NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES: A dataset of occurrence and abundance of freshwater fishes in the Neotropics.

The Neotropical region hosts 4225 freshwater fish species, ranking first among the world's most diverse regions for freshwater fishes. Our NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set is the first to produce a large-scale Neotropical freshwater fish inventory, covering the entire Neotropical region from Mexico and the Caribbean in the north to the southern limits in Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, and Uruguay. We compiled 185,787 distribution records, with unique georeferenced coordinates, for the 4225 species, represented by occurrence and abundance data. The number of species for the most numerous orders are as follows: Characiformes (1289), Siluriformes (1384), Cichliformes (354), Cyprinodontiformes (245), and Gymnotiformes (135). The most recorded species was the characid Astyanax fasciatus (4696 records). We registered 116,802 distribution records for native species, compared to 1802 distribution records for nonnative species. The main aim of the NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set was to make these occurrence and abundance data accessible for international researchers to develop ecological and macroecological studies, from local to regional scales, with focal fish species, families, or orders. We anticipate that the NEOTROPICAL FRESHWATER FISHES data set will be valuable for studies on a wide range of ecological processes, such as trophic cascades, fishery pressure, the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation, and the impacts of species invasion and climate change. There are no copyright restrictions on the data, and please cite this data paper when using the data in publications.

Hidden or unnoticed? Multiple lines of evidence support the recognition of a new species of Pseudocorynopoma (Characidae: Corynopomini).

Species delimitation is a permanent issue in systematics. The increasing recognition of geographically isolated populations as independent lineages allowed by new methods of analysis has inflated the species-populations dilemma, which involves deciding whether to consider separate lineages as different species or structured genetic populations. This is commonly observed between fishes of adjacent river basins, with some lineages being considered allopatric sister species and others considered isolated populations or variants of the same species. Pseudocorynopoma doriae is a characid diagnosed from its single congener by the number of anal-fin rays and sexually dimorphic characters of males, including distinct fin colouration. The authors found variation in the colour pattern between isolated populations previously identified as P. doriae but no variation in scale or fin-ray counts. They analysed molecular evidence at the population level and morphological differences related to life history (e.g., colour dimorphism related to inseminating behaviour). The results provide compelling evidence for the recognition of a new species of Pseudocorynopoma despite the lack of discrete differences in meristic data. The recognition of the new species is consistent with biogeographical evidence for the long-term isolation of the respective river drainages and with differences between the ichthyofaunal communities of these rivers.

Ontogenetic changes in mouth morphology triggers conflicting hypotheses of relationships in characid fishes (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

Bryconamericus lethostigmus is the type-species of the monotypic genus Odontostoechus, diagnosed in part based on the presence of a unique tooth series in the premaxilla. Recently a new proposal of classification of the Stevardiinae placed Odontostoechus as a junior synonym of a monophyletic genus Bryconamericus sensu stricto, a genus characterized by the presence of two tooth series. Bryconamericus lethostigmus is redescribed herein and the single tooth series in the premaxilla is demonstrated to originate from merging of the external tooth row with the inner row during ontogeny refuting primary hypothesis of homology between the mouth morphology of B. lethostigmus and the genera Bryconacidnus, Ceratobranchia, Monotocheirodon, Othonocheirodus, Rhinopetitia and Rhinobrycon. A phylogeographic analysis indicated that the pattern described for the sympatric species Diapoma itaimbe is not mirrored by B. lethostigmus. The results also do not support the hypothesis of a new species in the rio Araranguá drainage.(AU)

Bryconamericus lethostigmus é a espécie tipo do gênero monotípico Odontostoechus, diagnosticado em parte pela presença de uma única série de dentes na pré-maxila. Recentemente uma nova proposta de classificação de Stevardiinae considerou Odontostoechus como sinônimo júnior do gênero monofilético Bryconamericus sensu stricto caracterizado pela presença de duas séries de dentes. Bryconamericus lethostigmus é redescrito e demonstra-se que a única série de dentes no premaxilar se origina pela junção da série externa de dentes com a série interna durante a ontogenia, refutando a hipótese de homologia primária entre a morfologia da boca de B. lethostigmus e os gêneros Bryconacidnus, Ceratobranchia, Monotocheirodon, Othonocheirodus, Rhinopetitia e Rhinobrycon. A análise filogeográfica indica que o padrão descrito para a espécie simpátrica Diapoma itaimbe não se repete em B. lethostigmus. Os resultados também não suportam a hipótese de uma nova espécie para a bacia do rio Araranguá.(AU)

Ontogenetic changes in mouth morphology triggers conflicting hypotheses of relationships in characid fishes (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

Bryconamericus lethostigmus is the type-species of the monotypic genus Odontostoechus, diagnosed in part based on the presence of a unique tooth series in the premaxilla. Recently a new proposal of classification of the Stevardiinae placed Odontostoechus as a junior synonym of a monophyletic genus Bryconamericus sensu stricto, a genus characterized by the presence of two tooth series. Bryconamericus lethostigmus is redescribed herein and the single tooth series in the premaxilla is demonstrated to originate from merging of the external tooth row with the inner row during ontogeny refuting primary hypothesis of homology between the mouth morphology of B. lethostigmus and the genera Bryconacidnus, Ceratobranchia, Monotocheirodon, Othonocheirodus, Rhinopetitia and Rhinobrycon. A phylogeographic analysis indicated that the pattern described for the sympatric species Diapoma itaimbe is not mirrored by B. lethostigmus. The results also do not support the hypothesis of a new species in the rio Araranguá drainage.(AU)

Bryconamericus lethostigmus é a espécie tipo do gênero monotípico Odontostoechus, diagnosticado em parte pela presença de uma única série de dentes na pré-maxila. Recentemente uma nova proposta de classificação de Stevardiinae considerou Odontostoechus como sinônimo júnior do gênero monofilético Bryconamericus sensu stricto caracterizado pela presença de duas séries de dentes. Bryconamericus lethostigmus é redescrito e demonstra-se que a única série de dentes no premaxilar se origina pela junção da série externa de dentes com a série interna durante a ontogenia, refutando a hipótese de homologia primária entre a morfologia da boca de B. lethostigmus e os gêneros Bryconacidnus, Ceratobranchia, Monotocheirodon, Othonocheirodus, Rhinopetitia e Rhinobrycon. A análise filogeográfica indica que o padrão descrito para a espécie simpátrica Diapoma itaimbe não se repete em B. lethostigmus. Os resultados também não suportam a hipótese de uma nova espécie para a bacia do rio Araranguá.(AU)

Alterações na ictiocenose do rio Forqueta em função da instalação da Pequena Central Hidrelétrica Salto Forqueta, Putinga, Rio Grande do Sul

This study aimed to verify the alterations on the fish assemblage due the installation of the Small Hydroelectrical Power-Station Salto Forqueta in the course of the Forqueta River. The study area is located in the Taquari River basin, between the municipalities of Putinga (left margin of the river) and São José do Herval (right margin of the river). The study encompassed four phases: Phase I - from dec/2000 to feb/2002 (before damming), Phase II - from dec/2002 to jan/2004 (first year following damming), Phase III - from may/2004 to apr/2005 (second year following damming) and Phase IV - from may/2005 to jul/2006 (third year following damming). The samples were taken using fishing nets with diverse mashes. It was registered 28 species during Phase I, 21 species during Phase II, 19 species during Phase III and 18 species during Phase IV. The abundance rates, during the four phases, varied among the following species: Astyanax spp., Hemiancistrus punctulatus Cardoso & Malabarba, 1999, Steindachnerina biornata (Pearson, 1924), Oligosarcus jenynsii (Günther, 1864) and Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824). It was verified a range of alterations in the local fish assemblage, nevertheless, these alterations were not statistically significant.

Este estudo teve como objetivo verificar alterações na taxocenose de peixes devido à instalação da Pequena Central Hidrelétrica Salto Forqueta no curso do rio Forqueta. A área de estudo localiza-se na bacia hidrográfica do rio Taquari, entre os municípios de Putinga (margem esquerda do rio) e São José do Herval (margem direita do rio). O estudo abrangeu quatro etapas: Etapa I - dez/2000 a fev/2002 (anterior ao represamento), Etapa II - dez/2002 a jan/2004 (primeiro ano subseqüente ao represamento), Etapa III - maio/2004 a abr/2005 (segundo ano após o represamento) e Etapa IV - maio/2005 a jul/2006 (terceiro ano após o represamento). As amostragens foram realizadas com redes de espera de malhas diversas. Foram registradas 28 espécies na Etapa I, 21 espécies na Etapa II, 19 espécies na Etapa III e 18 espécies na Etapa IV, sendo que as maiores taxas de abundância nas quatro etapas de monitoramento variaram entre as espécies Astyanax spp., Hemiancistrus punctulatus Cardoso & Malabarba, 1999, Steindachnerina biornata (Pearson, 1924), Oligosarcus jenynsii (Günther, 1864) e Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824). Verificaram-se diversas alterações na ictiocenose local, porém, as alterações não se mostraram estatisticamente significativas.

Alterações na ictiocenose do rio Forqueta em função da instalação da Pequena Central Hidrelétrica Salto Forqueta, Putinga, Rio Grande do Sul

This study aimed to verify the alterations on the fish assemblage due the installation of the Small Hydroelectrical Power-Station Salto Forqueta in the course of the Forqueta River. The study area is located in the Taquari River basin, between the municipalities of Putinga (left margin of the river) and São José do Herval (right margin of the river). The study encompassed four phases: Phase I - from dec/2000 to feb/2002 (before damming), Phase II - from dec/2002 to jan/2004 (first year following damming), Phase III - from may/2004 to apr/2005 (second year following damming) and Phase IV - from may/2005 to jul/2006 (third year following damming). The samples were taken using fishing nets with diverse mashes. It was registered 28 species during Phase I, 21 species during Phase II, 19 species during Phase III and 18 species during Phase IV. The abundance rates, during the four phases, varied among the following species: Astyanax spp., Hemiancistrus punctulatus Cardoso & Malabarba, 1999, Steindachnerina biornata (Pearson, 1924), Oligosarcus jenynsii (Günther, 1864) and Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824). It was verified a range of alterations in the local fish assemblage, nevertheless, these alterations were not statistically significant.

Este estudo teve como objetivo verificar alterações na taxocenose de peixes devido à instalação da Pequena Central Hidrelétrica Salto Forqueta no curso do rio Forqueta. A área de estudo localiza-se na bacia hidrográfica do rio Taquari, entre os municípios de Putinga (margem esquerda do rio) e São José do Herval (margem direita do rio). O estudo abrangeu quatro etapas: Etapa I - dez/2000 a fev/2002 (anterior ao represamento), Etapa II - dez/2002 a jan/2004 (primeiro ano subseqüente ao represamento), Etapa III - maio/2004 a abr/2005 (segundo ano após o represamento) e Etapa IV - maio/2005 a jul/2006 (terceiro ano após o represamento). As amostragens foram realizadas com redes de espera de malhas diversas. Foram registradas 28 espécies na Etapa I, 21 espécies na Etapa II, 19 espécies na Etapa III e 18 espécies na Etapa IV, sendo que as maiores taxas de abundância nas quatro etapas de monitoramento variaram entre as espécies Astyanax spp., Hemiancistrus punctulatus Cardoso & Malabarba, 1999, Steindachnerina biornata (Pearson, 1924), Oligosarcus jenynsii (Günther, 1864) e Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824). Verificaram-se diversas alterações na ictiocenose local, porém, as alterações não se mostraram estatisticamente significativas.