Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(3)2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30567751

RESUMEN

Microbiological testing, including interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using current breakpoints, is crucial for clinical care and infection control. Continued use of obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints is common in clinical laboratories. The purposes of this study were (i) to determine why laboratories failed to update breakpoints and (ii) to provide support for breakpoint updates. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health conducted a 1-year outreach program for 41 hospitals in Los Angeles County that had reported, in a prior survey of California laboratories, using obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints. In-person interviews with hospital stakeholders and customized expert guidance and resources were provided to aid laboratories in updating breakpoints, including support from technical representatives from antimicrobial susceptibility testing device manufacturers. Forty-one hospitals were targeted, 7 of which had updated breakpoints since the prior survey. Of the 34 remaining hospitals, 27 (79%) assumed that their instruments applied current breakpoints, 17 (50%) were uncertain how to change breakpoints, and 10 (29%) lacked resources to perform a validation study for off-label use of the breakpoints on their systems. Only 7 hospitals (21%) were familiar with the FDA/CDC Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank. All hospitals launched a breakpoint update process; 16 (47%) successfully updated breakpoints, 12 (35%) received isolates from the CDC in order to validate breakpoints on their systems, and 6 (18%) were planning to update within 1 year. The public health intervention was moderately successful in identifying and overcoming barriers to updating Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints in Los Angeles hospitals. However, the majority of targeted hospitals continued to use obsolete breakpoints despite 1 year of effort. These findings have important implications for the quality of patient care and patient safety. Other public health jurisdictions may want to utilize similar resources to bridge the patient safety gap, while manufacturers, the FDA, and others determine how best to address this growing public health issue.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Administración en Salud Pública , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(2)2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29187565

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus schleiferi is a beta-hemolytic, coagulase-variable colonizer of small animals that can cause opportunistic infections in humans. In veterinary isolates, the rate of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance is significant, with reported resistance rates of >39%. The goal of this study was to evaluate oxacillin and cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) and MIC breakpoints for detection of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in 52 human and 38 veterinary isolates of S. schleiferi Isolates were tested on multiple brands of commercial media and according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods. Zone diameters and MIC values were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (CLSI, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100-S27, 2017) for Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus lugdunensis, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Results were compared to those of mecA PCR. Twenty-nine of 90 (32%) isolates were mecA positive. Oxacillin inhibition zone sizes and MICs interpreted by S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably differentiated mecA-positive and mecA-negative isolates, with a categorical agreement (CA) of 100% and no very major errors (VMEs) or major errors (MEs) for all media. For cefoxitin DD results interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis and CoNS breakpoints, CA values were 85% and 75%, respectively, and there were 72% and 64% VMEs, respectively, and 0 MEs. For cefoxitin MICs interpreted using S. aureus/S. lugdunensis breakpoints, CA was 81%, and there were 60% VMEs and no MEs. Our data demonstrate that oxacillin DD or MIC testing methods using the current S. pseudintermedius breakpoints reliably identify mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. schleiferi, while cefoxitin DD and MIC testing methods perform poorly.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cefoxitina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Oxacilina/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus/fisiología
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(7): 1814-1819, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122379

RESUMEN

Rapid identification of patients who are colonized with carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) is included in multiple national guidelines for containment of these organisms. In a multisite study, we evaluated the performance of the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay, a qualitative diagnostic test that was designed for the rapid detection and differentiation of the blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, and blaIMP-1 genes from rectal swab specimens. A double rectal swab set was collected from 383 patients admitted at four institutions (2 in the United States, 1 in the United Kingdom, 1 in Spain). One swab was used for reference culture (MacConkey broth containing 1 mg/liter of meropenem and subcultured to a MacConkey agar plate with a 10-µg meropenem disk) and for sequencing of DNA obtained from carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates for carbapenemase identification. The other swab was used for the Xpert Carba-R assay. In addition to the clinical rectal swabs, 250 contrived specimens (108 well-characterized CPO and 142 negative controls spiked onto negative rectal swabs) were tested. Overall, 149/633 (23.5%) samples were positive by the Xpert Carba-R assay. In 6 samples, multiple targets were detected (4 VIM/OXA-48, 1 IMP-1/NDM, and 1 NDM/KPC). The Xpert Carba-R assay detected 155 targets (26 IMP-1, 30 VIM, 27 NDM, 33 KPC, 39 OXA-48) within a time range of 32 to 48 min. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Xpert Carba-R assay compared to those of the reference culture and sequencing results were 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2% to 98.9%), 98.6% (95% CI, 97.1% to 99.4%), 95.3%, and 99.0%, respectively. The Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay is an accurate and rapid test to identify rectal colonization with CPO, which can guide infection control programs to limit the spread of these organisms.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Bacterias Gramnegativas/enzimología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Recto/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/análisis , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , España , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , beta-Lactamasas/genética
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(1): 83-8, 2016 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27025822

RESUMEN

Accurate and timely performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by the clinical laboratory is paramount to combating antimicrobial resistance. The ability of laboratories in the United States to effectively perform ASTs is challenged by several factors. Some, such as new resistance mechanisms and the associated evolution of testing recommendations and breakpoints, are inevitable. Others are entirely man-made. These include unnecessarily strict US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limitations on how commercial AST systems can be used for diagnostic testing, the absence of up-to-date performance data on these systems, and the lack of commercially available FDA-cleared tests for newer antimicrobial agents or for older agents with updated breakpoints. This viewpoint will highlight contemporary AST challenges faced by the clinical laboratory, and propose some solutions.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Valores de Referencia , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(3): 535-42, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26607988

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a coagulase-positive species that colonizes the nares and anal mucosa of healthy dogs and cats. Human infections with S. pseudintermedius range in severity from bite wounds and rhinosinusitis to endocarditis; historically, these infections were thought to be uncommon, but new laboratory methods suggest that their true incidence is underreported. Oxacillin and cefoxitin disk and MIC tests were evaluated for the detection of mecA- or mecC-mediated methicillin resistance in 115 human and animal isolates of the Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG), including 111 Staphylococcus pseudintermediusand 4 Staphylococcus delphini isolates, 37 of which were mecA positive. The disk and MIC breakpoints evaluated included the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S25 Staphylococcus aureus/Staphylococcus lugdunensis oxacillin MIC breakpoints and cefoxitin disk and MIC breakpoints, the CLSI M100-S25 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) oxacillin MIC breakpoint and cefoxitin disk breakpoint, the CLSI VET01-S2 S. pseudintermedius oxacillin MIC and disk breakpoints, and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) S. pseudintermedius cefoxitin disk breakpoint. The oxacillin results interpreted by the VET01-S2 (disk and MIC) and M100-S25 CoNS (MIC) breakpoints agreed with the results of mecA/mecC PCR for all isolates, with the exception of one false-resistant result (1.3% of mecA/mecC PCR-negative isolates). In contrast, cefoxitin tests performed poorly, ranging from 3 to 89% false susceptibility (very major errors) and 0 to 48% false resistance (major errors). BD Phoenix, bioMérieux Vitek 2, and Beckman Coulter MicroScan commercial automated susceptibility test panel oxacillin MIC results were also evaluated and demonstrated >95% categorical agreement with mecA/mecC PCR results if interpreted by using the M100-S25 CoNS breakpoint. The Alere penicillin-binding protein 2a test accurately detected all mecA-positive isolates, although for four isolates, cefoxitin induction was required prior to testing. These data demonstrate that the cefoxitin surrogate test does not reliably detect the presence of mecA in S. pseudintermedius isolates and that laboratories should perform oxacillin disk or MIC tests of these isolates when they are encountered.


Asunto(s)
Cefoxitina/farmacología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Oxacilina/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Staphylococcus intermedius/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(11): 4003-9, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25210072

RESUMEN

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a concern for health care in the United States but remain relatively uncommon in California. We describe the phenotype, clonality, and carbapenemase-encoding genes present in CRE isolated from patients at a Californian tertiary health care system. CRE for this study were identified by evaluating the antibiograms of Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the UCLA Health System from 2011 to 2013 for isolates that were not susceptible to meropenem and/or imipenem. The identification of these isolates was subsequently confirmed by matrix-associated laser desorption ionization-time of flight, and broth microdilution tests were repeated to confirm the CRE phenotype. Real-time PCR for bla(KPC), bla(SME), bla(IMP), bla(NDM-1), bla(VIM), and bla(OXA-48) was performed. Clonality was assessed by repetitive sequence-based PCR (repPCR) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Of 15,839 nonduplicate clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 115 (0.73%) met the study definition for CRE. This number increased from 0.5% (44/8165) in the first half of the study to 0.9% (71/7674) in the second (P = 0.004). The most common CRE species were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Escherichia coli. A carbapenemase-encoding gene was found in 81.7% (94/115) of CRE and included bla(KPC) (78.3%), bla(NDM-1) (0.9%), and bla(SME) (2.6%). The majority of bla(KPC) genes were in K. pneumoniae isolates, which fell into 14 clonal groups on typing. bla(KPC) was identified in more than one species of CRE cultured from the same patient in four cases. Three bla(SME)-carrying Serratia marcescens isolates and one bla(NDM-1) carrying Providencia rettgeri isolate were detected. CRE are increasing in California, and carbapenemases, particularly KPC, are a common mechanism for carbapenem resistance in this region.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/clasificación , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia betalactámica , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Análisis por Conglomerados , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Atención a la Salud , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/fisiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Genotipo , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación Molecular , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Centros de Atención Terciaria , beta-Lactamasas/genética
7.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 18(3): 268-81, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21793988

RESUMEN

Many different definitions for multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) bacteria are being used in the medical literature to characterize the different patterns of resistance found in healthcare-associated, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. A group of international experts came together through a joint initiative by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to create a standardized international terminology with which to describe acquired resistance profiles in Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae (other than Salmonella and Shigella), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., all bacteria often responsible for healthcare-associated infections and prone to multidrug resistance. Epidemiologically significant antimicrobial categories were constructed for each bacterium. Lists of antimicrobial categories proposed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were created using documents and breakpoints from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, XDR was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories (i.e. bacterial isolates remain susceptible to only one or two categories) and PDR was defined as non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories. To ensure correct application of these definitions, bacterial isolates should be tested against all or nearly all of the antimicrobial agents within the antimicrobial categories and selective reporting and suppression of results should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Terminología como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 7(6): 1023-5, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11747733

RESUMEN

In June 2000, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) was isolated from a 27-year-old home health-care patient following a complicated cholecystectomy. Two VISA strains were identified with identical MICs to all antimicrobials tested except oxacillin and with closely related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types. The patient was treated successfully with antimicrobial therapy, biliary drainage, and reconstruction. Standard precautions in the home health setting appear successful in preventing transmission.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Vancomicina/farmacología , Adulto , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/genética
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 39(7): 2637-9, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427582

RESUMEN

The clinical microbiology laboratory plays a critical role in the detection of Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin. Staff education and rapid laboratory response are of utmost importance. We report on our laboratory's experience and provide recommendations for the identification and confirmation of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Algoritmos , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 22(3): 160-4, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) gastrointestinal colonization prevalence in high-risk hospitalized patients and to assess the cost and utility of this laboratory-based surveillance. SETTING: Large university teaching hospital. DESIGN: Quarterly prevalence culture survey of 50 stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin A assay from October 1996 through June 1999 (n=526). Screening culture survey of all C difficile-positive stool specimens from July 1998 through June 1999 (n=140). PATIENTS: Specimens for analysis were collected from patients who were admitted to the hospital and who had C difficile toxin A testing ordered. Patient samples were excluded from analysis if they were obtained from patients not hospitalized at UCLA Medical Center, if the C difficile toxin assay result was indeterminate, or if the patient was known to have previous VRE colonization or infection. RESULTS: During quarterly surveillance, VRE was detected in 19.8%, C difficile toxin A in 9.5%, and both VRE and C difficile toxin A in 3.2% of stool specimens submitted for C difficile toxin assay. Patients whose stool specimens were positive for C difficile toxin A were significantly more likely than those whose specimens were negative to have VRE detected (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5). Based on these findings, in July 1998, we began routine screening of all C difficile-positive stool specimens for VRE. From July 1998 through June 1999, 58 (41.4%) of 140 patients with C difficile-positive specimens had VRE newly detected in the stool. The combined cost of the two laboratory-based surveillance strategies was approximately $62 per VRE-positive patient identified and $5,800 per year. CONCLUSION: Quarterly surveillance of stool submitted for C difficile assay combined with screening all C difficile-positive stools is a cost-effective and efficient strategy for detecting VRE stool colonization among high-risk hospitalized patients. Such a laboratory-based surveillance should be included as part of a comprehensive program to limit nosocomial VRE transmission.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Bacterianas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterotoxinas/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Laboratorios de Hospital/economía , Vigilancia de la Población , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Prevalencia
12.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(1): 25-31, 2001 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11173188

RESUMEN

We assessed the distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and treatment associated with 161 non-Candida albicans isolates recovered from hospitalized patients over a 6-month period. The three most prevalent species were C. glabrata (100), C. tropicalis (28), and C. krusei (15). Resistance of C. glabrata to fluconazole and itraconazole were 6% and 17% respectively; 80% of the fluconazole-resistant isolates were cross-resistant to itraconazole. Prior azole exposure significantly reduced azole susceptibility in C. glabrata and also affected its subsequent selection among colonized patients. Only 21% of the patients had clinical infections. Patients with fungemia were more likely to be treated with amphotericin versus an azole. Overall treatment success was higher in patients treated with amphotericin versus an azole (56% vs 31%). Routine susceptibility testing on all Candida species does not appear necessary except where therapy with an azole is being considered to detect resistant isolates or for epidemiologic surveillance purposes. Further studies are needed to delineate the relationship between azole MICs and treatment outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-C. albicans species.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Azoles/uso terapéutico , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Azoles/farmacología , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Fluconazol/farmacología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Fungemia/microbiología , Humanos , Itraconazol/farmacología , Itraconazol/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 44(11): 3035-9, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11036019

RESUMEN

Three sets of carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens isolates have been identified in the United States: 1 isolate in Minnesota in 1985 (before approval of carbapenems for clinical use), 5 isolates in Los Angeles (University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA]) in 1992, and 19 isolates in Boston from 1994 to 1999. All isolates tested produced two beta-lactamases, an AmpC-type enzyme with pI values of 8.6 to 9.0 and one with a pI value of approximately 9.5. The enzyme with the higher pI in each strain hydrolyzed carbapenems and was not inhibited by EDTA, similar to the chromosomal class A SME-1 beta-lactamase isolated from the 1982 London strain S. marcescens S6. The genes encoding the carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes were cloned in Escherichia coli and sequenced. The enzyme from the Minnesota isolate had an amino acid sequence identical to that of SME-1. The isolates from Boston and UCLA produced SME-2, an enzyme with a single amino acid change relative to SME-1, a substitution from valine to glutamine at position 207. Purified SME enzymes from the U. S. isolates had beta-lactam hydrolysis profiles similar to that of the London SME-1 enzyme. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that the isolates showed some similarity but differed by at least three genetic events. In conclusion, a family of rare class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamases first described in London has now been identified in S. marcescens isolates across the United States.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/metabolismo , Serratia marcescens/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Hidrólisis , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Análisis de Secuencia , Serratia marcescens/clasificación , Serratia marcescens/efectos de los fármacos , Serratia marcescens/genética , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos , beta-Lactamasas/clasificación , beta-Lactamasas/genética
14.
Rev Invest Clin ; 52(1): 39-43, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10818809

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the growth patterns of selected organisms in common parenteral solutions, in order to ascertain implications for nosocomial bacteremia. DESIGN: A microbial suspension of approximately 300 CFU/mL was sequentially inoculated into common parenteral infusions from three different manufacturers and incubated at room temperature. Initially, 11 bacterial isolates and one Candida species from clinical specimens were studied. Eight gram-negative rods (GNR) were tested at varying pH's. Species variability was examined by testing an additional 39 isolates. RESULTS: The eight GNR grew in Ringer's lactate (RL) from two manufacturers and only two grew in dextrose 5% in water (D5/W) (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens). No organism grew in saline or dextrose 5% in saline. The gram-positive cocci and Candida did not grow in any solution. No significant changes in growth were found after modifying the pH of solutions. Significant inter- and intra-species growth variability was noted. CONCLUSIONS: RL is a good culture media for GNR and D5/W is a poor culture media with the exception of some bacteria of the Tribe Klebsielleae. We recommend to follow high standards of nursing practice for administering intravenous infusions and to avoid nutrient-containing solutions for prolonged parenteral use, when possible.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Medios de Cultivo , Soluciones , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 30(5): 790-7, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10817685

RESUMEN

The efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin for treatment of infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium were evaluated in 24 hospitalized patients with documented infections (19 bacteremias, 5 localized infections) caused by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium that was susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin in vitro. Patients received iv quinupristin/dalfopristin at a dosage of either 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h or 5 mg/kg every 8 h. A favorable clinical response (cure or improvement) occurred in 19 (83%) of 23 evaluable patients; bacteriologic eradication occurred in 17 (74%) of 23 evaluable patients. A favorable clinical response was observed in 12 (80%) of 15 patients who were treated with 7.5 mg/kg of quinupristin/dalfopristin every 8 h and in 7 (88%) of 8 patients treated with 5 mg/kg of quinupristin/dalfopristin every 8 h. Two of four treatment failures were associated with a decrease in the in vitro susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium to quinupristin/dalfopristin. Superinfections developed in 6 patients (26%), but only one was caused by Enterococcus faecalis that was resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin. Myalgias and arthralgias were the only adverse events related to quinupristin/dalfopristin. These conditions occurred in 8 (33%) of 24 patients and were dose-related (8 cases in 16 patients treated with 7.5 mg/kg of quinupristin/dalfopristin every 8 h, no cases in 8 patients treated with 5 mg/kg every 8 h). Mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium infection was 17% (4 of 23 patients), whereas mortality from other causes was 52% (12 of 23 patients). These results suggest that quinupristin/dalfopristin is effective as treatment for vancomycin-resistant E. faecium infections in critically ill patients with serious underlying conditions. Except for myalgias and arthralgias at higher dosages, the drug is well-tolerated.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Virginiamicina/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/farmacología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/mortalidad , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Virginiamicina/farmacología
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 26(6): 1440-6, 1998 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9636877

RESUMEN

From July 1994 through November 1996, a phenotypically unique strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing a pungent, "rotten-potato" odor and a positive lysine decarboxylase reaction was isolated from 39 patients at UCLA Medical Center (Los Angeles). Most cases (95%) were in intensive care units and had clinical infections (72%). Most isolates (74%) were recovered from cultures of respiratory secretions. To determine risk factors for acquisition of the organism, 23 cases were compared with 23 randomly selected controls matched by service and isolate date. Multivariate analysis revealed that isolation of malodorous P. aeruginosa was associated with mechanical ventilation of > 24 hours' duration (odds ratio [OR] = 9.4; P = .001) and transfer from an outside hospital (OR = 5.7; P = .04). DNA from outbreak strains hybridized to P. aeruginosa-specific toxin A and phospholipase C gene probes and all outbreak isolates tested were found to be identical by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. An unusual phenotypic characteristic of the strain led to the recognition of a nosocomial outbreak of P. aeruginosa infection associated with mechanical ventilation.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Odorantes , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Carboxiliasas/metabolismo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Femenino , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación
17.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 25(3): 137-41, 1996 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8902410

RESUMEN

A total of 152 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from diverse geographic areas in the United States and with different levels of penicillin resistance were tested against five broad-spectrum cephalosporins, ampicillin, piperacillin, ticarcillin, and three beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Also, the effect of human serum proteins on the activity of selected "third-generation" cephalosporins was examined. The overall rank order of activity among the cephalosporins against penicillin-susceptible strains was: ceftriaxone (MIC90, 0.03 microgram/mL) > cefotaxime > ceftizoxime = cefuroxime > ceftazidime (MIC90, 0.5 microgram/mL). Only cefotaxime and ceftriaxone exhibited significant activity against penicillin-intermediate or -resistant isolates. Ampicillin, piperacillin, and penicillin were generally eight- to 16-fold more potent than ticarcillin and no increase in the effectiveness of these agents was observed with the addition of the beta-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanate, sulbactam, tazobactam). Ceftriaxone potency was significantly decreased (> or = four-fold) by the modest addition of 25% pooled human serum proteins and this change modified the rank order of potency against nonpenicillin-susceptible pneumococci to favor cefotaxime (41% resistant versus 71% for ceftriaxone; MICs at > or = 2 micrograms/mL). Induced high-level capsular production had no measurable effect on the MIC results of tested agents. These results confirm the continued activity advantages of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone against various populations of pneumococci compared to other alternative beta-lactams. The predictive value, however, of the utilized breakpoint concentrations of the cephalosporins, remains in question for pneumococcal infections other than those in the central nervous system and at unaltered, "usual" dosing.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Resistencia a las Penicilinas , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Estados Unidos
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 33(11): 3019-21, 1995 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8576364

RESUMEN

Studies were conducted to validate the use of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299 (which is vancomycin resistant and resistant to high levels of gentamicin and streptomycin) and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (which is susceptible to vancomycin and against which gentamicin or streptomycin and cell wall-active agents have synergistic kill activity) as controls in an agar screening test for vancomycin resistance and high-level streptomycin and gentamicin resistance and a broth microdilution screening test for high-level streptomycin and gentamicin resistance. Both organisms performed as expected in these tests and will serve as appropriate controls. However, E. faecalis ATCC 29212 was occasionally noted to produce light growth on the vancomycin screening plate with certain lots of agar. Quality control ranges for disk diffusion tests with disks with large amounts of streptomycin (300 micrograms) and gentamicin (120 micrograms) were established for E. faecalis ATCC 29212; zone limits are 16 to 22 mm for gentamicin and 14 to 19 mm for streptomycin. No zones for inhibition were seen when E. faecalis ATCC 51299 was tested with these high-content disks.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Vancomicina/farmacología , Aminoglicósidos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Control de Calidad , Especificidad de la Especie
20.
J Clin Microbiol ; 32(10): 2448-59, 1994 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7814481

RESUMEN

A five-center collaborative study was undertaken to develop quality control and specific interpretive criteria for susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae against 12 antimicrobial agents. MICs were determined for 248 pneumococcal clinical isolates (with an emphasis on resistant strains) by use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended broth microdilution procedure incorporating lysed horse blood-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth. NCCLS disk diffusion testing was also performed for each isolate by using Mueller-Hinton sheep blood agar incubated in 5% CO2. Repetitive testing of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 with different sources and lots of media and disks allowed development of quality control ranges which encompassed approximately 95% of MIC and zone size values observed in the study. Good intra- and interlaboratory reproducibilities were seen with these testing methods and all of the drugs examined. On the basis of the results of this study, MIC interpretive criteria are proposed for 11 agents. Comparisons of MICs and disk diffusion zone sizes allowed disk diffusion zone size interpretive criteria to be proposed for five drugs and confirmed the use of the oxacillin disk test for prediction of penicillin susceptibility among pneumococci. Excessive numbers of minor-category interpretive errors precludes recommendation at this time of the disk diffusion method for testing of pneumococci against five of the drugs. Use of these proposed quality control and interpretive criteria should provide for reproducible test results and allow recognition of recently emerging resistance among pneumococcal clinical isolates.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Difusión , Control de Calidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...