Nurse-Initiated Fall and Osteoporosis Screening for Older Adults in the Emergency Department.

Background Many older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) after a fall are discharged without adequate assessment of their fall risk. A nurse-initiated protocol was introduced for the early screening of older adults with injurious falls. We aimed to promote osteoporosis education and right-site them to appropriate outpatient resources in the community. Methodology In this study, we included ≥65-year-old adults who attended the ED with injurious falls or near falls between December 2019 and December 2020. An ED nurse trained in basic geriatric care performed the cognitive assessment and provided advice on diet, footwear, fall safety, calcium/vitamin D supplementation, and osteoporosis screening. Results A total of 70 (75.7% female) patients aged 65-93 years were included. In total, 34 (48.6%) were started on calcium/vitamin D supplements and 22 (31.4%) went on to receive outpatient bone mineral density scans. Only three patients reattended the ED for recurrent falls/fractures in the six-month follow-up period. Conclusions A nurse-initiated fall and osteoporosis screening protocol is a feasible model of care for targeted screening and education of older adults who present to the ED with injurious falls.

Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital.

INTRODUCTION: 72-hour emergency department (ED) reattendance is a widely-used quality indicator for quality of care and patient safety. It is generally assumed that patients who return within 72 hours of ED discharge (72-hour re-attendees) received inadequate treatment or evaluation. The current literature also suggests considerable variation in probable causes of 72-hour ED reattendances internationally. This study aimed to understand the characteristics of these patients at the ED of a Singapore tertiary hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all ED visits between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. 72-hour re-attendees were compared against non-re-attendees based on patient demographics, mode of arrival, patient acuity category status (i.e. P1/P2/P3/P4), seniority ranking of doctor-in-charge and medical diagnoses. Multivariate analysis using the generalised linear model was conducted on variables associated with 72-hour ED re-attendance. RESULTS: Among 104,751 unique patients, 3,065 (2.93%) were in the 72-hour re-attendees group. Multivariate analysis showed that the following risk factors were associated with higher risk of returning within 72 hours: male gender, older age, arrival by ambulance, triaged as P2, diagnoses of heart problems, abdominal pain or viral infection (all p < 0.001), and Chinese ethnicity (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the seniority ranking of the doctor-in-charge between both groups (p = 0.419). CONCLUSION: Several patient and event factors were associated with higher risk of being a 72-hour re-attendee. This study forms the basis for hypothesis generation and further studies to explore reasons behind reattendances so that interventions can be developed to target high-risk groups.