Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m2/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m2/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m2/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P = .0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P = .0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P = .12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41.7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P = .004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single escalating doses of indacaterol, a once-daily beta2-agonist bronchodilator, in subjects with COPD.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and tolerability of 4 doses of indacaterol, a once-daily beta2-agonist, in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 24-h bronchodilator effect and pharmacokinetics of indacaterol were also investigated. METHODS: 16 subjects aged 43 - 72 years with mild/moderate COPD were each given single doses of indacaterol of 400, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 µg, via a single-dose dry powder inhaler. RESULTS: Changes from predose (400, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 µg doses, respectively) were as follows. Maximum mean decreases in fasting (up to 2 h post-dose) serum potassium were 0.12, 0.30, 0.38, 0.26 mmol/l; maximum mean increases (up to 2 h post-dose) in fasting serum glucose were 0.12, 0.40, 0.87, 1.01 mmol/l. The maximum increase in heart rate (by 3, 6, 12, 13 beats/min, respectively) was within 1 h post-dose. No clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities were reported. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with none considered serious or leading to withdrawal. Indacaterol was rapidly absorbed and displayed multiphasic disposition kinetics. The terminal elimination phase with a half-life of 50 - 63 h could only be seen for doses of 1,000 µg or higher. Mean systemic exposure to indacaterol (AUC0-24) increased by ~ 9-fold from 400 to 3,000 µg. CONCLUSION: Even at doses far in excess of the therapeutic range, indacaterol had minimal systemic effects; such changes would be considered within safe limits for a single dose.

Bronchodilator effects of indacaterol and formoterol in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Resting inspiratory capacity (IC) reflects static hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study compared the effects of formoterol and indacaterol, a novel once-daily ultra-long-acting beta(2)-agonist (or ultra-LABA), on resting IC and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)). METHODS: Thirty patients with COPD (mean FEV(1)/FVC 0.49, mean FEV(1) 56% predicted) each inhaled three treatments (two in randomized sequence followed by open-label formoterol) on separate study days: a single dose of indacaterol 300 microg, matching placebo, and two doses of formoterol 12 microg 12 h apart. RESULTS: Indacaterol and formoterol increased FEV(1) and IC at all time points relative to placebo (p<0.001). Peak effects on FEV(1) were similar, while indacaterol had a greater effect on peak IC (31% vs 23% from pre-dose; p=0.034). Indacaterol had a greater effect than formoterol on FEV(1) at 8 h (1.47 vs 1.39 L; p=0.014) and 24 h (1.44 vs 1.35 L; p=0.003), and on IC from 4 to 24 h (differences of 0.13-0.19 L; p<0.05). At 24 h, indacaterol and formoterol increased FEV(1) by 17.7% and 7.5%, respectively, from pre-dose. CONCLUSIONS: This study discriminated between the effects on IC and FEV(1) of once daily indacaterol and twice daily formoterol. The greater effect of indacaterol on IC may translate into improved long-term clinical outcomes.

FTY720 versus MMF with cyclosporine in de novo renal transplantation: a 1-year, randomized controlled trial in Europe and Australasia.

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator investigated in de novo renal transplantation and other therapeutic areas including multiple sclerosis. This 1-year multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 668 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) or FTY720 5.0 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC), with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Primary efficacy with FTY720 2.5 mg and MMF (32.4% and 30.2%; p = NS), plus mortality and BPAR incidence, were comparable. Patients receiving FTY720 5.0 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to increased risk of acute rejection (primary endpoint incidence 47.3%). FTY720 was associated with lower creatinine clearance (month 12: 53.1, 56.0 vs. 65.1 mL/min; p < 0.001) and more macular edema cases (2.2% and 1.3% vs. 0%), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were higher with MMF (6.2% and 10.6% vs. 18.1% p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0139, respectively). FTY720 2.5 mg provided comparable rejection prophylaxis over 12 months versus MMF; however, FTY720 5.0 mg did not support a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The cause of macular edema cases and lower creatinine clearance with FTY720 in de novo transplantation needs further investigation.

Everolimus versus azathioprine in maintenance lung transplant recipients: an international, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Everolimus is a proliferation signal inhibitor with immunosuppressive activity that may reduce the rate of progression of chronic rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), after lung transplantation. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 213 BOS-free maintenance patients received everolimus (3 mg/day) or azathioprine (AZA, 1-3 mg/kg/day) in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The prospectively defined primary endpoint was the incidence of efficacy failure (decline in FEV1 >15%[deltaFEV1 >15%], graft loss, death or loss to follow-up) at 12 months. Incidence of efficacy failure at 12 months was significantly lower in the everolimus group than AZA (21.8% vs. 33.9%; p = 0.046); at 24 months, rates of efficacy failure became similar between the groups. At 12 months, the everolimus group had significantly reduced incidences of deltaFEV1 >15%, deltaFEV1 >15% with BOS, and acute rejection. At 24 months, only incidence of acute rejection remained significantly less in the everolimus group. Treatment discontinuations (particularly due to adverse events), serious adverse events and high serum creatinine values were more common with everolimus. For the first time, a drug has demonstrated significant slowing of loss in lung function, suggesting that patients kept on prolonged maintenance treatment with everolimus may benefit from replacing AZA with everolimus 3 months after lung transplantation.

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.