Damage control strategy in perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: The best treatment for perforated colonic diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is still under debate. Concurrent strategies are resection with primary anastomosis (PRA) with or without diverting ileostomy (DI), Hartmann's procedure (HP), laparoscopic lavage (LL) and damage control surgery (DCS). This review intends to systematically analyze the current literature on DCS. METHODS: DCS consists of two stages. Emergency surgery: limited resection of the diseased colon, oral and aboral closure, lavage, vacuum-assisted abdominal closure. Second look surgery after 24-48 h: definite reconstruction with colorectal anastomosis (-/ + DI) or HP after adequate resuscitation. The review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA-P Statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) and EMBASE were searched using the following term: (Damage control surgery) AND (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum OR Peritonitis). RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies including 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. No randomized trial was available. 67% of the included patients had purulent, 30% feculent peritonitis. In 3% Hinchey stage II diverticulitis was found. In 49% the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) was greater than 26. Colorectal anastomosis was constructed during the course of the second surgery in 73%. In 15% of the latter DI was applied. The remaining 27% received HP. Postoperative mortality was 9%, morbidity 31% respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 13%. 55% of patients were discharged without a stoma. CONCLUSION: DCS is a safe technique for the treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, allowing a high rate of colorectal anastomosis and stoma-free hospital discharge in more than half of the patients.

Comparison of Clinical Outcome following Cartilage Repair for Patients with Underlying Varus Deformity with or without Additional High Tibial Osteotomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Based on the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU).

BACKGROUND: Even though realignment procedures have gained popularity as concomitant techniques in cartilage repair approaches with underlying malalignment, the clinical efficacy has not been proven to full extent. METHODS: Out of 5474 patients from the German Cartilage Registry, 788 patients with focal cartilage defects on the medial femoral condyle having received either no accompanying surgery or high tibial osteotomy (HTO) were identified. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, outcome of 440 patients was evaluated using KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), VAS (visual analogue scale), and satisfaction during the 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Patients having received a concomitant HTO had significantly higher postoperative KOOS values (12 months: 67.26 ± 15.69 vs.75.10 ± 16.12, P = 0.001; 24 months: 67.14 ± 23.85 vs. 77.11 ± 16.50, P = 0.010; 36 months: 74.40 ± 16.57 vs. 81.75 ± 14.22, P = 0.023) and lower pain levels (6 months: 3.43 ± 2.18 vs. 2.89 ± 2.15, P = 0.009; 12 months: 3.64 ± 2.20 vs. 2.17 ± 1.96, P < 0.001; 24 months: 4.20 ± 3.12 vs. 2.94 ± 2.45, P = 0.005; 36 months: 3.20 ± 2.18 vs. 2.02 ± 1.98, P = 0.003). One and 3 years postoperatively, concomitant HTO led to significantly higher satisfaction in patients. These advantages of accompanying HTO were also seen in the group of patients with a varus deformity of 5° or more, in which pain levels without concomitant HTO even increased during the 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study underline the importance and safety of concomitant HTO in patients with cartilage defects and varus deformity. HTO should therefore be considered and recommended generously in patients with focal cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle and varus deformity.

Does Gender Influence Outcome in Cartilage Repair Surgery? An Analysis of 4,968 Consecutive Patients from the German Cartilage Registry (Knorpel Register DGOU).

The goal was to examine gender differences of patient characteristics and outcome after cartilage repair based on a collective of nearly 5,000 patients. Patient characteristics, accompanying therapies, and outcome (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], reoperations, patient satisfaction) of 4,986 patients of the German cartilage register DGOU were assessed by t test for possible gender differences. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Women were older than men (38.07 ± 12.54 vs. 26.94 ± 12.394 years, P = 0.002), more often preoperated (0.30 ± 0.63 vs. 0.24 ± 0.55, P = 0.001), and had a longer symptom duration (25.22 ± 41.20 vs. 20.67 ± 35.32 months, P < 0.001). Men had greater mean leg axis malalignment than women (3.24° ± 3.26° vs. 2.67° ± 3.06°, P < 0.001), less favorable meniscal status (P = 0.001), worse defect stage (P = 0.006), and a more severely damaged corresponding articular surface (P = 0.042). At baseline (59.84 ± 17.49 vs. 52.10 ± 17.77, P < 0.001), after 6 months (72.83 ± 15.56 vs. 66.56 ± 17.66, P < 0.001), after 12 months (77.88 ± 15.95 vs. 73.07 ± 18.12, P < 0.001), and after 24 months (79.311 ± 15.94 vs. 74.39 ± 18.81, P < 0.001), men had better absolute KOOS values, but women had better relative KOOS increases 6 months (14.59 ± 17.31 vs. 12.49 ± 16.3, P = 0.005) as well as 12 months postoperatively (20.27 ± 18.6 vs. 17.34 ± 17.79, P = 0.001) compared with preoperatively, although 12 and 24 months postoperatively they were subjectively less satisfied with the outcome (P < 0.001) and had a higher reintervention rate at 24 months (0.17 ± 0.38 vs. 0.12 ± 0.33, P = 0.008). In summary, the present work shows specific gender differences in terms of patient characteristics, defect etiology, defect localization, concomitant therapy, and the choice of cartilage repair procedure. Unexpectedly, contrary to the established scientific opinion, it could be demonstrated that women show relatively better postoperative KOOS increases, despite a higher revision rate and higher subjective dissatisfaction.

PREDICtors for health-related quality of life after elective sigmoidectomy for DIVerticular disease: the PREDIC-DIV study protocol of a prospective multicentric transnational observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Diverticulitis is among the most common abdominal disorders. The best treatment strategy for this complicated disease as well as for recurrent stages is still under debate. Moreover, little knowledge exists regarding the effect of different therapeutic strategies on the health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Therefore, the PREDIC-DIV (PREDICtors for health-related quality of life after elective sigmoidectomy for DIVerticular disease) study aims to assess predictors of a change in HrQoL in patients after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre transnational observational study was started in November 2017. Patients undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease were included. Primary outcome includes HrQoL 6 months postoperatively, staged by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Secondary outcomes include HrQoL 6 months after sigmoidectomy, assessed using the Short Form 36 Questionnaire and a custom-made Visual Analogue Scale-based inventory; HrQoL after 12 and 24 months; postoperative morbidity; mortality; influence of surgical technique (conventional laparoscopic multiport operation vs robotic approach); histological grading of inflammation and morphological characteristics of the bowel wall in the resected specimen; postoperative functional changes (faecal incontinence, faecal urge, completeness of emptying, urinary incontinence, sexual function); disease-specific healthcare costs; and changes in economic productivity, measured by the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire. The total follow-up will be 2 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Bavarian Medical Council (report identification number: 2017-177). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Open, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery, Diseases of the Colon and the Rectum). Abstracts will be submitted to relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov register as NCT03527706; Pre-results.

Risk of colectomy after conservative treatment of diverticulitis of the left hemicolon complicated by abdominal or pelvic abscess: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is increasingly treated by a non-operative approach. The need for colectomy after recovery from a flare of acute diverticulitis of the left colon, complicated diverticular abscess is still controversial. The primary aim of this study is to assess the risk of interval emergency surgery by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE will be screened for the predefined searching term: (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum) AND (Abscess OR pelvic abscess OR pericolic abscess OR intraabdominal abscess) AND (surgery OR operation OR sigmoidectomy OR drainage OR percutaneous drainage OR conservative therapy OR watchful waiting). All studies published in an English or German-speaking peer-reviewed journal will be suitable for this analysis. Case reports, case series of less than five patients, studies without follow-up information, systematic and non-systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary endpoint is the rate of interval emergency surgery. Using the Review Manager Software (Review Manager/RevMan, V.5.3, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) meta-analysis will be pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool will be used to assess methodological quality of non-randomised studies. Risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no new data are being collected, ethical approval is exempt for this study. This systematic review is to provide a new insight on the need for surgical treatment after a first attack of acute diverticulitis, complicated by intra-abdominal or pelvic abscesses. The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020164813.

Frequency of Polyps and Adenocarcinoma in Colon Interposition After Esophagectomy in Adulthood - A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Colon interposition counts among the most common techniques for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Availability of data on metachronous mucosal pathologies is weak. The aim of this review was to identify all reports on the development of metachronous adenoma and adenocarcinoma in colon interposition after esophagectomy in adulthood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München. All studies reporting on patients who received colon interposition as substitute after esophagectomy in adulthood for benign and malignant reasons were included. RESULTS: Five retrospective studies were included, reporting on 1016 patients. Therein, no interval lesion was identified. One further study, which formally must be excluded for a misfit to inclusion criteria reports on three interval carcinomas within 365 patients. Because these lesions were the only ones found within a cohort analysis, results were supplementary reported in this review. Additionally, 31 case reports including 32 patients with benign (n=7) or malignant (n=25) findings were analyzed. Median age was 63.5 years (interval carcinoma) and 69 years (benign lesion). Benign and malignant lesions were diagnosed after a median of 8.5 years. CONCLUSION: Due to the rareness of respective cohort studies, the frequency of metachronous lesions cannot be calculated accurately. The estimated rate of interval carcinoma is 0-0.22%. Life-long endoscopic surveillance of patients with colon interposition is recommended.

What parameters affect knee function in patients with untreated cartilage defects: baseline data from the German Cartilage Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors influencing the baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with knee cartilage defects and planned cartilage repair surgery and to provide baseline KOOS data from a large patient population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2013 and April 2017, a total of 2815 patients assigned for cartilage repair surgery were included into the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) and their data were analyzed for the present study. Multivariate regression model and ANOVA were used to detect patient- and defect-specific factors with an influence on baseline KOOS. In addition, KOOS baseline data was calculated and compared according to these parameters. RESULTS: Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status were revealed as patient-specific factors, and defect location and the number of previous knee and cartilage operations were revealed as defect-specific factors with a significant influence on baseline KOOS. Most subscores were affected in accordance with the total KOOS. Interestingly, defect ICRS grade, defect size, and symptom duration had no significant influence. The mean baseline KOOS was 56.7 (± 17.9). Men had significantly higher mean overall KOOS (60 ± 17.3 vs. 51.8 ± 17.6, p < 0.001) than women, and patients with a BMI over 30 and smokers scored significantly lower (58.07 ± 17.67 vs. 50.32 ± 17.29, p < 0.001; 57.64 ± 17.86 vs. 53.59 ± 18.06, p < 0.001). Patients with two or more previous knee operations as well as patients with more than one previous cartilage procedure also showed significantly lower overall KOOS (57.19 ± 17.89 vs. 54.56 ± 17.58, p < 0.001; 57.68 ± 18.01 vs. 52.72 ± 17.58, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several factors influencing baseline KOOS data in patients with knee cartilage defects assigned for cartilage repair surgery could be detected. Their individual influence in the multivariate linear regression model was not very strong. Baseline data according to these criteria is presented in this paper.

Articular Cartilage Repair of the Knee in Children and Adolescents.

Articular cartilage predominantly serves a biomechanical function, which begins in utero and further develops during growth and locomotion. With regard to its 2-tissue structure (chondrocytes and matrix), the regenerative potential of hyaline cartilage defects is limited. Children and adolescents are increasingly suffering from articular cartilage and osteochondral deficiencies. Traumatic incidents often result in damage to the joint surfaces, while repetitive microtrauma may cause osteochondritis dissecans. When compared with their adult counterparts, children and adolescents have a greater capacity to regenerate articular cartilage defects. Even so, articular cartilage injuries in this age group may predispose them to premature osteoarthritis. Consequently, surgery is indicated in young patients when conservative measures fail. The operative techniques for articular cartilage injuries traditionally performed in adults may be performed in children, although an individualized approach must be tailored according to patient and defect characteristics. Clear guidelines for defect dimension-associated techniques have not been reported. Knee joint dimensions must be considered and correlated with respect to the cartilage defect size. Particular attention must be given to the subchondral bone, which is frequently affected in children and adolescents. Articular cartilage repair techniques appear to be safe in this cohort of patients, and no differences in complication rates have been reported when compared with adult patients. Particularly, autologous chondrocyte implantation has good biological potential, especially for large-diameter joint surface defects.

Surgical management of acute appendicitis in adults: A review of current techniques.

Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent disorders in abdominal surgery. Therefore, appendectomy is a matter of significant interest in that field. Yet, four different techniques are available: open appendectomy, (conventional) laparoscopic appendectomy, single port laparoscopic appendectomy and NOTES-appendectomy with its different variations. To evaluate the current state of the art in appendectomy a bibliographic search was conducted. All prospectively randomized trials and national register cohort studies published between 1/2010 and 5/2016 were included into the analysis. Overall, 25 respective studies were identified. All studies were screened for the following parameters: surgical site infection (SSI) (wound infection (WI) or intraabdominal abscess (IAA)), postoperative pain (PP), length of surgery (LoS), length of hospital stay (LHS), return to normal activities (RNA). Today the rate of laparoscopic appendectomy is reported to be up to 86% in the recent literature. Open appendectomy remains a safe and effective technique. Single port laparoscopic appendectomy presented almost equal in terms of safety and patient satisfaction. The method is still not as widespread as conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy, presumably due to the necessity of special equipment and training. NOTES appendectomy is the newest development in appendectomy technique. First prospective cohort studies proved the safety and feasibility in experienced hands. However, the method is still experimental and further prospectively randomized trials are necessary. Concluding the current evidence, a laparoscopic approach, which is most commonly and increasingly frequently used, could be called "state of the art" in the treatment of appendicitis.

The German Arthroscopy Registry (DART).

In Germany, more than 400,000 arthroscopic procedures are performed each year. The DART registry is designed to study the outcome of arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, hip, knee and ankle joint under everyday clinical circumstances using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). DART aims at identifying patient-specific factors correlated with therapy-associated complications and treatment failure and will help study the influence of concurrent joint diseases and procedures. To achieve these tasks, a Web-based remote data entry system will be applied and adapted to the needs of DART. DART will consist of a physician's and a patient's form to enter data on the specific disease, surgical procedure, joint-specific outcome, disability and quality of life measured by validated scores up to 5 years following surgery. The pool of data will be subjected to further clinical investigations and subgroup analysis. Individual results will be made accessible to the surgeon and the patient. Moreover, public reports will be generated to provide healthcare authorities and insurance companies with information on the effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery. The aim of this article is to present the methodology of the registry. Level of evidence V.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Safe: Influence of Appendectomy Technique on Surgical-site Infections and Intra-abdominal Abscesses.

PURPOSE: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) and intra-abdominal abscesses (IAAs) are the most frequent complications of appendectomy. The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of appendicitis remains controversial concerning the complication rate. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy for SSI and IAA. METHODS: All patients undergoing appendectomy between January 1, 2007 and May 31, 2010 were included in the study. Perioperative data and data on postoperative complications were collected from patient files. A questionnaire was used to assess complications after discharge. Main outcome parameters were SSI and IAA. Open appendectomy (OAG) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LAG) were compared with univariate and multivariate analyses for the outcome parameters. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty patients were included in the study. SSI (all: 10.6%, OAG: 11.7%, LAG: 7.5%, P=0.293) and IAA (all: 2.8%, OAG: 2.4%, LAG: 3.8%, P=0.506) were not significantly different between OAG and LAG. Risk factors for SSI were age (P=0.003), body mass index (P=0.017), ASA score (P=0.001), the intraoperative grade of inflammation (P=0.004), and the histologic grade of inflammation (P=0.015). The only risk factor for IAA was the intraoperative grade of inflammation (P=0.028). ASA score (odds ratio: 1.992, P=0.032) and the intraoperative grade of inflammation (odds ratio: 1.573, P=0.006) remained significant in the multivariate analysis for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: A higher ASA score correlates with SSI. A higher grade of intraoperative inflammation correlates with SSI and IAA. Laparoscopy has no impact on SSI and IAA in appendectomy.

Rehabilitation results following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hard brace compared to a fluid-filled soft brace.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using a water-filled soft brace to those using a hard brace. The method used in this study was a prospective randomised clinical trial including 36 patients wearing a hard brace and 37 patients wearing a water-filled soft brace for 6 weeks after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative (seven examinations) clinical evaluation within a follow-up period of 1 year including effusion status, swelling and range of motion (ROM), IKDC 2000, KT1000 Arthrometer, Lysholm knee scoring scale and Tegner activity score. Mean values are presented with standard deviations. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and Student's t-test for unpaired samples. Significantly less effusion was found in the soft brace group from 5 days (p=0.002) to 12 weeks (p<0.024) postoperative. Hard brace patients presented with significantly more extension deficit from 5 days (p=0.036) to 12 months (p=0.014) postoperative but no significant difference was detected in complete ROM, laxity or thigh atrophy at any follow-up examination. Patients treated with a soft brace had significantly higher IKDC subjective ratings at 6 weeks (p=0.02) up to 12 months after operation (p=0.002) and rated significantly higher in Tegner activity score (p=0.004) and Lysholm knee scoring scale (p=0.006) 6 and 12 months (p<0.001 for both scores) postoperatively. The water-filled soft brace was superior regarding effusion, swelling, extension deficit and patient-measured midterm outcome. The soft brace presents a safe, easy-to-use and effective alternative to the hard brace.