Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vaccine ; 41(47): 6941-6951, 2023 11 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884412

RESUMEN

Influenza A virus in swine (IAV-S) continues to cause significant negative impact to both sows and growing pigs. The viral hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes continue to evolve with HA diversifying at a faster rate than NA. Depending on country, whole inactivated virus (WIV) commercial and autogenous vaccines, as well as veterinary prescription vaccines targeting HA, are currently available. The use of these vaccines is focused on reducing virus and clinical signs in sows and to provide HA-specific maternally derived antibodies (MDA) to their suckling pigs. The deficiency in this strategy is that HA-MDA does not persist long enough to protect pigs through their growing phase from infection, and HA-MDA can interfere with effective pig immunization. This study evaluated the immunogenicity and efficacy of an adjuvanted, quadrivalent RNA Particle vaccine (Sequivity NA), currently licensed as Sequivity® IAV-S NA. This vaccine was formulated based on four NA antigens representing the major NA clades of IAV subtypes H1N1, H1N2 and H3N2 circulating in swine herds in the United States. In a series of trials, pigs were vaccinated twice, at three days and three weeks of age (WOA), followed by challenge with either homologous or heterologous IAV strains at 8 or 15 WOA. The Sequivity NA vaccine induced robust serum NA inhibition (NI) antibody and protected against IAV-S strains with homologous and heterologous NA to that of the vaccine. The magnitude and duration of nasal shedding was reduced in vaccinated-pigs challenged with either homologous or heterologous virus within the same NA clade. This NA-based RNA Particle vaccine avoids the known impact of HA-MDA on pig vaccination and provides a new tool to successfully reduce IAV-induced disease in the pig population.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae , Enfermedades de los Porcinos , Porcinos , Animales , Femenino , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/prevención & control , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/veterinaria , Neuraminidasa/genética , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas Combinadas , Vacunas contra la Influenza/genética , Anticuerpos , Anticuerpos Antivirales
2.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 17(10): 611-619, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286857

RESUMEN

The objectives of this study were (1) to estimate the prevalence and concentration of the seven major Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157), collectively called STEC-7, on cattle hides collected in different seasons and beef processing plants; and (2) to determine associations of season, plant, and hide cleanliness scores with the prevalence and concentration of STEC-7. A total of 720 hide surface samples (240/season) were collected over three seasons (summer and fall 2015 and spring 2016) from beef cattle carcasses in four commercial processing plants in the United States. Samples were subjected to selective culture and spiral plating methods. Overall model-adjusted mean prevalence (95% confidence interval) was 0.3% (0.03-2.3%) for STEC O26; 0.05% (<0.01-8.5%) for STEC O45; 0.2% (0.02-1.9%) for STEC O103; 0.05% (<0.01-8.5%) for STEC O145; and 3.1% (0.6-15.2%) for STEC O157. Four percent of hide samples were enumerable for STEC O157; mean concentration (standard deviation) = 2.1 (0.7) log10 colony-forming units (CFUs)/100 cm2. No samples were enumerable for non-O157 STEC. Hide-on prevalence of STEC O157 and STEC non-O157 (specifically of STEC O103) was higher in summer and spring, respectively. Across seasons and plants, the most common STEC non-O157 serogroups in this study (O26 and O103) were associated with a higher prevalence of STEC O157. Season and plant played a role in prevalence and concentration of STEC in beef cattle hides, varying by serogroup. Tailoring mitigation strategies at the plant can be challenging and processors would benefit from supplementary preharvest interventions to reduce overall contamination pressure at the plant, especially in fall and spring months when hide-on prevalence of STEC non-O157 is higher.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Carne Roja/microbiología , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/aislamiento & purificación , Piel/microbiología , Mataderos , Animales , Bovinos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Heces/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Microbiología de Alimentos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Estaciones del Año , Serogrupo , Toxina Shiga/genética , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/clasificación , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/genética , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 16(12): 844-855, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31381377

RESUMEN

Fecal bacteria, which reside in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle, can contaminate beef carcasses during processing. In beef cattle slaughter plants, the presence and concentrations of generic Escherichia coli, coliforms, Enterobacteriaceae (EB), and total aerobic bacteria are monitored as indicator organisms of fecal and environmental contamination. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to determine the concentrations of generic E. coli, coliforms, EB, and aerobic bacteria on beef carcasses at different processing points in Midwestern commercial beef slaughter plants during the summer, spring, and fall seasons; and (2) to estimate bacterial transfer on carcasses during the hide removal and evisceration processes. Hide and carcass surface sample swabs were collected from slaughtered cattle at four large commercial processing plants. At each plant visit (3 visits to each of the 4 plants) and during 3 seasons, 20 samples were collected at 5 points: hide-on (hide of animal near exsanguination pit), hide-off carcass, pre-evisceration carcass, postevisceration carcass, and postintervention carcass, for a total of 3600 samples. Bacterial concentrations were determined using 3M™ Petrifilm™ plates. Associations between season and processing plant with concentrations of E. coli, coliforms, EB, and total aerobic bacteria, overall, between hide-on and hide-off, and between pre- and post-evisceration, were evaluated using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models. Bacterial concentrations on beef carcasses significantly decreased throughout processing. Moreover, hide removal was an important source of carcass contamination, given bacterial concentrations detected on hide-off carcass samples were the highest, and bearing in mind that carcass muscle surfaces should be sterile. Results from this study indicate that the interventions applied by the processing plants were effective, as they probably contributed to the significant reduction of bacterial concentrations of carcasses.


Asunto(s)
Bovinos/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Contaminación de Alimentos , Microbiología de Alimentos , Carne/microbiología , Mataderos , Animales , Heces/microbiología , Industria de Procesamiento de Alimentos , Kansas , Estaciones del Año
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...