Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale and Swiss Narcolepsy Scale for screening Japanese individuals with narcolepsy type 1.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Japanese versions of the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (J-UNS) and Swiss Narcolepsy Scale (J-SNS) for screening narcolepsy in the Japanese population and to discuss strategies for their use in hypersomniac individuals. METHODS: We selected 451 outpatients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) already diagnosed according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders third edition. They responded to both scales twice at 1-month intervals. After eliminating individuals who met the exclusion criteria, validity and reliability analyses were performed on 408 and 381 participants, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) displayed higher J-UNS and lower J-SNS scores than those with NT2 and other sleep disorders. The intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted κ coefficient for scale scores in the total participants and patients with NT1 were ≥0.70 and ≥ 0.40, respectively, indicating high reliability. Furthermore, both the sensitivity and specificity of these scales upon using the original cut-off scores (14 for UNS and 0 for SNS) for detecting NT1 were 0.70 or ≥0.70, suggesting high validity. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best cut-off score did not change for the J-SNS but that for the J-UNS, it increased to 18. In our study, the scale's sensitivity and specificity changed from 96% to 82% and 58%-78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both scales revealed satisfactory screening abilities for NT1 in the Japanese population. However, it may be better to use J-UNS cut-off scores of 18 for a population with EDS.

Perospirone in the treatment of patients with delirium.

Perospirone is a recently developed atypical antipsychotic with potent serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 antagonist activity. Other atypical antipsychotics including risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine have been widely used for treatment, not only for schizophrenia symptoms but also for delirium, because of their low potential to induce extrapyramidal disturbances. In the present study the effectiveness and safety of perospirone in patients with delirium are described. Thirty-eight patients with DSM-IV delirium were given open-label perospirone. To evaluate the usefulness of perospirone, scores from 13 severity items of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 were assessed. Data were gathered from October 2003 to September 2004. Perospirone was effective in 86.8% (33/38) of patients, and the effect appeared within several days (5.1 +/- 4.9 days). The initial dose was 6.5 +/- 3.7 mg/day and maximum dose of perospirone was 10.0 +/- 5.3 mg/day. There were no serious adverse effects. However, increased fatigue (15.2%), sleepiness (6.1%), akathisia (3.0%) and a decline in blood pressure (3.0%) were observed. It is proposed that perospirone may be another safe and effective atypical antipsychotic drug for the treatment of delirium symptoms in hospitalized patients. This is a preliminary open trial, and further randomized double-blind placebo-controlled tests are needed.