Profile of the cardiovascular specialist physician workforce in Canada, 2004.

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) examined the demand for cardiovascular care, the supply of specialist physicians to provide that care and physician survey data on human resource issues, including workload, wait times, satisfaction and future intentions. The CCS used data from the National Physician Survey 2004, the CCS Cardiovascular Specialist Physician Workforce Survey 2001, the Canadian Medical Association's Physician Resource Evaluation Template and procedural volumes from the Canadian Institute for Health Information to analyze key human resource planning issues for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. There are indications in the 2004 survey data that the average workload continues to be very heavy, with an average workweek of between 55 h (cardiologists) and 64 h (cardiac surgeons), and an additional on-call responsibility of between 106 h (cardiologists) and 196 h (cardiac surgeons) per month, of which 38 h (cardiologists) to 45 h (cardiac surgeons) are spent with patients. As a result, many patients are waiting too long for nonurgent referrals. In addition to the toll that this heavy workload exacts from the current workforce and the long wait times for nonurgent referrals, the workload may also compromise the profession's ability to attract physicians into cardiovascular care. Medical graduates, particularly female graduates, tend to consider workload flexibility and predictability when choosing a specialty area. Supply projections already show a decline in the number of cardiovascular specialists per 100,000 elderly population over the next 15 years. If cardiology and cardiac surgery are perceived by female medical graduates (which now make up over 50% of all graduates) as unattractive areas of specialization, the profession may have difficulty attracting needed new entrants in the future. The CCS Workforce Project Team endorses and supports the 2003 Canadian Medical Association's recommendation for the federal government to establish an independent institute for health human resources to foster and conduct research on the supply, mix, distribution and sustainability of Canada's health workforce. The CCS should also renew its commitment to invest in related activities to improve access to cardiovascular care. The CCS Workforce Project Team also believes that the profession's ability to recruit and retain new medical graduates will depend on how well it addresses the identified quality of work life issues.

Vasopressin versus epinephrine for inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Survival rates for cardiac arrest patients, both in and out of hospital, are poor. Results of a previous study suggest better outcomes for patients treated with vasopressin than for those given epinephrine, in the out-of-hospital setting. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness and safety of these drugs for the treatment of in-patient cardiac arrest. METHODS: We did a triple-blind randomised trial in the emergency departments, critical care units, and wards of three Canadian teaching hospitals. We assigned adults who had cardiac arrest and required drug therapy to receive one dose of vasopressin 40 U or epinephrine 1 mg intravenously, as the initial vasopressor. Patients who failed to respond to the study intervention were given epinephrine as a rescue medication. The primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge, survival to 1 h, and neurological function. Preplanned subgroup assessments included patients with myocardial ischaemia or infarction, initial cardiac rhythm, and age. FINDINGS: We assigned 104 patients to vasopressin and 96 to epinephrine. For patients receiving vasopressin or epinephrine survival did not differ for hospital discharge (12 [12%] vs 13 [14%], respectively; p50.67; 95% CI for absolute increase in survival 211.8% to 7.8%) or for 1 h survival (40 [39%] vs 34 [35%]; p50.66; 210.9% to 17.0%); survivors had closely similar median mini-mental state examination scores (36 [range 19-38] vs 35 [20-40]; p50.75) and median cerebral performance category scores (1 vs 1). INTERPRETATION: We failed to detect any survival advantage for vasopressin over epinephrine. We cannot recommend the routine use of vasopressin for inhospital cardiac arrest patients, and disagree with American Heart Association guidelines, which recommend vasopressin as alternative therapy for cardiac arrest.

Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to directly compare primary stenting with accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis remains the standard therapy for AMI. However, at some institutions primary angioplasty is favored. Randomized trials have shown that primary angioplasty is equal or superior to thrombolysis, while recent studies demonstrate that stent implantation improves the results of primary angioplasty. METHODS: Patients presenting with AMI were randomly assigned to primary stenting (n = 62) or accelerated t-PA (n = 61). The primary end point was the composite of death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR) for ischemia at six months. RESULTS: The primary end point was significantly reduced in the stent group compared with the accelerated t-PA group, 24.2% versus 55.7% (p < 0.001). The event rates for other outcomes in the stent group versus the t-PA group were as follows: mortality: 4.8% versus 3.3% (p = 1.00); reinfarction: 6.5% versus 16.4% (p = 0.096); stroke: 1.6% versus 4.9% (p = 0.36); recurrent unstable ischemia: 9.7% versus 26.2% (p = 0.03) and repeat TVR for ischemia: 14.5% versus 49.2% (p < 0.001). The median length of the initial hospitalization was four days in the stent group and seven days in the t-PA group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with accelerated t-PA, primary stenting reduces death, reinfarction, stroke or repeat TVR for ischemia. In centers where facilities and experienced interventionists are available, primary stenting offers an attractive alternative to thrombolysis.

Early and follow-up angiography in minimally invasive coronary bypass without mechanical stabilization.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to assess the early and late outcome of coronary anastomosis constructed on a beating heart without the help of mechanical stabilization. METHODS: All consecutive patients (51) from January 1996 to September 1997 who had bypass done by one surgeon using a left minithoracotomy (39) or median sternotomy (12) on a beating heart with occlusive local snares without mechanical stabilization underwent follow-up angiography early (100%) (within 6 hours) and late (63.5%) at a mean of 9.6+/-4.48 months (range, 3.3 to 19.1 months). RESULTS: The cumulative late patency was 95.4% (83 of 87 patients), with two early and two late occlusions. There was no early or late mortality or perioperative myocardial infarction. Two patients (3.9%) developed recurrent angina. Four anastomotic irregularities (4 of 32 patients, 12.6%) have cleared up on follow-up angiography. There was no evidence of late stenosis at the snare sites used for local occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive coronary bypass is safe and effective. Early angiographic abnormalities should be interpreted with caution and we could not demonstrate any long-term deleterious effects of local snaring.

Establishing an approach for patients with recent coronary occlusion: identification of viable myocardium.

BACKGROUND: Revascularization of occluded coronary arteries after myocardial infarction (MI) may restore flow to viable myocardium and improve ventricular function. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the potential utility of thallium-201 viability imaging for the prediction of recovery of regional ventricular function in patients undergoing revascularization of total or subtotal occlusion of infarct-related arteries (TIMI 0-2 flow) during the convalescent period after MI. METHODS: Twenty-three patients were identified < 6 weeks after MI and underwent Tl-201 viability imaging (rest imaging, n = 16; stress/reinjection imaging, n = 7) and radionuclide angiography. Patients were revascularized with percutaneous transluminal coronary artery in 10, stent in 10, and bypass in 3. Follow-up radionuclide angiography at 3 months was used to assess recovery of regional wall motion. RESULTS: Among 41 abnormal wall motion segments in the infarct territories, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for Tl-201 imaging in the prediction of recovery of regional function were 89% (25/28), 54% (7/13), and 78% (32/41), respectively. When 8 segments supplied by vessels with restenosis to >70% were excluded, specificity improved to 70%. Wall motion scores improved in those with adequate revascularization (1.6+/-1.4 vs 2.7+/-1.6; P < .001) but not in those with restenosis or occlusion (1.8+/-1.0 vs 2.0+/-1.6; P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an occluded artery after MI, Tl-201 viability imaging can detect recoverable myocardium with reasonable accuracy and may help select which patients will most benefit from revascularization.

Predictors of long-term outcome after stent implantation in a saphenous vein graft.

Stenting of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is associated with significant clinical events at late follow-up. We sought to determine predictors of clinical outcome after this procedure. One hundred twenty-eight balloon-expandable stents were implanted in the SVGs of 106 patients. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were analyzed. All grafts, including those not stented, were scored for extent of disease involving the luminal surface of the graft, and for the presence of low profile lesions (< 50% graft stenosis) and/or high profile lesions (> or = 50% graft stenosis). The in-hospital success rate was 98.1%. Before discharge, no patient died, required bypass surgery, or had repeat angioplasty of the same graft. Follow-up was obtained on all the patients. At a median of 18 months, 15% had died, 17% had experienced myocardial infarction, 20% had required repeat bypass surgery, and 37% needed repeat angioplasty to either the same site or a different lesion. Event-free survival was recorded in only 44% of the patients. The cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival at 2.4 years was 78.7%. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, predictors of survival were the absence of a high profile lesion in any nonstented patent graft (p = 0.004), and the use of lipid-lowering agents at follow-up (p = 0.01). Stenting SVG lesions can be performed with a high degree of procedural success, but at long-term follow-up there is a high rate of cardiac events. The absence of a high profile lesion in any nonstented patent graft is the strongest predictor of survival.

Coronary stenting in unstable angina: early and late clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the procedural and long term success of coronary stenting in patients presenting with unstable angina and the effect of warfarin on the clinical outcome of these high risk patients. DESIGN: A nonrandomized, retrospective analysis of patients presenting with unstable angina. SETTING: A tertiary care, Canadian university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Of 1250 patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty between January 1994 and June 1995, 365 underwent coronary stenting. The study population consisted of the 156 patients presenting with unstable angina who underwent coronary stenting. Patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV and postinfarction angina were included. INTERVENTIONS: Stent delivery by standard techniques to the target lesion was successful in all patients. At discharge, 88 patients were prescribed warfarin, ticlopidine and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA); the remaining 68 patients received only ticlopidine and ASA. Late clinical outcomes were assessed by telephone interview. RESULTS: The overall procedural success rate was 96%. One patient died in hospital (0.6%). Other events were abrupt closure (1.9%), myocardial infarction (1.9%) and urgent bypass surgery (1.9%). During follow-up, target vessel reintervention was needed in 19.6% of patients. Early and late clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between anticoagulated patients and those treated with antiplatelet agents alone, but anticoagulated patients had a significantly longer hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting in patients with unstable angina was associated with excellent procedural success and favourable late clinical outcomes. Warfarin added no apparent additional clinical benefit to antiplatelet agents in this high risk population.

Late clinical and angiographic follow-up after stenting in evolving and recent myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the late clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients who received stents within the first week of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that stenting of the infarct-related artery is a useful adjunct to balloon angioplasty in patients with AMI. However, there are limited data on the late clinical and angiographic outcomes of these patients. METHODS: Between January 1994 and September 1995, 32 patients at our institution underwent stenting of the infarct-related artery within 1 week of AMI: 13 within 14 hours (evolving group) and 19 between days 2 and 7 (recent AMI group). Late clinical follow-up was obtained on all survivors. Quantitative angiographic measurements were recorded on the stented segments before stenting, immediately after stenting, and on the follow-up angiograms. RESULTS: At 13.1+/-6.4 months from the time of stenting, three patients died and three required repeat angioplasty, but no patient had reinfarction or required bypass surgery. At follow-up 26 (81%) of 32 patients remained free of major cardiac events; of these, 24 (92%) were free of angina. Repeat angiography performed at 10.8+/-7.5 months in 26 (87%) of 30 discharged patients showed that all infarct-related arteries were patent and the restenosis rate was low: 22% in the 13 patients with evolving AMI (<14 hours) and 12% in the 19 patients with recent AMI (days 2 through 7). CONCLUSION: In this study stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with evolving and recent AMI was associated with a favorable late clinical outcome. Patency of the infarct-related artery was well maintained, and the restenosis rate was low.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass: a series with early qualitative angiographic follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Notwithstanding the advantages offered by minimally invasive coronary bypass, valid concerns have been raised about the technical accuracy of the distal anastomoses that can be fashioned on a beating heart. The main objective of our study was to undertake early and complete qualitative angiographic graft analysis in all patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: All enrolled patients (25) from January to October 1996 who had bypass done by one surgeon via left minithoracotomy (19) or median sternotomy (6) on a beating heart underwent postoperative angiography within 4 to 6 hours. These angiograms were then reviewed for qualitative analysis and compared with a similar series done under conventional cardioplegic arrest. RESULTS: There was 97.5% graft patency (28/29) and no anastomotic occlusions. One internal thoracic artery was damaged. There was no mortality and no perioperative myocardial infarctions. All patients are alive and symptom free. The follow-up is 100% complete and ranges from 15 days to 11 months. Of the 26 anastomoses that could be assessed, 21 (81%) were grade A and 5 (19%) were grade B. In comparison, 24/25 (96%) of the anastomoses fashioned on an arrested heart by the same surgeon were grade A (p = 0.175). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive coronary bypass can be carried out effectively and safely in a select group of patients, and the development of stabilizing devices and proper instrumentation should further improve results.

Stenting of the left main coronary artery in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.

Coronary artery bypass grafting is the treatment of choice for significant left main coronary artery disease. A patient with an occluded left main coronary artery in the setting of myocardial infarction, who was given streptokinase and subsequently managed with intracoronary stenting, is reported.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in myocardial infarction--Part 1: Clinical data.

There is an increasing body of clinical trial evidence to support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the management of patients following myocardial infarction (MI). Enthusiasm for the use of ACE inhibitors in the acute phase of MI had previously been tempered by the adverse results of an early trial. However, exciting new information is available from several large, randomized studies that has not only quelled those initial concerns but also attests to the efficacy of using this class of medication in the first 24 h after an acute MI. A Canadian National Opinion Leader Symposium was held in November 1995 to review the results of the major ACE inhibitor clinical trials and to discuss key issues and controversies surrounding their use in acute MI. The focus of this paper, the first of two parts, is on the results of the major ACE inhibitor clinical trials.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in myocardial infarction--Part 2: Clinical issues and controversies.

Over the past 10 years, several clinical studies have concluded that, in patients already receiving conventional therapies, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors further reduce the risk of death following myocardial infarction (MI). Post-MI ACE inhibitors have proven to be effective as long term therapy in high risk patients as well as when used for much shorter periods in a broad patient population. However, while considerable mortality data have been collected, the effects of ACE inhibitors post-MI on other cardiovascular outcomes have not been as well documented. In addition, a number of issues regarding the most effective use of these agents remain unresolved. This paper, the second of two parts, focuses on the clinical issues and controversies surrounding the use of ACE inhibitors following acute MI. The effects of ACE inhibitors on the outcomes of sudden death, nonsudden death, recurrent angina, mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction are reviewed and potential mechanisms of action are proposed. In addition, ACE inhibitor therapy is discussed in terms of patient selection criteria, choice of agent, optimal dosing regimen, concomitant use of other therapies and relative costs of treatment. Finally, potential mechanisms of action of ACE inhibitors are proposed for each of the outcomes examined.

Coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction--patency demonstrated postmortem.

This report describes a patient with an acute anterior myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty and stenting of the infarct-related artery. The patient died 48 h later and at postmortem examination, patency of the stented artery was demonstrated, despite the adverse conditions which preceded death.

Usefulness of intracoronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction.

Data on the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are limited. This study examined the immediate angiographic results and the early and late outcomes in 32 patients who had stenting during AMI. Coronary angiograms recorded at the time of stenting were reviewed with quantitative measurements obtained on the "target" coronary lesion before and after stenting. Immediate angiographic success was achieved in 30 patients (94%). The minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.36 +/- 0.37 to 2.58 +/- 0.41 mm (p<0.0001). Two patients died in the hospital. Of the remainder, none had reinfarction or required bypass surgery, whereas 2 required repeat coronary angioplasty for recurrent ischemia. Although thrombus at the infarct-related coronary lesion was initially detected in 41% of the patients, its presence was not associated with adverse procedural outcome. Only 1 patient had persistent thrombus after stenting, which resolved with intracoronary urokinase. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 +/- 4.1 months, there was 1 additional cardiac death, and no patient had AMI or required repeat coronary angioplasty or bypass; among the 29 survivors, 86% were free of angina. Thus, intracoronary stenting of the infarct-related artery in the setting of AMI is associated with excellent immediate angiographic success and a favorable clinical outcome, and remains an option even in the presence of thrombus.

The Ontario trial of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital and prehospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and standard CPR on the outcomes of in-hospital and prehospital victims of cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with blinding of allocation using a sealed container. SETTINGS: (1) Emergency departments, wards, and intensive care units of 5 university hospitals and (2) all locations outside hospitals in 2 midsized cities. PATIENTS: A total of 1784 adults who had cardiac arrest. INTERVENTION: Patients received either standard or ACD CPR throughout resuscitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival for 1 hour and to hospital discharge and the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: All characteristics were similar in the standard and ACD CPR groups for the 773 in-hospital patients and the 1011 prehospital patients. For in-hospital patients, there were no significant differences between the standard (n = 368) and ACD (n = 405) CPR groups in survival for 1 hour (35.1% vs 34.6%; P = .89), in survival until hospital discharge (11.4% vs 10.4%; P = .64), or in the median MMSE score of survivors (37 in both groups). For patients who collapsed outside the hospital, there were also no significant differences between the standard (n = 510) and ACD (n = 501) CPR groups in survival for 1 hour (16.5% vs 18.2%; P = .48), in survival to hospital discharge (3.7% vs 4.6%; P = .49), or in the median MMSE score of survivors (35 in both groups). Exploration of clinically important subgroups failed to identify any patients who appeared to benefit from ACD CPR. CONCLUSIONS: ACD CPR did not improve survival or neurologic outcomes in any group of patients with cardiac arrest.

Refractory ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction terminated by intracoronary stenting.

We report on a case of intractable recurrent ventricular fibrillation that responded poorly to antiarrhythmic medication and balloon angioplasty, but resolved instantaneously following intracoronary stenting.