Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily, single-tablet regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and low propensity for resistance. We report week 48 results from a phase 3 trial evaluating switch from stable, oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) to the fixed combination of doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg). METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted at 77 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 15 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL on any oral, two-drug or three-drug ART regimen for at least 3 months, and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or to continue their baseline ART regimen. Block randomisation was based on a block size of four, and randomisation was stratified by baseline regimen (ie, protease inhibitor, integrase inhibitor, or other). Participants in the doravirine and islatravir group were instructed to take one tablet at approximately the same time each day, and participants in the baseline ART group continued to take the medication according to the locally approved label. HIV-1 RNA and safety evaluations were done at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. CD4 cell counts were measured at baseline, week 24, and week 48. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug) using the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach and prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04223778) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 18 and Oct 2, 2020, 740 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 672 (90·8%) participants (249 [37·1%] women and 423 [62·9%] men; median CD4 count of 678 cells per µL [IQR 496-868]) were randomly assigned to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg; n=336) or to continue baseline ART (n=336). The last follow-up visit occurred on Sept 8, 2021. At week 48, zero of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group versus five (1·5%) of 336 participants in the baseline ART group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference -1·5, 95% CI -3·4 to -0·3). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. Headache was the most common adverse event in both groups (35 [10·4%] of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group, 16 [4·8%] of 336 in the baseline ART group), infection rates were similar (113 [33·6%] in both groups), and discontinuations due to adverse events were low (seven [2·1%] vs one [0·3%]). 66 (19·6%) of 336 participants had treatment-related adverse events in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with 30 (8·9%) of 336 in the baseline ART group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -30·3 cells per µL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·26 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Switching to single-tablet doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) maintained viral suppression up to week 48 and was non-inferior to antiretroviral combinations used in clinical practice for adults with HIV-1; however, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg). FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Racial/ethnic disparities in HIV care outcomes among insured patients at a large urban sexual health clinic.

Prior studies demonstrate that non-White patients are less likely to achieve human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) suppression compared to White patients due to lack of health insurance. This study aims to determine whether racial disparities in the HIV care cascade persist among a cohort of privately and publicly insured patients. This retrospective analysis evaluated HIV care outcomes during the first year of care. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years, treatment-naïve, and seen between 2016 and 2019. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record. Differences in the proportion of patients achieving each HIV care cascade stage by race were evaluated using unadjusted chi-square testing. Risk factors for viral non-suppression at 52 weeks were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. We included 285 patients; ninety-nine were White, 101 were Black, and 85 identified as Hispanic/LatinX ethnicity. Significant differences in retention in care for Hispanic/LatinX patients (odds ratio (OR): 0.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.067-0.676) and viral suppression for both Black (OR: 0.348, 95% CI: 0.178, 0.682) and Hispanic/LatinX patients (OR: 0.392, 95% CI: 0.195, 0.791) compared to White patients were observed. In multivariate analyses, Black patients were less likely to achieve viral suppression compared to White patients (OR: 0.464, 95% CI: 0.236, 0.902). This study showed that non-White patients were less likely to achieve viral suppression after 1 year despite insurance and suggests that other unmeasured factors may disproportionately affect viral suppression in these patients. Interventions to identify and address these factors are needed to improve HIV care outcomes for non-White populations.

Treatment-related early discontinuations and adverse events among newly diagnosed people living with HIV initiating integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Cohort studies suggest higher discontinuation rates with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) than are seen in clinical trials. We assessed discontinuations and adverse events (AEs) that were considered related to the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation among treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: Newly diagnosed PLWH initiating raltegravir, elvitegravir/cobicistat, dolutegravir or bictegravir in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate between 10/2007 and 1/2020 at the Orlando Immunology Center were included. Unadjusted incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for treatment-related discontinuations and AEs associated with the initial INSTI in the first year following initiation. RESULTS: Of 331 enrolled, 26 (8%) initiated raltegravir, 151 (46%) initiated elvitegravir/cobicistat, 74 (22%) initiated dolutegravir and 80 (24%) initiated bictegravir. Within the first year, treatment-related discontinuations occurred in 3 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.02 per person-years (PPY)) and 5 on dolutegravir (IR 0.08 PPY); no treatment-related discontinuations occurred among those initiating raltegravir or bictegravir. Eleven treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 on raltegravir (IR 0.46 PPY), 100 treatment-related AEs occurred in 63 on elvitegravir/cobicistat (IR 0.72 PPY), 66 treatment-related AEs occurred in 37 on dolutegravir (IR 0.97 PPY) and 65 treatment-related AEs occurred in 34 on bictegravir (IR 0.88 PPY). Unadjusted IRRs did not reveal any significant difference between INSTIs in terms of early treatment-related discontinuations or AEs. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, treatment-related AEs occurred in 43% initiating INSTIs but were responsible for early discontinuation in only 2% with no treatment-related discontinuations observed among those initiating RAL or BIC.

Real-world efficacy and safety of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in older people living with HIV.

ABSTRACT: Approximately 50% of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are ≥50 years old. Clinical trials of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) demonstrated potent efficacy and favorable safety in older PLWH; however, real-world data would be useful to validate these results.Retrospective cohort study.We evaluated records from PLWH aged ≥50 years at the Orlando Immunology Center who were switched to B/F/TAF between February 2018 and August 2019. Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and 48 weeks of follow-up data. The primary endpoint was maintenance of HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48. The impact of switching to B/F/TAF on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and safety parameters were also assessed.Three-hundred and fifty patients met inclusion criteria, median age was 57 years, 20% were women, and 43% were non-White. Fifty-five percent of patients switched from integrase inhibitor-based regimens; the most common reason for switch was simplification. At Week 48, 330 (94%) patients maintained an HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and 20 (6%) had an HIV-1 RNA between 50 and 400 copies/mL. One-hundred and forty potential DDIs were identified in 121 (35%) patients taking a boosting agent or rilpivirine at baseline that were resolved after switching to B/F/TAF. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 51 (15%) patients (all Grade 1-2) and led to 8 discontinuations.In this real-world cohort, switching to B/F/TAF was associated with maintenance of virologic control, and avoidance of DDIs in a large proportion of patients. These data support use of B/F/TAF as a treatment option in older PLWH.

A Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Antivirals for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: The PRIORITIZE Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens are available to treat HCV genotype 1 infection. However, comparative effectiveness from randomized controlled trials of DAA regimens is unavailable. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (NCT02786537) to compare the effectiveness of DAAs for HCV genotype 1a or 1b on viral response, safety, tolerability, and medication nonadherence. Adults with compensated liver disease, HCV genotype 1, not pregnant or breastfeeding, and with health insurance likely to cover ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) were recruited from 34 US viral hepatitis clinics. Participants were randomized (± ribavirin) to LDV/SOF, elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir+dasabuvir (PrOD; treatment arm stopped early). Primary outcomes included sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12), clinician-recorded adverse events, patient-reported symptoms, and medication nonadherence. Between June 2016 and March 2018, 1,609 participants were randomized. Among 1,128 participants who received ≥1 dose of EBR/GZR or LDV/SOF (± ribavirin), SVR12 was 95.2% (95% CI, 92.8%-97.6%) and 97.4% (95% CI, 95.5%-99.2%), respectively, with a difference estimate of 2.2% (-0.5% to 4.7%), falling within the "equivalence" interval (-5% to 5%). While most (56%) participants experienced adverse events, few were serious (4.2%) or severe (1.8%). In the absence of ribavirin, discontinuations due to adverse events were rare. Patient-reported symptoms and medication nonadherence were similar. Study limitations were dropout due to insurance denial and loss to follow-up after treatment, limiting the ability to measure SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: This pragmatic trial demonstrated high SVR12 for participants treated with EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF with few adverse effects. Overall, the two regimens were equivalent in effectiveness. The results support current HCV guidelines that do not distinguish between ribavirin-free EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF.

Virologic outcomes of switching to dolutegravir functional mono- or dual therapy with a non-cytosine nucleoside analog: a retrospective study of treatment-experienced, patients living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir (DTG) monotherapy results in virologic failure and the development of DTG resistance. Here, we evaluated virologic outcomes of patients switched to DTG functional mono- or dual therapy with a non-cytosine nucleoside analog (NA). METHODS: This retrospective, single center study included treatment-experienced patients switched to regimens containing ≥ 2 antiretrovirals between 8/13/13-11/22/14 who were later found to be on DTG functional mono- or dual therapy with a non-cytosine NA based on historical genotypes. Eligible patients were either suppressed or viremic at baseline and had ≥ 2 HIV-1 RNA measurements at least 4 weeks apart following switch. Demographics, laboratory values and clinical parameters were extracted from the charts of all eligible patients during study treatment until 12/31/2018 and were summarized using descriptive statistics. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL following switch. RESULTS: Of 70 patients switched to DTG functional mono- or dual therapy, 39 were eligible; 19 (49%) were on DTG functional monotherapy and 20 (51%) were on DTG functional dual therapy with a non-cytosine NA. Historical genotypes indicated that all had an M184V/I, and 23 (59%) had an M184V/I and ≥ 1 additional NA mutation. The median duration of follow-up on study treatment was 50 weeks (range 12-244). Following switch, 32/39 (82%) patients achieved or maintained an HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and 7 (18%) had persistent HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL. Five viremic patients were found to be on functional dual therapy with DTG plus a non-cytosine NA and 2 were on DTG functional monotherapy. Five of these patients had post-switch genotypes ordered as a part of routine clinical care and there was no evidence of treatment-emergent resistance. Five were switched to a different DTG-containing regimen and achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, 1 was switched to a non-DTG containing regimen and achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL and 1 was lost-to-follow up at week 36. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, the majority of whom had virus with the M184V/I and ≥ 1 additional NA mutation, switching to DTG functional mono-or dual therapy with a non-cytosine NA resulted in persistent HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL in 18%. None with post-switch genotypes developed treatment-emergent resistance.

Clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infected patients switched from complex multi-tablet regimens to tenofovir alafenamide based single-tablet regimens plus a boosted protease inhibitor in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Multi-tablet regimens (MTRs) are associated with increased adverse events and non-adherence. Single tablet regimens (STRs) plus boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) are a simplification option for MTR-treated patients; however, data is needed to validate this therapeutic strategy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all HIV-1 infected patients seen at a single center from March 2016 to December 2017 who were switched from twice-daily (BID) regimens or regimens containing â€‹≥ â€‹3 pills daily to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) plus darunavir (DRV) or rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (RPV/F/TAF) plus DRV boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat (DRV/r-c). Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA<200 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HIV-1 RNA≥50 copies/mL at Week 48. Adherence and safety data were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 61 patients included, median age was 53 years, the median number of pills taken daily (range) was 5 (3-9), 80% were taking BID regimens, 97% had baseline HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL, 56 (92%) were switched to E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and 5 (8%) to RPV/F/TAF plus DRV/r-c. At Week 48, 2 patients (3%) had HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL, both were treated with E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and neither had evidence of treatment-emergent resistance. Fifty-nine (97%) had an HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 3/61 (5%) (all Grade 2) leading to 3/61 (5%) ADR-related discontinuations. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort of MTR-treated patients, switching to a TAF-based STR plus boosted PI maintained virologic control in 97% and was well-tolerated, supporting potential use of this strategy for regimen simplification.

Clinical outcomes of once-daily darunavir in treatment-experienced patients with darunavir resistance-associated mutations through 48 weeks of treatment.

Darunavir (DRV) is approved for once-daily use in patients with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and twice-daily use in those with DRV RAMs. Several studies suggest that once-daily DRV retains efficacy in the setting of 1-2 DRV RAMs whereas three or more DRV RAMs are needed for DRV resistance. There are few data to support the long-term use of once-daily DRV in patients with DRV RAMs. This observational study evaluated 48-week clinical outcomes of 22 treatment-experienced patients with ≥1 DRV RAMs switched to once-daily DRV between 2014 and 2017. The primary endpoint was HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at week 48. Safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study. The median age of the sample was 53 years, 18 (82%) had baseline HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml, and the median number of historical DRV RAMs was 2. At week 48, 20 (91%) had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml, and 2 (9%) had HIV-1 RNA of 82 and 59,637 copies/ml and reported non-adherence. No adverse drug reactions were observed through week 48. Once-daily DRV maintained virologic control in patients with ≥1 historical DRV RAMs and was safe and well-tolerated. Further data are needed to validate this as a viable treatment option in this population.

HIV/HCV therapy with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir after randomized switch to emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide-based single-tablet regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines advocate the treatment of HCV in all HIV/HCV co-infected individuals. The aim of this randomized, open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02707601; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02707601) was to evaluate the safety/efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) co-administered with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) or rilpivirine/F/TAF (R/F/TAF) in HIV-1/HCV co-infected participants. METHODS: Participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and chronic HCV-genotype (GT) 1 (HCV treatment-naïve ± compensated cirrhosis or HCV treatment-experienced non-cirrhotic) were randomized 1:1 to switch to E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF. If HIV suppression was maintained at Week 8, participants received 12 weeks of LDV/SOF. The primary endpoint was sustained HCV virologic response 12 weeks after LDV/SOF completion (SVR12). RESULTS: Of 150 participants, 148 received ≥1 dose of HIV study drug and 144 received LDV/SOF (72 in each F/TAF group; 83% GT1a, 94% HCV treatment-naïve, 12% cirrhotic). Overall, SVR12 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 93-99%). Black race did not affect SVR12. Of four participants not achieving SVR12, one had HCV relapse, one had HCV virologic non-response due to non-adherence, and two missed the post-HCV Week 12 visit. Of 148 participants, 96% receiving E/C/F/TAF and 95% receiving R/F/TAF maintained HIV suppression at Week 24; no HIV resistance was detected. No participant discontinued LDV/SOF or E/C/F/TAF due to adverse events; one participant discontinued R/F/TAF due to worsening of pre-existing hypercholesterolemia. Renal toxicity was not observed in either F/TAF regimen during LDV/SOF co-administration. In conclusion, high rates of HCV SVR12 and maintenance of HIV suppression were achieved with LDV/SOF and F/TAF-based regimens. CONCLUSION: This study supports LDV/SOF co-administered with an F/TAF-based regimen in HIV-1/HCV-GT1 co-infected patients.

Efficacy of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Patients With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection With Treatment Failure After NS5A Inhibitor Plus Sofosbuvir Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment options are limited for patients with hepatitis C (HCV) infection with treatment failure after sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor. There are some data for the efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in these patients. We performed a randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of 12 and 16 weeks of G/P, with or without ribavirin, in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection with treatment failure after sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor. METHODS: We performed a phase 3b, open-label study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who received previous treatment with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor. Patients without cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups that received G/P for 12 weeks (n = 78, group A) or 16 weeks (n = 49, group B). Patients with compensated cirrhosis were randomly assigned to groups that received G/P and ribavirin for 12 weeks (n = 21, group C) or G/P for 16 weeks (n = 29, group D). The primary end point was a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment. Samples collected at baseline and at time of treatment failure were sequenced for resistance-associated substitutions in NS3 and NS5A. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients in the 4 groups, 81% were men, 79% had HCV genotype 1a infection, and 44% were black. Proportions of patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in groups A, B, C, and D were 90%, 94%, 86%, and 97%, respectively. The treatment failed in 13 (7.3%) patients with HCV genotype 1a infection, 6 (7.9%) in group A, 3 (6.1%) in group B, 3 (6.1%) in group C (6.1%), and 1 (3.4%) in group D. Most patients had baseline resistance-associated substitutions in NS5A. Treatment-emergent resistance-associated substitutions in NS3 and NS5A were observed in 9 and 10 patients with treatment failure, respectively. G/P was well tolerated. Ribavirin increased adverse events but did not increase efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection who received previous treatment with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor, 16 weeks treatment with G/P produced sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment in >90% of patients, including those with compensated cirrhosis. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03092375.

Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks in hepatitis C virus patients previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral regimen.

The optimal retreatment strategy for patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus who experience virologic failure after treatment with direct-acting antiviral-based therapies remains unclear. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (400 mg/100 mg) plus weight-adjusted ribavirin administered for 24 weeks in patients who did not achieve sustained virologic response after prior treatment with direct-acting antiviral regimens that included the nucleotide analogue nonstructural protein 5B inhibitor sofosbuvir plus the nonstructural protein 5A inhibitor velpatasvir with or without the nonstructural protein 3/4A protease inhibitor voxilaprevir. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the cessation of treatment. In total, 63 of 69 (91%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-97%) patients achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks, including 36 of 37 (97%; 95% confidence interval, 86%-100%) patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection, 13 of 14 (93%; 95% confidence interval, 66%-100%) patients with genotype 2 infection, and 14 of 18 (78%; 95% confidence interval, 52%-94%) patients with genotype 3 infection. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The most frequently reported adverse events were fatigue, nausea, headache, insomnia, and rash. One patient (1%) with genotype 1a infection discontinued all study drugs due to an adverse event (irritability). CONCLUSION: Retreatment of patients who previously failed direct-acting antiviral-based therapies with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks was well tolerated and effective, particularly those with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 2 infection. (Hepatology 2017;66:1083-1089).

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and GS-9857 in Patients With Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection in an Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The best regimen to re-treat patients who do not respond to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the feasibility of further shortening regimens is unclear. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir, and the NS3/4A protease inhibitor GS-9857 in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. METHODS: We performed an open-label trial at 32 sites in the United States and at 2 sites in New Zealand of 197 patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection, with or without compensated cirrhosis, who were treatment-naive or were treated previously with a DAA. Between March 2, 2015, and September 1, 2015, patients received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (400 mg/100 mg in a fixed-dose combination) plus GS-9857 (100 mg) once daily for 6-12 weeks, plus ribavirin for 1 treatment group consisting of treatment-naive patients with cirrhosis. The primary end point was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: Among treatment-naive patients without cirrhosis, 71% (24 of 34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 53-85) achieved SVR12 after 6 weeks of treatment and 100% (36 of 36; 95% CI, 90%-100%) achieved SVR12 after 8 weeks of treatment. Among treatment-naive patients with cirrhosis, 94% (31 of 33; 95% CI, 80-99) achieved SVR12 after 8 weeks of treatment and 81% (25 of 31; 95% CI, 63-93) achieved SVR12 after 8 weeks of treatment with ribavirin. Among DAA-experienced patients treated for 12 weeks, 100% without cirrhosis (31 of 31; 95% CI, 89-100) and 100% with cirrhosis (32 of 32; 95% CI, 89-100) achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were headache, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea. One patient (<1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 open-label trial, we found 8 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir plus GS-9857 to be safe and effective in treatment-naive patients; 12 weeks was safe and effective in patients previously treated with DAAs. The combination was safe and effective in patients with or without compensated cirrhosis. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02378935.

Daclatasvir + asunaprevir + beclabuvir ± ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype 1-infected treatment-naive patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This phase-2b study examined the safety and efficacy of an all-oral, interferon-free combination of the NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir (DCV), the NS3 protease inhibitor asunaprevir (ASV), and the nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor beclabuvir (BCV) with or without ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection. METHODS: A total of 187 patients received 12 weeks of DCV 30 mg BID plus ASV 200 mg BID and BCV 150 mg BID (n = 86) or 75 mg BID with (n = 21) or without (n = 80) weight-based ribavirin BID. The primary endpoint was HCV RNA <25 IU/ml at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: Overall, 90% of patients (169/187) in the combined treatment groups achieved SVR on or after post-treatment week 12. SVR rates were similar across subgroups (by mITT analysis), i.e. patients with cirrhosis (88%, 14/16), HCV GT-1a (90%, 137/155), and IL28B non-CC genotype (90%, 115/128). There were no drug-related serious AEs or grade 4 AEs. The most frequently reported AEs were headache, diarrhoea, fatigue and nausea. Addition of ribavirin to DCV+ASV+BCV was associated with decreased haemoglobin, compared with DCV+ASV+BCV alone. There were six grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities noted, all unrelated to the study drugs. Viral breakthrough occurred in 2.5-4.8% of patients across groups and appeared unrelated to BCV dose or ribavirin inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Results support phase 3 evaluation of a twice-daily, fixed-dose formulation of this DCV+ASV+BCV regimen with or without ribavirin in HCV GT-1-infected patients.

Sofosbuvir With Velpatasvir in Treatment-Naive Noncirrhotic Patients With Genotype 1 to 6 Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective, pangenotypic treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are needed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir with velpatasvir in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6. DESIGN: Randomized, phase 2, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01858766). SETTING: 48 U.S. sites. PATIENTS: 377 treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients. In part A, patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6 were randomly assigned to sofosbuvir, 400 mg, with velpatasvir, 25 or 100 mg, for 12 weeks. In part B, patients with genotype 1 or 2 HCV infection were randomly assigned to sofosbuvir, 400 mg, and velpatasvir, 25 or 100 mg, with or without ribavirin for 8 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12). RESULTS: In part A, SVR12 rates were 96% (26 of 27) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, and 100% (28 of 28) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, for genotype 1; 93% (25 of 27) in both groups for genotype 3; and 96% (22 of 23) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, and 95% (21 of 22) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, for genotypes 2, 4, 5, and 6. In part B, for genotype 1, SVR12 rates were 87% (26 of 30) with velpatasvir, 25 mg; 83% (25 of 30) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, plus ribavirin; 90% (26 of 29) with velpatasvir, 100 mg; and 81% (25 of 31) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, plus ribavirin. For genotype 2, SVR12 rates were 77% (20 of 26) with velpatasvir, 25 mg; 88% (22 of 25) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, plus ribavirin; 88% (23 of 26) with velpatasvir, 100 mg; and 88% (23 of 26) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, plus ribavirin. Adverse events included fatigue (21%), headache (20%), and nausea (12%). One patient committed suicide. LIMITATION: The study was open-label, no inferential statistics were planned, and sample sizes were small. CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks of sofosbuvir, 400 mg, and velpatasvir, 100 mg, was well-tolerated and resulted in high SVR in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Gilead Sciences.

Daclatasvir plus Sofosbuvir for HCV in Patients Coinfected with HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: The combination of daclatasvir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A inhibitor, and the NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir has shown efficacy in patients with HCV monoinfection. Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). METHODS: This was an open-label study involving 151 patients who had not received HCV treatment and 52 previously treated patients, all of whom were coinfected with HIV-1. Previously untreated patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 12 weeks or 8 weeks of daclatasvir at a standard dose of 60 mg daily (with dose adjustment for concomitant antiretroviral medications) plus 400 mg of sofosbuvir daily. Previously treated patients were assigned to undergo 12 weeks of therapy at the same doses. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at week 12 after the end of therapy among previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 1 who were treated for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Patients had HCV genotypes 1 through 4 (83% with genotype 1), and 14% had compensated cirrhosis; 98% were receiving antiretroviral therapy. Among patients with genotype 1, a sustained virologic response was reported in 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8 to 99.2) who were treated for 12 weeks and in 75.6% (95% CI, 59.7 to 87.6) who were treated for 8 weeks among previously untreated patients and in 97.7% (95% CI, 88.0 to 99.9) who were treated for 12 weeks among previously treated patients. Rates of sustained virologic response across all genotypes were 97.0% (95% CI, 91.6 to 99.4), 76.0% (95% CI, 61.8 to 86.9), and 98.1% (95% CI, 89.7 to 100), respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, and headache. There were no study-drug discontinuations because of adverse events. HIV-1 suppression was not compromised. CONCLUSIONS: Among previously untreated HIV-HCV coinfected patients receiving daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for HCV infection, the rate of sustained virologic response across all genotypes was 97.0% after 12 weeks of treatment and 76.0% after 8 weeks. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ALLY-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02032888.).

Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection.

BACKGROUND: All-oral combination therapy is desirable for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We evaluated daclatasvir (an HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor) plus sofosbuvir (a nucleotide analogue HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitor) in patients infected with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3. METHODS: In this open-label study, we initially randomly assigned 44 previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and 44 patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 to daclatasvir at a dose of 60 mg orally once daily plus sofosbuvir at a dose of 400 mg orally once daily, with or without ribavirin, for 24 weeks. The study was expanded to include 123 additional patients with genotype 1 infection who were randomly assigned to daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, for 12 weeks (82 previously untreated patients) or 24 weeks (41 patients who had previous virologic failure with telaprevir or boceprevir plus peginterferon alfa-ribavirin). The primary end point was a sustained virologic response (an HCV RNA level of <25 IU per milliliter) at week 12 after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 211 patients received treatment. Among patients with genotype 1 infection, 98% of 126 previously untreated patients and 98% of 41 patients who did not have a sustained virologic response with HCV protease inhibitors had a sustained virologic response at week 12 after the end of therapy. A total of 92% of 26 patients with genotype 2 infection and 89% of 18 patients with genotype 3 infection had a sustained virologic response at week 12. High rates of sustained virologic response at week 12 were observed among patients with HCV subtypes 1a and 1b (98% and 100%, respectively) and those with CC and non-CC IL28B genotypes (93% and 98%, respectively), as well as among patients who received ribavirin and those who did not (94% and 98%, respectively). The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response among patients infected with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3, including patients with no response to prior therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pharmasset (Gilead); A1444040 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01359644.).

Severe gastroenteritis and hypovolemic shock caused by Grimontia (Vibrio) hollisae infection.

Vibrio hollisae is a halophilic species that was recently reclassified as Grimontia hollisae. This organism is known to cause moderate to severe cases of gastroenteritis. We report a case of an individual who suffered a more severe form of this disease, presenting with profound hypotension and acute renal failure, secondary to hypovolemic shock.

Propionibacterium acnes as a cause of prosthetic valve aortic root abscess.

Propionibacterium acnes isolates usually have relatively low virulence and are often classified as contaminants when isolated from blood and tissue cultures. We report a patient with Propionibacterium acnes bacteremia and late prosthetic valve endocarditis, complicated by an aortic root abscess.