Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 258: 126-131, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421809

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes associated with spatulas or forceps assisted delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a bicentric retrospective cohort study including all assisted deliveries in cephalic presentation after 37 weeks of gestation, performed on singleton pregnancy with forceps and with spatulas in two tertiary centers. The main outcome was the rate of episiotomy. Secondary outcomes included obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), maternal outcomes and neonatal parameters. RESULTS: Out of 37 002 deliveries, the overall rate of assisted delivery was 11.4 %, and 1 041 (2.8 %) assisted deliveries with forceps and 2 462 (6.7 %) spatulas deliveries were included. The rate of episiotomy was 90.3 % after forceps-assisted delivery and 70.9 % for spatulas (p < 0.001). The rate of OASIS was 7.2 % and 5.6 % respectively (p = 0.06). A slight but significant decrease in neonatal trauma after spatulas was observed. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, the episiotomy rate was higher with forceps assisted deliveries than with spatulas. Both instruments have low neonatal morbidity and are similar regarding OASIS.


Asunto(s)
Episiotomía , Perineo , Canal Anal , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Forceps Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...