muchos pacientes no están correctamente diagnosticados y otros están sobremedicados, por lo que sería preciso revisar el diagnóstico

Introduction. The objective of the present study is to study the prevalence, as well as the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hypothyroid disease in adults using the computerised clinical records. Material and methods. Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. The target population was the patients of the health centres of Lucena I and II (Córdoba). Inclusion criteria: Patients 14 years or older, diagnosed with hypothyroidism, born and resident in Lucena. Two hundred and fourteen patients were recruited by random sampling, who then underwent a clinical interview using a questionnaire. Results. The mean age of the patients was 49.71 years (SD 17.03; 95% CI 47.34-51.98), with 85.5% women. A diagnosis of sub-clinical hypothyroidism was found in 74.8%, compared to 18.7% of primary hypothyroidism, and 6.5% of secondary hypothyroidism. The 53.7% (95% CI 46.81-60.59) of patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism did not have thyroid antibodies results. However, 75.2% (95% CI 68.89-80.86) were being treated with levothyroxine. The prevalence of hypothyroidism was 5.7% (95% CI 5.46-5.96). Conclusions. Sub-clinical hypothyroidism is very common in Primary Care clinics. Many patients are not correctly diagnosed and many are over-medicated, suggesting a need to review the diagnosis

[Hypothyroidism in adults in a basic health area]. / Hipotiroidismo adulto en una zona básica de salud.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study is to study the prevalence, as well as the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hypothyroid disease in adults using the computerised clinical records. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. The target population was the patients of the health centres of Lucena I and II (Córdoba). INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients 14 years or older, diagnosed with hypothyroidism, born and resident in Lucena. Two hundred and fourteen patients were recruited by random sampling, who then underwent a clinical interview using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 49.71 years (SD 17.03; 95% CI 47.34-51.98), with 85.5% women. A diagnosis of sub-clinical hypothyroidism was found in 74.8%, compared to 18.7% of primary hypothyroidism, and 6.5% of secondary hypothyroidism. The 53.7% (95% CI 46.81-60.59) of patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism did not have thyroid antibodies results. However, 75.2% (95% CI 68.89-80.86) were being treated with levothyroxine. The prevalence of hypothyroidism was 5.7% (95% CI 5.46-5.96). CONCLUSIONS: Sub-clinical hypothyroidism is very common in Primary Care clinics. Many patients are not correctly diagnosed and many are over-medicated, suggesting a need to review the diagnosis.

Calidad de vida del paciente asmático con beclometasona/formoterol. Análisis de coste-utilidad / Quality of life of patients with asthma on beclomethasone/formoterol. Cost-utility analysis

Objetivo. Realizar un estudio de coste-utilidad en pacientes asmáticos en tratamiento con beclometasona/formoterol en combinación fija en Atención Primaria de Salud. Material y métodos. Se seleccionó de forma no probabilística un grupo de pacientes asmáticos con severidad persistente moderada/grave (GEMA 2009), en tratamiento con beclometasona/formoterol a dosis fijas, mayores de 18 años, que habían otorgado su consentimiento informado. El período de observación del estudio fue de 6 meses. Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, duración de la enfermedad, recursos sanitarios empleados, análisis de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud mediante EQ-5D y SF-36, y el cuestionario específico Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Para las variables cualitativas se analizó la frecuencia y la proporción. Para las cuantitativas, la media, la DE y el IC 95%. En la estadística inferencial se utilizaron los test de Chi-cuadrado, t de Student y ANOVA. Las comparaciones se realizaron con una significación estadística de 0,05. Resultados. Sesenta y cuatro pacientes completaron el estudio; el 59,4% eran mujeres. La edad media fue de 49 años y la duración media de la enfermedad fue de 93 meses. Para el control del asma el 53% de los pacientes tenían una pauta prescrita de uno/12 h. Todas las escalas de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud se modificaron respecto del inicio del estudio y las diferencias fueron estadísticamente significativas. Nuestros pacientes lograron mejores puntuaciones en calidad de vida relacionada con la salud que la cohorte española de asma. El coste-utilidad incremental de beclometasona/formoterol frente a la opción habitual de tratamiento fue de 6.256 €/AVAC (AU)

Aim. To perform a cost-utility analysis on asthmatic patients on beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination in Primary Health Care. Material and methods Non-probability sampling was used to select a group of asthmatic patients with moderate/severe persistent severity (GEMA 2009), treated with beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination, over 18 years, had given their informed consent. The study observation period was 6 months. The variables studied were: age, sex, duration of disease, health resources used, analysis of health related quality of life by EQ-5D and SF-36, and the specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. For the qualitative variables, the frequency and percentages were calculated, and for the quantitative variables, the mean, SD and 95% CI. Chi-square, Student t-test and ANOVA were used for statistical inference. Comparisons were made with a statistical significance of 0.05. Results. Of the 64 patients that completed the study, 59.4% were female. The mean age was 49 years, and mean disease duration was 93 months. For asthma control, 53% of patients had a prescription pattern of one/12 h. All health related quality of life scales were modified with respect to the baseline and the differences were statistically significant. Our patients had a better health related quality of life than Spanish asthma cohort. The incremental cost utility beclomethasone/formoterol versus usual treatment option was € 6,256/QALY (AU)

[Quality of life of patients with asthma on beclomethasone/formoterol. Cost-utility analysis]. / Calidad de vida del paciente asmático con beclometasona/formoterol. Análisis de coste-utilidad.

AIM: To perform a cost-utility analysis on asthmatic patients on beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination in Primary Health Care. Material and methods Non-probability sampling was used to select a group of asthmatic patients with moderate/severe persistent severity (GEMA 2009), treated with beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination, over 18 years, had given their informed consent. The study observation period was 6 months. The variables studied were: age, sex, duration of disease, health resources used, analysis of health related quality of life by EQ-5D and SF-36, and the specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. For the qualitative variables, the frequency and percentages were calculated, and for the quantitative variables, the mean, SD and 95% CI. Chi-square, Student t-test and ANOVA were used for statistical inference. Comparisons were made with a statistical significance of 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 64 patients that completed the study, 59.4% were female. The mean age was 49 years, and mean disease duration was 93 months. For asthma control, 53% of patients had a prescription pattern of one/12h. All health related quality of life scales were modified with respect to the baseline and the differences were statistically significant. Our patients had a better health related quality of life than Spanish asthma cohort. The incremental cost utility beclomethasone/formoterol versus usual treatment option was € 6,256/QALY.

Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: morbimortalidad e impacto sanitario / Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Morbimortality and healthcare burden

La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) constituye un problema de salud pública de enorme y creciente importancia por su alta prevalencia, elevada morbimortalidad y costes socioeconómicos. Diversos estudios epidemiológicos españoles cifran la prevalencia en un 10% de la población adulta, pareciendo haberse estabilizado su crecimiento. Con todo, el infradiagnóstico sigue superando el 75%. El diagnóstico en fases de obstrucción leve y moderada se asocia a mayor supervivencia y menores costes (14 años y 9.730 D ), frente a los 10 años de supervivencia y 43.785 D de los pacientes diagnosticados en fases de obstrucción grave. La EPOC constituyó la cuarta causa de mortalidad en España en 2011, si bien las tasas de mortalidad ajustadas han disminuido en la última década más de un 20%, sobre todo en varones. Los pacientes con EPOC avanzada fallecen de la misma, pero los pacientes con EPOC leve o moderada lo hacen por enfermedades cardiovasculares o cáncer (sobre todo de pulmón). Se estima que el coste anual de la enfermedad alcanza los 3.000 millones de euros al año. Estos aumentan con la gravedad espirométrica y se asocian fundamentalmente con las agudizaciones (casi un 60% de los costes directos). La comorbilidad, entendida como la presencia de dolencias que coexisten con la enfermedad de estudio, es mayor en los pacientes con EPOC que en la población general, y condiciona resultados en salud (AU)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an enormous public health problem and of growing importance due to its high prevalence, elevated morbimortality, and socioeconomic costs. Many Spanish epidemiological studies report a prevalence of 10% of the adult population, with its growth appearing to have stabilised. Nevertheless, over 75% of cases are still underdiagnosed. The diagnosis of mild and moderate obstruction is associated with a higher survival and lower costs (14 years and D 9,730) compared to 10 years survival and D 43,785 of patients diagnosed in the severe obstruction phase. COPD was the fourth cause of death in Spain in 2011, although the adjusted mortality rates have decreased more than 20% in the last decade, particularly in males. Patients with advanced COPD die from it, but patients with mild or moderate COPD die due to cardiovascular diseases or cancer (mainly of the lung). It is estimated that the annual cost of the disease is around 3,000 million Euros. These increase with the spirometric severity, and is mainly associated with exacerbations (almost 60% of the direct costs). Comorbidity, that is the presence of diseases that coexist with the studied disease, is higher in patients with COPD than in the general population and affects health results. © 2013 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved (AU)

[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Morbimortality and healthcare burden]. / Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: morbimortalidad e impacto sanitario.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an enormous public health problem and of growing importance due to its high prevalence, elevated morbimortality, and socioeconomic costs. Many Spanish epidemiological studies report a prevalence of 10% of the adult population, with its growth appearing to have stabilised. Nevertheless, over 75% of cases are still underdiagnosed. The diagnosis of mild and moderate obstruction is associated with a higher survival and lower costs (14 years and €9,730) compared to 10 years survival and €43,785 of patients diagnosed in the severe obstruction phase. COPD was the fourth cause of death in Spain in 2011, although the adjusted mortality rates have decreased more than 20% in the last decade, particularly in males. Patients with advanced COPD die from it, but patients with mild or moderate COPD die due to cardiovascular diseases or cancer (mainly of the lung). It is estimated that the annual cost of the disease is around 3,000 million Euros. These increase with the spirometric severity, and is mainly associated with exacerbations (almost 60% of the direct costs). Comorbidity, that is the presence of diseases that coexist with the studied disease, is higher in patients with COPD than in the general population and affects health results.

Documento de consenso sobre asma bronquial en Andalucía / No disponible

No disponible