Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 2024 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) causes considerable morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. Advanced age, prolonged stay in healthcare facility, and exposure to antibiotics are leading risk factors for CDI. Data on CDI clinical outcomes in the very elderly patients are limited. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized between 2016 and 2018 with CDI. We evaluated demographic clinical and laboratory parameters. Major clinical outcomes were evaluated including duration of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital mortality, 30 days post-discharge mortality, and readmission/mortality composite outcome. We compared patients aged up to 80 years (elderly) to those of 80 years old or more (very elderly). RESULTS: Of 196 patients included in the study, 112 (57%) were very elderly with a mean age of 86 versus 67 years in the elderly group. The duration of hospital stays, and intensive care unit admission frequency were significantly reduced in the very elderly (13 vs. 22 days p = 0.003 and 1.8% vs. 10.7% p = 0.01, respectively). No significant difference was found in the frequencies of in-hospital and in 30 days post-discharge mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the duration of hospital stay seemed to be shorter in the very elderly with no increase of in-hospital and post-discharge mortality. Although admitted less frequently to ICU, the in-hospital survival of the very elderly was not adversely affected compared to the elderly, suggesting that very advanced age per se should not be a major factor to consider in determining the prognosis of a patient with CDI.

2.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(3): 1053-1061, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38082206

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of uveitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the era of biologics and to identify risk factors associated with uveitis. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted within the database of a large healthcare provider. Newly diagnosed 6147 adult PsA patients between 2005 and 2020 were matched by the index date of PsA diagnosis, age, sex, and ethnicity to 23,999 randomly selected controls. This cohort was used to examine the association between PsA and uveitis. An additional analysis was conducted within the PsA group to identify uveitis risk factors, using two analytic approaches: a retrospective cohort study and a nested case-control study. RESULTS: Uveitis was diagnosed in 107 patients in the PsA group (1.7%) vs 187 (0.8%) patients in the control group (adjusted HR, 2.38, 95% CI 1.80-3.15, p<0.005) and was similar when the analysis was confined to patients without past uveitis. Uveitis was diagnosed more in females (2.1% vs 1.3%, HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.40, p<0.05), and was acute in all cases. Anterior uveitis was documented in 41.1% of the cases, 64.5% unilateral, and 9.3% bilateral. In the PsA group, using nested case control approach, only past uveitis [adjusted OR 136.4 (95% CI 27.38-679.88), p<0.005] and treatment with etanercept [adjusted OR 2.57 (95% CI 1.45-4.57), p=0.001] were independently associated with uveitis. Only one PsA patient with uveitis (out of 107) required systemic oral treatment with prednisone, while the rest of the patients were treated with topical glucocorticosteroids only. CONCLUSION: PsA is associated with increased risk of uveitis. Past uveitis and treatment with etanercept were associated with higher risk of uveitis. Key Points • Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a major risk factor for uveitis with hazard ratio of 2.38 compared to healthy individuals without PsA. • Among PsA patients, the past event of uveitis and treatment with etanercept are risk factors for uveitis. • Uveitis in patients treated with biologics for their PsA requires topical therapy only in most of the cases.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Productos Biológicos , Uveítis , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Artritis Psoriásica/complicaciones , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Psoriásica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Uveítis/etiología , Uveítis/complicaciones , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico
3.
J Clin Med ; 12(16)2023 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37629319

RESUMEN

Despite the increasing recognition of cardiac involvement in systemic sarcoidosis, the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) remains challenging. Our aim is to present a comprehensive, retrospective case series of CS patients, focusing on the current diagnostic guidelines and management of this life-threatening condition. In our case series, patient data were collected retrospectively, including hospital admission records and rheumatology and cardiology clinic visit notes, detailing demographic, clinical, laboratory, pathology, and imaging studies, as well as cardiac devices and prescribed medications. Cases were divided into definite and probable CS based on the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society guidelines as well as presumed CS based on imaging criteria and clinical findings. Overall, 19 CS patients were included, 17 of whom were diagnosed with probable or presumed CS based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and/or cardiac positron emission tomography using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (PET-FDG) without supporting endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The majority of CS patients were male (53%), with a mean age of 52.9 ± 11.8, with CS being the initial manifestation of sarcoidosis in 63% of cases. Most patients presented with high-grade AVB (63%), followed by heart failure (42%) and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) (26%). This case series highlights the significance of utilizing updated diagnostic criteria relying on CMR and PET-FDG given that cardiac involvement can be the initial manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent morbidity and mortality.

4.
Am J Med ; 136(8): e166, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481331
5.
Am J Med ; 136(6): e111-e112, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739060

Asunto(s)
Tacto , Confianza , Humanos
6.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36851352

RESUMEN

Development of autoantibodies following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and their association with disease flares in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) and the general population: results of 1-year prospective follow-up study. We conducted a prospective study aimed at investigating the incidence of appearance of autoantibodies (antinuclear, antiphospholipid, and rheumatoid factor) in the sera of 463 adult patients with AIIRD compared to 55 controls from the general population prior to, and following the second and third vaccine doses, and at 1-year of follow-up. Pre- and post-vaccination disease activity indices and the association of autoantibodies with rheumatic disease flares and new onset AIIRD were examined. Autoantibody development of any type in AIIRD patients vs. the controls was 4.0% (vs. 6.7%, p = 0.423) following two vaccine doses and 7.6% (vs. 0%, p = 0.152) after three doses. There was no significant difference in sex, age, or disease-type among individuals with and without autoantibody development, regardless of the immunosuppressant use. More patients developed autoantibodies following the third than the second vaccine dose (p = 0.004). Disease flares occurred in 5.8% and 7.2% of AIIRD patients following second and third vaccine doses, respectively, with autoantibody production increasing the risk of flares following the second (p = 0.002) and third (p = 0.004) vaccine doses. BNT162b2 vaccination resulted in the development of autoantibodies in a minority of AIIRD patients and controls. Autoantibody development was associated with disease flares in patients, but no new-onset autoimmunity was observed.

7.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(5)2021 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33946748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases and vaccines can occasionally cause new-onset or flare of immune-mediated diseases (IMDs). The adjuvanticity of the available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is based on either TLR-7/8 or TLR-9 agonism, which is distinct from previous vaccines and is a common pathogenic mechanism in IMDs. METHODS: We evaluated IMD flares or new disease onset within 28-days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at five large tertiary centres in countries with early vaccination adoption, three in Israel, one in UK, and one in USA. We assessed the pattern of disease expression in terms of autoimmune, autoinflammatory, or mixed disease phenotype and organ system affected. We also evaluated outcomes. FINDINGS: 27 cases included 17 flares and 10 new onset IMDs. 23/27 received the BNT - 162b2 vaccine, 2/27 the mRNA-1273 and 2/27 the ChAdOx1 vaccines. The mean age was 54.4 ± 19.2 years and 55% of cases were female. Among the 27 cases, 21 (78%) had at least one underlying autoimmune/rheumatic disease prior the vaccination. Among those patients with a flare or activation, four episodes occurred after receiving the second-dose and in one patient they occurred both after the first and the second-dose. In those patients with a new onset disease, two occurred after the second-dose and in one patient occurred both after the first (new onset) and second-dose (flare). For either dose, IMDs occurred on average 4 days later. Of the cases, 20/27 (75%) were mild to moderate in severity. Over 80% of cases had excellent resolution of inflammatory features, mostly with the use of corticosteroid therapy. Other immune-mediated conditions included idiopathic pericarditis (n = 2), neurosarcoidosis with small fiber neuropathy (n = 1), demyelination (n = 1), and myasthenia gravis (n = 2). In 22 cases (81.5%), the insurgence of Adverse event following immunization (AEFI)/IMD could not be explained based on the drug received by the patient. In 23 cases (85.2%), AEFI development could not be explained based on the underlying disease/co-morbidities. Only in one case (3.7%), the timing window of the insurgence of the side effect was considered not compatible with the time from vaccine to flare. INTERPRETATION: Despite the high population exposure in the regions served by these centers, IMDs flares or onset temporally-associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appear rare. Most are moderate in severity and responsive to therapy although some severe flares occurred. FUNDING: none.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...