Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Intern Med J ; 50(9): 1109-1114, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31908103

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A major impediment to the provision of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) treatment is reliance on labour-intensive and costly laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG). AIMS: To investigate if measurement of oximetry and nasal flow through the ApneaLink device (AL) could identify patients with moderate-severe OSA among those referred for PSG to a tertiary sleep service. METHODS: New referrals to The Prince Charles Hospital Sleep Disorders Centre were assessed for suitability. Demographics, anthropometrics, Epworth Sleepiness and OSA50 scores were collected. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, pregnancy, significant cognitive impairment, poorly controlled psychiatric disorder, domiciliary oxygen and prior OSA treatment. Participants underwent concurrent type 1 PSG and AL assessments. RESULTS: One hundred participants had a mean age of 55 years (standard deviation 17) and were 49% male. Forty-eight (48%) had moderate-severe OSA on PSG. Composite variable AL 3% oxygen desaturation index ≥16 and AL apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 had receiver operator characteristic area under the curve of 0.87, sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 94% for PSG AHI ≥15. The three false-positives seen with this composite variable had PSG AHI 11-14 and Epworth Sleepiness Score 6-17. The various composites of AL, anthropometric and questionnaire variables did not improve the AUC or specificity but did improve sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: AL is useful in the diagnosis of moderate-severe OSA in patients referred to a tertiary sleep disorders centre. This could lessen reliance on PSG, expedite OSA care, lead to significant cost savings and make diagnosis of OSA more available in non-urban areas.


Asunto(s)
Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximetría , Polisomnografía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 51(9): 1281-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sleep is a dynamic and essential part of human life and health. In healthcare settings, nurses are strategically placed to promote sleep and sleep health. In this regard, nursing actions should be based upon effective methods of assessment of patient sleep. Standardised sleep assessment does not currently occur in the care of acute hospitalised patients. Use of an appropriate measurement tool would help evaluate inpatient sleep. An effective, efficient sleep assessment tool is needed to aid clinicians. Such assessment would enable specific nursing intervention to be tailored to individual patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to examine the literature on sleep measurement to identify subjective sleep assessment tools that may be suitable for routine use with hospitalised patients, and to evaluate their reliability and validity. METHOD: A review of existing literature was undertaken to identify and evaluate subjective sleep measurement tools. RESULTS: The initial literature searches identified 402 articles, of which ten met the criteria for review. These reported on three subjective sleep measurement scales: the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire; the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire; and the Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire is brief and easy to use. In specific samples, its items correlate with domains reflecting sleep quality and has shown excellent internal consistency. Equivocal results and scoring challenges were found with the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire. The Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale captured sleep disturbance and total sleep time, but time-to-complete is more burdensome than the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The current use of sleep assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting is restricted mainly to research activities. Of the three tools identified that could be used clinically to measure inpatient sleep, and although it was developed for use in the intensive care setting, the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire held greatest potential due to its ease and rapidity of use. However, it has yet to be validated for use with general hospital inpatients, and further research is required in this area.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Sueño , Rol de la Enfermera , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA