Are racial disparities in stroke care still prevalent in certified stroke centers?

Racial differences in stroke risk and risk factor prevalence are well established. The present study explored racial differences in the delivery of care to patients with acute stroke between Joint Commission (JC)-certified hospitals and noncertified hospitals. A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients sustaining ischemic stroke admitted to 5 JC-certified centers and 5 noncertified hospitals. Demographic data, risk factors, utilization of acute stroke therapies, and compliance with core measures were recorded. Racial disparities were investigated in the entire group as well as for JC-certified and noncertified hospitals separately. A total of 574 patients (25.1% African Americans) were included. African Americans were significantly younger and more likely to have previous stroke, whereas Caucasians were more likely to have coronary disease and atrial fibrillation. There were no racial differences in other risk factors or baseline functions. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were similar in African Americans and Caucasians, as were proportions receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) therapy (2.1% in African Americans, 3.5% in Caucasians; P = .40) and intervention (4.2% in African Americans, 6.8% in Caucasians; P = .26). Caucasians were more likely to arrive by emergency medical services (65.5% vs 51.5%; P = .004), to be evaluated by a stroke team (19.1% vs 7.7%; P = .001), and to have a documented National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (40.2% vs 29.9%; P = .03). African Americans often did not receive intravenous tPA because of a delay in arrival. African Americans performed better on virtually all stroke care variables in JC-certified centers. JC certification reduced disparity in certain variables, including tPA and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis administration. Important racial disparities exist in the delivery of several acute stroke care variables. Efforts must be focused on eliminating disparities in prehospital delays. Guideline-based care tendered at JC-certified centers might help narrow disparities in acute stroke care delivery.

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Joint Commission-certified and -noncertified hospitals in Michigan.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission (JC) for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has devised disease specific certification programs for hospitals, including stroke. JC certification as a primary stroke center (PSC) suggests that the hospital has critical measures in place to ensure improving stroke outcomes over the long term. In this study, we focused on the delivery of care for patients with acute ischemic and compared differences in JC-certified and -noncertified centers in Michigan. METHODS: We performed a systematic chart review of patients with acute ischemic stroke from 10 Michigan hospitals, half of whom were JC-certified PSCs. Sixty charts were randomly chosen from 1 calendar year from each hospital. An experienced nurse performed the data abstraction, and data analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 602 charts--of which 302 were from JC-certified PSCs--were chosen for the study. The 2 groups were similar with regard to stroke risk factors except that there were significantly more patients with atrial fibrillation in noncertified centers and there were more African American patients in JC-certified PSCs. Significantly more patients were considered for thrombolytic therapy in JC-certified PSCs compared to noncertified centers (90.4% v 66%; P = .0001). Overall, 3.8% of patients had received thrombolytic therapy without any significant difference between JC-certified PSCs and noncertified centers (4.6% v 3%; adjusted odds ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 0.64-4.19; P = .87). However, thrombolysis rates among eligible patients was significantly higher in the JC-certified PSCs (48.2% v 8.8%; P = .0001). The most common reason documented for not giving thrombolytic therapy was late arrival outside the therapeutic window, which was more common in JC-certified PSCs (72.8% v 55.6%; P = .0001) compared to noncertified centers. Seventy-four percent of patients from JC-certified PSCs were discharged home or to inpatient rehabilitation facility compared to 71% (P = .38) from noncertified hospitals. The mean length of stay was marginally shorter in JC-certified PSCs compared to noncertified centers (5.53 v 6.25 days; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of thrombolysis administration for acute stroke patients across Michigan were low in both JC-certified and noncertified hospitals, although better processes were in place in JC-certified PSCs. While there was no overall difference in the administration of thrombolytic treatment, a greater number of the eligible patients received thrombolysis in the certified centers. There was a tendency to shorter lengths of stay at JC-certified PSCs, but there was no significant difference in discharge to home, inpatient rehabilitation, or inpatient mortality in this study.

Gender based differences in acute stroke care in Michigan hospitals.

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine whether gender-based differences in acute stroke care occur in both Joint Commission (JC) certified and noncertified hospitals. METHODS: 602 charts of patients with ischemic stroke were reviewed from five JC certified and five noncertified hospitals for gender differences in the prehospital factors, emergency department evaluation, in-hospital stroke care, discharge outcome and use of secondary prevention measures. RESULTS: More women arrived via ambulance (63.1% women vs. 53.9% men, p=0.025) while more men came by self-transportation (42.6% vs. 30%, p=0.0016). There was no difference by gender for evaluation for thrombolytics (89.4% men vs. 85.9% women) or intravenous t-PA administered (3.5% men vs. 2.5% women, p=0.82). More patients in JC certified centers were evaluated for thrombolysis than in noncertified centers. Delay in arrival was the commonest reason for not getting thrombolysis in both groups. More men than women had mild/resolving symptoms, had more interventional procedures, and better discharge outcome. More men were discharged on antithrombotics. Even after adjusting for age, gender differences were significant for arrival by ambulance, self transportation, mild/resolving symptoms, interventional procedures performed and marginally for good discharge outcome. CONCLUSION: There were significant gender differences in delivery of acute stroke care in Michigan hospitals even after adjustment for age differences. In spite of milder symptoms and less usage of emergency services, men received more aggressive stroke care with a tendency towards better discharge outcome. Going to a JC certified center was a better predictor of consideration for thrombolytics than gender.