Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P<0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.

Towards NHS Zero: greener gastroenterology and the impact of virtual clinics on carbon emissions and patient outcomes. A multisite, observational, cross-sectional study.

Objective: The National Health Service (NHS) produces more carbon emissions than any public sector organisation in England. In 2020, it became the first health service worldwide to commit to becoming carbon net zero, the same year as the COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare systems globally to rapidly adapt service delivery. As part of this, outpatient appointments became largely remote. Although the environmental benefit of this change may seem intuitive the impact on patient outcomes must remain a priority. Previous studies have evaluated the impact of telemedicine on emission reduction and patient outcomes but never before in the gastroenterology outpatient setting. Method: 2140 appointments from general gastroenterology clinics across 11 Trusts were retrospectively analysed prior to and during the pandemic. 100 consecutive appointments during two periods of time, from 1 June 2019 (prepandemic) to 1 June 2020 (during the pandemic), were used. Patients were telephoned to confirm the mode of transport used to attend their appointment and electronic patient records reviewed to assess did-not-attend (DNA) rates, 90-day admission rates and 90-day mortality rates. Results: Remote consultations greatly reduced the carbon emissions associated with each appointment. Although more patients DNA their remote consultations and doctors more frequently requested follow-up blood tests when reviewing patients face-to-face, there was no significant difference in patient 90-day admissions or mortality when consultations were remote. Conclusion: Teleconsultations can provide patients with a flexible and safe means of being reviewed in outpatient clinics while simultaneously having a major impact on the reduction of carbon emissions created by the NHS.

Efficacy and safety of medical therapies in microscopic colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: The mainstay of treatment for microscopic colitis (MC) is budesonide. However, the optimal formulation and dosage of budesonide to induce and maintain remission has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Objectives: To compare the data for efficacy and safety of treatments to induce and maintain remission for MC. Design: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with each other or placebo for induction and maintenance of clinical and histological remission in MC. Data sources and methods: We searched MEDLINE (1946 to May 2021), EMBASE and EMBASE Classis (1947 to May 2021), the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (Issue 2, May 2021) and conference proceedings between 2006 and 2020. Results were reported as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarise the effect of each comparison tested, with treatments ranked according to p score. Results: We identified 15 RCTs in total for the treatment of MC. Entocort 9 mg ranked first for clinical (RR: 4.89, CI: 2.43-9.83; p score: 0.86) and histological (RR: 13.39, CI: 1.92-93.44; p score 0.94) induction of remission, whilst VSL#3 ranked second for clinical induction (RR: 5.30, CI: 0.68-41.39; p score 0.81). Budenofalk 6 mg/3 mg alternate day dosing ranked first for clinical maintenance of remission (RR: 3.68, CI: 0.08-159.92, p-score 0.65). Entocort and Budenofalk were associated with the greatest adverse events for induction and maintenance of clinical remission, respectively, although the overall withdrawal numbers for treatment versus placebo groups were 10.9% (22/201) and 10.5% (20/190), respectively. Conclusion: Entocort 9 mg/day ranked first among the treatment options in inducing remission and Budenofalk 6 mg/3 mg alternate day dosing for maintaining remission in the treatment of MC. Moving forward, mechanistic studies exploring the differences between Entocort and Budenofalk would be valuable whilst future RCT studies are needed in non-corticosteroidal maintenance, particularly looking into immunomodulators, biologics and probiotics.

A practical approach to the patient with chronic diarrhoea.

Chronic diarrhoea is common, occurring as the first presentation of several diagnoses, or as a prolonged disorder where stool frequency, urgency and incontinence have major impacts on quality of life. Good history taking is necessary, with different causes to be considered: onset and duration of symptoms, previous treatments, co-existing conditions, travel and drug use may all be relevant. Tests include blood and faecal screening. Exclusion of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal neoplasia is important and may require colonoscopy. Coeliac disease, microscopic colitis and bile acid diarrhoea are all common conditions which should not be missed, as specific therapy is available for each of these. Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea are prevalent, overlapping with other more treatable conditions. Dietetic assessment and advice are helpful. Awareness of high FODMAP foods, with identification of individual sensitivities, is often beneficial.

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Callus in the Diabetic Foot.

Diabetic foot is one of the most common long term complications of diabetes. The risk of developing a foot ulcer is significantly increased when a patient presents with a callus. Callus develops due to various reasons, of which, the most important in people with diabetes is peripheral neuropathy. Motor neuropathy leads to deformity and sensory neuropathy causes lack of sensation, which results in persistent abnormal pressure on the foot. The cells of skin react to it by increasing keratinization and turns into a callus, which predisposes to foot ulceration. However, there is a lack of research in the field of callus. The link between hyperkeratosis, insulin and hyperglycaemia is not fully explored. There is also a lack of research on the relationship between genetic defects of hyperkeratosis, and the risk of developing a diabetic foot ulcer. There is scope for further research in this area, such as exploring whether development of callus is an individual risk factor, and whether glycaemic control or its treatment has any relationship with callus formation. The research around the genetic defects of hyperkeratosis may lead to identification of those, with diabetes, who may have increased risk of developing a foot ulcer.