RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Military helicopter mishaps frequently lead to multiple casualty events with complex injury patterns. Data specific to this mechanism of injury in the deployed setting are limited. We describe injury patterns associated with helicopter crashes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) dataset from 2007 to 2020 seeking to describe prehospital care within all theaters in the registry. We searched within the dataset for casualties injured by helicopter crash. A serious injury was defined by an abbreviated injury scale of =3 by body region. RESULTS: We identified 120 casualties injured by helicopter crash within the dataset. Most were Army (64%), the median age was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 26-35), and most were male (98%), enlisted service members made up the largest cohort (47%), with most injuries occurring during Operation Enduring Freedom (69%). Only 2 were classified as battle injuries. The median injury severity score was 9 (IQR 4-22). Serious injuries by body region are the following: thorax (27%), head/neck (17%), extremities (17%), abdomen (11%), facial (3%), and skin/superficial (1%). The most common prehospital interventions focused on hypothermia prevention/management (62%) and cervical spine stabilization (32%). Most patients survived to hospital discharge (98%). CONCLUSIONS: Serious injuries to the thorax were most common. Survival was high, although better data capture systems are needed to study deaths that occur prehospital that do not reach military treatment facilities with surgical care to optimize planning and outcomes. The high proportion of nonbattle injuries highlights the risks associated with helicopters in general.
Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Heridas y Lesiones , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Aeronaves , Femenino , Humanos , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapiaRESUMEN
Units within the Special Operations Forces (SOF) community require medically competent and operationally proficient medical providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners, among others) to support complex mission sets. The expectations placed on providers who successfully assess for and are selected into these units are high. These providers are not only expected to be experts in their respective subspecialities, but also to serve as staff officers, provide medical direction for SOF medics, serve as medical advisors to the command team, and provide direct medical support for kinetic operations. They are expected to perform these functions with little oversight and guidance and when geographically separated from higher units. Graduates from military Graduate Medical Education (GME) programs are extremely well-educated and can provide high quality medical care. However, they often find themselves ill-prepared for the extra demands placed upon them by the Special Operations community due to a lack of operational exposure. The authors of this paper recognized this gap and propose that the Joint Emergency Medicine Exercise (JEMX) model can help augment the body of knowledge required to perform well as a provider in a Special Operations unit.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Medicina Militar , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Humanos , Medicina Militar/educación , MédicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: As the landscape and resources of combat operations change and become more unpredictable, the ability to provide prolonged combat casualty care in austere environments will become increasingly important. Prolonged casualty care (PCC) (until recently, prolonged field care [PFC]) is an emerging niche of military medicine that requires specific and dedicated training within our military medical education curricula for providers at all levels. That training should incorporate both didactic classroom instruction and high-fidelity, hands-on, full-scale training in order to prepare providers for delivering care beyond the standard doctrinal timelines employed in recent combat operations. A resolute commitment to training providers in the application of the core principles of PCC will improve the combat readiness of providers and decrease the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties. Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center's Emergency Medicine Residency Training Program Joint Emergency Medicine Training Exercise is an example of high value training in all facets of military medicine, including prolonged casualty care.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Internado y Residencia , Medicina Militar , Médicos , Curriculum , Humanos , Medicina Militar/educaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Based on isolated case reports, military helicopter mishaps often result in multiple critical casualties leading to complicated stabilization and evacuation by healthcare providers. The aim of this retrospective descriptive analysis is to describe the incidence of common prehospital injuries associated with rotary wing crashes in order to improve mission planning and casualty survivability. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the Prehospital Trauma Registry and the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) from April 2003 through May 2019. We searched within our dataset for all encounters involving aviation crashes. RESULTS: From April 2003 through May 2019 there were 1,357 casualty encounters in the Prehospital Trauma Registry. There were 12 casualties identified injured by aircraft crash, of which, 10 were linkable to the DoDTR for outcome data. All encounters for this sub analysis occurred in Afghanistan in 2014, all were US military service members, and a majority were enlisted conventional forces. Most prehospital interventions focused on hemorrhage control, to include limb tourniquets (n=3), pressure dressings (n=2), and pelvic splint (n=1). One patient received a cervical collar and two patients received temperature control with a hypothermia kit. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, hemorrhage control and extremity stabilization accounted for the majority of prehospital interventions. Larger datasets are needed to validate findings and extrapolate it into mission planning.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Afganistán/epidemiología , Aeronaves , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vascular access in critically ill pediatric patients can be challenging with delays potentially leading to worse outcomes. Intraosseous (IO) access has a low rate of complications and can be utilized to administer lifesaving medications. Combat medics are trained to treat adults but may also be required to treat children in the deployed setting. Vascular access in children can be challenging, especially in a hypovolemic state. There are limited data on prehospital lifesaving interventions in children in the combat setting. We sought to characterize the use of IO access in pediatric patients who sustained trauma in the combat setting. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry for all pediatric patients admitted to fixed-facilities and forward surgical teams in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. Within that population, we searched for all subjects with a documented prehospital IO or intravenous (IV) access obtained. Subjects with both an IO and IV documented were placed into the IO category. We separated subjects by age groupings: younger than 1, 1 to 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 14, and 15 to 17 years. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3439 subjects 17 years or younger. There were 177 in the IO cohort and 803 in the IV cohort. Most subjects in the IO cohort were in the 10- to 14-year-old age group (35.6%), male (79.1%), located in Afghanistan (95.5%), and injured by explosive (52.0%), with lower survival rates than the IV cohort (68.9% vs 90.7%, P < 0.001). Hemostatic dressing application, tourniquet application, intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sedative administration, ketamine administration, and paralytic administration were all higher in the IO cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric IO placement in the prehospital setting occurred infrequently. Pediatric subjects receiving an IO had higher injury severity scores and higher mortality rates compared with those who received an IV only. Intraosseous use appears to be used more often in critically ill pediatric subjects.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Infusiones Intraóseas , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Afganistán , Niño , Preescolar , Explosiones , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Irak , Masculino , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of preventable death in both military and civilian trauma. Implementation of items such as tourniquets and hemostatic dressings are helpful in controlling hemorrhage and increasing the survival rate of casualties when such injuries occur. Prehospital blood transfusions are used to treat patients with severe injuries where the standard methods of hemorrhage control are not an effective form of treatment. There is limited research and no widely accepted protocol on pediatric prehospital blood transfusions. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric subjects admitted to U.S. and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. This is a secondary analysis of casualties that received blood products prehospital. RESULTS: From January 2007 through January 2016 there were 3439 pediatric casualties within the registry. Within this group, 22 casualties that received one or more blood product prehospital were identified. Children in the 10-14 years age (40%) group made up the largest proportion, 86% were male, almost all were injured by explosive (63%) or firearm (27%), and 77% survived to hospital discharge. The most frequently administered blood product was packed red cells (n = 17). Of the 22, 15 underwent massive transfusion within the first 24 hours of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital administration of blood products occurred infrequently within this pediatric dataset, but those that received blood were critically injured with most receiving a massive transfusion. Given the frequency with which medical personnel are carrying blood products in the prehospital, combat setting, guidelines specific to pediatric administration would be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Afganistán , Humanos , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infectious complications of war wounds are a significant source of mortality and morbidity. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend prehospital moxifloxacin, ertapenem, or cefotetan for "all open combat wounds." We describe the prehospital administration of antibiotics to pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry for all pediatric subjects admitted to United States and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. RESULTS: During this time, there were 3,439 pediatric encounters which represented 8.0% of all admissions. Prehospital providers administered a total of 216 antibiotic doses to 210 subjects. Older children received antibiotics more frequently than younger children, were more likely to be male, located in Afghanistan, and injured by explosive with the majority surviving to hospital discharge. Cefazolin and ceftriaxone were the most frequently utilized antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently administered antibiotics were cephalosporins. TCCC recommended agents for adult prehospital wound prophylaxis were infrequently administered to pediatric casualties. Administration rates of pediatric prehospital wound prophylaxis may be improved with pediatric-specific TCCC guidelines recommending cephalosporins as first-line agents, fielding of a TCCC-oriented Broselow tape, and training prehospital providers on administration of antimicrobials.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Pediatría/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Afganistán , Profilaxis Antibiótica/clasificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Pediatría/normas , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Existing data on pediatric massive transfusion as part of trauma resuscitation is limited. We report the characteristics of pediatric casualties associated with undergoing massive transfusion at US military treatment facilities during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric subjects admitted to US and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. We stratified subjects by Centers for Disease Control age groupings: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-17â¯years. We defined a massive transfusion as 40â¯mL/kg of total blood products or more. RESULTS: From January 2007 through January 2016 there were 3439 pediatric casualties within the registry, of which 543 (15.7%) met criteria for receiving a massive transfusion. The median age of children undergoing massive transfusion was 9â¯years (IQR 5-12), male (73.4%), injured in Afghanistan (69.9%) and injured by explosives (60.4%). Compared to other pediatric casualties, subjects undergoing massive transfusion had higher composite injury severity scores (median 17 versus 9), higher incidence of tachycardia (86.8% versus 70.9%), increased incidence of hypotension (31.2% versus 7.5%), and decreased survival to hospital discharge (82.6% versus 91.6%). Specific to body regions, casualties undergoing massive transfusion more frequently had serious injuries to the head/neck (30.0% versus 22.8%), the thorax (22.8% versus 9.9%), abdomen (26.8% versus 6.9%), the extremities (42.1% versus 14.6%), while less frequently had serious injuries to the skin (5.3% versus 8.4%). All findings were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to better translate the lessons learned from pediatric trauma care in the combat setting into the civilian setting in developed countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/terapia , Adolescente , Afganistán , Conflictos Armados , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Irak , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence suggests hyperoxia therapy may be harmful. We describe injury characteristics and survival outcomes for pediatric trauma casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, stratified by partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2). Secondarily, we performed subgroup analyses for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and massive transfusion of blood products (MT). METHODS: We utilized Department of Defense Trauma Registry data. We included subjects <18 years. We excluded subjects without an arterial blood gas (ABG). We stratified subjects as hyperoxemia (PaO2 100-300 mmHg) and extreme hyperoxemia (PaO2 >300 mmHg). RESULTS: January 2007-January 2016, 3439 pediatric encounters were in the database. Of those, 1323 had an ABG, with 291 (22%) demonstrating hyperoxemia and 43 (3.3%) extreme hyperoxemia. The median age was 8, most were male (76%) in Afghanistan (69%), and injured by explosive (42%). There were no significant differences in survival between subjects with no hyperoxemia, hyperoxemia, and extreme hyperoxemia (92% vs 87% vs 86%; pâ¯=â¯0.078). Also, there were no significant differences in survival between groups among TBI and MT subjects, and there were no increased odds of survival between groups on multivariable regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperoxemia was common among hospitalized, wartime pediatric trauma casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan that underwent ABG analysis. Survival to hospital discharge rates were not significantly different between subjects with hyperoxemia and subjects without hyperoxemia.
Asunto(s)
Hiperoxia/fisiopatología , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adolescente , Afganistán , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Irak , Masculino , Oxígeno/sangre , Presión Parcial , Pediatría/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Background: Traumatic injuries were the most common reason for pediatric admission to military hospitals during the recent wars in the Middle East. We describe injury characteristics and prehospital interventions performed on wartime pediatric trauma casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq, stratified by medical evacuation platform. Methods: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (age < 18 years) encounters from January 2007 to January 2016. The DODTR is the data repository for all trauma-related injuries managed by deployed US military medical treatment facilities with surgical capabilities. We requested all documented prehospital care, which may have been delivered anywhere from the point-of-injury until a fixed-facility with surgical capabilities. We stratified subjects according to Centers for Disease Control age groupings: <1 year, 1-4 years, 5-9 years, 10-14 years, and 15-17 years. Results: Of the 3,493 pediatric encounters in the DODTR, 1,004 underwent military evacuation from the point of injury: 911 (90.7%) by standard medical evacuation platforms and 93 (9.3%) by nonstandard, improvised evacuation assets. Six hundred seventy-five of the 1004 pediatric trauma casualties were between 5 and 14 years of age. Over 75% were male, over 80% were in Afghanistan, and most were injured by explosives. Across all age groups, serious injuries to the head/neck and extremities were most common. Subjects transported by standard evacuation platforms underwent tourniquet application (12.2% vs 5.3%, p < 0.05) and intraosseous access (12.2% vs 4.3%; p = 0.02) more frequently than those on nonstandard platforms. Casualties evacuated by nonstandard platforms underwent airway adjunct emplacement more frequently those on standard evacuation assets (3.2% vs 0.3%; p = 0.01). IV access and opiate administration were the most commonly performed interventions on both standard and nonstandard assets. Subject survival to hospital discharge was 88.1% on standard platforms and 89.2% on nonstandard platforms (p = 0.75). Conclusions: Approximately 30% of pediatric trauma casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq underwent medical evacuation from the point of injury directly to a military treatment facility with surgical capabilities. Most of those children did not undergo the prehospital interventions studied. Future investigations evaluating pediatric medical evacuation and prehospital care, medical staffing, pediatric-specific training, and equipping of pediatric-specific materials may be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Medicina Militar , Pediatría , Transporte de Pacientes , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Afganistán , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Military providers frequently treat civilians, including pediatric patients. Cervical spine injuries in pediatric trauma patients occur infrequently, with limited data on the incidence. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of cervical spine injuries in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry for all pediatric encounters from January 2007 to January 2016. We searched within that dataset for all cervical spine fractures. RESULTS: From January 2007 through January 2016 there were 3439 pediatric encounters. There were 36 subjects identified (1.0%) with a cervical spine fracture. Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a prehospital cervical collar placed, which did not improve survival to hospital discharge (collar, 66.7% vs no collar, 83.3%, P = 0.573). Of those with a cervical spine fracture, 6 (17%) had a documented spinal cord injury. The median age of subjects with a cervical spine fracture was 9.5 years and the majority (63.9%) were male. Most were injured by explosion (41.7%). The median composite injury score was higher in subjects with a cervical spine fracture compared with those without one (16.5 vs 10, P < 0.001). Subjects with a cervical spine fracture had longer lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (median 3 days vs 1, P = 0.012) and a trend toward worse survival to hospital discharge (80.6%, n = 29, vs 90.3%, n = 3074, P = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine injuries occurred infrequently in pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. When a fracture was present, almost one in five patients had spinal cord involvement. The pediatric prehospital literature would benefit from the development of a clinical decision tool to guide prehospital personnel as to when a cervical collar is indicated. Moreover, appropriate size equipment should be available when caring for host national civilians.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiología , Afganistán/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Irak/epidemiología , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Head injuries frequently occur in combat. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend pre-hospital use of ketamine for analgesia. Yet the use of this medication in patients with head injuries remains controversial, particularly among pediatric patients. We compare survival to hospital discharge rates among pediatric head injury subjects who received prehospital ketamine versus those who did not. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (<18â¯years of age) subjects from January 2007 to January 2016. We performed a sub-analysis of subjects with an abbreviated injury severity score for the head of 3 (serious) or higher and at least one documented Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤13. RESULTS: Of the 3439 pediatric patients within our dataset, 555 subjects met inclusion criteria for head injury - 36 (6.5%) received prehospital ketamine versus 519 (93.5%) who did not. There was no significant difference noted between groups regarding median age (10 versus 8, pâ¯=â¯0.259), percent male gender (72.2% versus 76.3%, pâ¯=â¯0.579), mechanism of injury (pâ¯=â¯0.143), median composite injury scores (22 versus 20, pâ¯=â¯0.082), median ventilator-free days (28 versus 27, pâ¯=â¯0.068), median ICU-free days (27.5 versus 27, pâ¯=â¯0.767), median hospital days (3.5 versus 4, pâ¯=â¯0.876) or survival to discharge (66.7% versus 70.7%, pâ¯=â¯0.607). CONCLUSIONS: Within this data set, we were unable to detect any differences in mortality among pediatric head trauma subjects administered ketamine compared to subjects not receiving this medication in the prehospital setting.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Analgesia/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/mortalidad , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Defense , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/complicaciones , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric casualties made up a significant proportion of patients during the recent military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Damage control resuscitation strategies used by military physicians included rapid reversal of metabolic acidosis to mitigate its pathophysiologic consequences, primarily through hemorrhage control and volume restoration. Alkalizing agents, including tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (THAM), are potential therapeutic adjuncts to treat significant acidosis. There is, however, limited published data on THAM administration in the pediatric trauma population. We compared demographics and outcomes among pediatric trauma patients in Afghanistan and Iraq receiving THAM versus those not receiving THAM. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry for all of the pediatric patients admitted to US and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Afghanistan and Iraq from January 2007 to January 2016. We retrieved data on age, sex, location, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Scores, ventilator days, days in the intensive care unit, days of total hospitalization, and survival to hospital discharge. We excluded subjects if they were dead on arrival to the emergency department. RESULTS: From January 2007 to January 2016, there were 3386 pediatric subjects that met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 received THAM. The youngest subject receiving THAM was a 2-month-old burn victim. Subjects receiving THAM were more likely to be injured by submersion or burn (P < 0.001), had higher composite Injury Severity Scores (17 vs 10; P < 0.001) and Abbreviated Injury Scores for the thorax and abdomen (P = 0.004 and P = 0.019, respectively), and longer ventilator days/intensive care unit stays/hospital lengths of stay (P < 0.001/P < 0.001/P = 0.013). In addition, subjects receiving THAM had a lower survival rate than subjects not receiving THAM (73.3% vs 91.7%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: THAM was administered rarely to pediatric trauma casualties during the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Subjects receiving THAM were more critically injured than the baseline population.
Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas/administración & dosificación , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Acrilamidas/farmacología , Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicina Militar/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/normas , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/métodos , Resucitación/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: United States (US) and coalition military medical units deployed to combat zones frequently encounter pediatric trauma patients. Pediatric patients may present unique challenges due to their anatomical and physiological characteristics and most military prehospital providers lack pediatric-specific training. A minimal amount of data exists to illuminate the prehospital care of pediatric patients in this environment. We describe the prehospital care of pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric subjects admitted to US and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. Subjects were grouped by age: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-17 years. We focused our analysis on interventions related to trauma resuscitation. RESULTS: Of 42,790 encounters in the DODTR during the study period, 3,439 (8.0%) were aged <18 years. Most subjects were in the 5-9 age group (33.1%), male (77.1%), located in Afghanistan (67.8%), injured by explosives (43.1%). Most subjects survived to hospital discharge (90.2%). The most frequently performed interventions were tourniquet placement (6.6%), intubation (6.1%), supplemental oxygen (11.7%), IV access (24.8%), IV fluids (13.3%), IO access (5.1%), and hypothermia prevention (44.5%). The most frequently administered medications were antibiotics (6.2%) and opioids (15.0%). Most procedural and medication interventions occurred in subjects injured by explosives (43.1%) and gunshot wounds (22.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric subjects comprised over 1 in 13 casualties treated in the joint theaters with the majority injured by explosives. Vascular access and hypothermia prevention interventions were the most frequently performed procedures.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/terapia , Adolescente , Afganistán , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Personal Militar , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos , United States Department of DefenseRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated prehospital analgesia during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, but were limited to the adult population. However, a significant portion of the casualties of those conflicts were children. We describe the prehospital analgesia administered to wartime pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric patients (<18 years of age) admitted to United States and Coalition fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. We divided pediatric patients into 2 groups: those that had documentation of receipt of analgesic drugs in the prehospital setting (n = 618) and those who had not received analgesia before reaching a fixed-facility (n = 2,821). For characterization of drug administration, we grouped patients into those receiving acetaminophen, NSAID, fentanyl, ketamine, morphine, or other analgesics (e.g., hydromorphone, tramadol, etc.). RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3,439 pediatric encounters with documentation of 703 instances of analgesia administrations to 618 patients (17.9% of total pediatric encounters). Of the subjects receiving analgesic agents, 46.2% (n = 325) received morphine, 30.4% (n = 214) received fentanyl, 17.4% (n = 122) received ketamine, 1.8% (n = 13) received acetaminophen, and 2.8% (n = 20) received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The remaining 9 administrations consisted of methoxyflourane (1), nalbuphine (2), hydromorphone (3), and tramadol (3). An injury severity score (ISS) >15 increased the odds of receiving an analgesic agent (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.56). Additionally, there was an association between analgesia administration and the following prehospital interventions: wound dressing, tourniquet, intravenous (IV) line placement, intraosseous line placement, IV fluids, intubation, and external warming. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a low proportion of pediatric trauma subjects within this population received analgesia in the prehospital environment. The most common analgesic medication administered was morphine. Those receiving analgesic agents had more severe injuries and higher rates of concomitant interventions. These results highlight the potential need for Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines specifically providing recommendations for analgesia administration among pediatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Afganistán , Analgesia/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Irak , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Defense , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combat zone trauma poses a unique set of challenges and injury patterns not seen in the civilian setting. The role of the pediatric resuscitative thoracotomy in combat zones remains unclear given a paucity of data regarding procedure outcomes in this setting. We compare outcomes among children in traumatic arrest undergoing resuscitative thoracotomy versus cardiopulmonary (CPR) resuscitation only. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) from 2007 to 2016 for all pediatric subjects that underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy or CPR in the prehospital or emergency department setting during operations in Iraq or Afghanistan. We removed CPR subjects with mechanisms of injury not matched in the thoracotomy cohort. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3439 pediatric encounters. We identified 13 subjects who underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy and 66 subjects who underwent CPR without thoracotomy with matching mechanisms of injury. When comparing the two cohorts those in the thoracotomy group had higher median thorax body region scores (median 3 versus 0, pâ¯=â¯.001), but a trend towards higher rates of survival to discharge (31% versus 9%, pâ¯=â¯.108). The youngest survivor in the thoracotomy cohort was less than 1â¯year old. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a trend towards higher survival among subjects that underwent a resuscitative thoracotomy survived to hospital discharge compared to subjects undergoing CPR without thoracotomy. The literature will benefit from further data to confirm an association between this procedure and a survival benefit among pediatric subjects in the resource limited setting. Furthermore, improvements in documentation will guide equipping and training providers expected to care for pediatric trauma patients.
Asunto(s)
Resucitación , Toracotomía , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/terapia , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Afganistán/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Irak/epidemiología , Masculino , Resucitación/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Toracotomía/mortalidad , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Military hospital healthcare providers treated children during the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Compared to adults, pediatric patients present unique challenges during trauma resuscitations and have notably been discussed in few research reports. We seek to describe ED interventions performed on pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric patients in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. Subjects were grouped based on Centers for Disease Control age categories. We used descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During this period, there were 3388 pediatric encounters that arrived at the ED with signs of life or on-going interventions. Most subjects were male (77.2%), located in Afghanistan (67.9%), injured by explosive (43.2%), and admitted to an intensive care unit (57.8%). Most of those arriving to the ED alive or with on-going interventions survived to hospital discharge (91.6%). The most frequently encountered age group was 5-9years (33.3%) followed by 10-14years (31.5%). The most common interventions were vascular access (86.6%), fluid administration (85.0%), and external warming (44.6%). Intubation was the most frequent airway intervention (18.2%). Packed red blood cells were the most frequently administered blood product (33.8% of subjects). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric subjects accounted for a notable portion of care delivered in theater emergency departments during the study period. Vascular access and fluid administration were the most frequently performed interventions. Pediatric-specific training is needed as a part of deployment medicine operations.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Afganistán/epidemiología , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Irak/epidemiología , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a la Guerra/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Military hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan treated children with traumatic injuries during the recent conflicts. Diagnostic imaging is an integral component of trauma management; however, few published data exist on its use in the wartime pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe the emergency department (ED) utilization of radiology resources for pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric patients admitted to military fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. We retrieved ED data on ultrasound (US), radiographic and computed tomography (CT) studies. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3,439 pediatric encounters, which represented 8.0% of all military hospital trauma admissions. ED providers obtained a total of 12,376 imaging studies on 2,920 (84.9%) children. Of the 12,376 imaging studies, 1,341 (10.8%) were US, 4,868 (39.3%) were radiographic and 6,167 (49.8%) were CT exams. Most children undergoing radiographic evaluation were boys (77.8%) and located in Afghanistan (70.4%), and they sustained penetrating injuries (68.0%). Children who underwent imaging had higher composite injury severity scores in comparison to those who did not undergo imaging (10 versus 9). CONCLUSION: Military health care providers frequently utilized radiographic studies in the evaluation of pediatric trauma casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. Deployed military hospitals that treat children would benefit from dedicated pediatric-specific imaging training and protocols.
Asunto(s)
Campaña Afgana 2001- , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Militares , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Airway compromise is the second leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield among US military casualties. Airway management is an important component of pediatric trauma care. Yet, intubation is a challenging skill with which many prehospital providers have limited pediatric experience. We compare mortality among pediatric trauma patients undergoing intubation in the prehospital setting versus a fixed-facility emergency department. METHODS: We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric encounters in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. We compared outcomes of pediatric subjects undergoing intubation in the prehospital setting versus the emergency department (ED) setting. RESULTS: During this period, there were 3439 pediatric encounters (8.0% of DODTR encounters during this time). Of those, 802 (23.3%) underwent intubation (prehospital=211, ED=591). Compared to patients undergoing ED intubation, patients undergoing prehospital intubation had higher median composite injury severity scores (17 versus 16) and lower survival rates (66.8% versus 79.9%, p<0.001). On univariable logistic regression analysis, prehospital intubation increased mortality odds (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.39-2.79). After adjusting for confounders, the association between prehospital intubation and death remained significant (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.35-3.06). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric trauma subjects intubated in the prehospital setting had worse outcomes than those intubated in the ED. This finding persisted after controlling for measurable confounders.