A novel framework for enhancing transparency in credit scoring: Leveraging Shapley values for interpretable credit scorecards.

Credit scorecards are essential tools for banks to assess the creditworthiness of loan applicants. While advanced machine learning models like XGBoost and random forest often outperform traditional logistic regression in predictive accuracy, their lack of interpretability hinders their adoption in practice. This study bridges the gap between research and practice by developing a novel framework for constructing interpretable credit scorecards using Shapley values. We apply this framework to two credit datasets, discretizing numerical variables and utilizing one-hot encoding to facilitate model development. Shapley values are then employed to derive credit scores for each predictor variable group in XGBoost, random forest, LightGBM, and CatBoost models. Our results demonstrate that this approach yields credit scorecards with interpretability comparable to logistic regression while maintaining superior predictive accuracy. This framework offers a practical and effective solution for credit practitioners seeking to leverage the power of advanced models without sacrificing transparency and regulatory compliance.

Enhancing credit scoring accuracy with a comprehensive evaluation of alternative data.

This study explores the potential of utilizing alternative data sources to enhance the accuracy of credit scoring models, compared to relying solely on traditional data sources, such as credit bureau data. A comprehensive dataset from the Home Credit Group's home loan portfolio is analysed. The research examines the impact of incorporating alternative predictors that are typically overlooked, such as an applicant's social network default status, regional economic ratings, and local population characteristics. The modelling approach applies the model-X knockoffs framework for systematic variable selection. By including these alternative data sources, the credit scoring models demonstrate improved predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve metric of 0.79360 on the Kaggle Home Credit default risk competition dataset, outperforming models that relied solely on traditional data sources, such as credit bureau data. The findings highlight the significance of leveraging diverse, non-traditional data sources to augment credit risk assessment capabilities and overall model accuracy.