Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Hernia ; 25(4): 977-984, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712933

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification of ventral/incisional hernia (IH) was developed by expert consensus in 2010. Subsequently, Kanters et al. have demonstrated the validity of a modified version of the system for predicting short-term outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the modified system for predicting hernia recurrence. METHODS: Patients undergoing IH surgery (defined by OPCS codes) in the England Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database, from 1997 to 2012, were identified. Baseline demographics at index hernia operation and episodes of further hernia surgery (FHS) were recorded. Risk factors for FHS were identified using cox regression and evaluated against the modified-VHWG grade using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: The final analysis included 214,082 index IH operations. Of these, 52.6% were female and mean age was 56.59 (SD15.9). An admission for FHS was found in 8.3% cases (17,714 patients). Multi-variate cox regression revealed contaminated hernia (p < 0.0001), pre-existing IBD (p < 0.0001) and hernia comorbidity (p = 0.05) to be significantly related to long-term FHS. Classifying patients using these factors, according to the modified-VHWG classification, revealed that compared to Grade 1, the hazard ratio (HR) of FHS increased in Grade 2 (HR 1.19; p < 0.0001) and further increased in Grade 3 (HR 1.79; p < 0.0001). ROC analysis revealed the area under the curve to be 0.73 (95% CI 0.73-0.74). CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the broad validity of the modified-VHWG classification in discriminating risk for FHS. Inclusion of pre-existing IBD as a factor defining Grade 2 patients would be recommended. This analysis is limited by the absence of certain factors within the HES database, such as BMI.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/epidemiología , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Mallas Quirúrgicas
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(12): 2191-2198, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32954658

RESUMEN

AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a minimally invasive treatment for faecal incontinence (FI). We report our experience of patients who have undergone SNS for FI with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. This is a single centre prospective observational study with the aim to assess the long-term function of SNS. METHOD: All patients implanted with SNS were identified from our prospective database. The date of implantation, first and last clinic follow-up, surgical complications and St Mark's incontinence scores were abstracted and analysed. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2014, 381 patients were considered for SNS. Of these, 256 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Median age at implantation was 52 years (range 18-81). The ratio of women to men was 205:51. Indications were urge FI (25%), passive FI (17.9%) and mixed FI (57%). The median of the incontinence score at baseline was 19/24 and this improved to 7/24 at the 6-month follow-up. Of the total cohort, 235 patients received a medium-term follow-up (median 110 months, range 12-270) with a median continence score of 10/24 which was also confirmed at the telephone long-term follow-up on 185 patients (132 months, range 60-276). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SNS is an effective treatment in the long term. SNS results in an improvement of validated scores for approximately 60% of patients; however, there is a significant reduction of efficacy over time due to underlying causes.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Incontinencia Fecal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Plexo Lumbosacro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Región Sacrococcígea , Nervios Espinales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Hernia ; 24(3): 459-468, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078080

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) in a contaminated operative field is a challenge. Available literature regarding long-term outcomes of CAWR comprises studies that often have small numbers and heterogeneous patient populations. This study aims to assess long-term outcomes of modified-ventral hernia working group (VHWG) grade 3 repairs. Because the relevance of hernia recurrence (HR) as the primary outcome for this patient group is contentious, the need for further hernia surgery (FHS) was also assessed in relation to long-term survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with a single prospective follow-up time-point nested in a consecutive series of patients undergoing CAWR in two European national intestinal failure centers. RESULTS: In long-term analysis, 266 modified VHWG grade 3 procedures were included. The overall HR rate was 32.3%. The HR rates for non-crosslinked biologic meshes and synthetic meshes when fascial closure was achieved were 20.3% and 30.6%, respectively. The rates of FHS were 7.2% and 16.7%, and occurred only within the first 3 years. Bridged repairs showed poorer results (fascial closure 22.9% hernia recurrence vs bridged 57.1% recurrence). Overall survival was relatively good with 80% en 70% of the patients still alive after 5 and 10 years, respectively. In total 86.6% of the patients remained free of FHS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of contaminated CAWR, non-crosslinked biologic mesh shows better results than synthetic mesh. Bridging repairs with no posterior and/or anterior fascial closure have a higher recurrence rate. The overall survival was good and the majority of patients remained free of additional hernia surgery.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Herida Quirúrgica , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía
4.
Hernia ; 24(3): 449-458, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Short-term outcomes for patients undergoing contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CCAWR), including risk stratification, have not been studied in sufficiently high numbers. This study aims to develop and validate risk-stratification models for Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3 complications in patients undergoing CCAWR. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent CCAWR in two European national intestinal failure centers, from January 2004 to December 2015, was identified. Data were collected retrospectively for short-term outcomes and used to develop risk models using logistic regression. A further cohort, from January 2016 to December 2017, was used to validate the models. RESULTS: The development cohort consisted of 272 procedures performed in 254 patients. The validation cohort consisted of 114 patients. The cohorts were comparable in baseline demographics (mean age 58.0 vs 58.1; sex 58.8% male vs 54.4%, respectively). A multi-variate model including the presence of intestinal failure (p < 0.01) and operative time (p < 0.01) demonstrated good discrimination and calibration on validation. Models for wound and intra-abdominal complications were also developed, including pre-operative immunosuppression (p = 0.05), intestinal failure (p = 0.02), increasing operative time (p = 0.04), increasing number of anastomoses (p = 0.01) and the number of previous abdominal operations (p = 0.02). While these models showed reasonable ability to discriminate patients on internal assessment, they were not found to be accurate on external validation. CONCLUSION: Acceptable short-term outcomes after CCAWR are demonstrated. A robust model for the prediction of CD ≥ grade 3 complications has been developed and validated. This model is available online at www.smbari.co.uk/smjconv2.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Modelos Estadísticos , Medición de Riesgo , Herida Quirúrgica , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Herida Quirúrgica/clasificación , Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía
5.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(8): 923-930, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994307

RESUMEN

AIM: Anorectal physiology tests provide a functional assessment of the anal canal. The aim of this study was to compare the results generated by standard high-resolution water-perfused manometry (WPM) with the newer THD® Anopress manometry system. METHOD: This was a prospective observational study. Conventional manometry was carried out using a water-perfused catheter with high-resolution manometry and compared with the Anopress system with air-filled catheters. All patients underwent the two procedures successively in a randomized order. Time to arrive at the resting pressure plateau, resting, squeeze, straining pressure and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain were recorded. A qualitative analysis of the two devices was performed. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2017, 60 patients were recruited. The time from insertion of the catheter to arriving at the resting pressure plateau was significantly lower with the Anopress compared with WPM: 12 s [interquartile range (IQR) 10-17 s] versus 100 s (IQR 67-121 s) (P < 0.001). A strong correlation between the manometric values of WPM and the Anopress was observed. Both procedures were well tolerated, although the VAS score for insertion of the WPM catheter was significantly higher. The Anopress was easier to use and more time-efficient than the WPM. CONCLUSION: The pressure values obtained with Anopress correlated well with those of conventional manometry. The Anopress has the advantage of being less time-consuming, user-friendly and better tolerated by patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Ano , Incontinencia Fecal , Canal Anal , Catéteres , Humanos , Manometría , Recto , Agua
6.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(11): 1288-1295, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31218774

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aims to determine the prevalence of incisional hernia (IH) and enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) in patients with intestinal failure (IF) referred to a tertiary centre and to identify factors associated with their development. METHOD: A retrospective case note review was undertaken of a prospectively maintained database of all patients on home parenteral nutrition between 2011 and 2016 at a UK tertiary referral centre for IF. Risk factors were identified using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The database search identified 447 patients, of whom 349 (78.1%) had surgery prior to developing IF. Eighty-one (23.2%) patients had an IH and 123 (35.2%) had an ECF at the time of referral. Of these, 51 (14.6%) had both IH and ECF. IH was associated with a high body mass index (P = 0.05), a history of a major surgical complication resulting in IF (P = 0.01), previous emergency surgery (P = 0.04), increasing number of operations (P = 0.02) and surgical site infection (SSI; P = 0.01). ECF was associated with complications relating to earlier surgery. (P ≤ .001), previous treatment with an open abdomen (P = 0.03), SSI (P = 0.001), intra-abdominal collection (P ≤ 0.001) and anastomotic leak (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this series, patients with IF had a prevalence of IH which was more than double that expected following elective laparotomy (about 10%) and one in three had an ECF. Risk factors for IH and ECF are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/cirugía , Fístula Intestinal/epidemiología , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Enfermedad Crónica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(6): 684-688, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770633

RESUMEN

AIM: The Renew® anal insert is a recent treatment for patients who suffer from passive faecal incontinence (FI). Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of the insert and patients' satisfaction with it. METHOD: A retrospective audit of patients who were treated with the Renew® anal insert was undertaken. The St Mark's Incontinence Score was used to evaluate clinical outcome. Renew® size, the number of inserts used per day and per week had also been recorded. Subjective assessment of symptoms, how beneficial Renew® was and how satisfied patients were with the device were all recorded. Major events and side effects were also noted. RESULTS: Thirty patients received Renew® as a treatment for passive incontinence in 2016. The median St Mark's Incontinence Score was 15 (range 7-18) at baseline and 10 (range 2-18) at first follow-up (P < 0.0001) at a median of 11 (range 8-14) weeks. Eleven (37%) patients used the regular size and 19 (63%) the large size. Patients used an average of 1.67 inserts per day (range 1-3) on an average of 3.58 days per week (1-7). Three patients reported a deterioration in symptoms, seven (23%) had no change and 20 (67%) showed a significant improvement. Six patients (20%) did not like the device while 24 (80%) liked it. Seventeen patients (57%) wanted to continue this treatment in the long term. CONCLUSION: The Renew® device seems to be an acceptable and effective therapeutic option for passive FI. Further work is needed to compare it with other treatments and establish its position in the treatment pathway.


Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(1): 73-78, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30218632

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Restorative proctocolectomy has gained acceptance in the surgical management of medically refractive ulcerative colitis and cancer prevention in familial adenomatous polyposis. Incontinence following restorative proctocolectomy occurs in up to 25% of patients overnight. The Renew® insert is an inert single-use device which acts as an anal plug. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability, effectiveness and safety of the Renew® insert in patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy. The device has yet to be assessed in patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy. METHOD: This was a prospective study exploring the acceptability, effectiveness and safety of the Renew® insert in improving incontinence in patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy. A total of 15 patients with incontinence were asked to use the Renew® insert for 14 days following their standard care. The Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowels was used pre- and posttreatment to assess response and patients were asked to report the perceived acceptability, effectiveness and safety of the device at the end of the trial. RESULTS: The device was acceptable to 8/15 (53%) of patients and was effective in 6/15 (40%). Only 2/15 (13%) of patients raised any safety concerns, and these were minor. The device was associated with a significant reduction in night seepage (P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: In a small study, the Renew® insert can be both acceptable and effective and is also associated with few safety concerns. It is also associated with significant reductions in night-time seepage.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Equipos y Suministros , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
G Chir ; 39(2): 71-76, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29694304

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Internet has become an important platform for information communication. This study aim to investigate the utility of social media and search engines to disseminate faecal incontinence information. METHODS: We looked into Social media platforms and search engines. There was not a direct patient recruitment and any available information from patients was already on public domain at the time of search. A quantitative analysis of types and volumes of information regarding faecal incontinence was made. RESULTS: Twelve valid pages were identified on Facebook: 5 (41%) pages were advertising commercial incontinence products, 4 (33%) pages were dedicated to patients support groups and 3 (25%) pages provided healthcare information. Also we found 192 Facebook posts. On Twitter, 2890 tweets were found of which 51% tweets provided healthcare information; 675 (45%) were sent by healthcare professionals to patients, 530 tweets (35.3%) were between healthcare professionals, 201 tweets (13.4%) were from medical journals or scientific books and 103 tweets (7%) were from hospitals or clinics with information about events and meetings. The second commonest type of tweets was advertising commercial incontinence products 27%. Patients tweeted to exchange information and advice between themselves (20.5%). In contrast, search engines as Google/Yahoo/Bing had a higher proportion of healthcare information (over 70%). CONCLUSION: Internet appears to have potential to be a useful platform for patients to learn about faecal incontinence and share information; however, given one lack of focus of available data, patients may struggle to identify valid and useful information.


Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Internet , Terapias Complementarias , Publicidad Directa al Consumidor , Hospitales , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Médicos , Grupos de Autoayuda , Medios de Comunicación Sociales
10.
Hernia ; 22(4): 617-626, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516294

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of posterior component separation and transversus abdominis release (PCSTAR) with the open anterior component separation (OACS) technique. OACS, first described by Ramirez et al. (Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):519-526, 1990), has become an established technique for local myofascial advancement in abdominal hernia surgery. PCSTAR, described by Novitsky et al. (Am J Surg 204(5):709-716, 2012), is being used more frequently and is rapidly becoming the technique of choice in complex ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Pubmed databases was performed. Studies reporting exclusively on midline ventral hernia repair were reviewed. Studies describing PCSTAR were selected and compared to matched studies describing OACS. Meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes between the two-pooled groups. RESULTS: Seven studies describing 281 cases of PCSTAR for midline incisional hernia using a retromuscular mesh placement were identified. Six comparable studies describing 285 cases of OACS and retromuscular mesh placement were identified from the same search. Pooled analysis demonstrated a hernia recurrence rate of 5.7% (3.0-8.5) for PCSTAR and 9.5% (4.0-14.9) for OACS. Comparative analysis demonstrated no significant difference between hernia recurrence rate (p = 0.23). The use of bridging mesh was not significantly reduced by the use of PCSTAR (3.1%) when compared to ACS (7.5%) (p = 0.22). No significant difference was found in wound complication rates between PCSTAR and OACS, respectively, 'superficial' 10.9 vs 21.6% (p = 0.15); and 'deep' 9.5 vs 12.7% (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest PCSTAR have comparable outcomes to OACS. This analysis is limited by the lack of comparative studies and heterogenicity in the OACS group.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/cirugía , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mallas Quirúrgicas
11.
J Invest Surg ; 31(3): 256-262, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28362517

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term functional outcomes of Internal Delorme's Procedure (IDP) in patients refractory to conservative treatment for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS), and to compare those who received postoperative rehabilitation with those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with ODS refractory to nonoperative therapy were identified across three regional pelvic floor referral hospitals, and IDP was performed. Postoperatively selected patients received biofeedback therapy. Functional outcomes were established using the Cleveland Clinic Constipation (CCC) score and obstructed defecation score (OD score) preoperatively at 12 months and at the last available follow-up. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a visual analogue score. RESULTS: From October 2006 to September 2013, IDP was performed in 170 patients: 77 received postoperative biofeedback and 93 did not. Mean follow-up was 6.3 years (range 1-8 years). CCC and OD scores improved significantly in both groups after 12 months and at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). When comparing two groups while there was no significant difference between CCC and OD scores at 12 months, score was significantly better in the group that received rehabilitation at the last follow-up (p = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the rehabilitation group (67%) compared with those without rehabilitation (55%). Clinical recurrence was recorded in nine patients who did not have postoperative rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: It has been demonstrated that IDP is associated with good long-term functional outcomes. Patients receiving rehabilitation had a better long-term follow-up, a higher overall satisfaction, and lower recurrence rate when compared with the patients who did not receive postoperative rehabilitation.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/cirugía , Defecación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Anciano , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica/métodos , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/rehabilitación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/complicaciones , Obstrucción Intestinal/rehabilitación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Recto , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
G Chir ; 38(4): 176-180, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29182899

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The best treatment of early stage anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is under debated. Wide local excision (WLE) may be considered adequate for stage 1 anal margin cancer. This study demonstrates our experience in treatment of patients with SCC over 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who had undergone anal screening or anal cancer surveillance between October 2010 and 2015 in our department. Each patient underwent anal Pap test, HPV test PCR HPV DNA and cytology by Thin Prep. The examinations were performed by Proctostation THD©. Data were collected and analysed. RESULTS: We included 25 patients, 16 male (64%) and 9 female (36%). Twenty-four patients had SCC and 1 patient had adenocarcinoma. Of this cohort: 10 underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) because T3-4 N1-2 M0, 13 underwent only surgery because T1/T2 and 2 patients had CRT and surgery because they already have had anal cancer treated in the past with CRT. Seventeen patients (68%) of this cohort, including 5 with micro-invasive SCCs, had regular follow-up without recurrences. Four patients (17%) died from metastatic disease and 4 patients (17%) had recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort we demonstrated satisfactory results in treatment of SCCs, underlining the effective role of surgery in early stages of SCC. Screening program and follow up were fundamental to identify early stage and recurrent disease. Also we found the High-resolution video-proctoscopy a valid diagnostic tool.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proctoscopios , Proctoscopía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(9): O339-O344, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28736932

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the current practice of continence advisors in the United Kingdom. METHOD: Continence advisors were contacted by email or letter to participate in a survey. The survey contained 27 questions which addressed the practice of each continence advisor, their knowledge of continence management and the adequacy of their training. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-six out of a total of 448 continence advisors (50.4%), responded. One hundred and seventy (76.9%) advisors treated both faecal and urinary incontinence, 51 (23.1%) treated urinary incontinence. Thirty-six advisors (16.1%) were lone workers and 130 (58.6%) had more than 10 years' experience. The majority of the advisors (75.6%) performed a digital rectal examination as part of their assessment. Regarding the management of faecal incontinence, 148 prescribed suppositories, 127 offered enemas and 147 advised on rectal irrigation. Most of the advisors taught pelvic floor exercises (n = 207) and urge resistance techniques (n = 188). One hundred and fifty-nine (87.4%) prescribed the Peristeen Coloplast® anal plug and 78 (47.6%) prescribed the Renew® anal insert. Eighty-nine advisors (42.6%) felt they had not been adequately trained to provide a bowel continence service. CONCLUSION: The majority of continence advisors in the UK manage faecal incontinence. They are able to initiate a broad range of conservative treatment options; however, almost half of the advisors who answered the survey felt inadequately trained and may be better supported by further training.


Asunto(s)
Consultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Consultores/psicología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terapéutica , Reino Unido , Incontinencia Urinaria
14.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(4): 319-330, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28102927

RESUMEN

AIM: Minimal evidence exists to guide surgeons on the risk of complications when performing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in the presence of active infection, contamination or enterocutaneous fistula. This study aims to establish the outcomes of contaminated complex AWR. METHOD: Analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Pubmed databases was performed. Studies reporting exclusively on single-staged repair of contaminated complex AWR were included. Pooled data were analysed to establish rates of complications. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, consisting of 601 contaminated complex AWRs, of which 233 included concurrent enterocutaneous fistula repair. The average follow-up period was 26.7 months. There were 146 (24.3%) reported hernia recurrences. When stratified by repair method, suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (14.2%), followed by nonabsorbable synthetic mesh reinforcement (21.2%), biological mesh (25.8%) and absorbable synthetic mesh (53.1%). Hernia recurrence was higher when fascial closure was not achieved. Of the 233 enterocutaneous fistula repairs, fistula recurrence was seen in 24 patients (10.3%). Suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (1.6%), followed by nonbiological mesh (10.3%) and biological mesh reinforcement (12%). Forty-six per cent of patients were reported as having a wound-related complication and the mortality rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to perform simultaneous enterocutaneous fistula repair and AWR as rates of recurrent fistula are comparable with series describing enterocutaneous fistula repair alone. Hernias recurred in nearly a quarter of cases. This analysis is limited by a lack of comparative data and variability of outcome reporting.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Suturas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
G Chir ; 37(4): 171-173, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27938535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obturator hernia is a rare condition associated with a high morbidity and mortality. It is an uncommon cause of bowel obstruction most commonly described in elderly females with comorbidity. Surgical intervention is often delayed as a result of subtle presenting signs. Coexisting ipsilateral femoral hernia is an even rarer condition represented by non-exhaustive series in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a healthy 36 years old lady, nulliparous, with abdominal pain and swelling in the right groin. Preoperative CT showed only a right groin hernia, that was found to be femoral at operative intervention. She recovered and was discharged from hospital but represented with further symptoms of obstruction 9 days later. Diagnostic laparoscopy demonstrated a ipsilateral obturator hernia with associated bowel infarct. The bowel was resected and the defect was repaired. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Obturator hernia presents subtly with medial thigh pain and no lump. They are notorious for difficulty to diagnosis. We describe the first case of coexisting ipsilateral femoral and obturator hernias in a young nulliparous woman with bowel obstruction. Appropriate intraoperative exploration should always be considered.


Asunto(s)
Colon Ascendente/irrigación sanguínea , Hernia Femoral/complicaciones , Hernia Obturadora/complicaciones , Infarto , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Colon Ascendente/cirugía , Femenino , Hernia Femoral/diagnóstico , Hernia Femoral/cirugía , Hernia Obturadora/diagnóstico , Hernia Obturadora/cirugía , Humanos , Infarto/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Colorectal Dis ; 18(12): 1162-1166, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27110866

RESUMEN

AIM: Laparoscopic surgery is well established for colon cancer, with defined benefits. Use of laparoscopy for the performance of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileoanal anastomosis is more controversial. Technical aspects include difficult dissection of the distal rectum and a potentially increased risk of anastomotic leakage through multiple firings of the stapler. In an attempt to overcome these difficulties we have used the technique of transanal rectal excision to perform the proctectomy. This paper describes the technique, which is combined with an abdominal approach using a single-incision platform (SIP). METHOD: Data were collected prospectively for consecutive operations between May 2013 and October 2015, including all cases of restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch anastomosis performed laparoscopically. Only patients having a transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) assisted by SIP were included. The indication for RPC was ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 16 patients with a median age of 46 (26-70) years. The male:female ratio was 5:3 and the median hospital stay was 6 (3-20) days. The median operation time was 247 (185-470) min and the overall conversion rate to open surgery was 18.7%. The 30-day surgical complication rate was 37.5% (Clavien-Dindo 1 in four patients, 2 in one patient and 3 in one patient). One patient developed anastomotic leakage 2 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This initial study has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of TaTME combined with SIP when performing RPC with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for UC.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Cirugía Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto/cirugía , Cirugía Endoscópica Transanal/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Colorectal Dis ; 17(11): O247-55, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26291699

RESUMEN

AIM: Ileocolonic resection is reserved for patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Postoperative clinical recurrence can occur in up to 55% of patients within 5 years. Predicting the risk of recurrence is key in deciding upon appropriate treatment strategies. This study aims to determine the incidence of postoperative clinical recurrence and predictors of recurrence in a specialist institution. METHOD: The clinical case records of 142 patients who underwent either a one-stage or two-stage procedure for ileocolonic Crohn's disease from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2010 were reviewed. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables were extracted. Postoperative clinical recurrence was defined as an initiation or change in medical treatment for recurrent symptoms with endoscopic or radiological evidence of active disease. Time to clinical recurrence was measured in months after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Over the 6-year period, follow-up data were obtained on 142 patients over a median of 28.5 months. Clinical recurrence was demonstrated in 59 (41.5%) patients. The proportion of patients with clinical recurrence at 5 years was 48.2%. Predictors of recurrence included a re-resection for recurrent disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3; P = 0.02] and ileocolonic disease (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.0-2.9; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Identifying the predictors for postoperative clinical recurrence is important for determining the postoperative strategy. This study provides a unique perspective on the incidence of recurrence and associated predictors from the perspective of a specialist unit.


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Íleon/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Enfermedades del Colon/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...