A Comparison of Improvised and Commercially Available Point-of-Wounding Tourniquets in Simulated Traumatic Amputation with Catastrophic Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Catastrophic hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable trauma deaths in the military and civilian populations. The use of tourniquets by first responders (medical and nonmedically trained) is supported and has the potential to save lives if applied correctly. AIMS: We sought to examine the use of 5 tourniquets: 1 improvised and 4 commercially available tourniquets to investigate the time taken to stop simulated bleeding and to secure the device; evidence of rebleeding when the "blood pressure" was restored and to gain qualitative feedback on their application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four commercially available tourniquets (Combat Application Tourniquet [C-A-T], Special Operations Forces Tactical Tourniquet - Wide (SOFTT-W), stretch, wrap, and tuck tourniquet [SWAT-T], and the Tourni-key) and an improvised tourniquet (tie & wooden spoon) were tested on a complex silicone simulation model used to replicate catastrophic hemorrhage from a blast injury with above traumatic knee amputation (SAM 4.1 Trauma Simulation Ltd, UK). To limit the user variability, the same investigator applied each tourniquet and each was tested 3 times. No ethical approval was required to conduct this study. RESULTS: None of the devices took longer than 1 minute to secure. The C-A-T and SOFTT-W were quickest to occlude and secure. Although the Tourni-key took longer statistically, this was unlikely to be a clinically important difference. Compared to the others, the SOFTT-W rebled on 2 out of 3 applications. The improvised tourniquet had an obvious ligature effect because of its narrowness, followed by the Tourni-key. This effect was least evident with the SWAT-T; however, particular care was needed to ensure it was safely secured as it was slippery when wet. CONCLUSIONS: All tourniquets tested were effective and swift to apply. The Tourni-key's antipinch card seems helpful in reducing local pain under the windlass. Reinspection for rebleeding is important and should be routinely performed irrespective of the device. The width of the SWAT-T may be beneficial, thereby, reducing the risk of crush injury.

Perceptions and culture of safety among helicopter emergency medical service personnel in the UK.

BACKGROUND: The use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) has increased significantly in the UK since 1987. To date there has been no research that addresses HEMS pilots and medical crews' own ideas on the risks that they view as inherent in their line of work and how to mitigate these risks. The aim of this survey is to describe and compare the attitudes and perceptions towards risk in HEMS operations of these staff. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered electronically to a representative selection of HEMS doctors, paramedics and pilots in the UK. A number of questions were grouped into common themes, and presented as Likert scales and ranking where appropriate. Descriptive and comparative results were presented and statistically analysed. RESULTS: The target sample of 100 consecutive respondents was achieved. All questionnaires were entirely completed. Respondents attributed the most risk to night HEMS operations without the use of night vision goggles, commercial pressure and mechanical aircraft failure. There was no statistical difference in overall perception of safety and years of experience (p=0.58) or between professions (p=0.08). Those who had experienced a crash were more likely to believe that HEMS operations are not inherently safe (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have surveyed a cross-section of the HEMS operational community in the UK in order to describe their perceptions of safety and risk within their professional life. Two-thirds of respondents believed that HEMS operations were inherently safe. Those who did not seemed to be influenced by personal experience of a crash or serious incident. We support increased operational training for clinical crewmembers, an increased emphasis on incident reporting and a culture of safety, and careful attention to minimum training and equipment requirements for all HEMS missions.

A torso model comparison of temperature preservation devices for use in the prehospital environment.

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is an independent predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with trauma. Several strategies and products have been developed to minimise patients' heat loss in the prehospital arena, but there is little evidence to inform the clinician concerning their effectiveness. METHODS: We used a human torso model consisting of two 5.5-litre fluid bags to simultaneously compare four passive (space blanket, bubble wrap, Blizzard blanket, ambulance blanket) and one active (Ready-Heat II blanket) temperature preservation products. A torso model without any temperature preservation device provided a control. For each test, the torso models were warmed to 37°C and left outdoors. Core temperatures were recorded every 10 min for 1 h in total; tests were repeated 10 times. RESULTS: A significant difference in temperature was detected among groups at 30 and 60 min (F (1.29, 10.30)=103.58, p<0.001 and F (1.64, 14.78)=163.28, p<0.001, respectively). Mean temperature reductions (95% CI) after 1 h of environmental exposure were the following: 11.6 (10.3 to 12.9) °C in control group, 4.5 (3.9 to 5.1) °C in space blanket group, 3.6 (3 to 4.3) °C in bubble-wrap group, 2.1 (1.7 to 2.5) °C in Blizzard blanket group, 6.1 (5.8 to 6.5) °C in ambulance blanket group and 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6) °C in Ready-Heat II blanket group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, using a torso model based on two 5 L dialysate bags we found the Ready-Heat II heating blanket and Blizzard blanket were associated with lower rates of heat loss after 60 min environmental exposure than the other devices tested.

Survival to Discharge After Cardiac Arrest Attended by a Doctor-Paramedic Helicopter Emergency Medical Service: An Utstein-style Multiservice Review of 1085 Activations.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of outcomes after cardiac arrest presented by emergency medical service and in-hospital teams in the Utstein style allows for comparative analysis of populations and systems. Essex and Herts Air Ambulance Trust (EHAAT) and the East Anglian Air Ambulance (EAAA) are doctor-plus-paramedic prehospital care teams that respond to a large number of medical cardiac arrests. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of medical cardiac arrests according to the Utstein style. METHODS: Retrospective database analysis and hospital follow-up of all cardiac arrests attended by either service over a 31-month period. Traumatic cardiac arrests were excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME: survival and cerebral performance category at discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: There were 429 patients attended by the two services; 193 patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation, which was sustained at the time of handover to the hospital team. Of 140 patients for whom complete follow-up was available, the overall survival rate was 50.7%, 86% of whom had a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2. The overall survival-to-discharge rate for all patients attended was 11.7%. CONCLUSION: Benchmarking of performance is essential to understand reasons for variability, and to allow individual systems to reflect on their own practices. We have described 31 months of data that pertain to medical cardiac arrest cases attended by our services and demonstrated a comparable survival rate to discharge with good neurological outcome.

A 26-year comparative review of United Kingdom helicopter emergency medical services crashes and serious incidents.

BACKGROUND: The use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) has increased substantially in the United Kingdom since 1987. There are currently no data on the rate of crashes and serious incidents related to HEMS in the United Kingdom. The aims of this article were to present data from a 26-year period since the start of HEMS operations in the United Kingdom and to compare them with published data from Germany, Australia, and the United States. Factors identified as affecting the safety of HEMS operations will also be discussed. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed to retrieve published data on accident rates and safety discussions for international HEMS using the key words HEMS, helicopter, emergency medical services, accident, incident, and crash. The details of every helicopter crash in the United States since the beginning of HEMS operations was obtained and reviewed to identify those that involved HEMS aircraft. This novel UK information was compared with published data from three international systems. RESULTS: A total of 13 accidents or serious incidents involving HEMS aircraft were identified from Civil Aviation Authority records, only 1 of which was a fatal accident. It was estimated that approximately 230,000 HEMS missions occurred in the United Kingdom between 1987 and 2013, giving an absolute accident incidence of approximately 0.0057% and a fatal accident incidence of approximately 0.00043%. The accident and fatal accident rate per 10,000 missions in the United Kingdom was 0.57 and 0.04, respectively. This compares with published rates from Germany, Australia, and the United States with accident rate per 10,000 missions ranging between 0.57 and 0.75 and fatal accident rates per 10,000 missions ranging between 0.04 and 0.23. CONCLUSION: Accidents and serious incidents relating to HEMS operations in the United Kingdom have been comprehensively identified for the first time, allowing an estimation of overall accident and fatal accident rates and comparison with other countries' HEMS operations. Data collection and analysis were hampered by obscurity of data sources and poor availability of data. In a time of increasing HEMS use in the United Kingdom, it is essential to be mindful of safety, and standardization of data collection will improve focus in this important area.

A roadmap for innovation.

Medicine has historically advanced during conflict, but military medical services have consistently regressed during peace. As over a decade of campaigning in Iraq and Afghanistan draws to a close, securing the legacy of hard won clinical lessons and retaining flexibility to adapt to new patterns of illness and injury during contingency is critical. Central to sustaining exceptional outcomes for future operations and to maintaining the current position of the Defence Medical Services as providers of clinical excellence is retaining the capability to innovate. This capability must extend across the spectrum of clinical innovation-concepts, guidelines, equipment (invention and adoption), curricula (design, assessment and refinement), research and Defence diplomacy. To achieve this requires a strategy, a 'roadmap', with a clear vision, end state and centres of gravity (core strengths that must be protected). The direction for innovation will be guided by emergent analysis of the future character of military medicine. Success will be determined by ensuring the conditions are met to protect and enhance the existing 'winning culture'.

Tourniquet use in combat trauma: U.K. military experience.

AIM: To determine the prevalence of tourniquet use in combat trauma, the contribution to lives saved and the complications of their use in this environment. POPULATION: All casualties treated at U.K. field hospital facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan and meeting criteria for entry into U.K. Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) from 04 Feb 03 to 30 Sep 07. METHODS: Cases were identified from U.K. JTTR. Casualties from Permanent Joint Overseas Bases (PJOBs) were excluded. ISS, NISS, TRISS and ASCOT were calculated automatically within JTTR from AIS 2005 (Military) codes. RESULTS: 1375 patients met U.K. JTTR entry criteria for the period specified (excluding PJOBs). 70/1375 patients (5.1%) were treated with one or more tourniquets (total 107 tourniquet applications). 61/70 (87%) survived their injuries. 17/70 (24%) patients had 2 or more tourniquets applied. 64/70 patients received a tourniquet after April 2006, when tourniquets were introduced as an individual first aid item. 43/70 (61%) patients were U.K. military. CONCLUSIONS: ISS and TRISS are poorly representative of injury severity and outcome for combat trauma involving isolated multiple limb injuries and cannot be used to discriminate whether a tourniquet is life-saving. The presence of severe isolated limb injuries, profound hypovolaemic shock and the requirement for massive transfusion reasonably identifies a cohort where the use of one or more tourniquets pre-hospital to control external bleeding can be said to be life-saving.

Tourniquet use in combat trauma: UK military experience.

AIM: To determine the prevalence of tourniquet use in combat trauma, the contribution to lives saved and the complications of their use in this environment. POPULATION: All casualties treated at UK field hospital facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan and meeting criteria for entry into UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) from 04 Feb 03 to 30 Sep 07. METHODS: Cases were identified from UK JTTR. Casualties from Permanent Joint Overseas Bases (PJOBs) were excluded. ISS, NISS, TRISS and ASCOT were calculated automatically within JTTR from AIS 2005 (Military) codes. RESULTS: 1375 patients met UK JTTR entry criteria for the period specified (excluding PJOBs). 70/1375 patients (5.1%) were treated with one or more tourniquets (total 107 tourniquet applications). 61/70 (87%) survived their injuries. 17/70 (24%) patients had 2 or more tourniquets applied. 64/70 patients received a tourniquet after April 2006, when tourniquets were introduced as an individual first aid item. 43/70 (61%) patients were UK military. CONCLUSIONS: ISS and TRISS are poorly representative of injury severity and outcome for combat trauma involving isolated multiple limb injuries and cannot be used to discriminate whether a tourniquet is life-saving. The presence of severe isolated limb injuries, profound hypovolaemic shock and the requirement for massive transfusion reasonably identifies a cohort where the use of one or more tourniquets pre-hospital to control external bleeding can be said to be life-saving.

Incidence, location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital.

AIMS: To determine the incidence of avoidable cardiac arrest among patients who had received resuscitation in a district general hospital. To establish how location and individual or system factors influence avoidable cardiac arrest in order to develop an evidence-based preventive strategy. METHODS: Expert panel review of case-notes from 139 consecutive adult in-hospital cardiac arrests over 1 year. RESULTS: There were 32,348 adult admissions in 1999 with 1,023 deaths. The cardiac arrest team was activated 139 times: 118 were for primary in-hospital cardiac arrest. The cardiac arrest rate excluding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) cases was 3.8/1000 admissions. In 88.5% of deaths there was a DNAR policy. Survival to hospital discharge following resuscitation was 14%. Among the 118 cases, the panel unanimously agreed that 61.9% of arrests were potentially avoidable, rising to 68% when emergency department arrests were excluded (66 and 73% for majority opinion). Cardiac arrests were more likely at the weekend than during the week (P = 0.02). The odds of potentially avoidable cardiac arrest was 5.1 times greater for patients in general wards than critical care areas (P < 0.001); patients in critical care areas were more likely to survive (P < 0.001). The odds of potentially avoidable cardiac arrest was 12.6 times greater for patients nursed in a clinical area judged 'inappropriate' for their main complaint (P < 0.002, Fisher's exact test) compared to those nursed in 'appropriate' areas. The panel agreed that 100% of potentially avoidable arrests were judged to have received inadequate prior treatment. Clinical signs of deterioration in the preceding 24 h were not acted upon in 48%, and review was confined to a house officer in 45%. CONCLUSION: The majority of treated in-hospital cardiac arrests are potentially avoidable. Multiple system failures include delays and errors in diagnosis, inadequate interpretation of investigations, incomplete treatment, inexperienced doctors and management in inappropriate clinical areas.

The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team.

AIM: (1) To identify risk factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest; (2) to formulate activation criteria to alert a clinical response culminating in attendance by a Medical Emergency Team (MET); (3) to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system. METHODS: Quasi-experimental design to determine prevalence of risk factors for cardiac arrest in the hospitalised population. Weighting of risk factors and formulation of activation criteria to alert a graded clinical response. ROC analysis of weighted cumulative scores to determine their sensitivity and specificity. SETTING: An acute 700 bed district general hospital with 32,348 adult admissions in 1999 and a catchment population of around 365,000. SUBJECTS: 118 consecutive adult patients suffering primary cardiac arrest in-hospital and 132 non-arrest patients, randomly selected according to stratified randomisation by gender and age. RESULTS: Risk factors for cardiac arrest include: abnormal respiratory rate (P = 0.013), abnormal breathing indicator (abnormal rate or documented shortness of breath) (P < 0.001), abnormal pulse (P < 0.001), reduced systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001), abnormal temperature (P < 0.001), reduced pulse oximetry (P < 0.001), chest pain (P < 0.001) and nurse or doctor concern (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of cardiac arrest cases identified three positive associations for cardiac arrest: abnormal breathing indicator (OR 3.49; 95% CI: 1.69-7.21), abnormal pulse (OR 4.07; 95% CI: 2.0-8.31) and abnormal systolic blood pressure (OR 19.92; 95% CI: 9.48-41.84). Risk factors were weighted and tabulated. The aggregate score determines the grade of clinical response. ROC analysis determined that a score of 4 has 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity for cardiac arrest; a score of 8 has 52% sensitivity and 99% specificity. All patients scoring greater than 10 suffered cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for cardiac arrest have been identified, quantified and formulated into a table of activation criteria to help predict and avert cardiac arrest by alerting a clinical response. A graded clinical response has resulted in a tool that has both sensitivity and specificity for cardiac arrest.

Health system costs of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

This paper reports on the health system resources used in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrests in a British district general hospital. The resources used in resuscitation attempts were recorded prospectively by observation of a convenience sample of 30 cardiac arrests. The post-resuscitation resource use by survivors was collected through a retrospective record review (n = 37) and by following survivor members in the prospective sample (n = 6). Financial data were used to translate resource use into costs (1999 prices). There was a non-significant trend for more resources to be used in daytime resuscitations than at night. Survivors had significantly fewer diagnostic tests during resuscitation than those who died (P = 0.004). Length of resuscitation attempt was positively and significantly related to resource use (P < 0.05). The average variable cost per resuscitation attempt (1999 prices) was 195.66 pounds sterling; 76.5% was for staff, and 13.1% for drugs and fluids. Emergency calls were attended by an average of 10.11 staff. The average fixed cost per resuscitation attempt was 928.81 pounds sterling; 12% for capital equipment and 73% for staff training. The average post-resuscitation costs attributable to the cardiac arrest of the 29 people surviving more than 24 h after cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were estimated to be 1,589.72 pounds sterling. This is lower than other studies which estimated total costs of post-CPR lengths of stay. Reducing avoidable cardiac arrests would generate in-hospital savings in direct resuscitation care of survivors. Scope for reducing capital and training costs is discussed.