Prevalence and trends of Clostridioides difficile infection among persons requiring maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is among the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections. Persons requiring maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are at increased risk of CDI and associated mortality compared to persons not requiring MHD. Given the clinical impact of CDI among persons requiring MHD, we aimed to quantify the burden of CDI and trends over time in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting rates of CDI among persons requiring MHD in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed. Searches were conducted on May 17, 2021, and March 4, 2022. RESULTS: In total, 2,408 titles and abstracts were identified; 240 underwent full text review. Among them, 15 studies provided data on rates of CDI among persons requiring MHD, and 8 of these also provided rates among persons not requiring MHD. The pooled prevalence of CDI among persons requiring MHD was 19.14%, compared to 5.16% among persons not requiring MHD (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07-9.16; P = .47). The linear increase in CDI over time was significant, increasing an average of 31.97% annually between 1993 and 2017 (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.1-1.58; P < .01). The linear annual increase was similar among persons requiring and not requiring MHD (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.45; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Persons requiring MHD have a 4-fold higher risk of CDI compared to persons not requiring MHD, and rates of CDI are increasing over time in both groups.

Clinical Implication of Drug Resistance for H. pylori Management.

Rates of antimicrobial-resistance among H. pylori strains are increasing worldwide, resulting in declining eradication rates with current therapies, especially those containing clarithromycin or levofloxacin. To improve H. pylori management, a paradigm shift is needed, from the empiric approaches formerly employed, to regimen selection based upon knowledge of local and patient-level antimicrobial susceptibility data. We review the mechanisms of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance and the available worldwide pattern of resistance to key antimicrobials used in H. pylori therapy. The practicalities and challenges of measuring susceptibility in clinical practice is discussed, including not only conventional culture-based techniques but also novel sequencing-based methods performed on gastric tissue and stool samples. Though clinical trials of "tailored" (susceptibility-based) treatments have yet to show the clear superiority of tailored over empiric regimen selection, the ability to measure and modify treatment based upon antimicrobial susceptibility testing is likely to become more frequent in clinical practice and should lead to improved H. pylori management in the near future.

Helicobacter pylori Treatment Regimens: A US Perspective.

Helicobacter pylori infects nearly one-third of the US population. H pylori is a significant cause of gastroduodenal disease, including peptic ulcers and cancers. However, rising antibiotic resistance has complicated management of H pylori. This article provides a practical review of management strategies, including first-line empiric therapies and how to treat patients when prior therapies fail. Bismuthbased quadruple therapy remains the standard initial empiric regimen, although a rifabutin-based triple regimen is another approach for empiric therapy in the United States. Clarithromycin and levofloxacin therapies should be avoided except when treating a strain of known susceptibility. When therapies fail, resistance should be tested with molecular or culture-based methods. Knowing local resistance patterns and/or using practice-based eradication rates is important for devising logic-based clinical choices. Ultimately, shared decision-making, patient counseling, and careful attention to drug type and dosage are essential for refractory cases.

Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in the United States Between 2011 and 2021: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance among Helicobacter pylori strains has been rising globally, leading to declining eradication rates. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the resistance patterns of H. pylori strains in the United States between 2011 and 2021. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for manuscripts and conference abstracts published between 2011 and 2021 reporting H. pylori antibiotic resistance. A mixed-effects model estimated pooled rates of resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole, tetracycline, rifabutin, levofloxacin, or a combination of these, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies including 2,660 samples, met inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of resistance to metronidazole was 42.1% (95% CI 27.3%-58.6%), levofloxacin 37.6% (95% CI 26.3%-50.4%), clarithromycin 31.5% (95% CI 23.6%-40.6%), amoxicillin 2.6% (95% CI 1.4%-5.0%), tetracycline 0.87% (95% CI 0.2%-3.8%), rifabutin 0.17% (95% CI 0.00%-10.9%), and dual clarithromycin and metronidazole 11.7% (95% CI 0.1%-94.0%). Considerable data heterogeneity was evident for pooled resistance prevalence rates (I 2 > 50%), with the exception of rifabutin resistance. DISCUSSION: Metronidazole, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin resistance rates each exceed 30%; thus, choosing an empiric antibiotic regimen without knowledge of the likely pattern of antibiotic resistance is not appropriate. Resistance to tetracycline, rifabutin, and amoxicillin remains low. Given the scarcity of available data with considerable heterogeneity among studies, continued surveillance, ideally with a more systematic approach to data collection, is an increasingly important goal in H. pylori management.