RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Levetiracetam (LEV) and valproic acid (VPA) are two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) routinely used for post-traumatic seizure (PTS) prophylaxis at our institution. In our practice, VPA is used for its beneficial effects on behavioral agitation and headaches, but it is also associated with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs). Both medications may be associated with thrombocytopenia. There is less literature comparing the adverse effect profiles and discontinuation rates of LEV and VPA in the context of PTS prophylaxis. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) analysis to determine the safety of LEV and VPA for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients at our institution. In particular, our QI analysis involved calculating the rates of discontinuation or change of drug regimen due to the adverse effects. METHODS: Our QI analysis focused on patients treated for TBI at our institution during a six-year period. We recorded the AED used and if the AED was discontinued or switched due to thrombocytopenia, behavioral agitation, headaches, or elevated LFTs (including elevated aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase values). We also recorded the incidence of early PTS, defined as seizures within seven days of the TBI. RESULTS: Our QI analysis included patients with a mean age of approximately 49 years with nearly 75% males. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 12.88, with 73.11% of patients having a mild GCS. The three leading injury mechanisms were fall, assault, and motor vehicle collision. The three leading types of TBI were traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and cerebral contusion. Among patients with no prior history of seizures, we found an early PTS incidence of 7.28%. For patients administered LEV and VPA, 0.11% (1/898) and 3.85% (4/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001), respectively. For patients on LEV, 4.01% (36/898) and 1.78% (16/898) had the medication discontinued or changed because of behavioral agitation and headaches, respectively. For patients on VPA, 2.88% (3/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of hepatotoxicity. In total, 5.90% versus 6.73% (p > 0.5) of patients on LEV and VPA, respectively, had their medication regimens changed due to the adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of early PTS in our patients is within the range of what has been reported in the literature. The rate of discontinuation of LEV and VPA on account of adverse events is low in the context of PTS prophylaxis. Both medications had similar overall rates of discontinuation. VPA was discontinued more frequently than LEV due to thrombocytopenia, but discontinuation was not common in either case. LEV is associated with behavioral agitation and headaches, which makes VPA a desirable alternative for patients suffering from these symptoms.
RESUMEN
Hemangioblastoma (HB) is a rare, highly vascularized, and benign central nervous system (CNS) tumor. This vascularity is due to a high degree of signaling by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Consequently, anti-VEGF agents, such as bevacizumab, have been postulated and shown in a few cases to be effective in treating these tumors when surgical therapy is not feasible. Additionally, selective intra-arterial (IA) administration of bevacizumab has shown promise in treating other cancers such as glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we present the case of a 60-year-old female with a symptomatic posterior fossa HB where embolization and surgery were not feasible due to tumor location. She underwent selective IA treatment with bevacizumab, which led to tumor stability and symptomatic improvement. Bevacizumab has been used intravenously (IV) as a treatment for HB, however, its efficacy has not been well-established. This case demonstrates the potential viability of selective bevacizumab in HB, as demonstrated by symptomatic improvement and decreased tumor size on MRI. Further research is needed to demonstrate the specific efficacy of IA bevacizumab for CNS HB when surgery or other treatment modalities are not viable options.
